Recommended Posts

Apparently it's just XP that you earn from anything is more than it used to be for those levels... I completely forgot they were going to implement that. I might have to get back into it as I always seem to lose interest around level 40. If I can level faster I would love it.

But knowing Blizzard, i doubt It's anything noticeable beyond a simple "Oh ... 50 extra XP".

I remember from when I was levelling to 56 or something that the required xp amount dropped from 156000xp to 134000xp after 2.3....not too shabby.

XP from quests have also been boosted considerably, its definitely noticeable all round.

Meh, the guy is right.

I had 3 level 70's and It's the same **** all through the game, grinding! 1 to 10 and you've experienced the game, except a few crappy dungeons, some ingame pixel "Epic items" and the odd PvP.

( You can see i lost the "WoW Spark" a long time ago :laugh: )

Your signature is great. I was totally trying to get the bug off my screen, and was like wtf?.

As for your comment... solo play is definitely not what WoW is suppose to be about. If you are questing with someone the game is a lot easier and the time passes a lot faster. Still, think of all those hours of gameplay you got out of the game as you leveled 3 characters to level 70. Do any other games even come close to the amount of hours you invested in WoW? What does that say about re-playability? Obviously you found that it was worth your time when you were playing it. It is easy to talk some **** about a game once you've played it to death and you're sick of it.

Your signature is great. I was totally trying to get the bug off my screen, and was like wtf?.

As for your comment... solo play is definitely not what WoW is suppose to be about. If you are questing with someone the game is a lot easier and the time passes a lot faster. Still, think of all those hours of gameplay you got out of the game as you leveled 3 characters to level 70. Do any other games even come close to the amount of hours you invested in WoW? What does that say about re-playability? Obviously you found that it was worth your time when you were playing it. It is easy to talk some **** about a game once you've played it to death and you're sick of it.

That's just the thing. WoW is nothing but the old grind formula. Walking around waiting for mobs to spawn and killing them hundreds of times is not my idea of fun. No-one has made my ideal MMO yet. Though Hellgate London is probobly the best casual game I've played online.

WoW is not a grind fest per se. What WoW tries to do is target anyone. You can level to 70 soloing, you can group together and level. In terms of endgame, you can PvP if Raiding is not your style and if your a casual and cant run Black Temple weekly, theres ZA that can be cleared in like 2 hours.

From what I've been told ZA isn't casual friendly at all. Neither is Kara imo. Starting from scratch, with casuals, would be quite a undertaking.

You have been told incorrectly. **** even Hellen Keller could solo ZA. There are tons of guilds on my sever who are casual and can clear the place.

Yes, I'm going to hell.

Depends on what you consider casual... There's no raid instance which will only require you to play 1 hour a day, not check tactics for any of the bosses, not prepare for the raid, and still have a great time + clear it without problems.

But Kara and ZA are the most casual friendly instances of all.

Depends on what you consider casual... There's no raid instance which will only require you to play 1 hour a day, not check tactics for any of the bosses, not prepare for the raid, and still have a great time + clear it without problems.

But Kara and ZA are the most casual friendly instances of all.

Causal in definition of WoW is not raiding 6-12 4 days a week.....

I Was a level 53 almost 54 Paladin but some how my computer messed up on me and glitched and caused them to think I was running "Third Party Software" so they banned me for 72 hours the day after the 73 hour ban I received an E-mail saying that I was using software that enabled me to move illegally WTF So I contacted them and said that was imposable why would I jeopardize my account to cheat and wheres the fun in that right if I wanted to cheat I think Id try it on thows privet servers... well any ways I wasn't even back for an hour playing when I got disconnected and a new e-mail telling me that my account is permanently banned for using Illegal Third Party Software and our actions are FINAL.. being ****ed I contacted them thinking this might have been an error but they replayed back 5 days later saying that It was further invetaged that the programs i was using was a third party and the action was to bann me from game play ... now being really ****ed thinking that maybe i was hacked or something i sent them a nice 4 pg e-mail asking for full details on why and all they could tell me was that there action is final so ya thats my wow experience ...

Causal in definition of WoW is not raiding 6-12 4 days a week.....

Yeah I know, I was answering to Spookie who said he's been told about ZA and Kara not being casual, but you've posted just a few seconds before me so I didn't bother editing my post and adding his quote.

I Was a level 53 almost 54 Paladin but some how my computer messed up on me and glitched and caused them to think I was running "Third Party Software" so they banned me for 72 hours

yea... its actually funny because cheaters always use 1 of 2 excuses when they're caught

1. Someone else did it - the computer was hacked, it was their friend, it was their brother, whatever. its never them.

2. The computer mystery - their computer crashed, messed up, glitched, the software somehow got on their system without their knowledge, etc.

its never a new story.

yea... its actually funny because cheaters always use 1 of 2 excuses when they're caught

1. Someone else did it - the computer was hacked, it was their friend, it was their brother, whatever. its never them.

2. The computer mystery - their computer crashed, messed up, glitched, the software somehow got on their system without their knowledge, etc.

its never a new story.

KEY LOGGERS! Its funny that people get key logged... It makes you wonder what kind of person they are in real life. Lets just click on anything or install add ons by exes!

That's just the thing. WoW is nothing but the old grind formula. Walking around waiting for mobs to spawn and killing them hundreds of times is not my idea of fun. No-one has made my ideal MMO yet. Though Hellgate London is probobly the best casual game I've played online.

You do know that WoW has these things called "quests" right? They actually eliminate the need to grind. If you don't know how to get from 1 to 70 without grinding, then you don't know how to play WoW.

KEY LOGGERS! Its funny that people get key logged... It makes you wonder what kind of person they are in real life. Lets just click on anything or install add ons by exes!

Some sites have scripts built in to steal accounts. Even I had my account hacked in Feb. Was one of the first on the server to 70, first in Kara then bang.

Everything DE'ed and gold sold. :(

Started on a druid to get away from the drama of it all in the end.

That's just the thing. WoW is nothing but the old grind formula. Walking around waiting for mobs to spawn and killing them hundreds of times is not my idea of fun. No-one has made my ideal MMO yet. Though Hellgate London is probobly the best casual game I've played online.

Can you name a game for me that you didn't think was repetitive? People always complain about how repetitive WoW is but compared to what? I don't think it is anymore repetitive than any other game I've ever played. What happens is some of you people have just played the game to absolute death. If you would put the same amount of hours into any other game you would be saying similar things about that particular game.

If your in a good kara group, you can clear it in less than 3 hours. We cleared in 5 hours last week and that was when we were farting around looking for a lock for illhoof/netherspite.

Good. Meaning past experience? As in knows the bosses and has downed them at least once?

If I took my sister and a bunch of other casuals threw some blues on them and said kill Shade they would wipe on the first explosion.

Point being it's catch 22: I have no doubt casuals could clear Kara with practice. But to kill the bosses and get them on farm. You have to invest hours on consecutive days to learn how to kill a boss. Which most can't.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      576
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      78
    5. 5
      neufuse
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!