Recommended Posts

LOL we had a hunter raidleading tonite, he said something about how pallys made for crap tanks (not serious just as a joke), tho it kinda backfired as myself and all the other pallys took it in turns to Blessing Of Protection (bop) him. Was hilarious. One of the funniest and most enjoyable BT raids ive had in a while.

Season 4 is rolling out today. Grats on those that got Gladiator!! :)

I'm thinking about horing myself out and getting all of season 2 from honor and any other gear I can, and start arena's seriously. Never bothered before, always saw arena as a bad thing for WoW, but it seems it's here to stay. The major problem is I can't ever find a decent squad to run with or any good players.

I just quit, and I'm GLAD. Now maybe I can get my life back.

Lol!!! congrats on the quit.. but you will be back in no time mate :D .. Wow is living in your body from the second you install it.. soon enough it will call you back to play.. its only a matter of time :D

why do people like this game? it suck so bad. all you do is gather quest and complete them by killing something most of the time. how is this fun? i forced myself to play it for 2 hrs and i couldn't take it anymore.

To each his own :)

why do people like this game? it suck so bad. all you do is gather quest and complete them by killing something most of the time. how is this fun? i forced myself to play it for 2 hrs and i couldn't take it anymore.

If you only played for 2 hours then you were still in the starting zones, which are the most tedious. The game gets better and better the higher level you are. End game is the best due to the raiding and all the unique places there are.

Honestly if you've only played for 2 hours, you have no real right to talk about how good or bad it is.

why do people like this game? it suck so bad. all you do is gather quest and complete them by killing something most of the time. how is this fun? i forced myself to play it for 2 hrs and i couldn't take it anymore.

Why do people play games in general? They play for the fun factor. A lot of players find WoW fun (me included), while some don't.

"To each his own" is a phrase thrown around constantly, and while not every player will enjoy playing WoW, the number that do enjoy it outweighs them.

Why do people play StarCraft or Diablo? They play because it's a unique game that offers a very high fun factor.

If you don't like playing WoW, then just don't play. There is no need to come in here and bash it because you didn't have fun.

why do people like this game? it suck so bad. all you do is gather quest and complete them by killing something most of the time. how is this fun? i forced myself to play it for 2 hrs and i couldn't take it anymore.

name one game that's NOT repetitive. i dare you!

why do people like this game? it suck so bad. all you do is gather quest and complete them by killing something most of the time. how is this fun? i forced myself to play it for 2 hrs and i couldn't take it anymore.

why do idiots flame this thread? they suck so bad, all they do is gimp posts up and and whine to people who dont care. How is that productive? I forced myself to try and read your posts but gave up after 2 secs, I coudn`t take anymore.

I moved on to WoW from FPS online games and it took a little while to get used to but I think the fact most of my mates from those FPS games were on it made it a good laugh with the ingame chat etc. Now that we're raiding and seeing endgame stuff it just makes it all the better.

Of course I do get times where I get bored of it. Just have a break for a week or two and I'm right back into it. (during that week I probably still log on just to chat to people ;) )

I moved on to WoW from FPS online games and it took a little while to get used to but I think the fact most of my mates from those FPS games were on it made it a good laugh with the ingame chat etc. Now that we're raiding and seeing endgame stuff it just makes it all the better.

Of course I do get times where I get bored of it. Just have a break for a week or two and I'm right back into it. (during that week I probably still log on just to chat to people ;) )

Same for me. I HATED MMO's and HATED RPG's. I was a hardcore fps'er. Counterstrike, Day of Defeat, COD, Doom, UT, etc. Was even a CAL admin and Operations Manager for 9 yrs.. Then WOW came along.. Tried it out cause of my friends, and it was ok at first. But once you really get into it, after like the first week or 2.. holy cow, you get so addicted and becomes so much more fun. Haven't turned back since.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
    • A $300 price hike is insane! No one is going to want to pay that much!
    • Since the 1st one flopped, there is really no reason to make another one. It's just losing money left and right.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!