Recommended Posts

Is there any servers with lots of people? Every server I go on seems to be pretty dead with the ocasional player sighting. I wanna pick a server for good so I dont have a million creatures. :p

when you choose a server, theres a column for Population. Pick a medium or high one if you want alot of people. Just realize that when events happen, there may be queues/wait times to login and play if you do.

Also, even on medium/high population servers, most everyone is in Outlands. Old content is fairly light on people running around now.

Speaking of having half the screen covered. You sure youve got enuff going on in that screen?

I don't always have the MonkeyBuddy quests all expanded like that. Earlier I had been comparing quests with a friend is the reason they're all expanded in that shot.

The fact you have auto attack as button 1 and only have 5k hp at lvl 70 speaks volumes.

What difference does it make what button is #1 and what's wrong with having 5k hp at 70? I have friends whose warlocks are level 70 and have 7k hp but I can kick their rear ends before mine drops below 2k.

I feel like a newb reading these threads. Only got into WoW two weeks ago, and I have no idea what you guys are talking about.

Only character I have is a Lv 16 Drenei Paladin with pansy 384hp. I fail to see whats wrong with a 70 character with 5k hp. Man I should read more.

A lock never needs to auto attack for one thing. Also, your friends must be bad :(. None of the locks in my guild have less than 7500 hp.

To each their own I suppose.

A lock that never solos doesn't need auto attack. I've had no problems with my warlock the way he's spec'd, and 7500 hp won't do you a bit of good when I can 2 or 3 shot it. As for the rest, the way you comment on how others choose to play and spec their characters speaks volumes, not only of your in game, but your out of game personality as well. You are correct on one point though, and that is to each his own.

http://wowwiki.com/ - good place for info on classes, professions, starting out, etc. etc. useful.

http://wow.allakhazam.com/ - i use this site a lot to help with quests.

http://www.thottbot.com/ - kind of like allakhazam. woot.

the last2 are owned by goldbuyer/selling companys dont use them

www.wowhead.com > all others

A lock never needs to auto attack for one thing. Also, your friends must be bad :(. None of the locks in my guild have less than 7500 hp.

To each their own I suppose.

at lvl 70 my lock has almost 9k hits unbuffed

That's the new land mass added with the Burning Crusades expansion. You have to be, well, you're supposed to be level 60 to get out there. People figured out that mages could learn Summon Portal: Shattrath (a neutral city in Outlands) and then people below 60 could get there using the summoned portal. Unless you have a lower than 60 character with maxed or near maxed out trade skills and you're looking for training / new patterns etc. to learn, or you just want to look around, there's not much use in going to the Outlands before 60 or at the very least mid 50's as all of the content and quests are too high level for anyone lower than that.

Edit: I will say this though. Once you get to Outlands, gold will no longer be an issue for you. Loot drops and quest rewards are tremendously improved. It's easy to make a few hundred gold in just a couple of hours playing and that's just on the quest rewards without putting anything up in the auction house.

no its not a new server. You know how there is eastern kingdoms and kalimdor? Think of it as another continent, its Outland!

PS: artex, stop talking. No one gives a rat's ass what you think and no need to start flaming someone because they do not play 8 hours a day.

PS: artex, stop talking. No one gives a rat's ass what you think and no need to start flaming someone because they do not play 8 hours a day.

Thank you! I'm tired of these elitists thinking they're so amazing. They're what make playing games like WoW (or any game for that matter) annoying.

no its not a new server. You know how there is eastern kingdoms and kalimdor? Think of it as another continent, its Outland!

PS: artex, stop talking. No one gives a rat's ass what you think and no need to start flaming someone because they do not play 8 hours a day.

*Still Confused* I think Im getting realms, servers and all those mixed up. Are all the realms connected or something?

Sorry for asking all these newbish questions but thats what I am in WoW, a newbie. :p

PS: artex, stop talking. No one gives a rat's ass what you think and no need to start flaming someone because they do not play 8 hours a day.

Uh? That's more or less how games like WoW work. I don't play WoW anymore - I quit during my trial because I had more constructive things to do, like sticking my hand in a food processor. The lore and stuff interests the hell out of me, but I can't stand the game itself or the people playing it. I spent more time reading the official forums and soaking in all the information than playing the game. Anyway, that guy who plays 8 hours a day? He is going to end up better than you, like it or not. Every MMO works this way. Also, I didn't see him flame anyone, or even mention play times. Perhaps you should stop talking instead? Looks to me like he's just trying to give advice.

I really did want to enjoy WoW, I was a huge huge huge fan of all the RTS games. I honestly had a lot of faith in Blizzard that they could make a MMO and not fall back to the same tactics everyone else did (namely, boring level grinds, and gear grinds at 60). I got a priest into the 20s and just couldn't stand it anymore. It was just the same crap painted a different color. Instead of killing 10 kobolds in the human starting place, I was killing 10 wolves or whatever. And, there's what I was saying above. The people who play 5 or more hours a day are always going to kick my ass. I'd spend an hour, maybe 2 tops a day playing, because that was all I could stomach. I don't understand how some people can sit around and devote the time they do to this game.

Well I just started up again after 2 months of being off the game. I quit 2 weeks before the expansion hit out. Ever since the expansion was out I was curious about it, heh , I quit at the wrong time (in my opinion). Anyways, i caved and went back , I am part of a large guild , not quite raiding size but we still do naxx (alliance of 2 guilds go there as 40), and both our guilds are preparing for the 25-man content. Honestly I will tell you this, being 70 with nice blues still don't mean jack if you don't know how to raid. heh (After learning that from an interesting night of BWL). My guild is helping me reach 70 and hopefully join the ranks on joining their 25-mans.

Enjoy the game, thats all that matters..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Calling GTA 6 overhyped crap doesn’t make you edgy, it just makes you sound like someone who hasn’t enjoyed anything since the PS2 era.
    • I’m not arguing whether Rockstar likes money. Obviously, they do, they’re a business. I’m saying this isn’t new. They’ve always launched console first. This is just how Rockstar operates.
    • I'm not sure how old the school is, but they've been doing this since GTA 3. Back in those days we'd be lucky for game companies to release on the PC at all. And with the current state of Sony (or Microsoft) their gaming wing won't be getting a penny from me.
    • We now know when and how the Universe may truly end by Sayan Sen Image by Marek Pavlík via Pexels| Not representative A study by physicist Henry Tye of Cornell University suggests that the universe may not expand forever. Instead, it could eventually stop expanding, begin contracting and end in a "Big Crunch" roughly 20 billion years from now. The research, published in the Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, was conducted by Tye, Horace White Professor of Physics Emeritus at Cornell University. Using recent observations from major dark-energy surveys, Tye and his collaborators developed a cosmological model that predicts the universe could have a total lifespan of about 33 billion years. Since the universe is currently estimated to be 13.8 billion years old, the model places it near the midpoint of its existence. According to Cornell University's summary of the research, the study centers on the cosmological constant, a term introduced by Albert Einstein in his theory of general relativity. In modern cosmology, the cosmological constant is commonly used to describe the simplest form of dark energy, the unknown phenomenon believed to be driving the accelerating expansion of the universe. "For the last 20 years, people believed that the cosmological constant is positive, and the universe will expand forever," Tye said in a Cornell University news release. "The new data seem to indicate that the cosmological constant is negative, and that the universe will end in a big crunch." The study draws on data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) and the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), two major projects designed to investigate the nature of dark energy. According to Tye, recent observations suggest that dark energy may not behave exactly like a simple cosmological constant. To account for those observations, Tye and his collaborators proposed a model involving an extremely light hypothetical particle that evolves over time. In their calculations, this produces a negative cosmological constant and leads to a future collapse of the universe. The model predicts that cosmic expansion would continue for approximately another 11 billion years before reaching a maximum size, after which the universe would begin contracting and eventually collapse. Scientists have long debated how the universe might end. As explained in an article published in The Conversation by Stephen DiKerby of Michigan State University, several possibilities have been proposed. If dark energy remains constant and positive, the universe could continue expanding indefinitely, gradually becoming colder, darker and more diffuse in a scenario often called the "heat death" of the universe. Other theoretical possibilities include a Big Rip, in which cosmic expansion accelerates so dramatically that galaxies, stars and even atoms are torn apart, or a Big Crunch, in which expansion reverses and the universe collapses back into an extremely dense state. DiKerby notes that the Big Crunch idea itself is not new. What distinguishes Tye's work is that it attempts to use current observational data to estimate when such a collapse might occur and how it could unfold. Much of the universe's long-term evolution remains uncertain. According to current astrophysical understanding, stars will continue to form and die for billions of years. The Sun, for example, is about halfway through its expected lifespan. Galaxies are also expected to continue merging; the Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies are projected to collide several billion years from now. At the same time, the nature of dark energy remains one of the biggest unanswered questions in cosmology. While observations indicate that the universe's expansion is accelerating, scientists still do not know what is causing that acceleration. Future observations may therefore alter current predictions about the cosmos's ultimate fate. Tye emphasized that additional evidence will be needed before firm conclusions can be drawn. DESI continues to collect data, while upcoming observations from missions and observatories including Euclid, SPHEREx and the Vera C. Rubin Observatory are expected to provide more precise measurements of dark energy. "People have said before that if the cosmological constant is negative, then the universe will collapse eventually. That's not new," Tye said. "However, here the model tells you when the universe collapses and how it collapses." For now, the study presents one possible future for the cosmos rather than a settled prediction. Whether the universe ultimately ends in a Big Crunch, expands forever, or follows another path entirely remains an open question that future observations will help answer. Source: Cornell University, The Conversation This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • If you look around on Amazon, some of these are available for $9
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      572
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      173
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      73
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!