Recommended Posts

Well, our guild rolled through Uld last night for a drake run. We decided to down Algalon too since many people had not seen him. Sadly, the achievement for the drake where you have to kill both arms bugged out and we did not get it. So we will have to go back in next week, but at least i got the Starcaller title for my shaman!

Mages hands have had that since Vengeful Gladiator back in BC.

Hit cap's are the same as LK (percentage wise). You still need 5% (i believe that's right for PvP).

blink cd time reduction was a set bonus in bc, gloves gave improved fireblast.i just vendored my bc gear like 3 weeks ago.

any idea how many points in hit i need? i didn't play much at all in wotlk so...

blink cd time reduction was a set bonus in bc, gloves gave improved fireblast.i just vendored my bc gear like 3 weeks ago.

At one time it decreased the chance of Poly being interrupted. It used to give a increased range on fireblast, then they changed it to polymorph and presumably it was changed to this Blink part.

http://www.wowhead.com/spell=44301

It's how I figured out which pieces have had it.

At level 85 you will need 102.45 hit rating for each 1%.

oh i c. they must've changed it during tbc. i only played during the first year of tbc or so.

so i need roughly 500 point in hit to get near 100% hit chance? or ummm well iirc my miss chance against 85(mobs?) is ~2% so maybe just ~200 points?

anyways what i'm more interested in what to stack through reforging, crit or haste. i'm thinking mastery isn't as useful as either of the other two.

oh and about the gcd reduction on blink would that be useful for something like refreshing ice barrier after blinking out of cc when it's likely been broken or if not turning ~45 degrees and strafing into instants spam?

Just received the following email from blizzard, It did not ask for any passwords or anything (and I did not click the linik) So i replied hoping it was real.

Congratulations!

You have been randomly chosen as a winner for the Blizzard CS Twitter? Authenticator Sweepstakes. In order to claim your prize, please respond to this email within two weeks containing the following information:

Twitter Account Name:

Battle.net Account Name:

Verify that your address on your Battle.net is up to date and accurate by responding with CONFIRMED below:

If you need to modify your shipping address, please visit the official us.battle.net website under account details.

Once all information had been verified, a Blizzard Authenticator will be shipped to your registered Battle.net shipping address.

If you have any questions in regards to claiming the prize, please send an email to **************************** with subject, ?Authenticator Sweepstakes Question.?

Blizzard CS Twitter Team

did it have your original wow account name anywhere in the email? if not it's probably fake. although it does seem different than your usual phsihing spam if it has no links or not asking for a pwd.

do you have twitter and following blizzard or wow?

Yes I have a twitter account, yes i am following blizzardcs (their official customer support twitter) and Yes I entered the contest via twitter last week. It seams rather legit and as stated I did NOT click the link on the page just in case however, they did not ask for a pwd so i did as asked to see if it was real :D I will post again with pics if i receive it also if i get hacked I will let you know as well. However, I already use an authenticator (Android one) just wanted a physical one :D

Yes I have a twitter account, yes i am following blizzardcs (their official customer support twitter) and Yes I entered the contest via twitter last week. It seams rather legit and as stated I did NOT click the link on the page just in case however, they did not ask for a pwd so i did as asked to see if it was real :D I will post again with pics if i receive it also if i get hacked I will let you know as well. However, I already use an authenticator (Android one) just wanted a physical one :D

sounds less and less like phishing spam scams but nonetheless keep us updated. chances are if thi sis your bnet account email they already have the information requested if they are sending you spam and that's what this is, so it seems unlikely that it is phishing spam.

all that aside, if you did win an authenticator, gratz man! thinking of getting one myself. if they're giving them away that must mean they have them in stock(been hearing from probably bad sources they're always out of stock)

sounds less and less like phishing spam scams but nonetheless keep us updated. chances are if thi sis your bnet account email they already have the information requested if they are sending you spam and that's what this is, so it seems unlikely that it is phishing spam.

all that aside, if you did win an authenticator, gratz man! thinking of getting one myself. if they're giving them away that must mean they have them in stock(been hearing from probably bad sources they're always out of stock)

I have only once seen them out of stock however, since Cata was released they have been back ordered however they are still shipping them out rather quickly and for only $6.50 and no shipping to protect your account they are worth it.

And if you have an Android or iOS device you can download the authenticator app for FREE

Not to mention you get the Corehound pup for having one on your account :D

I have only once seen them out of stock however, since Cata was released they have been back ordered however they are still shipping them out rather quickly and for only $6.50 and no shipping to protect your account they are worth it.

And if you have an Android or iOS device you can download the authenticator app for FREE

Not to mention you get the Corehound pup for having one on your account :D

eyah i don't have a smart phone and all and if i did get one it would be a black berry. care less about hte free pet and more about security, since i've been hacked once already.

Been playing wow for 2 years. love it!

gratz on teh whale shark.

how do you get the camel? i go the achievement for ~105(?) quests in uldum. never saw the option to get a camel.

gratz on teh whale shark.

how do you get the camel? i go the achievement for ~105(?) quests in uldum. never saw the option to get a camel.

TY, must have exalt rep with Ramkahen to be able to buy two different camels from QM for 60g ea. Theres also rare npc that drops a camel mount, you may look for /target Mysterious Camel Figurine.

.

Been playing wow for 2 years. love it!

grats on the mount. I've been playing for about 2 years as well. After playing cata i lost all interest and sold my account for $550. I thought i would miss playing but i havent even thought about it. I guess cata just killed my want to play it ever again.

So we've got some incoming class changes

Some clearly aren't a surprise (feral druids in PVP are very strong, Hunters are ridiculous in PVP, dual-wield unholy DKs are over the top).

For my class:

  • Shadow priest AOE has been horrible since the start of expansion for exactly the reason they said: Mind Sear is garbage. Right now I'm undecided on whether or not it's worth casting at all, even on fights.
  • I disagree that shadow priest single target has the issues they say. The problem is not that it's "low": on the majority of (raid) fights I'm only tailing the hunters, the real issue is ramp up time. I need a good 10 seconds: dot, dot dot, mind flay mind flay, mind blast, archangel: Now I'm ready to start. For trash that lives 30 seconds you blow half the fight just getting started.

We assembled a raid last night now that everyone's back from Christmas obligations. Had some really good attempts on Cho'gal but an under-performing ret paladin who isn't a regular member of our group held us back (my opinion, he'd disagree). Given our progress so far I think there's a pretty good chance we'll be getting mounts and titles this lock-out.

I'm uploading our Chimaeron kill. We lucked out and had a regular healer come home earlier than expected. That let me go DPS (with healing during the stacked AOE) and got us through to a kill. It's a pretty boring fight to watch, pretty intense to heal, and it forces you to be on top of your "don't die now" buttons as a DPS. Overall it's a pretty solid encounter: the first 80% is fun and not the sort of thing you can rely on healers to fix all the time, the last 20% should continue to be fun for a few weeks. The boss enrages, becomes immune to taunt, all healing stops working (he hits for 300k on tanks) and he just works his way down the threat list eating your tanks, top DPS, Lower DPS, and eventually finds his way to the healers. You have to kill him before he eats everyone in your raid.

thanks for hte link evn. i liked the love for mages early in the article, but noticed a distinct lack of mage talk for the rest of it. i find it interesting in teh context of after 4.03a was released before cata everyone was saying how OP we were and how we needed to get nerfed. now it turns out that we're still kinda gimpy at endgame. but at least we're getting some attention in the right direction instead of either getting nerfed or totally ignored.

i've been noticing alot of what it talks about otherwise in regards to other classes in pvp in the last week or so. nothing i really disagree with at all.

druids are a huge pita to pvp against, as they are completely un cc able. i think it's absolutely insane that a class that can switch between dps tanking and healing itself within seconds can also anti cc everything. making fear stronger against them only helps teams with locks or preists on them, and locks are already strong with fear in pvp compared to other cc. i think if they're going to get so much anti cc other classe's anti cc should be buffed somewhat, for example letting blink escape more cc's.

most hunters i've seen in pvp have been easy to roll over quickly and without getting hurt much. idk if it's the players the class or their gear(keeping in mind i'm not even in the full crafted pvp mage set- and this tarted before i geared up) but i did get totally owned by a hunter one on one the other night in a bg, with nothing i could do.

locks seem to be able to fear and dot spam in pvp, and unlike my cc's their fear takes huge amounts of damage before breaking. they also seem to get some ice lance spammable instant now i've been seeing some use, which is just totally lame considering how much more powerful their pets are than ours in any of their specs.

warriors are really strong in pvp right now and are incredibly hard to kite or stay out of their stuns.

dk's wise i've seen good ones and bad ones, but they are innately strong in pvp with their ranged pull thing and a mix of ranged and melee dps skills. some of them seem to be able to do outrageous burst that i could only dream of, and considering how early it is in the expansion in terms of gear. while others seem to be played just terribly and are easy to kite around without taking too much damage.

it's hard to say about preists because i haven't fought many, but my bro plays one and we seem to do alright in pvp together. he seems to be doing well in 5mans in terms of dps overall, and beat my arcane spec(with quest gear) in average dps throughout the dungeon.

i'm glad they addressed the thing about people getting into heroics with min i level and finding it to be a bit too hard. i've mentioned this a few times when it comes up elsewhere and blizz seems to back me up on it.

i sold my 5 year old account as well.. just felt cataclysm destroyed what was familiar to me already and i didn't feel like re-doing anything anymore.. TBC is where my heart was :)

Off to play lord of the rings online.. at least only playing 2-4 hours a week doesn't make me feel guilty since it is 14.95/month

YAY for arcane damage going to be buffed again!!! haha on the frostnova/ring of frost nerf, that worries me, because we use it as a oh crap move in instances all the time. I don't pvp so can't give you that side of things, but for PVE both are used A LOT. I honestly would have rather seen them nerf the amount of time a target is sheeped, then nerfing the time frostnova/ring of frost lasts.

YAY for arcane damage going to be buffed again!!! haha on the frostnova/ring of frost nerf, that worries me, because we use it as a oh crap move in instances all the time. I don't pvp so can't give you that side of things, but for PVE both are used A LOT. I honestly would have rather seen them nerf the amount of time a target is sheeped, then nerfing the time frostnova/ring of frost lasts.

honestly frozen state from these spells is so ****ing quick and break on damage almost instantly. i don't know why they would nerf them. especially compared ot other classe's cc.

unless i'm solo pvping if someone is dpsing my target the frozen state is broken before the gcd from w/e spell froze the target is up and i can icelance them just once. for icelance usage i pretty much have to rely on fof in 2 man arenas alone. that's after speccing into the talent that allows frozen targets to take more damage befor ebreaking. it's pretty much useless at 85.

where as a lock can fear me and put all his dots on me and spam that instant thing and it last longer than my polymorph in pvp. and seems to cast faster too. never mind lock version of counterspell or his pet that stuns or other ****.

other classes seemm to get tonnes of stuns now which are way strong than my frostbolt snares and even my spells that freeze players, since they can still do ranged attacks from it, and almost everything escapes from it. and our only stun is our iltimate frost tree talent and the target has to be frozen first unlike other class's stuns that are a component of damaging attacks.

edit: thinking about it really kind of annoys me. while mages ahve gotten some much needed love in cata compared to previous years, we're still on teh gimpy end of hte class balance scale, and really do not need any nerfs when compared to other classes which have much stronger cc's and burst that's far more consistent and easier to use.

while the number of buttons we need to have has been cut down, we still are utilizing more than 20 buttons to be effective in pvp. and our pet is relatively gimp.

sure i once in while get a 12-16k cirt on icelance, but it so inconsistent really, more often i get normal 6k hits on fof or frozen targets. and even 16k crits are relatively small in terms of players with 100k+ hp.

our bubbles are also relatively weak compared to other classes who have bubbles in addition to high armour and great sustained and burst dps combined with stuns.

anytime a player targets me i am pretty much reduced to instant spells as i try to out position and outrun them. my bubble almost always breaks instantly and even with the frozen effect on ice barrier breaking i still have a hard time putting distance between myself and any melee player.

and as frost any class that can heal can outheal my sustained dps even with good crit rate and good use of improved cs in their dps specs. and god forbid they have any instant heals they can use on the go, in which case they can easily get out of my hardcast time nukes range while healing themselves or los me or reduce me to chasing them with ice lance spam without fof procs.

it seems my initial feeling that blizz no longer hates mages is somewhat wrong. we may not be hte red headed ****** child among wow classes but we're still on the low end of the gimp list.

So, I've begun playing again a bit more seriously. Been trying to do dungeons, but with a low player base I find I wait and wait (as a healer). I've done a couple with a good group and I made out fine healing, 1-2 deaths per run (not bad if I say so myself), however.. there seems to be a large number of players that don't care about CC, and don't understand why they are dieing. They don't grasp that my heals heal for 6-15k (if I smite to get Evangelism up It heals 6-7k, same with normal heal, Pennance gives me 3 (3-5k) heals), and in the time it takes me to get those heals off they have taken double that in damage.

If I am lucky I can keep everyone alive in the non CC'd pulls using barrier and my group heals, but that drains my mana and they get upset when we gotta sit and let me mana up due to their inability to play WoW.

So, I've begun playing again a bit more seriously. Been trying to do dungeons, but with a low player base I find I wait and wait (as a healer). I've done a couple with a good group and I made out fine healing, 1-2 deaths per run (not bad if I say so myself), however.. there seems to be a large number of players that don't care about CC, and don't understand why they are dieing. They don't grasp that my heals heal for 6-15k (if I smite to get Evangelism up It heals 6-7k, same with normal heal, Pennance gives me 3 (3-5k) heals), and in the time it takes me to get those heals off they have taken double that in damage.

If I am lucky I can keep everyone alive in the non CC'd pulls using barrier and my group heals, but that drains my mana and they get upset when we gotta sit and let me mana up due to their inability to play WoW.

Honestly thats my biggest complaint, is heals haven't really scaled at all with the HUGE health pools now. I mean I know its a tough balancing act between, do we make it so healers do nothing again but hots or do we make it so they are spam heals the entire instance, but I think it can be better than what it is.

Honestly thats my biggest complaint, is heals haven't really scaled at all with the HUGE health pools now. I mean I know its a tough balancing act between, do we make it so healers do nothing again but hots or do we make it so they are spam heals the entire instance, but I think it can be better than what it is.

Yea, it's like the health has jumped to double. But my heals increased by 10 - 20% not the 100% that health did. I mean, it's kinda strange to sit there and cast smite to heal players.. don't really get that whole DPS to Heal Better thing. I wish it was something like the holy tree where if ya cast heal 5x you get the speed and mana bonus.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Motrix Next 3.9.6 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.6 changelog: New Features Clipboard management — App-owned copy actions no longer trigger the Add Task auto-detect popup. aria2 input compatibility — Multi-line aria2-style task input is supported for URLs with per-task options such as out=. BitTorrent IPv6 DHT — Added IPv6 DHT support and related configuration. File category URL patterns — File category rules can match URL patterns with validation and localized hints. Task status tags — Added clearer waiting and sharing states for task cards. Download event bridge — Added an aria2 WebSocket event bridge for faster download notifications. Improvements Improved task list transitions and preserved task state during tab switches. Kept RPC origin access enabled for local integrations. Restored AppImage stripping in release builds after beta validation. Added localized preference guidance across supported languages. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Segra 1.6.2 by Razvan Serea Segra is a free, open-source OBS-powered game recorder offering fast gameplay capture, instant clips, AI highlights, deep game integration, and seamless uploads—perfect for gamers, streamers, and content creators. Lightweight, fast, zero bloat. Segra key features: Automatic Game Recording: Begin capturing gameplay the moment your game launches, with zero manual setup. Instant Clipping: Save important moments instantly using a customizable hotkey—perfect for highlights, montages, or quick shares. Segra AI Highlights: Let Segra automatically detect kills, assists, deaths, and key events to generate polished highlight reels without manual editing. Gameplay Uploads: Upload recordings and clips directly to Segra.tv for fast sharing and cloud access. Deep Game Integration: Enjoy advanced game-data tracking across hundreds of supported titles, enabling smart highlight generation and stat-informed clipping. High-Performance Capture: Record up to 4K at 144 FPS using OBS-powered technology with minimal performance impact, supporting NVENC, AMD VCE, and custom quality controls. Segra Editor: Edit recordings easily with timeline controls, segment management, and event-based navigation to build the perfect clip. Customization Options: Adjust hotkeys, output formats, storage paths, codecs, capture quality, and performance settings for a tailored recording experience. Segra 1.6.2 changelog: UI: Improved the transition from the loading skeleton to the real content card. Security: Added Segra.dll code signing and automatic VirusTotal upload. Settings: Fixed the settings header to highlight Account when scrolled to the top. Recording: Updated OBSKit.NET to 1.4.1. Download: Segra 1.6.2 | 74.5 MB (Open Source) View: Segra Homepage | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hey Google, these are the Gemini features I want in 2026 by Aditya Tiwari Google Gemini has been around for over three years. The AI chatbot started its journey back in 2023 (as Bard) when ChatGPT was already a talk of the town. However, it quickly attracted criticism after misrepresenting facts about the James Webb Space Telescope. The search giant spent a year fine-tuning Bard before rebranding the chatbot and its underlying generative AI model to Gemini, drawing inspiration from NASA's first human spaceflight program. Note that Bard was initially powered by LaMDA and PaLM 2; Google has since added several new features and integrations to Gemini. That said, there is scope for improvement and a gap for new features. I have been using Gemini for a while now and have realized that the chatbot lacks several features, making it harder for me to research across topics. These are mostly function-over-form updates that can improve the overall experience. Delete individual messages from a conversation Image via DepositPhotos.com One good thing about Gemini is that it can maintain context throughout the conversation. But things might get chaotic when you want to ask a related question, but don't want it to be part of your conversation in the long run. You can't ask that related question in a fresh chat because Gemini will lose the active conversation context of what you're trying to research. If Google allowed you to delete individual question/answer pairs, you could simply ask about a sub-topic and remove it from the conversation to create a smooth flow of important stuff. Offline mode Image via DepositPhotos.com A big pain of using Gemini daily is that everything loads from the cloud. It takes time for your chats to appear, and you can't view your conversation history while offline. To get a better idea, you can open the Gemini app and see how it looks without an internet connection. While Gemini models run in the cloud, it wouldn't hurt if Google could store chats (at least the text part) on the device so we can refer to them when offline. Google can also offer a lightweight version of its AI model to help with basic drafting, summarization, and other tasks. It has the Gemini Nano model, which can perform on-device processing on Google Pixel, Samsung, and some other Android brands, but it's a system feature and not related to the cloud-based Gemini app. Make temporary chats permanent I can't thank Google enough for taking the time and effort to add incognito mode or temporary chat mode to the Gemini app. It lets you have conversations without worrying that the topics will end up in your chat history or used for model training (at least on paper). Google claims that it doesn't use your temporary chats to "personalize your Gemini experience or train Google’s AI models." However, the data is stored "up to 72 hours to respond to you and to process any feedback you choose to provide." That said, I often start researching something in a temporary chat, only to realize the chatbot's answer is good enough to refer to later. Sadly, Gemini doesn't have an option to make such temporary chats permanent. In other words, I won't be able to follow up on it if I close the temporary chat. I'm left with alternatives like copying the answers into notes or another app. My digital life will get a lot better if Gemini gets a button to make temporary chats permanent. Collapse answers for a cleaner view You're heavily invested in your research game and suddenly feel the need to go up in the chat to recall something. This is when the conversation thread starts to feel like an overwhelming, unending wall of questions and answers. What if Google added a way to collapse Q&A pairs in the Gemini chat thread? It would look quite clean and easy to navigate. You'll quickly get an overview of everything you have discussed with the chatbot. Add buttons to jump between messages Suggested mockup of the feature. This reminds me of a small but useful Gemini feature that Google could add to its chatbot: the ability to hop between prompts in a conversation. Just add simple up- and down-arrow buttons, similar to YouTube Shorts, so people can quickly scroll through the messages. A table of contents or Chat Overview It's hard to get a bird's-eye view of everything you have discussed with the chatbot during a lengthy conversation. This is where a table of contents, or Chat Overview, displayed at the top of the screen, possibly in a drop-down button, might come in handy. You'll be able to get an overview of the chat and jump between messages, serving as an alternative to the up/down arrow buttons. Temporary mode for Gemini Live Image: Google You can use Gemini Live to have real-time conversations with the chatbot, which feels like you're talking to someone in the same room. However, a downside is that Gemini Live doesn't work in Temporary Chat mode, so all your conversations end up in the chat history. Google should consider expanding the temporary chat mode to include Gemini Live. Default to a specific chat One thing that feels somewhat annoying to me is that Gemini always opens in a new chat, whether on web or mobile. Sometimes, you want to return to your last chat. Google can take cues from web browsers, which let you choose whether you want to go to a new tab or a specific web page(s). Gemini can also have options to default to a specific chat when reopened. That said, generative AI chatbots have endless possibilities given the vagueness of their work. You can mold them the way you want by attaching different connectors, adding custom instructions, and including source files. It remains to be seen what Google has in store for future updates and whether anything from this wishlist gets the green light. The search giant released a stream of new Gemini updates in recent months, including Gemini 3.5 Flash and Gemini Omni Spark, adding that it now has 13 products with more than a billion users each. What do you want to see in the Gemini app? Tell us in the comments.
    • Thank you for the post. Just a FYI that links to an outside site or promoting specific software is considered spamming here. Asking general questions is fine.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      507
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      181
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      86
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!