Recommended Posts

i find it interesting in teh context of after 4.03a was released before cata everyone was saying how OP we were and how we needed to get nerfed

They were overpowered then, things have changed.

now it turns out that we're still kinda gimpy at endgame. b

Two out of three specs are viable in PVE, and they're arguably one of the strongest classes in PVP which is why they're getting nerfed.

If you're having trouble right now it's probably got more to do with your lack of experience than the class. Almost everyone is in 'crap'

gear right now - unless you're playing arena (or rated BGs) at >2k it's not going to be a gear issue that's holding you back.

2 pages ago you were talking about dominating people with icelance spam, the game was supposed to be more complex than that. PVP is supposed

to last > 30 seconds, and you're supposed to have to work your ass off to keep melee at a distance.

can't give you that side of things, but for PVE both are used A LOT.

It trivializes a chogal and makes magmaw/maloriak much easier but you can get similar levels of CC from a hunter or frost DK. You can certainly do those encounters without strong mutli-mob snares but they're much harder than they need to be. It sounds like these are intended to be PVP nerfs so it'll be interesting to see how they shape up for PVE.

Honestly thats my biggest complaint, is heals haven't really scaled at all with the HUGE health pools now. I mean I know its a tough balancing act between, do we make it so healers do nothing again but hots or do we make it so they are spam heals the entire instance, but I think it can be better than what it is.

They didn't need to because nobody gets one-shot unless they're retarded any more. Once you get used the idea that people have to end fights above 1 HP but not at full health healing becomes almost trivial again (having heroic blues helps too). All of the mechanics that will kill you at less than full health are avoidable, DPS has plenty of self healing (OH NO! My damage meters!) to help with the incidental damage, and tanks have enough cooldowns to survive a good while when "oh crap" happens. For the first time in years players are starting to learn that mobs have mechanics - it's taking time to adjust.

If anything I think healing is still too easy because once you're out of greens the new dungeons go back to being chain pulled without CC. His mana issues would vanish if people learned to play: they're refusing so it's making the whole experience miserable.

Yea, it's like the health has jumped to double. But my heals increased by 10 - 20% not the 100% that health did. I mean, it's kinda strange to sit there and cast smite to heal players.. don't really get that whole DPS to Heal Better thing. I wish it was something like the holy tree where if ya cast heal 5x you get the speed and mana bonus.

You can always just not spec evangelism: going for more direct healing buffs works just fine. You lose your AOE heal but that's only really hitting your tank + melee anwyay. You've still got POH/POM/Nova/Renew which are viable.

They didn't need to because nobody gets one-shot unless they're retarded any more. Once you get used the idea that people have to end fights above 1 HP but not at full health healing becomes almost trivial again (having heroic blues helps too). All of the mechanics that will kill you at less than full health are avoidable, DPS has plenty of self healing (OH NO! My damage meters!) to help with the incidental damage, and tanks have enough cooldowns to survive a good while when "oh crap" happens. For the first time in years players are starting to learn that mobs have mechanics - it's taking time to adjust.

If anything I think healing is still too easy because once you're out of greens the new dungeons go back to being chain pulled without CC. His mana issues would vanish if people learned to play: they're refusing so it's making the whole experience miserable.

You can always just not spec evangelism: going for more direct healing buffs works just fine. You lose your AOE heal but that's only really hitting your tank + melee anwyay. You've still got POH/POM/Nova/Renew which are viable.

Renew actually uses 5% of my mana, which is quite a bit. I always keep a POM up, and I do POM when things get rough (that was the AOE heal I was talking about). And yea, I can manage but the problem is with the tanks being retarded if I don't spam heal them, they will die. Especially as they are rocking greens.

Renew actually uses 5% of my mana, which is quite a bit. I always keep a POM up, and I do POM when things get rough (that was the AOE heal I was talking about). And yea, I can manage but the problem is with the tanks being retarded if I don't spam heal them, they will die. Especially as they are rocking greens.

You're not in full epic gear so "end-game" content shouldn't be trivial in the best of situations.

If you can struggle through even when people are being idiots then that sounds like everything is fine.

You're not supposed to be able to carry idiots through a dungeon: it's nice having that burden lifted.

They were overpowered then, things have changed.

Two out of three specs are viable in PVE, and they're arguably one of the strongest classes in PVP which is why they're getting nerfed.

If you're having trouble right now it's probably got more to do with your lack of experience than the class. Almost everyone is in 'crap'

gear right now - unless you're playing arena (or rated BGs) at >2k it's not going to be a gear issue that's holding you back.

2 pages ago you were talking about dominating people with icelance spam, the game was supposed to be more complex than that. PVP is supposed

to last > 30 seconds, and you're supposed to have to work your ass off to keep melee at a distance.

ice lance spam was at 82 with a shadow priest against unorganized players in world pvp.

tell frost mages they're op when their ice barriers break instantly when they get targetted in bg's or arenas and frost nova often breaks before the mage has a chance to turn around and shot a single ice lance when specced or glyphed or w/e it is into frost nova. never mind when we use these spells to get some distance on melee who out burst us easily while stunning the **** out of us.

they're talking about them being lowered in the duration they last when they're like hte shortest cc any class has already.

look at how long lock's fear lasts without breaking from damage for example.

http://us.battle.net/wow/en/forum/topic/1648731654?page=4

pali's and druids qqing about our freeze effects, as if they aren't the two most annoying classes to fight as a mage besides warriors.

We assembled a raid last night now that everyone's back from Christmas obligations. Had some really good attempts on Cho'gal but an under-performing ret paladin who isn't a regular member of our group held us back (my opinion, he'd disagree). Given our progress so far I think there's a pretty good chance we'll be getting mounts and titles this lock-out.

Nice man. What about 3 weeks till exalted with guild and you can fly?

tell frost mages they're op when their ice barriers break instantly when they get targetted in bg's or arenas and frost nova often breaks before the mage has a chance to turn around and shot a single ice lance when specced or glyphed or w/e it is into frost nova. never mind when we use these spells to get some distance on melee who out burst us easily while stunning the **** out of us.

I checked with a couple of friends dan and mark. They've got alts in my priest's guild and PVP alliance side.

"mages are fine" - details will have to wait until we're all done with our raids tonight.

they're talking about them being lowered in the duration they last when they're like hte shortest cc any class has already.

So warlocks have a 'forever' cooldown on deathcoil, and a cast fear (learn to counterspell IMO, and you can out range it) and that's over powered.

Mages have roots that can applied at range, that can be applied in melee, a stunn that can be applied at range, a "put the fight on pause" CC, and

an automatic root that happens when you get hit too much by melee. None of those with cast time.

Then there's rogue CCs which on average last 2 seconds less than frost nova, intercept stun, etc. etc. etc.

It's hard to take you seriously when your post is so "Sky is falling" and the best evidence you can offer to support your claims is random bitching on the wow general forums (which arent' exactly known for the quality of their content).

look at how long lock's fear lasts without breaking from damage for example.

12 seconds, on DR.

How long do frost nova, freeze, polymorph and deep freeze last when you do 0 damage?

I bet the numbers are similar to sap and kidney shot.

Or seduce and deathcoil

or repentence and hand of justice

or...do you see a pattern?

Nice man. What about 3 weeks till exalted with guild and you can fly?

Give or take, I'll hit revered next week.

Few weeks into Cata and the main problem I am seeing is ignorance, mainly due to wotlk. Players who thought they were great in wotlk think they still are great now but even the simplest of encounter mechanics can send them packing. Players who have brought the wotlk mentality into cata need to be weeded out and separated from the players who actually spend time to gear sensibly, to look into encounters, to actually listen to other. I was always under the impression blizzard had some sort of matchmaking system for Random Dungeons but this does not seem to be the case.

Some problems that I am seeing are DPS wearing healing gear to DPS (doing less dps than tanks both single and aoe damage), the same is going for tanks, they think they can get away with tanking 85 Heroics in DPS gear and finally DPS wearing Tanking gear, now I am not talking about 1-2 items I am talking about the full sha'bang set!

I have asked a few times why they queue for heroics when clearly they are not prepared and want to be carried, I have never been given a straight answer. I do not get how most people can tolerate random dungeons, some of the scum that is present in them disgusts me.

Few weeks into Cata and the main problem I am seeing is ignorance, mainly due to wotlk. Players who thought they were great in wotlk think they still are great now but even the simplest of encounter mechanics can send them packing. Players who have brought the wotlk mentality into cata need to be weeded out and separated from the players who actually spend time to gear sensibly, to look into encounters, to actually listen to other. I was always under the impression blizzard had some sort of matchmaking system for Random Dungeons but this does not seem to be the case.

Some problems that I am seeing are DPS wearing healing gear to DPS (doing less dps than tanks both single and aoe damage), the same is going for tanks, they think they can get away with tanking 85 Heroics in DPS gear and finally DPS wearing Tanking gear, now I am not talking about 1-2 items I am talking about the full sha'bang set!

I have asked a few times why they queue for heroics when clearly they are not prepared and want to be carried, I have never been given a straight answer. I do not get how most people can tolerate random dungeons, some of the scum that is present in them disgusts me.

+1. It really is making me give up hope.

So I finally tried healing tonight on my Shaman. It was not fun... Not in the slightest.

I was expecting a challenge -- which I have no problem with -- but instead all I got was having to worry about my mana the whole time, seeing heals do practically nothing and/or be negated due to damage less than a second after they were cast, and having DPS die because I didn't have the mana to spare to save them.

It's not fun. It's just stressful. And I'm not a bad player; I tend to do very well despite what role I'm in.

I hope they fix healing. I don't mean Wrath level where I could basically do whatever I wanted the whole time (that was boring; I don't want that again). But perhaps make heals cost a little less or do a little more so I don't have to worry about running out in trash pulls. I actually found boss fights easier than trash. It just didn't make sense to me.

I checked with a couple of friends dan and mark. They've got alts in my priest's guild and PVP alliance side.

"mages are fine" - details will have to wait until we're all done with our raids tonight.

So warlocks have a 'forever' cooldown on deathcoil, and a cast fear (learn to counterspell IMO, and you can out range it) and that's over powered.

Mages have roots that can applied at range, that can be applied in melee, a stunn that can be applied at range, a "put the fight on pause" CC, and

an automatic root that happens when you get hit too much by melee. None of those with cast time.

Then there's rogue CCs which on average last 2 seconds less than frost nova, intercept stun, etc. etc. etc.

It's hard to take you seriously when your post is so "Sky is falling" and the best evidence you can offer to support your claims is random bitching on the wow general forums (which arent' exactly known for the quality of their content).

12 seconds, on DR.

How long do frost nova, freeze, polymorph and deep freeze last when you do 0 damage?

I bet the numbers are similar to sap and kidney shot.

Or seduce and deathcoil

or repentence and hand of justice

or...do you see a pattern?

Give or take, I'll hit revered next week.

i didn't say they were gimp now, but we're not OP either. i just don't think the duration of our already breakable with a gentle breeze frozen effect should be reduced. sure it happens often, but it's also an easy cc for almost any class(well pretty much every class) to get out of.

and speaking of fear vs polymorph, polymorph lasts less than half it's pve time in pvp, where as fear lasts a long time. not says polymorph isn't worth casting, but it's something you're going to use as more of a opportunity to spike someone down while it's up in 5 seconds then something to take someone out of the fight or control while you dps them, like fear can be used.

what is DR exactly? nvm lolz

speaking of taking seriously being hard to do, hard to take people here seriously when i ask for advice on how to play frost mage in pvp and people tell me to spam anything let alone hard cast time nukes, but at least i took it into consideration modified my play into something more similar to what i did in tbc anyway even if the way frost mage has changed quite a bit since then(no more fb shatter combos for example)

frozen state is easy for any class to get out of with a pvp trinket. it's also an integrated part in a frost mage doing decent/good damage.nerfing it means buffing mages in some other way even slightly to make up for it.

PS it's hard to cs a warlock casting fear when it's on cd.

So I finally tried healing tonight on my Shaman. It was not fun... Not in the slightest.

I was expecting a challenge -- which I have no problem with -- but instead all I got was having to worry about my mana the whole time, seeing heals do practically nothing and/or be negated due to damage less than a second after they were cast, and having DPS die because I didn't have the mana to spare to save them.

It's not fun. It's just stressful. And I'm not a bad player; I tend to do very well despite what role I'm in.

I hope they fix healing. I don't mean Wrath level where I could basically do whatever I wanted the whole time (that was boring; I don't want that again). But perhaps make heals cost a little less or do a little more so I don't have to worry about running out in trash pulls. I actually found boss fights easier than trash. It just didn't make sense to me.

It's strange how healing works now, and it's unfortunately very gear dependant as opposed to skill dependant. Yes, it requires skill in knowing who to heal and when, the problem is with green, or quest blue items, you could be an amazing healer and mana will still be an issue. I find that as a healer you tend to rely on your group to do the right thing as opposed to you being there as a carry through. If the tank, or dps lack in any way it's a sure fire way to kill all your mana, and you are SOL. I always felt as a healer if DPS died that I be able to heal the tank through whatever encounter we are in. However now, if a DPS dies my mana just flies out a lot faster as the mobs are alive for longer.

Im not a bad healer/player either I manage, albeit im doing non-heroics, I've not caused any wipes, and I've held my own but at the same time, I spend less time learning fights, and learning what I should be doing, instead I sit there watching my mana, and healbot which to some extent takes the fun out of the game.

Wrath was way to easy for healing, I could chat on msn while doing heroics, or be texting. But hell if i fart during a cata dungeon I risk a wipe (no pun intended). I don't care if our heals get boosted, my preference is that the mana use be dropped on spells like flash heal or renew as FH was a quick, strong heal now it's just a waste of mana. Same as renew, it uses 5% of my 75k mana pool.

Few weeks into Cata and the main problem I am seeing is ignorance, mainly due to wotlk. Players who thought they were great in wotlk think they still are great now but even the simplest of encounter mechanics can send them packing. Players who have brought the wotlk mentality into cata need to be weeded out and separated from the players who actually spend time to gear sensibly, to look into encounters, to actually listen to other. I was always under the impression blizzard had some sort of matchmaking system for Random Dungeons but this does not seem to be the case.

Some problems that I am seeing are DPS wearing healing gear to DPS (doing less dps than tanks both single and aoe damage), the same is going for tanks, they think they can get away with tanking 85 Heroics in DPS gear and finally DPS wearing Tanking gear, now I am not talking about 1-2 items I am talking about the full sha'bang set!

I have asked a few times why they queue for heroics when clearly they are not prepared and want to be carried, I have never been given a straight answer. I do not get how most people can tolerate random dungeons, some of the scum that is present in them disgusts me.

Reason why I quickly decided to stop queing unless I have at least two guildies. With me tanking and either two dps or 1 heal and 1 dps we can nearly carry anybody already. Once you get geared, it's not bad, but it's going to be a long time before I que w/o guildies. Just not worth the headache at all. Nobody likes the pally healer who didn't know he could cleanse. :(

@Giga - I don't play a healer so can't comment on much, but the healers in guild once they got some gear we can go nearly non-stop in any instance using light CC. W/o CC'ing and just AoE tanking, having to drink roughly every 3-5 pulls. This is them in 346 heroics and some 359. I do know when the healers were gearing up it was extremely important for DPS not to stand in "fire", for people to properly react and plan accordingly to boss abilities. While you may not have gear to chain pull non-stop, it won't help if DPS/tank are standing in "fire" or not moving out of the way from abilities.

Few weeks into Cata and the main problem I am seeing is ignorance, mainly due to wotlk. Players who thought they were great in wotlk think they still are great now but even the simplest of encounter mechanics can send them packing. Players who have brought the wotlk mentality into cata need to be weeded out and separated from the players who actually spend time to gear sensibly, to look into encounters, to actually listen to other. I was always under the impression blizzard had some sort of matchmaking system for Random Dungeons but this does not seem to be the case.

Some problems that I am seeing are DPS wearing healing gear to DPS (doing less dps than tanks both single and aoe damage), the same is going for tanks, they think they can get away with tanking 85 Heroics in DPS gear and finally DPS wearing Tanking gear, now I am not talking about 1-2 items I am talking about the full sha'bang set!

I have asked a few times why they queue for heroics when clearly they are not prepared and want to be carried, I have never been given a straight answer. I do not get how most people can tolerate random dungeons, some of the scum that is present in them disgusts me.

You know on some of that I blame blizzard. We had an open spot last night come up for a (H)Deadmines last night and we decided to take the first person in guild to say they had the minimal gearscore to go. When he got in the instance and I looked at his gear, I noticed he was wearing some greens that were just horrible.. I mean he is a lock wearing greens that had a ton of spirit or like his robe, had nothing but int/stam, when I asked him about it, he said he was just trying to get the gear score to do heroics. His dps sucked, his hp sucked, and overall there was NO way he was ready. I showed him all the great quest rewards, not counting rep rewards that were so much better then what he was wearing and he is now focused on getting those,, but my point is:

I blame blizzard with the gearscore deal, because most people I see coming in to a random queue are just wearing crap gear just to get the ilvl requirement. Thats why 99% of the time we do a full guild run so we avoid that.

I showed him all the great quest rewards, not counting rep rewards that were so much better then what he was wearing and he is now focused on getting those,, but my point is:

I blame blizzard with the gearscore deal, because most people I see coming in to a random queue are just wearing crap gear just to get the ilvl requirement. Thats why 99% of the time we do a full guild run so we avoid that.

I always tell people to go quest highlands. Tons of 325+ gear available for nearly everyone there, not to mention a great pre-heroic weapon for a fairly simple/straight up quest chain (Crucible).

I blame blizzard with the gearscore deal, because most people I see coming in to a random queue are just wearing crap gear just to get the ilvl requirement. Thats why 99% of the time we do a full guild run so we avoid that.

It shouldn't be too hard to implement an in-game GS, combine that with your level and racial/class abilities, to determine an optimum set of dungeons for you to queue up for... does it really matter if a level 20 player with good gear is playing with a level 25 player with bad gear? likewise, a level 85 DPS with great DPS gear would be placed in a different queue than a level 85 tank with mage armor (who would get a level 70 dungeon)

This would prevent the awkward situation I had last night where I was healing, and after the tank died right away on me, one of the DPS took over and lived for a good while...

So I finally tried healing tonight on my Shaman. It was not fun... Not in the slightest.

I was expecting a challenge -- which I have no problem with -- but instead all I got was having to worry about my mana the whole time, seeing heals do practically nothing and/or be negated due to damage less than a second after they were cast, and having DPS die because I didn't have the mana to spare to save them.

It's not fun. It's just stressful. And I'm not a bad player; I tend to do very well despite what role I'm in.

I hope they fix healing. I don't mean Wrath level where I could basically do whatever I wanted the whole time (that was boring; I don't want that again). But perhaps make heals cost a little less or do a little more so I don't have to worry about running out in trash pulls. I actually found boss fights easier than trash. It just didn't make sense to me.

One of the main reasons for the hugely increased health pools is that players can take slow, heavy damage. As a healer in LK and now in Cata, the biggest change in technique is knowing who to heal when and how much. That is skill by definition. If your goal is to top everyone off, that is a flaud technique in this expansion; you cannot afford to top everyone off in early gear. At best you are going to just get by by a hair in some encounters with 333-346 gear levels. Maybe even giving up a DPS to save the tank.

Now, on the other hand, most of these encounters involve tons of avoidable damage. It requires everyone to be knowledgeable of the mechanics to avoid taking unnecessary damage. That is, until the healer has the gear to compensate for baddies.

These are the main points of what makes these heroics so much more "difficult".

I kinda enjoy the new healing. Now that i've gotten some gear i see where they were going with it. Healers are now part of the group, it's used to be that a good healer could make up for a crappy tank and dps; but now everyone needs to be on their game. Tank dies? Wipe. One of the DPS dies? Fight may go on too long, adds may not die, etc - any of these will cause the healer to eventually go OOM. Healer not on the ball? Wipe. Groups really are now a cooperation, and i run into very little mana problems unless people are not doing what they are supposed to. If a DPS is stepping on mines in Tol'vir then talk to them and get them to fix up, or kick them. It is no longer our responsibility to heal failure, and i have no problems letting someone take durability damage until they learn to not step in the fire. The mana problems described in posts above are only really apparent at lower GS. I'm around 345 average item level and i'm getting to the point where i CAN use any spell i want, but its' not economical in the long run. My healing wave will heal for plenty with healing stream, earth living, and ancestral fortitude/awakening.

Few weeks into Cata and the main problem I am seeing is ignorance, mainly due to wotlk. Players who thought they were great in wotlk think they still are great now but even the simplest of encounter mechanics can send them packing. Players who have brought the wotlk mentality into cata need to be weeded out and separated from the players who actually spend time to gear sensibly, to look into encounters, to actually listen to other. I was always under the impression blizzard had some sort of matchmaking system for Random Dungeons but this does not seem to be the case.

Some problems that I am seeing are DPS wearing healing gear to DPS (doing less dps than tanks both single and aoe damage), the same is going for tanks, they think they can get away with tanking 85 Heroics in DPS gear and finally DPS wearing Tanking gear, now I am not talking about 1-2 items I am talking about the full sha'bang set!

I have asked a few times why they queue for heroics when clearly they are not prepared and want to be carried, I have never been given a straight answer. I do not get how most people can tolerate random dungeons, some of the scum that is present in them disgusts me.

lol damn, wow is srs bzns. People like you that get so worked up over a game is a major +1 why i started to think i wanted to leave the game.

lol damn, wow is srs bzns. People like you that get so worked up over a game is a major +1 why i started to think i wanted to leave the game.

The thing is man, granted we are there to have fun, it is a game. But at the same time, when you have people holding you back from enjoying the game (that you pay 15$ a month to play) yea it does bother ya. It's like driving somewhere being stuck behind someone going super slow, you get mad and angry it wastes your time, and wastes your gas. With driving you can just speed up and go around them, but that's not the case in wow, especially now. So yea, it is a bit of a **** off when you can't enjoy all aspects of what you pay for because of some idiots.

I kinda enjoy the new healing. Now that i've gotten some gear i see where they were going with it. Healers are now part of the group, it's used to be that a good healer could make up for a crappy tank and dps; but now everyone needs to be on their game. Tank dies? Wipe. One of the DPS dies? Fight may go on too long, adds may not die, etc - any of these will cause the healer to eventually go OOM. Healer not on the ball? Wipe. Groups really are now a cooperation, and i run into very little mana problems unless people are not doing what they are supposed to. If a DPS is stepping on mines in Tol'vir then talk to them and get them to fix up, or kick them. It is no longer our responsibility to heal failure, and i have no problems letting someone take durability damage until they learn to not step in the fire. The mana problems described in posts above are only really apparent at lower GS. I'm around 345 average item level and i'm getting to the point where i CAN use any spell i want, but its' not economical in the long run. My healing wave will heal for plenty with healing stream, earth living, and ancestral fortitude/awakening.

Precisely. During the first week/week and a half of the expansion I was rapidly gearing out my paladin. During that time, I was able to see a very clear and steady performance increase in my healing. At this time, with 6 epics, I can start to carry some players who tend to make mistakes. I can see a light at the end of the tunnel for the baddies who rely on Valor Points to get gear, or worse, other players with better gear.

lol damn, wow is srs bzns. People like you that get so worked up over a game is a major +1 why i started to think i wanted to leave the game.

You must be so fond of yourself to talk a topic down as if you are so much better.

lol damn, wow is srs bzns. People like you that get so worked up over a game is a major +1 why i started to think i wanted to leave the game.

What is so different from any other video game? People in a CoD thread will complain about ___ weapon mod, or gun. People in a Starcraft 2 thread will complain about ___ strategy, or ___ unit. WoW is much the same, it's many players who interact and when said players are nurturing habits which reduces others enjoyment of the game there is reason to complain.

You know on some of that I blame blizzard. We had an open spot last night come up for a (H)Deadmines last night and we decided to take the first person in guild to say they had the minimal gearscore to go. When he got in the instance and I looked at his gear, I noticed he was wearing some greens that were just horrible.. I mean he is a lock wearing greens that had a ton of spirit or like his robe, had nothing but int/stam, when I asked him about it, he said he was just trying to get the gear score to do heroics. His dps sucked, his hp sucked, and overall there was NO way he was ready. I showed him all the great quest rewards, not counting rep rewards that were so much better then what he was wearing and he is now focused on getting those,, but my point is:

I blame blizzard with the gearscore deal, because most people I see coming in to a random queue are just wearing crap gear just to get the ilvl requirement. Thats why 99% of the time we do a full guild run so we avoid that.

yeah the min i level for heorics is too low imho. i have 333 i level and i don;'t think it's enough as a dps to do heroics. i'm not even a big pve player either. but i think i'll stick to normal mode for point and minor gear upgrade farming with some gold gains.

i'm seeing people talk about doing heroics and linking their profiles and they don't even have the basic rep gear you can buy for cheap from the QMs with rep you get from just leveling to 85 via world quests alone.

on my normal run the other night i saw dps deaths due to the healer healing like it's wotlk and only thinking about the tank. even if trash pulls would've been faster with cc and single target dps/tanking to avoid resting afterwards, they still ran in without marking and aoe faceroll fests.

my bro had to drop out of shadow a few times that run to heal dps that were taking damage and hitting below 30% hp.

One of the main reasons for the hugely increased health pools is that players can take slow, heavy damage. As a healer in LK and now in Cata, the biggest change in technique is knowing who to heal when and how much. That is skill by definition. If your goal is to top everyone off, that is a flaud technique in this expansion; you cannot afford to top everyone off in early gear. At best you are going to just get by by a hair in some encounters with 333-346 gear levels. Maybe even giving up a DPS to save the tank.

Now, on the other hand, most of these encounters involve tons of avoidable damage. It requires everyone to be knowledgeable of the mechanics to avoid taking unnecessary damage. That is, until the healer has the gear to compensate for baddies.

These are the main points of what makes these heroics so much more "difficult".

+1

lol damn, wow is srs bzns. People like you that get so worked up over a game is a major +1 why i started to think i wanted to leave the game.

welcome to absolutely any kind of gaming, spectator sports included. or absolutely any hobby or form of entertainment. there are american/european football nerds who are more hardcore about mathleting than the most hardcore number crunching wow raider. and in the case of sports they're willing to gamble large amounts of money in addiation to nerding up the numbers and arguing passionately and playing fantasy leagues and so on.

anyways my biggest concern about the state of pve, as this was mentioned in the thought about upcmiong changes article, is that people are going to find pve too hard to prgress in, and switch to pvp to progress in gear, adding even mor ebaddies in an activity saturated by faction skill imbalance, and grindy matches. the plus side is queues will shorten in bg's. but we'll probably lose even more often(as if you can call a 90% loss rate better than a 100% loss rate in terms of how grindy honour gear progression is) as well arenas are also more grindy especalliy for losers because you can no longer lose 10 matches a week for points(which is a good thing imho) but you never go down in rating either, so while i'm not sure how that works for matching(my bro noticed a component in teh kill screen in areas showing some kind of match rating) but i won't be surprised where many arena player will be unable to prgress gear wise and still be matched up with people who are progressing and even outgear them, creating a downward spiral of a brick wall in gear progression only fo rht esake of equal footing in pvp. as well losers are going to spend more time grinding for wins in arenas to get their weekly cap, vs winners who can one shot 5 and 0 matches for th cap and go back to honour or 5 man grinds for extra upgrades creating an early gear imbalance that may translate to later gear imabalnces if they maintain their win ratios fairly well and spend their off time rpgressing othe rupgrades through non arena means.

at least on the big upside is that rated arena gear is now cosmetic, which was a huge thing in previous expansions where you reached a point where you could no longer progress in gear to iron out imbalances due to rating and were still matched with higher rated teams with those rated upgrades. however thi smay not matter much with the other changes to the system highlighted above.

then again some of that may be tinfoil hat zone, but just some thought sna dfeelings on the grindiness and other issues involving pvp gear progression. i may end up totally wrong or partially wrong and the cata pvp system is the best arena/ladder/pvp system in anexpansion yet, and most worthy of being any kind of esport(if blizz is till pushing that angle-idk)

oh and rated bg's seem to be just for fun. considering you can hit conquest cap for the first few weeks in 5 wins in 2s and the dificulty in recruiting the 10-25 man teams for a rated bg team coupled with the only wins give points system. all of this makes me think it's going to be more of novelty then something a fair section of pvpers take seriously do often. which in turn leads to longer queues in this particular actviity.

Some problems that I am seeing are DPS wearing healing gear to DPS (doing less dps than tanks both single and aoe damage),

For some casters spirt = hit, and when you need 1742 hit to be capped that healer gear starts looking pretty damn good. Roughly half of my 'best in slot' gear is healer loot.

I expect the same is true for warlocks and moonkin. Enhancement shaman apparently get something out of using caster weapons right now too.

The first tier of gear has some pretty rough itemization so sometimes even if a stat is useless to you (like spirit to mages) healer gear might still be an upgrade to the alternatives.

eah the min i level for heorics is too low imho. i have 333 i level and i don;'t think it's enough as a dps to do heroics.

I ran every heroic and the first 4 raid bosses with a group average of 325 -- we couldn't even use the random dungeon finder to get in to heroics. You don't need gear, you need experience. Right now ilevel is sort of a proxy measure of experience. If someone is at 350-something you know they've been raiding, if they're at 340-something they've been doing heroics, and 330-something they've been into normal mode dungeons.

That almost works right now but it'll start to fall apart very quickly. "Welfair epics" are just around the corner. Right now it's PVP blues (you can honor cap yourself in < 5 minutes with the new tol barad changes) but it'll expand fairly quickly as more crafted gear become available, as people start selling conquest points, valor points, and raid epics trickle down, and lose 10-games arena/battleground teams collect points, etc.

IMO some sort of attunement chain for heroics similar to magister's terrace would be a good place to start. Maybe bring back some element of the TBC rep grinds where you had to run normal mode dungeons a couple of times before you could go to the heroic version. That's annoying as hell for alts, but this early in the expansion it's not going to be a big deal.

IMO some sort of attunement chain for heroics similar to magister's terrace would be a good place to start. Maybe bring back some element of the TBC rep grinds where you had to run normal mode dungeons a couple of times before you could go to the heroic version. That's annoying as hell for alts, but this early in the expansion it's not going to be a big deal.

I was always very fond of the attunement chains and rep grinds. It kind of goes against what Blizzard wanted in terms of progression though. In TBC, the attunements forced progression through earlier content. They wanted a complete 180 in LK. I would love to see it come back though.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Rufus 4.15.2393 Beta 2 by Razvan Serea Rufus is a small utility that helps format and create bootable USB flash drives, such as USB keys/pendrives, memory sticks, etc. Despite its small size, Rufus provides everything you need! Oh, and Rufus is fast. For instance it's about twice as fast as UNetbootin, Universal USB Installer or Windows 7 USB download tool, on the creation of a Windows 7 USB installation drive from an ISO (with honorable mention to WiNToBootic for managing to keep up). It is also marginally faster on the creation of Linux bootable USBs from ISOs. A non-exhaustive list of Rufus supported ISOs is available here. It can be especially useful for cases where: you need to create USB installation media from bootable ISOs (Windows, Linux, UEFI, etc.) you need to work on a system that doesn't have an OS installed you need to flash a BIOS or other firmware from DOS you want to run a low-level utility Rufus 4.15.2393 Beta 2 changelog: Add RISC-V 64 support to UEFI:NTFS Improve the guards for using the "silent" option Improve the ability to cancel during write retries Improve progress reporting for compressed image extraction Fix unrestricted XML entity expansion and integer overflow in ezxml parser (courtesy of @esadowski4) [GHSA-55r2-34wg-8mv9] Fix "silent" Windows installation failing at 75% in most cases [#2960] Fix a crash during boot when using UEFI:NTFS on Snapdragon X based ARM64 platforms [#2934] Fix the first WUE option always being checked by default [#2965] Fix an infinite loop when using Windows ISOs that contain multiple WIMs Fix "Enable runtime UEFI media validation" checkbox not always being properly enabled Other WUE improvements/fixes for OneDrive removal and username validation (with thanks to @christian8641) [#2984, #2991] Download: Rufus 4.15 Beta 2 | 1.9 MB (Open Source) Links: Rufus Home Page | Project Page @GitHub | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Tixati 3.43 by Razvan Serea Tixati is a free and easy to use BitTorrent client featuring detailed views of all seed, peer, and file transfer properties. Also included are powerful bandwidth charting and throttling capabilities, and a full DHT implementation. Tixati is one of the most advanced and flexible BitTorrent clients available. And unlike many other clients, Tixati contains NO SPYWARE, NO ADS, and NO GIMMICKS. Tixati portable version is meant to run on a USB flash drive or other portable media. It stores all its configuration files in the same folder as the executable binary files, and all file paths are stored in a format relative to the program executable folder. It is important you do not delete the "tixati_portable_mode.txt" file within the executables folder. This file is what triggers Tixati to run in portable mode. (The executable binaries are actually the same as the standard edition binaries.) When running the portable edition from a USB flash drive, especially one that is formatted in FAT16/FAT32, you may experience some lag when initially loading a new transfer. This is because initializing and allocating large files on flash-based media consumes a greater amount of time and resources compared to a conventional hard-drive. Tixati has the following features: detailed views of all aspects of the swarm, including peers, pieces, files, and trackers support for magnet links, so no need to download .torrent files if a simple magnet-link is available super-efficient peer choking/unchoking algorithms ensure the fastest downloads peer connection encryption for added security full DHT (Distributed Hash Table) implementation for trackerless torrents, including detailed message traffic graphs and customizable event logging advanced bandwidth charting of overall traffic and per-transfer traffic, with separate classification of protocol and file bytes, and with separate classification of outbound traffic for trading and seeding highly flexible bandwidth throttling, including trading/seeding proportion adjustment and adjustable priority for individual transfers and peers bitfield graphs that show the completeness of all downloaded files, what pieces other peers have available, and the health of the overall swarm customizable event logging for each download, and individual event logs for all peers within the swarm expert local file management functions which allow you to move files to a different partition even while downloading is still in progress 100% compatible with the BitTorrent protocol Windows and Linux-GTK native versions available Tixati 3.43 changelog: Several major DHT improvements Added several screening heuristics to filter malicious DHT nodes, prevent Sybil floods Rewrote DHT search algorithms to add support for multi-path lookups Improved DHT logging, more details in several error messages Extended timeout lengths for outgoing queries over I2P Added incoming query / response per second to DHT table status display Updated Regex engine to PCRE2 Faster Search function, scans channel user profiles in much less time Fixed problems with file name parsing and date handling in RSS Faster and more accurate RSS filtering and episode number detection Several optimizations to global text processing functions, such as UTF-8 cleaning, line splitting, and token parsing Complete update of port-mapping UPNP/NAT-PMP engine, added PCP support, mapping over VPN support, and more Several refinements to default gateway detection on Windows / Android, which is used for port-mapping Support for IPv6 interface-scoped addresses, which is sometimes needed for IPv6 gateway detection and port mapping Full support for PCP port remapping, added backup zero-port query in case requested port is rejected New UPNP/NAT-PMP Monitor in Help > Diagnostics New reflected local port/location tracker that analyzes DHT replies to detect true port/location and NAT mapping type New TCP/UDP Ports monitor in Help > Diagnostics, with several statistic and information tabs, and a detailed event log Calculated/reflected local port is now used for port parameter in tracker queries and peer handshake Fixed several problems with Linux Wayland compatibility Completely replaced tray icon functions in Linux, new SNI implementation is now the default with GSI backup Implemented full DBus-Menu server to be used by new SNI tray icon implementation Replaced Linux tray balloon notification DBus client Rewrote auto-shutdown DBus interface for Linux Rewrote sleep inhibit DBus interface for Linux Dropped deprecated Linux dbus-glib dependencies Completely new Windows asynchronous file handling, now using IOCP model with several block-alignment optimizations Better handling of system network resets and interface down/up cycles Added option to fully clear configuration in Settings > Import/Export Remember last option checkboxes when using Import/Export Fixed minor I2P incoming connection routing problems Much faster I2P vanity host name finder Much faster channel user vanity key finder Raised length limit for torrent tracker remote failure messages to 120 from 64 Fixed problems setting download location on a torrent before the meta info is resolved Added location/MOC paths to category pane tooltips Several minor Web Interface fixes Refinements to static and scrolling ellipsizing layout routines Several fixes and improvements to single and multi-line text edit controls Many other minor fixes throughout the user interface A major overhaul of the Android framework has also been done: API target raised to 35, page alignment set to 16K Rewrote all inset processing routines Full rewrite of foreground service, application, and main activity objects New permission request routines Added multi-cast lock request before UPNP/LPDP discovery operations Fixed file permission and locking problems when loading .torrent from web browsers Fixed problems with Z-ordering of modal / non-modal and popup windows Fixed handling of back gesture on newer OS Added status bar icon adjustment based on status bar background color Added option in Settings > UI > Behavior to continue running in tray when task removed from recents App can be closed by swiping away notification Rewrote IME interface, fixed several problems with auto-correct, on-screen keyboard visibility, and cursor positioning Added full support for Android hardware mouse and keyboard function Added full tooltip implementation for Android hovering via mouse or other cursor device Full rewrite of popup menu widgets to better support hardware pointers and keyboard Added mouse cursor updating framework for Android hovering Added Settings > Import/Export to Android builds Added language file support to Android builds Download: Tixati 64-bit | Tixati 32-bit ~20.0 MB (Freeware) Download: Portable Tixati 3.43 | 114.0 MB Download: Tixati 3.43 for Linux | Android View: Tixati Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Firefox 152.0.1 by Razvan Serea Firefox is a fast, full-featured Web browser. It offers great security, privacy, and protection against viruses, spyware, malware, and it can also easily block pop-up windows. The key features that have made Firefox so popular are the simple and effective UI, browser speed and strong security capabilities. Firefox has complete features for browsing the Internet. It is very reliable and flexible due to its implemented security features, along with customization options. Firefox includes pop-up blocking, tab-browsing, integrated Google search, simplified privacy controls, a streamlined browser window that shows you more of the page than any other browser and a number of additional features that work with you to help you get the most out of your time online. Firefox key features Enhanced Tracking Protection (ETP) – Blocks trackers, cookies, cryptominers, and fingerprinters by default. Private Browsing Mode – Deletes history, cookies, and temporary files when closed. Lightweight & Fast Performance – Optimized memory usage with efficient page loading. Cross-Platform Sync – Sync bookmarks, passwords, history, and open tabs across devices. Customizable Interface – Toolbars, themes, and extensions can be tailored to user needs. Strong Privacy Controls – Options to manage cookies, permissions, and site data easily. Reader Mode – Strips away clutter for distraction-free reading. Pocket Integration – Save and read articles offline with Pocket built into Firefox. Picture-in-Picture (PiP) – Watch videos in a floating window while multitasking. Extensions & Add-ons – Vast library for productivity, security, and personalization. Built-in PDF Viewer – No need for external software to view PDFs. Firefox Monitor – Alerts users if their email is part of a known data breach. Multi-Account Containers – Isolate browsing sessions (e.g., work, personal, shopping). Performance & Resource Efficiency – Uses fewer system resources than some competitors. Open Source & Community-Driven – Transparent development with global contributions. Firefox 152.0.1 fixes: Fixed frequent crashes affecting users with Intel Raptor Lake processors. (Bug 2039575) Fixed an issue on macOS where choosing a PDF option, such as "Save as PDF", from the system print dialog would send the job to your printer instead of saving a file. (Bug 2047850) Download: Firefox 64-bit | Firefox 32-bit | ARM64 | ~70.0 MB (Freeware) Download: Firefox for MacOS | 146.0 MB View: Firefox Home Page | Release Notes Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Zed 1.7.2 has landed with updated OpenCode models, bug fixes and other improvements by David Uzondu Zed 1.7.2 recently landed on the stable release channel, bringing a host of AI-related features including automatic context compaction and settings-based skill management, along with other things like better Markdown preview rendering and custom git commands in the graph view. Starting with the AI stuff, the developers introduced "/compact", a command that basically summarizes your conversation history on demand. This tool prevents your active chat window from hitting token limits by compressing older parts of the dialogue into a brief overview. In addition to that, the team relocated skill management to the settings UI, improving how the application communicates errors regarding those skills, and updated the OpenCode model roster to support DeepSeek V4 Flash, MiniMax M3, Qwen 3.7 Plus, and Nemotron 3 Ultra Free. External agent users can also monitor context window cost metrics and delete individual sessions directly from their history. Right-clicking ref labels in the git graph now opens a context menu that runs different actions against selected targets, kind of how VS Code does it. Here are some of the bug fixes this new release brings: The active agent fails to auto-select when creating a new git worktree. A scrollbar unexpectedly appears on wrapped code blocks in the agent chat. Collapse indicators for project headers appear when performing sidebar searches. Bracketed ellipsis title prefixes fail to show the ellipsis icon properly. Project icons render incorrectly in the recent projects picker. Diff hunk controls appear inside non-editable commit view multibuffers. The software update button hangs indefinitely on the downloading stage. Restoring an agent terminal in a remote project triggers a sudden crash. Splitting a pane that contains an active commit view causes a crash. Linux Wayland freezes when trying to read the clipboard from laggy external apps. Zed is a "newish" code editor trying to break the massive stronghold VS Code has on the developer community. Funny enough, the editor was created by former GitHub employees who worked on the Atom text editor (which Microsoft killed in 2022, several years after it bought GitHub). The project officially hit version 1.0 back in April, introducing platform parity for Windows and Linux alongside deep support for DeepSeek-V4-Pro.
    • 26H2 absolutely will support ARM Windows just not on devices that came with 26H1. This is evident by the fact I am running 26H2, which on my MacBook Neo and Surface Pro 12 (inch), within a VM.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      523
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      78
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!