Recommended Posts

Health bar is provided by DXE a replacement for deadly boss mods, bigwigs, etc.

Mail etc is Stat blocks. Think of it like a replacement for Fubar

but you're allowed to position your little modules anywhere on the screen. The are plugins for things like dungeon finder, mail, calendar, DPS, etc. that

you can add.

Both are available from curse.

Thanks man. Stat Blocks reminds me of Sldatatext and I've been looking for a suitable replacement for that for ages.

Now to find a suitable buff addon to replace Buffalo and why squeenix isn't allowing me to turn off 'Show Clock' (i uncheck it, it still shows) and I'll be set.

I think I'm going to pop back in game for a while and take a gander around. I stopped playing last year when Crusaders hit, I just didn't have the time for the game anymore and I wanted to stop raiding. I killed Yogg-Saron (10-25) and I haven't been back since.. I know it's a between expansions point right now, but is there anything I will really need to note going back in? (downloading 3.x.x to 4.0.0 now)

Haha, I figured that might be the case after I watched last years blizzcon... I'd say no time like the present to learn them again, but I believe tuesdays are still patch days aren't they? So even once this thing finishes installing I wont be playing till tomorrow.

If I do get back in to it I'll have a lot to learn I guess, I have a few 80s to choose from so if they bork up one class too badly I can switch around.

I'll put it this way: my hunter used to be my main in vanilla and TBC. I'm now leveling it to 80 now. I'm at 76. I was having a great time with it until lvl 74 when the new patch dropped. I hate playing him now. They took away a bunch of abilities that made the class interesting. I'm sure some people like the decrease in useable abilities, but I am not one of them. I have yet to play my paly since the patch (it became my main), but I am not looking forward to it.

If it didn't take so damn long to level through northrend I would consider leveling my priest up.

And yes, Tuesdays are still patch/maintenance day. It generally only last a few hours, so you should be able to get playing in.

I managed to get into 3 of my toons in the little time I was able to play, but it seems to take nearly 20 minutes to log into any toon in Northrend at the moment and about 10 for anywhere else. I gather the character recovery isn't speeding that process up, nor is the client downloading.

The moment I got in I saw that a lot had changed... should be interesting.

Chuck up the ideas on youtube gang (I really like that Beiber one.. :laugh:).. I'll add them in the next one .. :D

Someone gave me the idea to do Shatner's "KHAAAAAAAAAAAAN!!" from the wrath of khan. .. which will probably be in the next installment as well.

Been playing the beta pretty much when I get the chance, no problems with it apart from the bugs which is why its a beta but there is 1 thing, ONE THING THAT INFURIATES ME SO MUCH! THE **********ING GUILD REPUTATION CAP! I'm 1 rep point from exalted so I can get the mount but NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO I got to wait till next week to get it. *headdesk. Look at my experience bar ; _ ;

post-280528-12881388038293.jpg

Oh and here is a Worgen dancing on a horse.

post-280528-12881389561245.jpg

How much does the mount cost when You hit exalted and what about the flying one?

No Idea about the flying one as my guild doesnt have "Glory of the Cataclysm Raider" but the lion mount is 1350 gold.

336859256.jpg

Got to Exalted with my guild.

Latest beta build brought Worgen Females In the game, Running Wild Animation and the new login screen.

Holy crap! That mount is full of win. :D I can't wait to get that on my shaman.

No Idea about the flying one as my guild doesnt have "Glory of the Cataclysm Raider" but the lion mount is 1350 gold.

How the hell do you guys reach this much gold, i am trying to save up 6100G for artisan flying, a mount and cold weather flying.

I've just hit 72 so am in Northrend but mining is quite scarce where i'm grinding, i'll be finished before i ever reach that much i've got just over 2000G

How the hell do you guys reach this much gold, i am trying to save up 6100G for artisan flying, a mount and cold weather flying.

I've just hit 72 so am in Northrend but mining is quite scarce where i'm grinding, i'll be finished before i ever reach that much i've got just over 2000G

Crafting / Gathering.

How the hell do you guys reach this much gold, i am trying to save up 6100G for artisan flying, a mount and cold weather flying.

I've just hit 72 so am in Northrend but mining is quite scarce where i'm grinding, i'll be finished before i ever reach that much i've got just over 2000G

Professions. That's about it. I've got about 30k gold spread out amongst all my characters (though 26k of that is on my shaman :p).

How do you guys reach this much gold, i am trying to save up 6100G for artisan flying, a mount and cold weather flying.

25 daily quests with an average of 13G per quest (325G per day) from Dailies not to mention Heroic Dungeons loot, non daily quests. took me about a week to make the 4K gold required for the 310% flying before the 4.0.1 patch hit. and since then i am already back up to around 5K gold.

  • Buy cheap crap on the AH and sell it high. Right now glyphs are still pretty viable: buy up anything with <5 on the market selling for less than 30g and repost it. "good" glyphs (read every classes 'how to play in 4.0 guide') can be resold for 100g+. Don't waste your time farming for herbs or making glyphs unless it is substantially cheaper than just buying finished glyphs and reposting.
  • Selling mounts and titles. An ICC achievements drake will net me around 10k for about 5 hours of work. An Ulduar drake brings down half as much gold but takes about half as long too. Titles (kingslayer typically) will turn up 2k for about 10 minutes of work so I sell those when I can.
  • If I'm just chatting in town I might make up some of the old enchants: mongoose, 30 spellpower, crusader, etc. using materials from the AH. If the difference in mats vs average sell price is > 100g then it's worth the effort.
  • Gem buying/cutting/relisting worked but the profits are way down from where they used to be. I rely on friends to do the cutting for me now so I almost never bother with it these days. It's probably the easiest market to get into because you can farm justice points for your first 10 gems and after that it's entirely self sustaining
  • Selling rare items at a markup. 8 months ago I'd hop in trade chat and try to buy things like Battered hilts or primordial saronite for 6k or 1k respectively from anybody offering, then I'd just take them to the AH and list them for 8k or 1.5k respectively (about 5% under AH price). Profit rolled in pretty fast. Some BOE items (necks, wand, chest from ICC) sold very well but I try to avoid dealing in items I can't use myself.

When I'm actively trying to make gold I'll spend around 30 minutes a day with the auction house and then my normal activities (basically I just raiding) was bringing down about 2k per week from boss drops and stuff I could shard or sell.

Once you've got dual spec, all the heirlooms, and your tier sets for all of your specs there's no cost in the game. I make it a rule to stay above 50k at all times and average around 75-90k on a typical day. Sometimes I'm way up or down from gambling, but over time you'll break even on that. Past 20k there's really no change in 'quality of life' so it's hard to be motivated to earn gold past that point.

I'm not a mount or achievement ###### and the best gear is from raiding so I don't buy anything other than flasks/food/potions (and even those I buy in lots of 100+ so the price is very cheap, ie 10 stacks of fish-feasts for 1k instead of buying them individually for 180g per stack)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
    • A $300 price hike is insane! No one is going to want to pay that much!
    • Since the 1st one flopped, there is really no reason to make another one. It's just losing money left and right.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!