Recommended Posts

I find it funny, when i began playing 5 years ago my first class was a hunter and i loved the hell out of controlling a pet. It may have been due to me being younger, but i thought it was the best thing since sliced bread. Now when i try to play warlock or hunter i find the pet more of a nuisance than a help. I think I'll be sticking with mage, considering a pet is pretty much a focus point of the hunter class.

my first class in wow was a warlock, and the pet was kind of fun. i had just come from l2 where the most op class in the game was alot like a warlock in wow, at least in theory. but by level 40 i just wasnt feeling it.

i don't mind the frost mage pet. it's pretty low maintenance and has a useful ability. sometimes it chases after players until it unsummons if i don't notice it. it seems to have this thing for breaking my sheeps as soon as i finish casting them. it's nice that it's no longer limited to 2 minutes at a time, but i hope they don't over complicate it in teh future to put it on the level of hunters and warlocks pets.

my first class in wow was a warlock, and the pet was kind of fun. i had just come from l2 where the most op class in the game was alot like a warlock in wow, at least in theory. but by level 40 i just wasnt feeling it.

i don't mind the frost mage pet. it's pretty low maintenance and has a useful ability. sometimes it chases after players until it unsummons if i don't notice it. it seems to have this thing for breaking my sheeps as soon as i finish casting them. it's nice that it's no longer limited to 2 minutes at a time, but i hope they don't over complicate it in teh future to put it on the level of hunters and warlocks pets.

I laugh on the forums when people complain about not being able to name the mage pet, or that it is not as powerful as warlock/hunter pets. If they want a mage with a pet then play a warlock, don't ask for it to be as powerful as the pets from classes that are based around pets, that's just absurd.

I laugh on the forums when people complain about not being able to name the mage pet, or that it is not as powerful as warlock/hunter pets. If they want a mage with a pet then play a warlock, don't ask for it to be as powerful as the pets from classes that are based around pets, that's just absurd.

Pre-4.03. You could do: /run PetRename("NAME HERE") in chat and it would let you rename the water elemental.

I laugh on the forums when people complain about not being able to name the mage pet, or that it is not as powerful as warlock/hunter pets. If they want a mage with a pet then play a warlock, don't ask for it to be as powerful as the pets from classes that are based around pets, that's just absurd.

well in pvp depending on the spec warlocks and hunters are pretty strong even if they just let their pets run around willy nilly. the warlock pet spec seems pretty stong right now, the hunter pet specc seems gimpy but i remember in tbc it being a huge PITA to fight(red player, red pet, let the pet dps while the player went afk, dead frost mage)

but meh, i don't want the pet to play a bigger role on our play. it's jus tthere to add another control option when it's not following some random player half way across the bg and give our sustained dps a bit of a boost, since we rely on our big crits so much.

Frost mage pets do as much damage as hunter pets in PVE.

Top hunter DPS parse for Argaloth

Hunter DPS: 22,000, pet DPS: 2500, so a pet is about 11% of the hunter's damage

Top mage DPS parse for Argaloth

Mage DPS: 18,700 , pet DPS: 2400 so a mage pet is about 13% of the mage's damage.

If you drag out BM as an example (where pets do roughly 5,000 DPS in top parses making up 1/3 of the player's damage) I'll point out unholy DK pets that do upwards of 7500 DPS and make up an even larger percentage of the player's damage and do more damage in absolute terms too (because BM hunters are worthless right now and unholy DKs are overpowered).

As a portion of the player's damage a frost mage's pet is at least as important as a hunter's and the absolute difference between them is trivial. If "importance to your classes' primary role" is the criteria by which we allow players to name pets then I think mages have at least as much claim as MM and SV hunters do. Unholy DKs even more so.

Frost mage pets do as much damage as hunter pets in PVE.

Top hunter DPS parse for Argaloth

Hunter DPS: 22,000, pet DPS: 2500, so a pet is about 11% of the hunter's damage

Top mage DPS parse for Argaloth

Mage DPS: 18,700 , pet DPS: 2400 so a mage pet is about 13% of the mage's damage.

If you drag out BM as an example (where pets do roughly 5,000 DPS in top parses making up 1/3 of the player's damage) I'll point out unholy DK pets that do upwards of 7500 DPS and make up an even larger percentage of the player's damage and do more damage in absolute terms too (because BM hunters are worthless right now and unholy DKs are overpowered).

As a portion of the player's damage a frost mage's pet is at least as important as a hunter's and the absolute difference between them is trivial. If "importance to your classes' primary role" is the criteria by which we allow players to name pets then I think mages have at least as much claim as MM and SV hunters do. Unholy DKs even more so.

Kill Command for BM is due to receive a buff in the near future so BM pet damage will be going up even more, do I see BM catching SV though... No. I feel the SV will get nerfed, it kinda needs to as I am topping DPS charts in just heroic gear with a few crafted items, other classes in similar gear levels do not even come close.

Frost mage pets do as much damage as hunter pets in PVE.

Top hunter DPS parse for Argaloth

Hunter DPS: 22,000, pet DPS: 2500, so a pet is about 11% of the hunter's damage

Top mage DPS parse for Argaloth

Mage DPS: 18,700 , pet DPS: 2400 so a mage pet is about 13% of the mage's damage.

If you drag out BM as an example (where pets do roughly 5,000 DPS in top parses making up 1/3 of the player's damage) I'll point out unholy DK pets that do upwards of 7500 DPS and make up an even larger percentage of the player's damage and do more damage in absolute terms too (because BM hunters are worthless right now and unholy DKs are overpowered).

As a portion of the player's damage a frost mage's pet is at least as important as a hunter's and the absolute difference between them is trivial. If "importance to your classes' primary role" is the criteria by which we allow players to name pets then I think mages have at least as much claim as MM and SV hunters do. Unholy DKs even more so.

interesting i never realized our frost pet was that good. :p

got totally owned in arenas tonight. something like 7 loss and one win that was to a team that only one of them got in. pretty aggravating so we decided to give it a break until tomrrow.

http://us.battle.net/wow/en/forum/topic/1021053250?page=57 - thread full of people with connection issues, and majority of them are Time Warner.

****ty. The only thing that changed for me, was when I xsfer'd to a new server. Gained about 50-100ms added onto what I normally have. I just chalked that up to being on a server hosted in Phoenix. The max I seen my connection since Cata was released was 500ish and that's because I was downloading some HD, err, videos in the background. :p

I forgive the RNG.

Dropped best-in-slot (non-heroic) gloves which freed up my points to buy best-in-slot ring/cape in the morning. I decided to give up on 4 piece until we're getting heroic pieces; as long as Chog'all isn't

a jerk with the priest marks I'll be fully epic'd out tomorrow night.

I forgive the RNG.

Dropped best-in-slot (non-heroic) gloves which freed up my points to buy best-in-slot ring/cape in the morning. I decided to give up on 4 piece until we're getting heroic pieces; as long as Chog'all isn't

a jerk with the priest marks I'll be fully epic'd out tomorrow night.

Nice, I got tired of my stuff not dropping in normals. Im at 328 item level, so I can't queue for heroics yet. So I've been doing Archaeology, Im at 300 skill, and have gotten:

the Dino Minipet, and Dino Mount

the Mirror that creates a ghost of you, that always faces you

the "statue" the makes a big green pillar of light be around you for 10 seconds

Im hoping to get the trinket (the doll) the robes, and the staff.. but could be forever.

Archaeology isn't bad, I prefer it to doing instances with non-guildies I can do it at my own pace, and when I am flying from the top of Kalimdor to the Bottom for the sites, I can auto fly, and go make a sammich or go bio or whatever.

You know firey that reminds me... There used to be an addon that would auto fly you to a place. Basically you open your map and click on where you wanted to go and it would auto fly to that spot. Anyone know if that addon still exists? I know I love to go afk while flying to a place but sometimes you come back and you are 100 miles past were you wanted to go and have to spend just as much time flying back... :p

You know firey that reminds me... There used to be an addon that would auto fly you to a place. Basically you open your map and click on where you wanted to go and it would auto fly to that spot. Anyone know if that addon still exists? I know I love to go afk while flying to a place but sometimes you come back and you are 100 miles past were you wanted to go and have to spend just as much time flying back... :p

I think Carbonite might have that, or something similar, I will have to look when I get home, my only concern would be flying into an invisible wall, or into a mountain.



Finished off Bastion of Twilight a little while ago. It didn't look like we were going to get a third raid night that week so we stayed up late
(an extra hour, midnight, OMG!) and apparently got the kill. Nobody remembers it because we were so tired.

You can hear the nerd rage when people tell John to STFU at the start.

EDIT: He didn't drop priest shoulders last night so I hate the RNG again.

haha i should post a player made boss drop chart from aion to make you feel better about wow's rng evn. :laugh:

RNG is RNG, there's no difference.

The only reason why Aion would seem worse is because they have (to my understanding) bigger loot tables. But RNG is still RNG.

RNG is RNG, there's no difference.

oh there's definitely a difference. and aion's loot tables are smaller.

aion had something like .00000000000001% chance of getting anything more than a common rarity item worth 10kiniah(about 10c in wow terms), and even lower for epic grade items, in dungeons that were 2 hours of speed trash runs for a boss with a script that was basically 10 minutes of normal tank and spank then blowing all your CDs at exactly the right time to avoid getting one shotted.

you could do hundreds of runs and never see an epic level drop. let alone one you could use.

patch notes for iaon would have line saying something like "drop rates have been greatly increased" player testing would show they were doubled, which means still incredibly low rates resulting in much the same results.

they increased dungeon boss drop rates on blue and epic items for 2 weeks to decent level where something like 2 blues and one epic were dropping per boss kill. then they nerfed it back to old levels. around the same time they released an article that supposedly proved drop rates were such and such, except there was no way they could've actually run any of the dungeons tested as many times as the test said in an actual retail server in the time period the drop rates were increased.

which is why i think if i posted a player made chart showing drop rates on dungeons with 18hour lockouts in aion it would make him feel better about not getting the item he wants in any particular run.

The only reason why Aion would seem worse is because they have (to my understanding) bigger loot tables. But RNG is still RNG.

Yeah, I'm not really bitching. According to wow progress I'm now the 200th best geared priest in the world so it's hard to complain too much. Of course wowprogress is dumb and doesn't realize that, for example, my epic bracer might be better than someone else's and their healm is better than mine despite being both epic and the same ilevel. it's all just item level dick-waving, but it's hard to seriously complain when you see that and then remember that 3 weeks ago we were all chasing green upgrades.

So close to being back in 'full epics' (and nearly full BIS non-heroic raid too). The big benefit to being done with normal mode is that I'd be able to sit out on "free-loot Tuesday". That'd mean I can pug in with friends outside of my guild and help them make some progress on bosses they're struggling with, then hop in for 'progression night' and do heroics with my guild later in the week.

getting at least one drop per boss is a lot less RNG than a 1 in a million chance at getting a drop from a boss. that's my point. it may be RNG which drop you get, but you have a reasonable chance at the piece you want dropping while in a static group with good activity within a reasonable amount of time, and chances are someone is going to get a drop, and if what drops can't be used by anyone it can be sold or disenchanted into something useful.

i'd say that's way better than an item that has a chance to socket a gear piece but takes about 60 of them on average to fill all 8 sockets of a epic piece. from a boss no less.

after this week's turnout we decided to move arans to sundays to acoomadate our work and hungover schedules

i'm at a terribly not bad point where i';m not sure what honour gear to grid so i'm playing other game. and i have like 6 other game to play or so. no tthat honour grinding hasn't been fun. playing mid on ctf maps has been a balst tbh, even if it's an example of not how to play wsg/tp.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • If I ever get that issue I will let you know how I fix it
    • As I've been usually saying lately - we all can thank "AI" for this.
    • Friday Windows 11 preview builds are here. Insiders in the Experimental (formerly Dev) and Beta Channel can download builds 26300.8697 and 26220.8690. My Windows11 device on the Preview Channel just got 26220.8728. My guess is this build is a nightly update from 26220.8690.
    • Traffic has a surprisingly unexpected impact on your surroundings by Sayan Sen Image by Radik 2707 via Pexels A collaborative study by researchers from several Israeli institutions found that everyday pollution from traffic and industrial activity measurably changed the atmospheric electric field over the Tel Aviv metropolitan area, providing new evidence of how human activity can influence the lower atmosphere. The research was led by Dr. Roy Yaniv of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and the Gertner Institute at Sheba Medical Center, Dr. Assaf Hochman of the Fredy & Nadine Herrmann Institute of Earth Sciences at the Hebrew University, and Prof. Yoav Yair of Reichman University. The study also involved Itay Froomer, a student from Hadera High School and the Israeli Museum of Medicine and Science (Technoda), who carried out the work as part of the Ministry of Education's 5-unit physics research track. The researchers focused on the atmospheric electric field under fair-weather conditions. Even in the absence of storms, a weak electric field naturally exists between Earth's surface and the atmosphere. One of the main ways scientists measure this field is through the Potential Gradient (PG), which is the inverse of the vertical component of the electric field. PG is a key part of the global electric circuit, a planet-wide system of electrical currents maintained by thunderstorms and electrified clouds around the world. Scientists have long known that the atmospheric electric field can be influenced by factors ranging from large-scale atmospheric processes to local weather conditions such as dust, fog and clouds. Human-made pollution is also known to play a role, but understanding exactly how urban emissions affect the electric field close to the ground has remained an area of ongoing research. To investigate this relationship, the team analyzed measurements from a newly installed electric field mill, an instrument used to continuously monitor the strength of the atmospheric electric field. The instrument was installed at the Center for Technological Education (Roter House) in Holon and became operational in August 2024. It was funded by Israel's Ministry of Education and the Holon municipality. The electric field mill forms part of a broader monitoring network that includes nearby meteorological stations and air-quality monitoring sites. This allowed researchers to compare electric field measurements with detailed weather data and pollution records to better understand what was driving changes in the Potential Gradient. The study focused on two major urban pollutants: fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and nitrogen oxides (NOx), both commonly produced by vehicle traffic and industrial activity. PM2.5 refers to microscopic airborne particles small enough to remain suspended in the atmosphere for extended periods, while NOx is a group of gases released during fuel combustion. Researchers examined daily, weekly and seasonal patterns in the atmospheric electric field and compared them with changes in pollutant concentrations. Their analysis revealed a clear relationship between NOx levels and changes in the Potential Gradient, particularly during morning and evening rush hours when traffic emissions were at their highest. “What we observe is a direct physical link between emission peaks and electrical variability,” explained Dr. Roy Yaniv. “NOx reduces atmospheric conductivity very quickly, so the electric field responds almost instantaneously during traffic rush hours.” Atmospheric conductivity describes how easily electrical charges move through the air. According to the researchers, nitrogen oxides rapidly alter this conductivity, causing a near-immediate response in the electric field. PM2.5, however, was associated with a delayed response. The researchers attributed this difference to the particles' longer atmospheric residence time, meaning they remain in the atmosphere for longer periods, as well as their different microphysical interactions with surrounding air and atmospheric components. The study also identified a pronounced "weekend effect." In Israel, traffic volumes and some industrial activity decline significantly on Fridays and Saturdays. During these periods, concentrations of both NOx and PM2.5 dropped, and corresponding changes were observed in the atmospheric electric field. “The weekend signal demonstrates just how sensitive the electric field is to changes in human activity,” the researchers noted. “When emissions decline, the electrical environment adjusts at once, providing a high-resolution indicator of urban atmospheric conditions.” The findings showed that pollution levels can influence not only the chemical composition of the atmosphere but also its electrical properties. Researchers said the results strengthened the case for using atmospheric electricity as an additional tool for environmental monitoring, particularly in densely populated urban areas where anthropogenic, or human-caused, influences are most pronounced. The study also pointed to potential public health applications. By combining air-quality measurements with observations of atmospheric electricity, researchers said they could gain a more complete picture of how urban atmospheric conditions change over time. “Integrating air-quality data with electric-field measurements gives us a clearer picture of how the lower atmosphere evolves moment by moment,” the researchers added. “It’s a framework that can support both scientific insight and practical environmental decision-making.” Beyond the scientific findings, the project highlighted a collaboration between universities, public institutions and secondary education. Researchers said the work demonstrated how students could take part in real-world environmental research while contributing to studies of air quality, atmospheric processes and their potential effects on society. Source: Hebrew University, ScienceDirect This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      540
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      186
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      80
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      77
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!