Recommended Posts

Please, someone tell me quick. It'll take a few days for my gamecard to come in but I need to play now ( :rolleyes: ). If I use my credit card for payment, can I cancel that and use my gamecard when it comes in?.

You need to play now? WoW addication at its best.

Does anyone here play on Executus (US)? Also, do you guys think it is better to pair up with someone and level, or is it just easier to solo? I have a guildmate (shaman) who is the same level as me and debating if I should just go ahead because we seem to have weird play times on weekends.

Would you like to kiss me also?

I guess you only care about post count.

Does anyone here play on Executus (US)? Also, do you guys think it is better to pair up with someone and level, or is it just easier to solo? I have a guildmate (shaman) who is the same level as me and debating if I should just go ahead because we seem to have weird play times on weekends.

I guess you only care about post count.

What level are you? If your low-level then just solo quest. Would be good to have a friend or even a group when you start questing in STV since your on a PVP server. If you've never played WoW before and don't know what your doing, it would be a good choice to pair up with someone who is experienced and seeing as your guildmate is a shaman he would be able to heal you while you quest and what-not. Hope this helps :s

For tree druids at pretty much any level of end game intellect is worthless.

+heal is better than everything once you have enough regeneration (through spirit and MP5). A quick and dirty calculation is value 1 MP5 as 3.5 spirit. The exact value depends on the length of the fight, your roll, and play-style.

There are times you're required to have certain minimum HP, and others where stacking stamina trivializes a fight but you can typically get all you need by just having appropriate gear for the instance and keeping a PVP item or two in your bags. Intellect, Spell crit, and all of the melee stats can safely be ignored.

defiantely +1 on that Evn. Personally i traded going for +healing gear for anything mana regen related (+spirit & MP5) since TBC came out. My mana regen rate is alot better now but i am not healing as big as i was prior to the expansion but as you say that suits my style of play more and I've always been (as a tree of course) more of a duration/backup healer in the sense that if i need to whack a big heal in i can but it's more about keeping the fight going when the other class healers are starting to flag. bit of a thankless task as it's always the other healers that get the praise but us trees have think skin ;)

hey guys i picked up WOW on boxing day for $20, the battlechest that comes with the normal game as well as BC, so i think its a great deal. anyways i know it has a month free and i dont plan on playing anymore than that, i just want to get a mount and run around on it. You get the mount at level 30 right? I was hoping someone could tell me what race/class combination will allow me to level up the fastest? it has to be alliance as im joining some freinds on their server and they are already alliance :)

You get the mount at level 30 right? I was hoping someone could tell me what race/class combination will allow me to level up the fastest?

You get the mount at level 40.

Assuming that farming gold isn't a problem (you have friends on the server, and any level 70 character can make enough money to buy the mount for you in about half an hour) then a hunter is arguably the fastest leveling class (as evidenced by the number of high-level hunters on new servers created by gold-selling companies). Warlocks are also a strong solo class and have the benefit of getting their mount 'free' when they hit 70.

Racial abilities don't really matter much until end game so you can roll any race you like. I'd go female night-elf hunter just because it's clich?.

You get the mount at level 40.

Assuming that farming gold isn't a problem (you have friends on the server, and any level 70 character can make enough money to buy the mount for you in about half an hour) then a hunter is arguably the fastest leveling class (as evidenced by the number of high-level hunters on new servers created by gold-selling companies). Warlocks are also a strong solo class and have the benefit of getting their mount 'free' when they hit 70.

Racial abilities don't really matter much until end game so you can roll any race you like. I'd go female night-elf hunter just because it's clich?.

thanks for the heads up. when you say warlocks get their mount free at level 70, dont you mean they get a free mount at level 40 when they get a mount? also the warlock plays with a "helper" but is restricted toa couple of demons. the hunter has a pet thats a "helper" right? what pets is the hunter restricted to?

thanks for the heads up. when you say warlocks get their mount free at level 70, dont you mean they get a free mount at level 40 when they get a mount?

Correct, I miss-typed.

Druids get a 'free' flying mount at level 68.

Warlocks and paladins get a 'free' mount at 40.

All the other classes have to pay a reasonable amount (around 500g) at 60 and 1000g at 70 for a flying mount.

Everyone has to drop 5000g if they want en epic flying mount.

Also the warlock plays with a "helper" but is restricted to a couple of demons. the hunter has a pet thats a "helper" right? what pets is the hunter restricted to?

The hunter pets can be (roughly) any beast-type mob. Around level 10 you gain the ability to tame beasts and use them as your pet. Not every beast can be tamed (for example some named quest mobs, dungeon bosses, etc) but many can. You may not be able to make "Snakeotron the evil snake lord" your pet you can probably tame a similar snake that will have similar abilities.

While there is some minor variation between the beasts for the most part they have the same base-abilities and the variation between beasts isn't much more significant than the differences between warlock minions.

Edited by the evn show

I've started a new Warlock character and I'm up to level 23 now. My DPS is major league SUCKING in groups. Hunters and Paladins are doing better according to my Damagemeters UI addon. Not sure what I'm doing wrong. If Warlock isn't for DPS, than what are they for? Anyway, Warlock is a lot easier to solo than Mage. I got to level 15 on my Mage and just kept dying. With my Warlock I can take on guys 4 levels above me np.

I've started a new Warlock character and I'm up to level 23 now. My DPS is major league SUCKING in groups. Hunters and Paladins are doing better according to my Damagemeters UI addon.

That sort of depends on spec/gear/play-style.

An affliction warlock will typically get trounced on trash-fights (anything not a boss) because most things die before their damage-over-time spells can run a full course. Going destruction will typically increase your single-target damage and your score on the meters but it forces you to sacrifice your ability to solo-kill 3-4 mobs at a time to be a shadow-mage. Part of your damage is caused by your pet so make sure to factor that in when you look at damage meters. Unless you plan to spend all of your time in a 5-man instance while you level I'd focus more on what lets you kill mobs fastest (typically the spec that reduces down-time to a maximum).

Also keep in mind that at the low-end of the level range 1-3 levels can make a world of difference in your damage: there are extra talent points, new ranks of spells, access to better gear, etc.

I got to level 15 on my Mage and just kept dying. With my Warlock I can take on guys 4 levels above me np.

I just finished leveling a mage - less than 1 day at 70 now. They're pretty fragile until you get the hang of playing the class. Unlike most casters mages are a very 'twitchy', sort of like rogues: there's always a button to press or something you should be doing unlike--for example--a shadow priest that has 3 seconds at a time to wait for mind-flay to channel.

Mages are the softest of the soft classes but they carry with them amazing crowd control. If you stick it out until around level 45 AOE grinding with blizzard becomes viable and I found that to be a lot of fun. Nothing quiet makes other people cry like having a mage pull up and kill 10-15 mobs in the time it takes them to kill 1 or 2.

a warlock's pets can be resummoned with one of those crystals, how does a hunter resummon pets after they die? or do you have to go out and train new ones?

Nope, there is a resurrect pet skill.

Nope, there is a resurrect pet skill.

Aye, there are drawbacks though if your pet is new there is a chance of him going to quote WoW terminology: 'emo and /wrists' and leaving you without a pet.

Which is another problem with hunters pets. You have to keep them fed, though you do get a damage buff if you do.

We took a few stabs at High Solarian or whatever that boss is in TK. After we wiped on our first attempt we realized how big of a joke the fight is.

Anyway 10 million addicts are now playing WoW.

http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/go...amp;newsLang=en

WOOT! Downed Archimonde last night, was pretty exciting.

http://files.filefront.com/Archimonde+Rage...;/fileinfo.html

Video if you want to watch.

Grats.

We've had to go back to the "dance naked until enrage" practice runs because people just can't stay out of doom fire / can't manage to not crater after burst. This fight can be fun as all hell if people don't die, but it's just more expensive version of Magmadar when they don't.

Maybe this week I'll get the leggings.

Do we have any paladins here who can share their experiences leveling up and finding groups while leveling up? Also, do any of you have retadin friends and can share your experiences questing/pvping with them?

I am getting bored of my hunter, it is such a 1 button class. Just arcane shot and sent pet. I am looking for something a bit more complicated and cannot decide between warrior or paladin.

Thanks for the help.

Hopefully this will be added on the end of the previous post, but I am just looking for a class that is fun to quest and pvp with.

Thanks

Melee or Caster class?

Melee: Rogue (though won't get any groups at any level), Feral Druid or Arms Warrs (but they aren't wanted at 70).

Caster: Mage (Will be expected to spec fire at 70), Warlock or Shadow Priest (will be expected to spec holy at 70)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
    • A $300 price hike is insane! No one is going to want to pay that much!
    • Since the 1st one flopped, there is really no reason to make another one. It's just losing money left and right.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!