Recommended Posts

Both GM island and the Island from the AQ opening quests daily that was south of Tanaris have been removed from the game. (GM island has been gone for a while)

I'm quite sure GM island is still there,

However, its a b*tch to get to.

Its in the faaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaar north western corner of kalimdor. :p

Are you seriously upset about not doing 58k crits anymore ?

Why would you "test" your DPS at level 80 ? It's irrelevant now, go test your DPS on a level 70 dummy (if there is one) now, see how balanced it is.

Besides, even if they do implement 4.0.1 this week, this doesn't mean they won't be changing stuff around, not that I think 58k crits are fine.

Mages critting for 40k is fine is it? I was grouped on PTR with a guildie hes a warlock doing 15k dps in destro spec with slightly inferior gear to mine I guess thats fine too? (I understand its not tuned for 80 but there are 2 months between patch and expansion)... read between the lines, I never said it was FINE it did need a nerf but not a huge one (and not 10 other nerfs), the issue is with scaling too, once classes are at 85 scaling will go out of the window for hunters. Obviously you may not be familiar with the changes hunters have gone through. There is no "signature" shot for BM hence why KC hits so hard in addition to this most of the hunter shots had thier damage lowered or "weapon damage" lowered big time. Kill Command even hits harder than Kill Shot, and Kill shot is meant to be our "finisher" move, on live my kill shot can hit for around 47k on PTR highest I have seen it hit for in randoms is around 16k. Just nerfing kill command should have been enough but they had to nerf the hell out of pretty much everything else

Animal Handler (Passive) now increases your Attack Power by 15%, down from 25%. 10% AP Gone Yay!

Kill Command now scales from 35% of RAP, down from 63% of RAP. Was Needed aye.

Bestial Wrath now causes 20% additional damage, down from 50%. Not this **** again!

Mastery: Master of Beasts now increases damage done by your pets by 13.6%, down from 20%. Each point of Mastery increases pet damage by 1.7%, down from 2.5%. So With reforging everything My pet was at 51% more damage done, now after the nerf its at 33%.

So with the nerf bat pet lost about 50% damage done. Great, cant see it staying like that, after more testing I am sure they will revert 1 or 2 of those changes.

Prior to patch 3.08 BM was op simply because Bestial Wrath and Readiness, also because of brain dead rotation of steadyshot spam. So they nerfed it when other classes were starting to scale and catch up. Hunters then fell behind (BM that is) and quite a bit switched to SV, then MM when ToC was introduced. Im not seeing any high end raiding guilds take a BM hunter ever thought why that was, most pugs do not have BM hunters either.

Patch wont be this week, they pushed out the latest PTR just a few days ago, patch is most likely next week, having said that Cataclysm is rumoured to release in December so your comment about irrelevant is invalid, there is still 2 months or so of raiding, questing, levelling so this is very much relevant.

... Back to playing the pala I guess.

Mages critting for 40k is fine is it? I was grouped on PTR with a guildie hes a warlock doing 15k dps in destro spec with slightly inferior gear to mine I guess thats fine too?

I did a HoR on my lock Saturday and I was WAY top of dps and recount said my Overall dps was 17K, Oh and I hate playing my paladin now on PTR. I can't figure out the changes and things just seem so awkward now

Theres so many varied reports I dont think we will get a proper idea of cata dps until were at 85 or at least using the cata gear. Truebiscuits vids says they are rocking in 325 gear and the numbers coming off his attacks seemed inline with what I would expect to see.

In eithercase the biggest change of the upcoming patch is going to be the loss of hit talents, my mage is like, hey bro wheres my 5% free hit gone? imma like I dunno, reforge away all those other nice stats :p

That and finding the optimal dps builds and rotations, atm reports are too varied. My fear is that arcane is the weakest of the mage specs and 2H Frost sucks for the DK (was looking forward to it, use to love 2H Frost pre-DW). Lock seems to be about the same, although disc and this new holy tree has me worried. SO hit and the new builds are my worries. Ill worry about whose critting for 50K's after I get to 85 :p

if you were really glad you wouldnt be here..... :whistle:

Ha touche. Almost. I like to click on this topic when I see it in the spy just to see what's new, or if the post is UI post. I still like those. I had my fun and quit a few months ago. Was fun though, wasn't trolling :)

Awesome news! Still debating on whether to get the Collector's Edition or not. The little Deathwing looks awesome. :laugh:

I hate that those pets are so awsome...I've held back from buying the Blizcon tickets but I don't know if I can hold out against my first WoW collectors edition ^.^

Get ready for the best news ever:

4.01 drops THIS TUESDAY!

This basically means Cataclysm drops on December 7th. :woot:

How does that translate to anything other than "Scheduled Maintenance"? MMO Champion thinks it's unlikely to be tomorrow.

You're all going to ask anyway. The answer is very likely no, they pushed a PTR build over the week-end and I don't see them testing a Release Candidate so quickly. Most likely next week.

World of Warcraft®: Cataclysm in Stores Starting December 7

I'll re-sub in Jan or Feb when:

  • The servers start to become operational again.
  • The bugs, extreme imbalances, etc have been ironed out.
  • The "ZOMG NEW WOW. MUST RE-SUB AND START TROLLING AGAIN!" newb crowd have died out (I can dream, can't I?).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
    • A $300 price hike is insane! No one is going to want to pay that much!
    • Since the 1st one flopped, there is really no reason to make another one. It's just losing money left and right.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!