Recommended Posts

Thanks guys for your help with the achievements :) I decided to stop Loremaster for now and I'm working actively on Champion of The Frozen Wastes (11/15) and Glory of The Hero (only 12 as of now) for the Red Proto Drake. I wanted some help on gearing, here's my Armory. I managed to get T9 legs and hands and working on the chest, the other 200/219 are just fillers until I have anough Triumph to buy better pieces. Also, someone told me that I can resell tier gear to the vendor and get back the Triumph Emblems, in this case is it wise to hold on gemming my 232 gear so I can replace it with 245 gear after doing TotC and getting trophies ?

PS : You'll notice my low crit, that's because I'm trying to cap haste at 400 (solar rotation) before gemming for crit. I'm also over-hitting, wich should be fixed with a full tier set and adequate gemming.

Thanks guys for your help with the achievements :) I decided to stop Loremaster for now and I'm working actively on Champion of The Frozen Wastes (11/15) and Glory of The Hero (only 12 as of now) for the Red Proto Drake. I wanted some help on gearing, here's my Armory. I managed to get T9 legs and hands and working on the chest, the other 200/219 are just fillers until I have anough Triumph to buy better pieces. Also, someone told me that I can resell tier gear to the vendor and get back the Triumph Emblems, in this case is it wise to hold on gemming my 232 gear so I can replace it with 245 gear after doing TotC and getting trophies ?

PS : You'll notice my low crit, that's because I'm trying to cap haste at 400 (solar rotation) before gemming for crit. I'm also over-hitting, wich should be fixed with a full tier set and adequate gemming.

You can only sell gear back within 2 hours of purchase. To get 245 you have to turn in 232 and the token. Gem and chant it (feel free to use blue quality if your confident you'll be doing ToC25 TOGC10 shortly). Also avoid buying legs/gloves (to late now), simply because that's the gear that drops in VoA. You should be running VoA 10/25 every week. Might have a hard time getting into a 10, but you should be able to sneak into a 25 (now and days 25's carry like 4-6 people while ten might carry 1-2). Other than that, just keeping running heroics and you should be able to replace just about everything via that, once your able to run HoR/PoS/FoS you'll get some real nice 232 pieces. I'd also run those on normal to replace some pieces with 219 (I think). I'm also hoping it's just an armory bug, but you need a relic and offhand.

Good good blizzard, nerfing the crap out of almost every class/spec I play.

So Volley was removed from hunters, Multi shot gets changed and looks kinda cool its a bit like FoK so to speak. Not bad looking forward to that.

However I do not see why they nerf the crap out of all the damage that the shots do and attack power scaling :/ really bizarre. Increasing cool down for finishing moves and making them weaker is great logic.

Next holy pala nerf yikes that kinda sucks too. Divine Plea CD increased but the mana return decreased. Doesn't make sense, true paladins may have high mana pools and but still don't think that change was needed.

Priest changes on the other hand are looking pretty sweet, DK changes are almost non existent but then again it is the newest class and not many changes may be needed on them.

They're doing the same for Prot Paladins, I don't know about Holy Paladins, but DP is a core Prot ability.. the CD is less important for us, but the % is a slap in the face, considering they're bumping the mana cost as on HW, as if "don't use this spell please".

I trust Blizzard that everything will eventually be balanced and playable, but I'm not looking forward to some of the changes to Paladins..

I saw the need for an overhaul in BC, but not now, we're not broken, go fix Warriors or something...

Afternoon to ya'

I've changed my name from IanPete to REDBEARDD.

Just wanted to (Kind of) inform you all that my WoW Blog has received an update including pictures! :) This is something I'd really like to keep up with and have other people keep up with as well. I have a goal of eventually become a columnist for WoW.com and I think maintaining my own blog would be a great place to start.

Red Beard's Adventures

We recently released a new Cataclysm beta launcher that allows you to stream game data while you play. We've received a lot of feedback from you regarding this new feature, and that feedback has allowed us to improve the player experience significantly.

In the next beta patch, you'll receive a new Cataclysm beta launcher that includes several updates to in-game streaming. Here's a quick preview of some of the upcoming changes:

  • Improved three-stage progress bar
  • Download speed improvements
  • Detailed peer-to-peer connection information
  • Bandwidth detection, which will improve the play experience of those with low bandwidth
  • New UI with a Cataclysm-inspired theme
  • Many bug fixes

We encourage you to continue posting your feedback about the streaming launcher, as we're constantly looking for ways to get you into the game faster and more smoothly.

Thank you!

Linky.

launchercata_small.jpg

For Spoilers .. click it.

ABSENCE_OF_MIND__by_FredStudios.gif

Beta added new dungeons, level cap is 85, and uldum is unlocked. I've also finally got friends on beta to play with now.

I can get out of the pugtastic craptacular and spend some time with people with people who don't need to be reminded

to pull down their pants when they go to the bathroom. I might start recording runs to show the basic strategies for

the new encounters.

Unrelated: I'm getting shadowmourne on my ridiculously bad, "I only leveled this so I'd have a miner", played oncee a week alt.

I don't care about the weapon but I want another tabard of the lightbringer and I'm not in a big hurry to

drop 100k gold on one.

We recently released a new Cataclysm beta launcher that allows you to stream game data while you play. We've received a lot of feedback from you regarding this new feature, and that feedback has allowed us to improve the player experience significantly.

In the next beta patch, you'll receive a new Cataclysm beta launcher that includes several updates to in-game streaming. Here's a quick preview of some of the upcoming changes:

  • Improved three-stage progress bar
  • Download speed improvements
  • Detailed peer-to-peer connection information
  • Bandwidth detection, which will improve the play experience of those with low bandwidth
  • New UI with a Cataclysm-inspired theme
  • Many bug fixes

We encourage you to continue posting your feedback about the streaming launcher, as we're constantly looking for ways to get you into the game faster and more smoothly.

Thank you!

Linky.

launchercata_small.jpg

For Spoilers .. click it.

ABSENCE_OF_MIND__by_FredStudios.gif

Screenshot please, I don't want to wait till I get home to look at it :D

100K? That is a bit much?

You're talking about an item that requires a minimum of 500 man hours to produce and that cannot be produced by less than 25 people and has a fixed material cost in the 10-20k range. It's an item with a very limited supply?likely less than 20 per server?of which only a small percentage will every come to market (for example my guild has 5 or 6 now, but they're all distributed to raiders and it would not be acceptable to sell it to somebody outside the guild).

As for spending that much: after major expenses you can last basically forever on 20,000g. There's no game-play change between having say 200k instead of 20k the same way that having 10k instead of 1000g switches things up. If you've got a giant pile of gold it doesn't do you any good sitting in the bank and if there's nothing to spend it on then you might as well pick up rare vanity items.

More importantly, anybody with 100k has the skills to make cash and that's far more valuable than actual gold in the bank. They can afford to blow it all because they can make more and it's useless to have so much anyway.

So will Cata help with the "Your GS is too low blah blah blah problem?" When you usually out dps them anyway.

No, not even a little bit.

Hater's gonna hate, baddies gonna bad. If anything the fewer options (ie: 10/25 are the same lockout) will mean that there will be less skilled players willing to take a risk with pugs and the idea that gear = skill will become even more enforced.

I posted a video in this thread months ago showing a mage in level 60 blues doing 3500 DPS in level 80 heroic 5-man content and even that wasn't enough to convince people here that there's more to being not-clueless than just having some magical amount of gear.

So Battered Hilt drop'd today. I won, currently waiting out the 5 instances per hour non-sense rule to enter SWP and snag that achievement.

Evn and/or other beta tester. Hoping some of ya have run the new dungeons. Impressions?

SWP ? Why would you enter Sunwell for that ? I think you're confused a bit :)

SWP ? Why would you enter Sunwell for that ? I think you're confused a bit :)

When you talk to the guards you get teleported into SWP. I don't know if it counts as a seperate instance, but it might...

In reaction to a post on the last page:

I've always played a Holy Paladin, since I started playing WoW right after 2.2 was released. I've tried retri and prot, but never made it longer than a month or so with anything but Holy, and I leveled as Holy aswell (shock shock shocking mobs).

Now in the Cataclysm beta, I feel like they've completely thrown away the Holy Paladin way of playing. We have always had a slow, costly but huge heal and a fast, decent and very cheap heal. Now they're completely reversing it to slow, cheap and worthless and fast, huge and manadraining? Sigh... I've tried it on the beta, and I really, really don't like it. As it was said before, Holy Paladins weren't broken, not at all. Just by fixing numbers and adding the new stuff (Light's Dawn and HP/WoG) it would've been more than fine, really.

What made Holy Paladins unique is, in my opinion, completely gone, and that's a shame.

If the complaint is that Holy Paladins can't go OOM, then look at the TBC model. It's all the procentual mana gains that made int-stacking Holy Paladins so undrainable. In Cataclysm Intellect is already being merged with Spellpower so I suspect procentual mana gains will go down a lot aswell. With the nerfs to Divine Plea and everything I see no reason not to keep the old system here. Yes, of course on some encounters it might not be fair compared to other healers without a fast, efficient heal, but does that even matter? There have always been fights where some healers did better than others, why can't that be the situation in Cataclysm... ?

If the complaint is that Holy Paladins can't go OOM, then look at the TBC model. It's all the procentual mana gains that made int-stacking Holy Paladins so undrainable.

Nobody goes OOM anymore and while that's a problem, it's not unique to paladins. The real issue is that one paladin can put out twice the throughput of any other healer.

Consider this break down.

Notice that one class is represented in numbers well beyond all the others?

Notice how the first slot is occupied by that same class 10 out of 12 times?

Notice that class is only displaced from their spot on a huge AOE orgy (BQL) or on a fight where one classes gimmick is powerful (LK)?

Take a look at the break down for any particular person in those logs and you'll see:

  • Holy light: ~65%
  • Glyph of Holy Light: ~15%
  • Beacon of light: ~10%
  • Judgement of light: ~10%
  • Other incidentals like sacred shield, holy shock, FoL, LoH make up < 5%

Notice that the class is using one button: holy light.

That's the problem: a one button class that out performs every other at an essential roll.

It's no different from fire mages in classic, hunters in TBC, and to a lesser extent druids at the end of WoTLK.

This time it's your turn to feel the nerf bat.

In Cataclysm Intellect is already being merged with Spellpower so I suspect procentual mana gains will go down a lot aswell. With the nerfs to Divine Plea and everything I see no reason not to keep the old system here. Yes, of course on some encounters it might not be fair compared to other healers without a fast, efficient heal, but does that even matter? There have always been fights where some healers did better than others, why can't that be the situation in Cataclysm? ?

A fast, efficient, high though-put heal is pretty much the most important thing in the game.

  • So long as tank healing is a niche dominated by paladins the class will be overly valued.
  • So long as paladins are worthless as raid healers it'll be impossible to make 5-man content with significant AOE components.
  • So long as paladins are a one button class the people who play that will be saddled with a trivial game-play experience and no way to differentiate themselves based on skill.

Nobody goes OOM anymore and while that's a problem, it's not unique to paladins. The real issue is that one paladin can put out twice the throughput of any other healer.

Consider this break down.

Notice that one class is represented in numbers well beyond all the others?

Notice how the first slot is occupied by that same class 10 out of 12 times?

Notice that class is only displaced from their spot on a huge AOE orgy (BQL) or on a fight where one classes gimmick is powerful (LK)?

Take a look at the break down for any particular person in those logs and you'll see:

  • Holy light: ~65%
  • Glyph of Holy Light: ~15%
  • Beacon of light: ~10%
  • Judgement of light: ~10%
  • Other incidentals like sacred shield, holy shock, FoL, LoH make up < 5%

Notice that the class is using one button: holy light.

That's the problem: a one button class that out performs every other at an essential roll.

It's no different from fire mages in classic, hunters in TBC, and to a lesser extent druids at the end of WoTLK.

This time it's your turn to feel the nerf bat.

A fast, efficient, high though-put heal is pretty much the most important thing in the game.

  • So long as tank healing is a niche dominated by paladins the class will be overly valued.
  • So long as paladins are worthless as raid healers it'll be impossible to make 5-man content with significant AOE components.
  • So long as paladins are a one button class the people who play that will be saddled with a trivial game-play experience and no way to differentiate themselves based on skill.

Very nice breakdown, however that is not what the TBC healing model used to be like, and WotLK only got that way in 3.2...

In BC you had to use a healthy mix between Flash of Light, Holy Light and Holy Shock. MOST Holy Palas now in WotLK indeed just stack Intellect and spam Holy Light.

Look at my spec and gemming (and libram) for example: http://armory.wow-europe.com/character-sheet.xml?r=Frostmane&cn=Theralas

Using this spec leads to a waaaay higher variety in healing, more fun and more skill involved, THOUGH it relies heavily on ALL available Holy Paladin spells exactly for their specific niches. It's a lot like BC-style healing aswell. Basically consists of using Holy Shock whenever possible or for Dmg spikes, followed by an instant Flash of Light. For periods of heavy damage you can switch over to Holy Light, which is HUGE because of Spellpower stacking. This spec also gets a lot out of Sacred Shield, since I have a 100% FoL crit chance when Sacred Shield is up, etc etc...

I'd link you some logs but I didn't save any lately so I can't... I've done ICC10 HC with it (11/12) and it worked just fine, resulting in me being around or topping the metres every time. Also an upside about this spec is the way increased mobility, ability to raid heal (Spam FoL on raid with Beacon on tank), way faster reaction time (Instants) and nearly no mana problems since Flash of Light is very efficient (I've never had to Divine Plea with this spec) In ICC25 HC (9/12) I almost always topped the metres aswell, leading to two very jealous Intadins.

In Cataclysm, the nature of most encounters would already be enough to make this spec have to manage mana. You'd have to use Holy Light more since there will probably be more damage, leading to you having to use more Holy Lights, leading to more mana usage. This would at least keep a part of the Holy Paladin playstyle intact, the playstyle that was there BEFORE 3.2.

It might just be sadness, but I love this way of playing Holy Paladins as it is a lot more challenging and just fun than the other one, and I'm going to be very sad if Cataclysm will be the way it is now in the beta.

In BC you had to use a healthy mix between Flash of Light, Holy Light and Holy Shock. MOST Holy Palas now in WotLK indeed just stack Intellect and spam Holy Light.

Holy paladins were 'broken' for 90% of BC. They never really recovered from the nerfs they received in patch 2.0.6 (and even then they still weren't ideal: we had to get ours attuned for SSC/TK by having them respec prot or having someone else clearing the trials for them). Looking over screenshots from sunwell and I don't see any there (unless for some reason we had less than 4 shamans). If we did bring one we'd toss them on tank healing because they were useless for anything else. Blessings were powerful and we had to tollerate sub-standard classes to get them.

When we were pushing through m'uru it wasn't unusual to have holy paladins, mages, and DS-spec'd priests 'raiding' from outside the instance. Have them cast their buffs and then zone out while the 'better' classes did the real work.

Using this spec leads to a waaaay higher variety in healing, more fun and more skill involved, THOUGH it relies heavily on ALL available Holy Paladin spells exactly for their specific niches

The fact that you can play this way and still out-perform everyone else is a clear indication that the class is broken.

You're playing less than optimally and still out-performing every other class that could fill role you play.

The issue isn't mana consumption, it's single and two-target througput.

Would you fell like your class was viable if your heals hit for 50% less? That's the situation everyone else is in when they look at paladins. Suppse they trivialized your niche: tanks stopped taking any more damage than the rest of the raid (think Sunwell style AOE orgies): would you feel like your class was well suited to healing 10 people at a time?

In ICC25 HC (9/12) I almost always topped the metres aswell, leading to two very jealous Intadins.

When you look at the logs of the best-performing paladins in the game the play style you've chosen isn't represented.

You might be getting by and you might be beating face-rolling players in your guild but you're not beating the face-rolling players on the world stage.

If anything you should be arguing for drastic paladin changes because people pushing one button are performing substantially better than players

like you that try to use many of their class abilities. The current mechanics make it impossible to tell a skilled player from somebody who's programmed

their G15 to press the holy light button every 1.2 seconds (if anything the afk players will look better than somebody who's trying to be more involved).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • On the topic of being locked out of a service. Recently two different friends of mine got locked out of their Google accounts. Both were hack attempts and one of them is waiting 30 days before he can get back in. He had backup codes and MFA but not a passkey. It was a browser token hack. Anyhow he has to wait 30 days for the dispute or whatever to end. The other person only had a password and is screwed losing all of the email, docs and years of photos. Google won’t help her at all. Her fault because she had no backup/recovery setup. Enable passkeys if possible. Also do NOT use browser based password managers. If using a cloud service make sure it is one you can fully sync to one of your devices so you can back it up. Like a PC or Mac with some backup drive plugged into it. Google is the worst to use IMHO. You can’t sync your photos at all. You have to use the “Take Out” service which is manual and takes days. That service strips the meta data from your photos. Also Google Docs synced to a device are useless without a Google accounts. MS Office/Libre Office is not going to open a link to a Google doc to a dead account.
    • Why you need to take back control of your synced passwords and how to go about doing that by Paul Hill Credit: Pixabay Last month, when Google decided to introduce daily and weekly caps for Gemini, it reignited an anxiety of mine, that you can’t really depend on service providers to maintain features forever, and it got me looking into free software (as in freedom) in other areas too. One app I quickly came across was KeePassXC on desktop and KeePassDX on Android as an alternative to password manager lock-in within the Chrome or Firefox ecosystems. I personally like to switch around with browsers, and using either password manager is inconvenient, so something like KeePassXC was interesting to me. The main issue with it now is syncing; I was not sure how to do that. After a bit of research, I came across Syncthing, a tool I was vaguely familiar with but had never used because it seemed complicated. However, I was completely wrong, and honestly, I think everyone should use it if they use multiple devices. It essentially lets you share folders peer to peer across all of your devices, no cloud services that you don’t control necessary! And it was fairly simple to set up, if not a bit clunky. Since setting it up, I’ve also started using Syncthing to back up other apps too, so don’t think it’s limited to just saving password databases. You can use it for pretty much anything you use Dropbox or Google Drive for. Before continuing to talk about those apps a bit more, let’s walk back a bit and talk about browser sync. Ever since the late 2000s and early 2010s, really, since we have been using smartphones, browser sync has been a necessity of life. I don’t know about you, but I have hundreds of passwords saved. For the most part, they’re all unique, so I don’t remember them and rely on software to manage them for me. Until recently, I’ve relied on password managers in Chrome and Firefox, but what I always found annoying was that it can be hard to transfer them between browsers. Sure, on Windows it is simple enough, but on Linux, exporting bookmarks has been temperamental. It works OK nowadays, but not too long ago, Chrome required you to enable exporting passwords in chrome://flags. The situation is even worse on mobile; there is no exporting or importing of passwords of any kind. You literally have to do it on a desktop, which is incredibly annoying in our mobile-first world. Sync also lets us take out bookmarks, history, tabs, and autofill data easily. To enable sync, it’s just a matter of signing into the browser once, and it handles the rest. It’s nice and easy. Obviously, all this has some issues, including those I’ve outlined above about it being hard to transfer data between browsers, but also things such as account suspension, lost account passwords, and other lock-in mechanisms, such as passkeys, being tied to a specific browser. On a sidenote, I have just removed all of my passkeys because they can make it harder to move browsers. I think the biggest threat to your synced passwords, especially if doing this with Google, is having your account suspended. I don’t ever expect mine to be suspended, but you do hear horror stories on Reddit where people lose access to their Google accounts. Imagine if you have hundreds of passwords, then suddenly lose access to them because Google froze your account, what would you do? So yes, it can be nice to use these syncing services for their convenience, but they also have risks. You may have seen me going on about free software quite a bit in my editorials. It’s essentially a concept championed by the Free Software Foundation. It’s software under particular licenses that grant you four freedoms: run the program for any purpose (0), study and change the source code (1), redistribute copies to others (2), and the freedom to distribute modified copies to others (3). For example, if there is an app I use and one day it gets abandoned by the developer, I can keep running it or even clone the software and continue developing it. Look at the myriad of cool services Google has run over the years before killing them. You can’t take the source code for those because they are proprietary, for the most part. Both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so I get the freedoms listed above. In my use case where I’m syncing a database full of my passwords, I also get proper ownership over my data, there is no losing access to the database due to a frozen account, I can access the code of the tools I’m using, and I can get support from real people online if I run into issues, rather than having to consult a vague help page from an opaque company. With the KeePassXC password manager, you create a .kdbx file, which is what will be synced between devices. KeePassXC has cross-platform apps and also has browser extensions so that the browser can fetch passwords from the database once it is unlocked. Meanwhile, Syncthing is a peer-to-peer file sync tool where you can select folders to sync between your devices. Just pop files in the folders you choose, and then they will be available across your other devices whenever they come online. Syncthing is resilient as it works over both LAN and the internet and only ever sends content between your devices, never to a third-party server somewhere else. By combining these two pieces of software, you can essentially replicate the browser sync functionality. I have had a weird, conflicting issue where a new file is appearing, but it doesn’t seem to be impacting my main password database, which is updating between devices just fine. If you want to get a setup similar to what I have, you will need to go here to download KeePassXC for your computer. Once you have that, you will need to download your passwords from your web browser to a CSV file. In Chrome, you can type chrome://password-manager/settings into the URL bar, and you should see an option to download your passwords under Export Passwords. This will give you the CSV file you need for importing into KeePassXC. If you use a different browser, just use a search engine and type “browser-name export passwords” and muddle along. In KeePassXC, you’ll want to press Import File from the home screen, select the CSV file, and create a new database from it. On one of the screens of the wizard, there will be a Title field with a drop-down selected to none. Change this to Title and continue. You’ll select a name for the database, the encryption level (the defaults are fine), and then you will pick a password. I would choose four unrelated words that are easy for you to remember, as you’ll be typing them fairly often to access your passwords. When you have all your passwords in your new database, you will want to set up the browser extension so that your browser can fetch passwords from KeePassXC. Rather than explain how to do that here, refer to KeePassXC’s guide on how to set it up properly. Once you’ve got that set up, you want to install KeePassDX on Android. You can grab it on the F-Droid store and the Google Play Store. For iPhone users, there are other .kdbx-supporting apps, but I haven’t tried any of them, so have a look around and use what suits you. Once you have that done, you will want to install Syncthing on your computer and find a third-party app for your mobile device. On Android, I use an app called BasicSync; there are also options for iOS, but again, I’ve not tried these. Once you’ve got SyncThing, you’ll want to set it up and connect all of your devices together and share a folder between your gadgets. PCWorld has a good tutorial on setting up a synchronized file between your devices using SyncThing. Once you’ve set it up, congrats, you’ll never have to touch that stuff again except for adding or removing devices. I’ll be honest, I didn’t particularly like setting up Syncthing. It didn’t take me a massive amount of time, but I think I had to check online because I found it a bit confusing. That said, I’ve had it running for several weeks now and never need to touch the Syncthing settings, so that’s very nice. I also mentioned a conflicting file. I’m not sure why this is appearing, but the main .kdbx file seems to be updating and syncing just fine. What’s nice is that both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so they won’t just vanish one day; you can take the code and fork the project or use a range of alternative implementations that others have made. It’s also nice that it works over LAN, so even if your ISP is having problems, your passwords will still sync. One area where you will want to be a bit more careful with this setup is if you only have one device. I am OK because I have a computer and two phones, all synced up. If you just have one device, you will probably want to store a backup of your .kdbx file somewhere else. Obviously, you’ll also want to remember your password really well, too. If you get locked out, it's game over. Overall, if you want to take back control of your computing from big tech, taking control of your passwords is an important part of this. You don’t need to immediately clear out your browser’s password manager; try running KeePassXC and the password manager concurrently for a while to see if you run into any problems. If you do try this out, let us know some other creative ways to use Syncthing. I haven’t really come up with a solution about what to do with my bookmarks, for example.
    • If the price was a dollar, someone would complain "Why isn't it free?" If it was free, someone would complain they weren't being paid to play it.
    • That lens of history will burn if you hold it at the right angle... Warn users too late: Shame, Microsoft! That extremely minor update to an obscure Control Panel widget required 2 years of warning. Warn users too early: Shame, Microsoft! We've got better things to do. Pipeline and process be damned, we'll just always be disappointed, eh?
    • Microsoft Paint used to be my favorite Windows app as a kid, and it's still pretty good by Usama Jawad I have been using Windows since the early 2000s, when I was around 10 years old or so. I vaguely remember playing around with Windows 98 and Windows 2000, but that may have been on school PCs which had old operating systems installed. My main OS on the home PC, and the one I recall spending most time with, was Windows XP. At that time, I used the home PC to create Word and PowerPoint documents for school, but a lot of the time, I simply used it to play games. My dad would bring game discs which we would try and install on the PC, sometimes unsuccessfully, and sometimes, we would rely on flash games in the browser, like Bubble Trouble on Miniclip. However, the problem with the latter approach was the internet speed. On a good day, our dial-up internet would offer us speeds of 56 kbps, but on most days, it was closer to 33 kbps. This did not facilitate online gaming as I would often have to wait minutes for a game to load or "draw" on the screen, and trying to download pirated games wasn't simple either. I remember getting tired of waiting for online games to load and just downloading simulator games from the Big Fish Games website instead, only to be disappointed after finding out that I was just being given access to trial versions of the title, and I needed to fork out money to pay for the full version. All of this is to say that it wasn't very easy to find entertainment options on the home PC when I was a kid, due to a number of reasons, mostly outside of my control. This situation pushed me towards a rather unconventional ally: Microsoft Paint. Whenever the internet wasn't working as good as I expected, I would simply spin up Paint and draw complete rubbish on the canvas. Of course, that wasn't always the intention, but it usually happened when I messed up drawing a straight line or something, and then I would give up on that particular piece and simply draw a random collection of objects. Microsoft Paint was extremely accessible and easy to use. Even if you weren't an artist, you could quickly understand the tools at your disposal and how to leverage them on a canvas. The absolute breadth on offer ensured that each painting was truly unique, as you could utilize various combinations of tools like the pencil, paint, spray paint, and more to truly personalize your creation. Since I wasn't particularly good at drawing both on digital screen or a physical screen, I remember that my main style of art would be to insert a bunch of randomly intersecting lines and then fill them with random colors through the paint can. I have trying to replicate that art style in the latest version of Paint below, and as you can see, it's truly Pablo Picasso-esque. The human imagination truly knows no bounds Microsoft Paint kept me occupied for hours and was my best friend when video games on the home PC were inaccessible for one reason or the other. There was no academic or professional reason for which I would need to use Paint, but I still loved using it in my personal time, even if what I created wasn't worth being shown to anyone. It was simply fun. Fast-forward to today, and the situation is mostly the same. Now that I am almost 29 years old, and I still have no reason to use Microsoft Paint in a professional capacity. In fact, I don't even use it in a personal capacity, except to dabble with it from time to time, just to see if core functionalities are still intact. And I'm happy to say that I think Microsoft Paint still offers the same accessibility and inviting experience that it did to me a couple of decades ago, even though its UX has been refreshed and it's been integrated with Copilot features. Interestingly, things could have been a lot different, had Microsoft had its way. Microsoft Paint was marked for deprecation with the Windows 10 Fall Creators Update in 2017, and even began displaying a product retirement alert, urging customers to shift to Paint 3D instead. Fortunately, after consumer backlash, Microsoft reversed course on this decision, and Paint continues to be a native app inside Windows installations that can also be updated quite frequently through the Microsoft Store. Instead, Paint 3D ended up on the chopping block, which is for the better, I think. I have intermittently played around with Microsoft's refreshed Paint experience in the past few years, and I do think it has received worthwhile upgrades. the UI and the UX has been modernized while retaining core functionality, and the app is still fairly easy to use. It doesn't meet any of my use-cases, but I've never really had any use-cases ever, as described previously. Of course, the elephant in the room is the Copilot integration. Personally, I believe that this is one place where Copilot does make sense, environmental concerns aside. I know that a lot of creatives use AI to generate images, and while some may be using professional alternatives, Paint still offers a decent casual experience, with the power of Copilot. Of course, you do need to have a valid Microsoft 365 Copilot license and available credits to use it, but even if you don't, you still get the big Copilot button in the toolbar, unfortunately. All in all, I am glad that Microsoft Paint continues to be a native feature in Windows 11, and a piece of software that has evolved to meet modern needs without cutting off its own roots. It's just an iconic piece of Windows history that was an essential part of my childhood, and while I don't use it anymore, I'm just glad it is still there.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!