Recommended Posts

When I see gear wierdness like that I just assume they're dodging the queue gear limit system.

When someone's alt hits 80 my guild usually rounds up a couple of people to power-level them through

heroics / toc / icc to see if we can't get them up to a respectable level in short order.

If' you're in full greens you can't random queue for many heroics which makes the process a pain.

We've found is that the queue system weights certain slots higher than others (ie: bad

weapons hut you more than bad trinkets). You also don't need to equip gear, you just need to have it.

We'll often 'borrow' boe epics from the guild bank and add those to random the pile of random epics collect

from 5-mans (ie: rogues with caster leather/tank weapons/mp5 rings) just to get around that restriction. It doesn't

make sense to try and 'honestly' gear somebody when you've got 3 or 4 other people in full 277 loot

and they'll be loot sponging ICC25 gear in a couple of days. If it weren't for the ridiculous spec and the fact that

he'd earned 250+ badges I'd assume he was pulling the same scam only without friends to carry him.

I like the change. The level 1 trolls have been a scourge on those forums. If there are less posts, so be it.

I don't understand why real names are considered such private things.

Because with real names, anyone can easily find out anything about you. Just look at how many lives people on 4chan's /b/ have ruined just by having their picture and name.

I like the change. The level 1 trolls have been a scourge on those forums. If there are less posts, so be it.

I don't understand why real names are considered such private things.

Because obviously if someone disliked you enough they could attempt (successfully) to disseminate your entire life. Maybe even show up on your doorstep in person to cause trouble. It takes it off the forum and in to real life and I don't believe Blizzard should be allowed to make that decision for their customers about what information of yours they share with the public.

There are many other good ways to get rid of trolls than this. If anything this is an overreaction.

Because with real names, anyone can easily find out anything about you. Just look at how many lives people on 4chan's /b/ have ruined just by having their picture and name.

Because obviously if someone disliked you enough they could attempt (successfully) to disseminate your entire life. Maybe even show up on your doorstep in person to cause trouble. It takes it off the forum and in to real life and I don't believe Blizzard should be allowed to make that decision for their customers about what information of yours they share with the public.

There are many other good ways to get rid of trolls than this. If anything this is an overreaction.

That's all well and good, but it's nothing you couldn't do already to just about anybody with Facebook. I don't see the difference between your name being on Facebook and your name being on the World of Warcraft forums. If you don't like it or if you think what you're posting is going to cause people to go after you, it's probably just a better idea to not post.

That's all well and good, but it's nothing you couldn't do already to just about anybody with Facebook. I don't see the difference between your name being on Facebook and your name being on the World of Warcraft forums. If you don't like it or if you think what you're posting is going to cause people to go after you, it's probably just a better idea to not post.

Well the forums are part of what I pay for in my monthly subscription. I have several accounts and I cannot post on accounts that are not active. I'm not giving out my real name, but what if I need support?

That's all well and good, but it's nothing you couldn't do already to just about anybody with Facebook. I don't see the difference between your name being on Facebook and your name being on the World of Warcraft forums. If you don't like it or if you think what you're posting is going to cause people to go after you, it's probably just a better idea to not post.

Well heres the thing elliot. Not all of us are on Facebook. I certainly am not. And Blizzard shouldn't be forcing their customers to reveal their real identities on a publically accessible board without their permission. And they have sprung this on the community after they already collected everyones real details. Also who knows what's going to happen to previous posts? It wouldn't be hard to switch those over if that is their intention.

I'm sorry Elliot but you can't defend this behaver it is just wrong.

That's all well and good, but it's nothing you couldn't do already to just about anybody with Facebook. I don't see the difference between your name being on Facebook and your name being on the World of Warcraft forums. If you don't like it or if you think what you're posting is going to cause people to go after you, it's probably just a better idea to not post.

The difference is you control who you are friends with. You control what groups you join and everything else. Sure, people can find names, but they have to know your name and who you are to start with.

Blizzard has no right to forcefully give up your personal information. It's not about "well don't act stupid". It's about PRIVACY.

Well heres the thing elliot. Not all of us are on Facebook. I certainly am not. And Blizzard shouldn't be forcing their customers to reveal their real identities on a publically accessible board without their permission. And they have sprung this on the community after they already collected everyones real details. Also who knows what's going to happen to previous posts? It wouldn't be hard to switch those over if that is their intention.

I'm sorry Elliot but you can't defend this behaver it is just wrong.

Nobody's forcing you to use their forum, got a problem with the game? Create a ticket. Want to discuss the game? Use one of the 50.000 other message boards out there.

Nobody's forcing you to use their forum, got a problem with the game? Create a ticket. Want to discuss the game? Use one of the 50.000 other message boards out there.

Yeah well I've already got posts on the forum and they've not explained yet if the old forum posts will all be converted when this new system goes live.

Nobody's forcing you to use their forum, got a problem with the game? Create a ticket. Want to discuss the game? Use one of the 50.000 other message boards out there.

Exactly. The forums are not a required part of your game experience.

The Warcraft forums are freaking out over this. I haven't read one positive post to this idea. This is the mother of all bone head ideas.

I have. The only people complaining are a few legitimate people and a LOT of level 1-10 trolls.

Nobody's forcing you to use their forum, got a problem with the game? Create a ticket. Want to discuss the game? Use one of the 50.000 other message boards out there.

Well thank god you're not an employee of Blizzard because with that attitude Blizzard would lose a serious amount of customers. I don't know if you've ever used their phone support before but Blizzard strongly encourages you to use their forums. Whether you like it or not forums now-a-days are key part of a business support structure.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
    • A $300 price hike is insane! No one is going to want to pay that much!
    • Since the 1st one flopped, there is really no reason to make another one. It's just losing money left and right.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      580
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      71
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!