Recommended Posts

I highly disagree!

I've just come back after a 3 month break and decided that I do not want to play like I used to (raiding/dailies religiously). I've too decided to work on Loremaster, The Seeker, and other various achievements, like the Exalted. Lightheaded + TomTom make finding quests very easy. There's a little bit of a limbo while you figure out exactly how to use LH, but.. it is more then sufficient. I just finished On the Blades Edge and Terror of Terrokkar today. Working on Nagrand Slam.

Playing WoW like this ^, as a single player game, has it's upsides. Even though the game thrives on the social aspect, feeling as though you have no ties to the game, at least for me, makes it much more fun... and easier to walk away from when the girlfriend wants to go out. ;)

They haven't said that's for sure yet, but they've thought about it.

I'm wondering if the 310% increase will affect Druid's flight forms too.

At the moment on beta there is no special attunement for azeroth, once you learn to fly you can fly in azeroth (at any speed) and yes it affects flight form.

I've heard rumors that green drops will be even better than t10's in cata. Is this true? I'm calling bs my self.

Probally. Not until 84/85 though. And most people probally won't replace 'em so they can keep set bonus. I believe it's suppose to be like Vanilla -> TBC gear wise and not TBC -> LK.

Didn't Evn write a post up about 4-5 pages back about this?

I've heard rumors that green drops will be even better than t10's in cata. Is this true? I'm calling bs my self.

251 is trash - you'll get greens on par with that within 10 minutes of questing.

264 lasts for a little while but within a couple of hours (end of hyjal/vashj'ir, start of deepholm) you'll be replacing it.

277/284 starts getting replaced at the end of Deepholm which should be about 12 hours after you get the expansion. Even Shadowmourne won't last until level 83.

Just as an example consider some fast daggers:

Heaven's Fall, Kryss of a Thousand Lies

Item level 284 Lich King 25 heroic

  • 381-572 (1.8 speed)
  • 125 stamina
  • 76 Agility
  • 48 Critical Strike Rating
  • 56 Haste Rating
  • 1 socket

Dimension Blade

Item level 318 quest reward (Level 82 zone)

  • 397-738 (1.8 speed)
  • 150 Stamina
  • 100 Agility
  • 73 Critical Strike Rating
  • 55 Haste Rating

Or Slow axes

Havoc's Call, Blade of Lordaeron Kings

Item level 284 Lich King 25 heroic

  • 481-895 (2.6 speed)
  • 113 stamina
  • 84 Agility
  • 48 Critical Strike Rating
  • 56 Haste Rating
  • 1 socket

Riftrent Waraxe

Item level 318 quest reward (Level 82 zone)

  • 574-1066 (2.6 speed)
  • 150 Stamina
  • 100 Agility
  • 67 Hit Rating
  • 67 Mastery Rating

Other items like trinkets don't last long either. For example Heroic DFO is worth about 5% haste rating at level 80 but only about 1% at level 83. Under ideal circumstances the proc is worth about 250 spell power (10 minute fight where you do nothing but stand and DPS). There are quest reward trinkets that work out to being equivalent to 300 spell power full time (no procs have been added to trinkets yet because many items are buggy. Staff drops/rewards in beta don't have bonus spell power for example).

251 is trash - you'll get greens on par with that within 10 minutes of questing.

264 lasts for a little while but within a couple of hours (end of hyjal/vashj'ir, start of deepholm) you'll be replacing it.

277/284 starts getting replaced at the end of Deepholm which should be about 12 hours after you get the expansion. Even Shadowmourne won't last until level 83.

Just as an example consider some fast daggers:

Or Slow axes

Other items like trinkets don't last long either. For example Heroic DFO is worth about 5% haste rating at level 80 but only about 1% at level 83. Under ideal circumstances the proc is worth about 250 spell power (10 minute fight where you do nothing but stand and DPS). There are quest reward trinkets that work out to being equivalent to 300 spell power full time (no procs have been added to trinkets yet because many items are buggy. Staff drops/rewards in beta don't have bonus spell power for example).

So unlike BC -> LK, those in the top tier of gear, won't have a huge advantage gear-wise. I was doing Naxx still in T6 gear, but reading what you said, by 85, you might have one or two pieces from 80, but most of it will be replace with greens/quests rewards?

So unlike BC -> LK, those in the top tier of gear, won't have a huge advantage gear-wise. I was doing Naxx still in T6 gear, but reading what you said, by 85, you might have one or two pieces from 80, but most of it will be replace with greens/quests rewards?

I would be very surprised if you had anything from level 80 by the time you got ready to raid. For starters ratings go to hell. You can be dripping in full ICC25h +hit gear today and you'd be barely ½ way the cap. Crit, haste, and mastery ratings are also way too low to be viable at end-game. Things hit substantially harder and you need to be able to take a couple of smacks because "lol aoe" is no longer a viable healing strategy. The stamina differences are pretty extreme.

If we assume the pattern that crafted gear is roughly on par with equal level dungeon drops/quest rewards then there's no way you'd ever choose any level 80 gear over even the worst level 85 gear.

For example:

best-in-slot 277 gear vs crafted level 85 blue.

In Cataclsym the 277 belt has all of the superpower removed but it's got 15 more intellect: it actually gets replaced by quest rewards at level 82, the crafted belt is orders of magnitude better.

I replaced 6 pieces of 277 with greens and blues by the end of level 82, and haven't run any of the new dungeons since they added loot to the bosses. I doubt I'll have any wotlk gear left by the end of 83.

I would be very surprised if you had anything from level 80 by the time you got ready to raid. For starters ratings go to hell. You can be dripping in full ICC25h +hit gear today and you'd be barely ? way the cap. Crit, haste, and mastery ratings are also way too low to be viable at end-game. Things hit substantially harder and you need to be able to take a couple of smacks because "lol aoe" is no longer a viable healing strategy. The stamina differences are pretty extreme.

If we assume the pattern that crafted gear is roughly on par with equal level dungeon drops/quest rewards then there's no way you'd ever choose any level 80 gear over even the worst level 85 gear.

For example:

best-in-slot 277 gear vs crafted level 85 blue.

In Cataclsym the 277 belt has all of the superpower removed but it's got 15 more intellect: it actually gets replaced by quest reward at level 82, the crafted belt is orders of magnitude better.

I replaced 6 pieces of 277 with greens and blues by the end of level 82, and haven't run any of the new dungeons since they added loot to the bosses. I doubt I'll have any left by the end of 83.

lol, quoted for the sheer awesomeness of this typo.

Don't you dare editing this out ! :)

A 5 year old should be able to compile their own Linux kernel too apparently. After all it's just typing numbers and letters.

looking at the userbase of noobuntu a 5 yr old apparently can use linux. and compiling your own kernel doesnt require skill either. My uncle runs gentoo from stage 1 and he can barely type

Actually, then youll whine about how pointless raiding has become because the gear there sucks (worse than epics)

I hope you're not talking to me. No I won't whine because I know how to look at stats on a piece gear. Anyone who complains that gear is bad because it's not purple is an idiot. Besides epics will still drop in raids, it's heroics they are mostly removing them from.

More importantly they are making quest gear rewards viable again. Cataclysm greens will make ICC raid epics look like garbage.

I dont know if I like the idea of 264 gear being phased out that quick in cata.

THere are 5 levels worth of content: if you want the last two dropping gear that people look forward to then stuff has to be replaced in the first 3. That brings us to scaling where ≤251 is instantly replaced, ≤264 gets dumped at level 81, and 277/284 gets replaced at 82. Obviously you're not getting 18 slots worth of quest reward gear every level so you'll have some pieces of "bad" gear that'll last until Uldum or Twilight Highlands but it's not hard to see when the writing is on the wall.

By the time Cataclysm comes out we—as a player-base, not necessarily you specifically—will have been raiding ICC for more than a year (counting PTR). Do you really need to get an extra 12 hours with gear that old? 264 is a tier behind end-game so if you made it viable until level 84 then people in 277/284 would have yet another expansion where they beat the game using gear they got a year ago.

so just cancel all existing dungeons and quests, head to blasted lands and start on outland?

are they are disadvantages of not completing a lot of dungeons and quests?

Yeah, just ditch what you have and move on - No real disadvantages, except perhaps lost quest completion counter for achievements etc.

there's so much XP to be had and the quests are really, really easy in Outlands. Not to mention the massive gear upgrade, green gear in Outlands

pound Vanilla epics to the ground.

so just cancel all existing dungeons and quests, head to blasted lands and start on outland?

are they are disadvantages of not completing a lot of dungeons and quests?

I did 58 to 63 in Hellfire Pen. Granted that's in two pieces of heirloom gear but the quests aren't hard, rewards are plentiful and there is a huge amount of quests to do.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Glow 26.10 by Razvan Serea Glow provides detailed reporting on every hardware component in your computer, saving you valuable time typically spent searching for CPU, motherboard, RAM, graphics card, and other stats. With Glow, all the information is conveniently presented in one clean interface, allowing you to easily access and review the comprehensive hardware details of your system. Glow provides detailed information on various system aspects, including OS, motherboard, processor, memory, graphics card, storage, network, battery, drivers, and services. The well-organized format ensures easy access to the required information. You can export all the gathered data to a plain text file, facilitating sharing with others for troubleshooting purposes. No installation needed. Just decompress the archive, launch the executable, and access computer-related information. Glow runs on Windows 11 and Windows 10 64-bit versions. Glow 26.10 changelog: New Features The bootstrapping algorithm has been completely redesigned. The software can now launch directly without requiring TS Preloader. As part of this change, the startup splash screen displayed during initialization has been removed. In addition, spikes in CPU usage have been eliminated, resulting in a more stable architecture with significantly lower memory consumption. The Microsoft Office detection infrastructure within the Operating System section has been enhanced. Additional detection support has been added for Office C2R (Click-to-Run) installations. Furthermore, the license status evaluation system has been improved, and the priority order has been revised as follows: Licensed > Grace Period > Other (NOTIFICATIONS, EVALUATION, etc.). Glow now includes preliminary support for Wi-Fi 8 technology, allowing more detailed information to be displayed for Wi-Fi 8-compatible network adapters. Glow now provides full support for Bluetooth 6.2. Adapters supporting Bluetooth 6.2 can be analyzed in greater detail and with improved accuracy. The disk distribution view in the Disk section has been modernized, replacing the traditional table layout with a new 2×2 card-based design. The TS Custom Controls module has been updated to v26.7. Thanks to the new custom controls, all Türkaysoft applications now offer a more modern and consistent user interface aligned with Windows 11 design standards. Bug Fixes Potential line-ending handling issues in the Office detection code within the Operating System section have been resolved. Additionally, the output format has been standardized to UTF-8 to prevent character encoding issues and ensure consistent data processing. Several stability and file management issues within the Debugging infrastructure have been addressed. Problems that prevented new log files from being created after Debugging was disabled, as well as issues causing debug records to be lost, have been fixed. File deletion and reaccess issues that occurred after file locks were released have also been resolved. In addition, a bug that caused newly recreated log files to remain locked after deletion has been eliminated. Unnecessary blank lines within debug logs and the extra empty line that could appear at the end of log files have also been corrected. A shortcut key conflict caused by assigning identical hotkeys to both the DNS Test Tool and the Donation page has been fixed. The DNS Test Tool can now be accessed using CTRL + Shift + D, while the Donation page is available via CTRL + Alt + D. Changes The service responsible for providing the Public IP Address and Internet Service Provider information in the Network section has been updated to use the ipinfo.io infrastructure. This change improves the accuracy and consistency of the displayed data. (No external requests are made while Hiding Mode is enabled.) Some terms in the Dutch and Korean language files have been updated to make them clearer and more user-friendly. [TS Updater] Before the update process begins, users are now prompted to choose whether they would like to view the release notes. Note: Always unzip the program before using it. Otherwise you may get an error. Download: Glow 26.10 | 1.8 MB (Open Source) Links: Glow Homepage | Screenshot | Github Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Maradona if hydration breaks had existed in Mexico 86.
    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!