Recommended Posts

Got bored, tried logging into my account, and wouldn't you know it- My authenticators battery died... I've only had it for 3 1/2 months, how is this possible? O.o

That is strange ... I've had mine for over a year and it's still going strong.

That is strange ... I've had mine for over a year and it's still going strong.

Exactly, my bro has one that he has had since they release them... Still works perfectly fine. Maybe I got a botched one?

I've seen horror stories of people spending weeks trying to get them off accounts, I don't even know if I want to go through with that to sit in Dalaran to stare at my pretty gear >_>

Few generic pet peeves:

- Outline chat if you can't read it remove the huge black box.

I'd just gotten out of a random when I took that, so the bar hadn't faded, the chat is black because the sun glares in my eye when I play during the mornings, so it's black so it doesn't have a glare.

Guys is this legit ? :whistle:

Delivered-To: <snip>

Received: by <snip> with SMTP id b54cs244751wea;

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:08:28 -0700 (PDT)

Received: by <snip> with SMTP id t8mr535974wac.156.1284494907362;

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:08:27 -0700 (PDT)

Return-Path: <[email protected]>

Received: from mx1.blizzard.com (mx1.blizzard.com [12.130.201.11])

by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u10si1241528wak.2.2010.09.14.13.08.26;

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:08:27 -0700 (PDT)

Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of [email protected] designates 12.130.201.11 as permitted sender) client-ip=12.130.201.11;

Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of [email protected] designates 12.130.201.11 as permitted sender) [email protected]

X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.56,366,1280732400";

d="scan'208,217";a="58658733"

Received: from irvex203.corp.blizzard.net ([10.130.14.23])

by mx1.blizzard.com with ESMTP; 14 Sep 2010 13:08:26 -0700

Received: from IRVEX012.corp.blizzard.net (10.130.0.217) by

IRVEX203.corp.blizzard.net (10.130.14.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id

8.2.254.0; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:08:25 -0700

Received: from IRVEX001.corp.blizzard.net ([fe80::446a:1923:919e:77fa]) by

IRVEX012.corp.blizzard.net ([::1]) with mapi; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:08:24 -0700

From: WoW Expansion Beta <[email protected]>

To: "<snip>" <snip>

Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:08:01 -0700

Subject: World of Warcraft®: Cataclysm Beta Test Invitation

Thread-Topic: World of Warcraft®: Cataclysm Beta Test Invitation

Thread-Index: ActUSIh9eOfMQdZhTZCC1DS+qC21iA==

Message-ID: <3C96FB3BD1D99B429EC1A92E6967588CD270D60E3D@IRVEX001.corp.blizzard.net>

Accept-Language: en-US

Content-Language: en-US

X-MS-Has-Attach:

X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:

acceptlanguage: en-US

Content-Type: multipart/alternative;

boundary="_000_3C96FB3BD1D99B429EC1A92E6967588CD270D60E3DIRVEX001corpb_"

MIME-Version: 1.0

Return-Path: [email protected]

And if so, can an email header be forged ?

EDIT : after checking the official board it appears to be legit, but I can't see the Cata account in my Battle.net, it says to wait 24h in the mail, does it take a long time ?

Guys is this legit ? :whistle:

And if so, can an email header be forged ?

No the [email protected] isn't a blizzard email I dont think and its usually just added to your account so see if it is in your battle.net account.

Not a pain at all. Unfortunately I'm unsure if the skinner.lua file I've uploaded will indeed give you my Skinner profile / setup. Try extracting the included file to this directory once you've installed the Skinner addon.

As far as the font goes, it's called Emblem, but I forgot where I grabbed it from originally so I've also uploaded it for you. To replace the fonts in WoW, download Malsumis Font Changer and follow the instructions, and use the Emblem font to replace WoW's default fonts. It's pretty easy.

emblem_and_skinner.zip

You didnt include any textures so I got

post-280528-12845183824466.jpg

When I logged in.

No the [email protected] isn't a blizzard email I dont think and its usually just added to your account so see if it is in your battle.net account.

Well if I'm to trust the official boards it's actually a legit blizzard email (in addition, the header shows that the mail came from blizzard servers) but still nothing in Battle.net, I made a post in the official boards for confirmation. Not getting my hopes too high thou :laugh:

You didnt include any textures so I got

post-280528-12845183824466.jpg

When I logged in.

Can you post a picture of a window such a character, talents, or the spellbook? As far as not including any textures, I don't use any. My modified Skinner settings rely on nothing but colors / transparency settings.

Can you post a picture of a window such a character, talents, or the spellbook? As far as not including any textures, I don't use any. My modified Skinner settings rely on nothing but colors / transparency settings.

I got it working, was me being an idiot xP, I didnt change profile xD!.

I decided to change my UI arround a bit. Going to change the Unit Frames to oUF Nivea, Move my Action Bars arround a bit as well as some other things.

post-280528-12845197154267.jpg

This is just what I did before the server shutdown.

Evn, what unit frames / dps meter are you using?

Unit frames are Stuf, I stripped it down to the most minimal configuration i could tolerate.

The Damage meter would be skada, I use it as a threat meter and almost always have the damage/healing meters unloaded. I like it for the threat, fails, and death modules.

Gratz on your orange weapon. I've started collecting shards on my DK, I might be the only person in the game that is getting one without actually wanting it.

Am I the only one sticking to default UI? It's not the classiest piece but it works, never breaks during updates and doesn't require a ton of work / maintenance. :)

The default UI is not very effective when it comes to communicating the information you need to know vs the stuff that is nice to know and the stuff that is completely

irrelevant. Just look at the buff frames: You probably don't care about 'chill of the throne' at all, and you can't really do anything about weakened soul. You probably care

a lot about debuffs like Legion Flame. The stock UI treats all of these debuffs as equally important and doesn't treat them any different from useless information like

the buff from deviate fish. Delaying your ability to respond to changes increases the chance your performance will negatively impact people around you.

The stock UI makes things like the ability to use Runestrike as important the cooldown on Icebound Fortitude or the ability to summon a ghoul.

You also need information about external events.

Is it safe to cast spells on Sindy hard-mode if you have 3 stacks of instability and you're 30 yards away from everyone? You need some way to know

the cooldown on her grip ability to know if you'll risk blowing-up the raid. The difference that knowledge can make is > 200k damage.

Knowing when your target is using (ie: shield wall) is useful for planning your cooldowns. You're probably not going to want to waste a blessing of protection

on a shadow priest with agro but has popped dispersion, you probably would want to use it on a rogue that has agro and hasn't vanished. A good set of raid

frames helps make sorting out this information much easier. You also need to know if you a boss is targeting you because you've pulled agro or if it's just using

a RSTS ability: the stock UI isn't very helpful here an waiting to find out isn't something you always have the ability to do.

Many fights require positioning yourself carefully: ie: running around on Saurfang is less than ideal. Being able to see how far away a mob is, and how quickly

it's moving out of range is useful for planning casts. If a mob is 30 yards away, at 20% health, and moving at standard running speed then you're not going to

want to cast a fireball at it because it'll be out of range before the cast completes. You'll proably scorch/fireblast instead. Even the best players have a hard time

guessing the difference between 25 yards and 30-yards in the middle of combat. A good unit frame will give you this information.

Knowing what you have threat on is more important than knowing that you have threat. On Lich King have I over DPS'd a raging spirit and it's going to

wipe the raid, or have I just got some healing agro on vile spirits and I can safely ignore the agro warning. You'll want a good multi-target and single-target

threat meter to manage your agro. I like Tidyplates + Skada for this but there are alternatives to suit any playstyle.

Even "simple" things are annoying with the default UI. "Hey check out this youtube video for how we should do <X>" is annoying without copy/paste.

May god have mercy on anybody trying to play a paladin in a raid without PalyPower, or any healing class without something like Grid. The default UI completely

inadequate for them.

Acutally, I know quite a few people that don't use Grid or Healbot for healing, and they are quite good at it. They use macros to extend the "basic" functionality of the standard UI.

I, myself, didn't use Pally Power for a while because I didn't want the clutter on my screen.

Was I able to function in a raid? Definitely.

Does it make it easier using PallyPower? yes, but I still am not too fond of the clutter.

The point is, the standard UI was put there for a reason. It is designed to give the basic information needed to do what you want. They gave it the option to be extended for a reason. If you want more information, simply install an addon that gives that information to you. But to say that it is completely useless is a stretch.

Acutally, I know quite a few people that don't use Grid or Healbot for healing, and they are quite good at it. They use macros to extend the "basic" functionality of the standard UI.

I'm sure you can do it, especially now that the game is a huge joke, but on any challenging content I think it's far less than optimal.

For a simple example: how does a group coordinate external cooldowns on your shambling horror tanks using stock raid frames?

I imagine you could do it on vent or with /s but the lag introduced means you could have say half-a-second where your tank has 2 enraged shambling and no cooldowns. Given that these mobs can one-shot a tank with full best-in-slot gear and the 30% ICC buff it's not good strategy to hope you get lucky.

The point is, the standard UI was put there for a reason. It is designed to give the basic information needed to do what you want. They gave it the option to be extended for a reason. If you want more information, simply install an addon that gives that information to you. But to say that it is completely useless is a stretch.

Nobody said it was useless, but I have argued it's less than ideal. There is simply no substitute for information about the environment and the stock UI provides much less than what is made available by various addons. Prioritizing information is also very important and the stock UI offers almost no functionality to filter out 'noise' or to highlight 'signal' which makes decision making more error prone. The stock UI also presents useful information in ways that are difficult or impossible to interpret in combat.

I tried to offer examples where the stock UI is deficient and how addons can address those shortcomings and allow players to make more informed decisions (and hopefully perform better as a result).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Spotify really have turned in to a butthole of a company. Assuming this isn't a bug then this is a low act for Premium users. Honestly, YT Premium which includes YT Music is a genuine alternative. In any event, the internet enshitification continues unabated...next up, the banning of VPN's.
    • This is why science is the only path to truth. It isn't rigid in its beliefs, rather it changes its views based on scientific discoveries.
    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      164
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      92
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!