World of Warcraft

By Redestium
in PC Gaming

 Share

Recommended Posts

Grand Master

Spookie

Posted
Posted

Just got a burning crusade beta key. I'm looking to sell it though as I don't have the time to play.

Don't mention it here, just chuck it up on ebay. Loads of people want one. Not to mention the more that flood the market the cheaper they become. :)

Grand Master

Gerowen

Posted
Posted

Stop your bloody crying! Why is every player an angsty teen who things every man and their dog hates them? /rant

The armour is a place holder (check the beta forums).

Agreed!

*cough*naked gnome protest*cough*(If you're not sure what this is, look it up on YouTube, a huge group of Gnomes got together and went streaking through towns to protest their lack of abilities, I heard they ended up crashing the server)

I like the game just the way it is, and get beat in BGs by Alliance sometimes, so I don't see any way that the game is unbalanced, it's the players. Some human warriors I can own, even if they're higher level than me, in fact just today I took on a rogue, warrior and mage in Warsong Gulch by myself, all of whom were higher level than me, and won. But then again I have fought human warriors lower level than me who eat me alive. It's all in how you play your character. If you get beat a lot in BGs it's because you or the people you're playing with are doing something wrong, not because the opposite side is stronger than you are or because your race is weaker than the rest. Sorry to add to the /rant but I hear people on the official forums constantly whining, "Horde players always win in the BGs we never win, they're made stronger than us". I will admit that in the BGs I fight in we win 7 out of 10 matches, but those 7 matches consist of Alliance players acting like noobs and just running straight down the middle trying to farm HKs. The 3 out of 10 we lose, the Alliance players formulate strategies, they play their class(healers heal, warriors tank, etc.) and they travel in groups, as well as keep people stationed to defend the flag(if it's Warsong Gulch that is). And that's my two cents.

Grand Master

Slane

Posted
Posted

Twinks are out of the question now. Enchants like Crusader etc have been moved to level 35 min.

I've heard of new enchants being level restricted but current enchants were going to stay the way they were. At least that's what I heard, where does it say Crusader is to 35.

Grand Master

RDX1

Posted
Posted

Has anyone played on PTR? It's really laggy with constant crashing. As much as the new talents and changes look awesome I really hope the patch is delayed another 4-5 weeks. I have 4 weeks until I hit HWL. I rolled on a new server and I am only rank 12, almost 13.

I have an undead warlock and 7/43/11 (around there) looks like an awesome PvP spec. I was testing the non destruction part of the build and it looks amazing with high damage.

Demonology has gotten a nice chunk of damage increase with the felguard and the new damage talents. Also full destruction looks great too. (7/5/39 right now)

Grand Master

Spookie

Posted
Posted
Finally character was put on PTR and fully installed, updated and 600 person que. /sigh

You're not missing much. All talents don't come in to their own until TBC.

Saying that the 'nerfs' are there from the get go! :p

Time to respec frost for me now Fire has the same DPS with out the survivablity. Ice lance + frozen warrior = 3 shot win.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Posts

    • Bluesky COO warns social media regulations could destroy competition from small startups

      By zikalify · Posted

      Bluesky COO warns social media regulations could destroy competition from small startups by Paul Hill Fears that increasing government control of social media risks regulatory capture by the biggest social media firms were raised again recently. Bluesky’s chief operating officer said in an interview that social media bans for children and tighter regulations for social media firms risk creating a world where there are only a few social media platforms run by companies with the deepest pockets. Regulations on social media firms have been very lax since they appeared for mainstream users in the 2000’s. This gave Meta, Snapchat, and Google time to build up their user bases and get entrenched, with Meta being the most successful. Now that Meta has succeeded, it has been attempting regulatory capture. By pushing for more regulations of social media, Meta hopes to make it more difficult for rivals to challenge it. For its part, it doesn’t need to worry about the cost of regulation because it has a lot of money to spend, whereas startups do not. Speaking to CNBC, Rose Wang, Bluesky’s chief operating officer, said: “I support the protection and the safety of youth, the question that we have then is at what cost, because essentially what I’m scared of is in the long term, we’re headed to a world where there’s about three to five platforms, and extreme heavy regulation of those platforms, and basically the whole compliance teams of these platforms are 10 times the size of our entire team. So, basically, we’re living in a world where it’s almost impossible for smaller entrants to come in and build healthier spaces. These platforms have led to a place where the bottom line is the thing that drives what they do... so I understand why governments have to step in and regulate, because the platforms have done nothing right.” She said that while she is not against regulation, there needs to be more channels between the small to mid-sized players and regulators to help protect them. She says that big tech players, on the other hand, “who we know are circumventing regulation,” need to be regulated. Essentially, the Bluesky position is one of nuance, rather than absolutes. While Bluesky’s proposal may preserve competition in the social media space, it still doesn’t address the massive privacy implications these age verification measures introduce, such as handing over sensitive identity documents to access age-gated content. Source: CNBC
    • Politically funny images of the World

      By Michael Scrip · Posted

    • Still using Classic Outlook? Microsoft highlights 15 reasons to switch to New Outlook

      By davesickofenshittification · Posted

      it dosnt support onprem exchange. it dosnt support mapi-calls. the views are all worse/limited. its slower. it cant see public folder calendars. we already have webmail. the list of other missing features is pretty huge but i only see it when customers call to say their email isnt working, and 9/10 times its cause they accidentality changed to outlooknew(new). Hold the line everyone!
    • Halo: Campaign Evolved is out next month with new prequel missions

      By ZipZapRap · Posted

      yeah, this looks beautiful. Damn this winter's going to be great.
    • 25th anniversary Xbox Series X unveiled with classic translucent green design

      By ZipZapRap · Posted

      Same. I want that controller!

  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      249
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      70
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!