Recommended Posts

Sorry if this seems like a stupid question but what is the Death Knight?

I know it can tank, do some DPS and throw some diseases but what is the primary reason you'd bring a Death Knight to say a raid, to tank or to DPS?

Same reason you would bring a feral druid to help tank. Or any other class to help heal or dps.

Sorry if this seems like a stupid question but what is the Death Knight?

I know it can tank, do some DPS and throw some diseases but what is the primary reason you'd bring a Death Knight to say a raid, to tank or to DPS?

Boka kind of summed it up. Just another plate wearing dps/tank added to the game. There designed to be able to tank spell encounters more efficently than other tank classes. But pallies, druids, warriors, death knights are all the same with some unique abilities and a different name/way to play. All can be MT and tank it all just like the others.

Personally for my guild I'll still seeing the warriors (myself and 1-2 others) being the MT for all bosses and "hard' trash. Are lone pally tank the AoE tank/boss healer. And the two feral druids we currently have just tanking trash/boss that requires/makes it easy a fourth tank. And I see DK's being the same as Feral druids.

I have a question for people who are playing the beta: Is it challenging at all? I'm a little disappointed with how easy they have made the end-game content of BC post 3.0 patch. I was in a Black Temple PUG and we just blasted through it. Someone tried to explain the different fights, but it wasn't like it made any difference. It was the first run for most people in the raid. Afterwards, I kinda lost interest in playing my level 70's.

I want more 10-man raid content that is challenging. I thought that ZA before the patch was the ****. It was adequately challenging, and gave rewards for all level of groups. The 25-man stuff is nice, but it can be a head ache to organize IMO.

Woohoo! I just quit WoW! :D

I'm highly considering doing the same.

All of the friendships I was a part of have disintegrated just like the interest I once had in the game. I don't feel like shelling out for the expansion or racing to see new content. The whole NEVER END thing was cool while I enjoyed it but now it's just the opposite. Perhaps I'll just cancel the account for now and come back to it when I have some more time/money.

have a question for people who are playing the beta: Is it challenging at all?

tldr

If your guild was deep in Sunwell before patch 3.0 then you'll find Tier 7 easy. If you were scheduling ZA runs as guild events and getting 2-3 chests you'll probably have to spend a few weeks learning the place.

long version

That depends on who you are and who you play with. I've been accused of being an elitist prick here a few times and so my take will be very different from somebody that wasn't as progressed.

Naxx feels tuned somewhere around the level of Karazhan at patch 2.1. After nerfs, before rampant gear inflation, but epics were actually 'good'. Patchwerk as a 10-man felt a lot like when I first learned Prince, possibly overtuned, possibly not: most of the people I did it with 50%+ Tier 6/sunwell geared so some more level 80 heroic gear would have helped.

Malygos left me feeling undergeared: If you can handle a fight like Bloodboil, Felmyst, or Kil'jaeden then you'll probably learn this encounter very quickly. You might need to do some gear farming to make him an easy kill every week but the mechanics aren't terribly hard. I really like movement fights and this one delivers. I had to cheese him by staying in the bubble phase because apparently you can't actually kill him with the drakes in 10-man mode (too much health to meet the enrage).

The chamber of aspects (easy mode: killing all the drakes) feels a lot like Onyxia in dungeon set 1 in terms of difficulty. If your guild learned netherspite quickly then you'll do very well here.

I did the Wintergrasp raid drunk so it's kinda fuzzy. It's mostly a tank and spank: he reminded me of Doomwalker or voidreaver. He's got a charge that doesn't drop agro but puts a cave-in AOE on the ground, a move similar to dark barage, and a pounding-style AOE.

Guilds that were deep into Sunwell will have everything farmed by early December at the latest. Guilds that would spread ZA over 2 days will probably find the raid content to be a lot of fun and appropriately challenging (especially if they didn't do Naxx at 60). Guilds that never really progressed past Kara/Gruul/Mag will have to work at the new content and will probably not have cleared everything by the time the Tier 8 raids come out.

Overall I think it's pretty well done: an average-skilled raid will have plenty of good content to do and shouldn't be stuck at any one boss for a long time. Technical requirements for raid content range between Attunemen and Magtheridon in 2.3. DPS requirements feel more tightly tuned than karazhan: let's say ZA in Tier 4/5/Season 2 but no IQD, Tier 6, Sunwell, or Season 3/4 gear. Eventually gear inflation will make all of this content obsolete but I think it's good for launch day.

I'm a little disappointed with how easy they have made the end-game content of BC post 3.0 patch. I was in a Black Temple PUG and we just blasted through it.

Tier 6 was always under-tuned, but if you weren't running it before October 15 then you didn't see it.

Judging the difficulty of anything based on how it is in 3.0 is pointless because it's all just a glorified loot vendor.

tldr

If your guild was deep in Sunwell before patch 3.0 then you'll find Tier 7 easy. If you were scheduling ZA runs as guild events and getting 2-3 chests you'll probably have to spend a few weeks learning the place.

My guild was still in Hjyal/BT come patch 3.0, but I doubt we will have much a trouble with Naxx. At least I hope not, watched a friend played beta and he did fine with mix of T6/Sunwell/80 heroic/badge gear. I defeintly see us clearing Naxx mid-december with Chamber and Malcogoy by mid-January latest. Plenty of time to farm the content off for max main/alt set (dual-spec going to be sweet) and gear us all up.

long version

That depends on who you are and who you play with. I've been accused of being an elitist prick here a few times and so my take will be very different from somebody that wasn't as progressed.

Naxx feels tuned somewhere around the level of Karazhan at patch 2.1. After nerfs, before rampant gear inflation, but epics were actually 'good'. Patchwerk as a 10-man felt a lot like when I first learned Prince, possibly overtuned, possibly not: most of the people I did it with 50%+ Tier 6/sunwell geared so some more level 80 heroic gear would have helped.

Malygos left me feeling undergeared: If you can handle a fight like Bloodboil, Felmyst, or Kil'jaeden then you'll probably learn this encounter very quickly. You might need to do some gear farming to make him an easy kill every week but the mechanics aren't terribly hard. I really like movement fights and this one delivers. I had to cheese him by staying in the bubble phase because apparently you can't actually kill him with the drakes in 10-man mode (too much health to meet the enrage).

The chamber of aspects (easy mode: killing all the drakes) feels a lot like Onyxia in dungeon set 1 in terms of difficulty. If your guild learned netherspite quickly then you'll do very well here.

I did the Wintergrasp raid drunk so it's kinda fuzzy. It's mostly a tank and spank: he reminded me of Doomwalker or voidreaver. He's got a charge that doesn't drop agro but puts a cave-in AOE on the ground, a move similar to dark barage, and a pounding-style AOE.

Guilds that were deep into Sunwell will have everything farmed by early December at the latest. Guilds that would spread ZA over 2 days will probably find the raid content to be a lot of fun and appropriately challenging (especially if they didn't do Naxx at 60). Guilds that never really progressed past Kara/Gruul/Mag will have to work at the new content and will probably not have cleared everything by the time the Tier 8 raids come out.

Overall I think it's pretty well done: an average-skilled raid will have plenty of good content to do and shouldn't be stuck at any one boss for a long time. Technical requirements for raid content range between Attunemen and Magtheridon in 2.3. DPS requirements feel more tightly tuned than karazhan: let's say ZA in Tier 4/5/Season 2 but no IQD, Tier 6, Sunwell, or Season 3/4 gear. Eventually gear inflation will make all of this content obsolete but I think it's good for launch day.

Sounds good, a little challenge even for top guilds (even if it's an easy challenege) and a more difficult challenge for the "casual" or slower-progressed guilds. King sounds better and better day by day.

Tier 6 was always under-tuned, but if you weren't running it before October 15 then you didn't see it.

Judging the difficulty of anything based on how it is in 3.0 is pointless because it's all just a glorified loot vendor.

Gotta agree about he glorified loot vendor. And gotta agree about T6. Clearing 4/5 Hyjal was a joke, Azgalore (4th guy) gave us problems due to under-geared tanks (i was, not anymore due to patch but I was), and we only saw up to RoS in BT weekly but it was a all breeze. Even bloodboil which was are freshest kill wasnt' to difficult, some nights we sucked at it but for the most part it was fine.

So basically the changes with the patch are just to allow "the rest of us" to see the end game BC content before the expansion. It isn't a sign of how easy the expansion will be. The expansion will be challenging enough to be interesting.

I've been a long time casual WoW player since its release. I just got into raiding this past spring. The whole guild thing is what gets so complicated about it. I was in a guild that was basically "stuck" on Kara/Mags/Gruuls. We split up, and I'm in 2 guilds now (between my two characters). One thing I like about my server is there is a channel called l8raid run by a larger guild on my server (order of the chicken). Its a slightly higher quality of raid pug.

One thing I like about my server is there is a channel called l8raid run by a larger guild on my server (order of the chicken). Its a slightly higher quality of raid pug.

Thats a pretty good idea, Blizz should encourage more servers to take up that kinda approach.

I'm so on the edge, do I level my main or do I start a Death Knight on day one ...

Anyone else have the same dilemma :p ?

I think alot of ppl will have the same dilemma Seth, I think I will do DK until all the ebonhold/PL specific DK quests are finished and then take the main to NR. My fear is that the first cpl days the DK area is gonna be so jam packed it wont be funny....

I'm so on the edge, do I level my main or do I start a Death Knight on day one ...

Anyone else have the same dilemma :p ?

Everyone is going DK. Eventually people will realize they aren't as great as everyone is hoping. Or we will have a bunch of bad DK's who don't know how to play the class running around (instead of being one of the other classes). Most guild are only going to have 2-3 tops (raiding guilds). Mine's letting anyone re-roll DK, but were planning one tank, one dps DK tops for are raids. And with dual specs going to be added, it might be cut down to one, if its one of are more prestigous raiders.

For me personally, leveling warrior to 80, got a few guildies going to be saving certain mats I need for the BS/Engineering gun to craft and have a tanking set to start tanking heroics/Naxx 10 ASAP and get geared for 25 mans. Going to be the unofficial MT, I guess.

wow superb games so far that is the key factor keeping by warcraft.Kids and young can enjoy maximum as long as they can. Really amazing.They always keeping a high level.

-----------------------------

Dewi

<bad url is bad>

I C WUT U DID THUR

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
    • A $300 price hike is insane! No one is going to want to pay that much!
    • Since the 1st one flopped, there is really no reason to make another one. It's just losing money left and right.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      580
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      71
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!