Recommended Posts

Oh, and if you're looking for hunter specs and examples, I have a few friends with hunters that are pretty good players.

Mostly raiding at this point:

http://www.wowarmory.com/character-sheet.x...os&n=Eelneb

Been a fan of Beast Mastery since before BC:

http://www.wowarmory.com/character-sheet.x...oon&n=Drask

Has hated his pet since the pet attack speed normalization, therefore refuses to use BM:

http://www.wowarmory.com/character-sheet.x...n&n=Blorian

My own hunter, haven't really played him since before BC though:

http://www.wowarmory.com/character-sheet.x...halo&n=Xeta

Hope that helps.

:(

My friend and I went to Azshara to duo Azuregos. He's super easy fight, and duoing just takes a long time. So myself on my warrior and her on her priest start the fight. 51 minutes later, he's at 2%, Challenging Shout on CD, Bloodrage on CD, he transports and taunt is resisted, hop into battle stance to use Mocking Blow, and I have no rage. Kills priest, and I can't finish off that last 2%. :( That sucked so hard. So got a shaman to come help, and killed him in 19 minutes. Not the 80G I was hoping for, but 56G for 19 minutes of work, isn't bad.

Got my epic flyer finally.

It's fun to put over 1500g worth of green and blue gems on the AH, go camping for the weekend, come back with 1200g in my mailbox.

So, still have over a thousand gold even after buying it.

:D

Gratsie :)

Got mine as soon as I hit 70, also funded 3 guildies epic flying skills and mounts. Stopped playing now became bored of it all, got about 9k gold last time I looked. Account is frozen now and being honest I have no urge to play again. My guild stopped raiding for summer but was getting defeatest in new boss attempts :(

Got my epic flyer finally.

It's fun to put over 1500g worth of green and blue gems on the AH, go camping for the weekend, come back with 1200g in my mailbox.

So, still have over a thousand gold even after buying it.

:D

Is jewelcrafting really that worth it??

I'd say so. I'm encouraging my girlfriend to drop Enchanting.. something that will not make money.. other than insignificant tips, and pick up mining so I can just prospect all her stuff and won't have to shell out all of my own gold for her mount. :p

But.. you have to be willing to work for it.. I prospect at least 6 stacks a day.. which can take some time to acquire.

I'd say so. I'm encouraging my girlfriend to drop Enchanting.. something that will not make money.. other than insignificant tips, and pick up mining so I can just prospect all her stuff and won't have to shell out all of my own gold for her mount. :p

But.. you have to be willing to work for it.. I prospect at least 6 stacks a day.. which can take some time to acquire.

I can make easily 1k gold daily from enchanting. How do you not make money enchanting? Simple scan the AH for cheap armor/weapons DE them, and sell what ya get. Yesterday I spent, 200G on various level 50 greens, and ended up making a 400G total, 200G profit, for 10 minutes worth of work. It's really easy to make money from enchanting, just got to know when whatever you buy, you will get more in return, and control the market.

My wife and I just recently deleted my 70 Warrior and 62 Lock, her 62 mage, 62 lock and 70 priest, and a handful of other toons, and canceled our accounts. WoW isn't worth playing past 70 unless you raid. At least on our realm, there were Kara guilds aplenty. . but seeing as how Kara is the new BRS, that's nothing special. The time requirements (especially nightly raiding) necessary to see all of the content in this game are not worth it. We've seen MC, ZG, AQ, and BWL. We aren't exactly strangers to raiding.

This is made worse by the upcoming expansion. The new 10 level grind, new reputation grinds, raid grinds to get geared. . get your guildies geared. Lets not forget that Blizzard will throw in at least one cockblock fight in a dungeon, necessitating a new resist gear set. And of course the boss will be set up in such a way as to prevent you from going on unless you gear specifically for that fight. . and so on. I'm tired of collecting furbolg feathers, killing Etherium, and raiding the same instances over and over. . and over.

We've spent too much time and money on this game. At least I can sit down with a non MMO and see the end of a game in 40 hours of playtime, and move on to something else for a change of pace. WoW. . you're looking at several hundred hours of constant play time to even look at the zone in portal for an end game instance, and then to move on to the next dungeon, I think probably about 100 hours of time in one instance, repeatedly, to gear everyone up and move on to the next instance.

It's not hardcore. . it's time wasting bull****.

I don't blame you, I just did the same thing :D

Even though the new expansion looks cool, its the same old song and dance.. i mean as soon as i heard it was coming out this year.. I looked at my epic's and said.. "Whats the point" heh

fun game, if you have the time, but the upgrading pixels ain't doing it for me..

http://www.vimeo.com/1451412

Good friend posted a video of our Felmyst kill last week. I hate seeing these things because you can spot your failures from miles away and you feel like the biggest scrub in scrub town.

Notice the first mass-dispel being like 10 minutes late (caught in global cooldown like an idiot) and then my epic failure at 8:40 where a combination of "box of doom" and horrible reaction time (seriously: it was lag) got me stuck in the vapors and mind controlled. Note that the boss is 'dead' a few seconds into the air phase but won't actually die until she lands. Apparently not screwing up for 2 minutes is the measure of ultimate skill: something I will never possess.

Oadi's sends me to angel-of-shame form just in time for loot.

If anyone has a spare beta key for wotlk, I can take it off your hands if you feel you aren't up to testing it or received an invite but just dont feel like participating in it.

I really want into this beta...never got into the first beta, bc beta and have yet to get a shot at this beta yet. :woot:

Also check out the wotlk post I made with the movie in it, its absolutely amazing.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
    • A $300 price hike is insane! No one is going to want to pay that much!
    • Since the 1st one flopped, there is really no reason to make another one. It's just losing money left and right.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      580
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      71
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!