Recommended Posts

wish i could say that, guild is stil reliably 1/7 normal ( even After FL Nerfs ), been that way since begining of last month. guild still has problems with chogal and nef.

I'm not really sure what to say. On my server the typical trade pug is doing at least 7/7 normal and many are doing 1 or 2 heroic bosses along the way.

I seriously doubt your guild mates are incapable of doing the encounters, maybe you just don't have a viable strategy?

Related: I'm looking for a mage/moomkin for PTR raiding. Join us, farm 7/7h while you wait for 4.3 -- then do it again on your alt, and your other alt, and your other alt. What else are you doing for the next 2 months?

I'm not really sure what to say. On my server the typical trade pug is doing at least 7/7 normal and many are doing 1 or 2 heroic bosses along the way.

I seriously doubt your guild mates are incapable of doing the encounters, maybe you just don't have a viable strategy?

Related: I'm looking for a mage/moomkin for PTR raiding. Join us, farm 7/7h while you wait for 4.3 -- then do it again on your alt, and your other alt, and your other alt. What else are you doing for the next 2 months?

Im not in control of the strats, GL is, but as far as me downed him last night with mostly random guildies and a couple pugs, only diffrence other then that was the GL/Co-lead wasnt there, so i was doing strats

  • 2 weeks later...

It seems they are slowly putting the new dungeons live. I believe they put out a preset dungeon, and then tune it from the feedback gathered. The PTR has been up for a few weeks and only End Time and Hour of Twilight is running. End Time still needs some fine tuning, but it's looking to be a fun dungeon to run. I haven't been able to complete a full run of Hour of Twilight yet, but it looks promising.

I can't wait until the Raid Finder and Dragon Soul are opened up for testing.

Finally killed Rag last night. Won the T12 shoulders off domo but gave them up. An officer had offered me 40K at the time but I said I didn't need the gold thinking the vial of the sands was still 50-60K and I didn't want to dip into my 15K of gem and enchanting reserves(its all I spend my gold on). Found out how cheap i could get one and so took up the 40K after wards. Really like the new mount.

It's been a while for me in this thread. I started playing again maybe two months ago when 4.2 was well under way and some friends started a guild of their own which I joined. Since then we're at 1/7H in Firelands. Ragnaros is a really cool fight. I still yearn for Ulduar-type heroics though. My guild has geared me up quite nicely too. Alt runs have become a good pass-time gearing up my Death Knight. I have videos if anyone is interested:

http://www.youtube.com/user/xenodubs

My server (horde side) is utter crap though. We only have one guild solidly running Heroic FL then our guild which got a very late start in FL.

Aside from current content, I have had some amazing luck farming for some legendaries. I always ran Molten Core weekly. Since I've come back I have gotten two Eye of Sulfuras one of which I used to craft the Sulfuron, Hand of Ragnaros on my Paladin. With my Death Knight I have seen two times the right binding off Garr drop and just yesterday got the other left binding off Baron Geddon. So I will have the the Thunderfury on my Death Knight. All within about a month. Unfortunate though that I will still have to farm the bindings for my Paladin.

I still yearn for Ulduar-type heroics though. My guild has geared me up quite nicely too. Alt runs have become a good pass-time gearing up my Death Knight.

What exactly about Ulduar heroics was "fun" that you don't get form the current hard mode raids?

Surely you're not talking about Hodir or Vezax but probably No lights, 3 tree, or firefighter. Those encounters most closely match the current model of hardmodes: "Do X before you start, the fight is now harder" rather than "do the fight wrong, or do the fight with some stupid gimmick and now it's harder".

I think the reason people remember certain ulduar hard modes favourably is because they were legitimately good encounters where playing better lead to success. No lights yogg wouldn't have been less fun if you selected "25m heroic" from the drop down rather than just leaving off all the Keepers: the fun was in the nature of the encounter. The same is true of Firefighter (which literally was 'push the button before you start to make the fight harder').

Maybe it's that I'm playing a different game than most people that post here, but I don't think the hard mode Ulduar encounters were any better than lich king, al'akir, sinestra, robot council, putricide, etc. There was some good stuff in ulduar but that's true of nearly every tier.

What exactly about Ulduar heroics was "fun" that you don't get form the current hard mode raids?

Surely you're not talking about Hodir or Vezax but probably No lights, 3 tree, or firefighter. Those encounters most closely match the current model of hardmodes: "Do X before you start, the fight is now harder" rather than "do the fight wrong, or do the fight with some stupid gimmick and now it's harder".

I think the reason people remember certain ulduar hard modes favourably is because they were legitimately good encounters where playing better lead to success. No lights yogg wouldn't have been less fun if you selected "25m heroic" from the drop down rather than just leaving off all the Keepers: the fun was in the nature of the encounter. The same is true of Firefighter (which literally was 'push the button before you start to make the fight harder').

Maybe it's that I'm playing a different game than most people that post here, but I don't think the hard mode Ulduar encounters were any better than lich king, al'akir, sinestra, robot council, putricide, etc. There was some good stuff in ulduar but that's true of nearly every tier.

Don't get me wrong, I enjoy the encounters still. But you already pointed out the difference that caused me to like Ulduar hard modes more in your second paragraph. I don't like the idea that the raid leader right-clicks his unitframe and selects Heroic to make a fight harder. I much prefer Heroic modes to be a more natural and achievable reward. The key words being achievable and reward because in an encounter like XT, you had to achieve the hard mode. Whereas now, you simply beat the last boss and go back click the button to make it harder then pull. With Freya, you had to make the conscious decision to not kill the mini-bosses and deal with the extra abilities as with Yogg Saron.

It's not that I don't like the non-Ulduar heroics (Lich King was amazing), it's just a lack of user-to-game interaction that I miss.

I much prefer Heroic modes to be a more natural and achievable reward. The key words being achievable and reward because in an encounter like XT, you had to achieve the hard mode. Whereas now, you simply beat the last boss and go back click the button to make it harder then pull. With Freya, you had to make the conscious decision to not kill the mini-bosses and deal with the extra abilities as with Yogg Saron.

I guess I just don't see the difference between talking to an NPC and choosing option 1 and clicking a menu and choosing option 4. I don't think anybody ever found the DPS check for heartbreaker a big deal (nor thorim or hodir) but that could just be a function of the sorts of groups I play in. I generally like blizzard's reason for ditching that style: it's clunky, non-obvious, and error prone. It also makes the new "hard from the start" hard modes much more difficult to execute (or obnoxious to learn).

Imagine heroic al'akir where p1 was activated by something you did in combat: it'd be even more obnoxious than it is now. Rag would be unbearable, and I'm not just complaining because doing it twice in one week was a bad idea.

So last night we got down Heroic Lord Rhyolith which slightly separates us now from the 95% of people who have killed Ragnaros Normal and subsequently Shannox Heroic. On to bigger and better bosses now.

I guess I just don't see the difference between talking to an NPC and choosing option 1 and clicking a menu and choosing option 4. I don't think anybody ever found the DPS check for heartbreaker a big deal (nor thorim or hodir) but that could just be a function of the sorts of groups I play in. I generally like blizzard's reason for ditching that style: it's clunky, non-obvious, and error prone. It also makes the new "hard from the start" hard modes much more difficult to execute (or obnoxious to learn).

Imagine heroic al'akir where p1 was activated by something you did in combat: it'd be even more obnoxious than it is now. Rag would be unbearable, and I'm not just complaining because doing it twice in one week was a bad idea.

It may be unrealistic and problematic to have hard modes in place of heroic modes, I understand. I guess I just had a good experience in Ulduar and it's stuck with me.

We got down Majordomo and Alysrazor now in Heroic. Feeling pretty good about it :). Only have Baleroc and Beth-tilac left. We probably won't be killing Ragnaros Heroic while it's current.

Majordomo is by far the easiest heroic we've done. Lord Rhyolith has proven the most difficult probably due to the RNG nature of the fight.

Finally managed to get Raggy down in normal a month after our first attempt. Quite a big acheivement for our guild as it is the first end game boss we have downed before the new content patch hits.

Taken from GM's view.

Finally managed to get Raggy down in normal a month after our first attempt. Quite a big acheivement for our guild as it is the first end game boss we have downed before the new content patch hits.

It's always nice to "beat" warcraft, however it is you define 'beating' a game like this.

Your druid has some cringe-inducing mistakes (back peddle into engulfing fire, standing in lava waves, etc) but then the next moment he's got an awesome cat form-sprint when somebody knocks a meteor onto him. I suspect 'good' and 'bad' players have similar average levels of skill, but the good player has a much smaller standard deviation. Good players are 75±5%, bad players are 70±20% as opposed to the popular notion that 'good' players are say 80±1% and bad players are 50±1%. That changes the way you complain from 'how do you raise the average skill level' to 'how do you make players more consistent'?

I should probably upload a rag video too - people on youtube have been asking but I'm incredibly lazy.

Only have Baleroc and Beth-tilac left.

IMO beth is down there with shannox now that she's been nerfed twice. If you can handle baelroc you'll get her in short order.

It's always nice to "beat" warcraft, however it is you define 'beating' a game like this.

Your druid has some cringe-inducing mistakes (back peddle into engulfing fire, standing in lava waves, etc) but then the next moment he's got an awesome cat form-sprint when somebody knocks a meteor onto him. I suspect 'good' and 'bad' players have similar average levels of skill, but the good player has a much smaller standard deviation. Good players are 75±5%, bad players are 70±20% as opposed to the popular notion that 'good' players are say 80±1% and bad players are 50±1%. That changes the way you complain from 'how do you raise the average skill level' to 'how do you make players more consistent'?

I should probably upload a rag video too - people on youtube have been asking but I'm incredibly lazy.

IMO beth is down there with shannox now that she's been nerfed twice. If you can handle baelroc you'll get her in short order.

I'd like to know your channel.

Here is our Ragnaros kill. Embedded for convenience.

Channel

A new class and race is cool and all but I want to know what lore content they will be developing with the next expansion pack. Many possibilities... but what would go best with this new race and class?

Edit:

The new expansion will not have a main vilain, it will focus on the Horde vs Alliance war!

Really really lame if you ask me... I know it's really soon to jump to any conclusion but... no main antagonist?

Pandas look cool. New expansion looks cool. God forbid they add something lighthearted and fun for a change. You've had THREE "serious evil bad guy 'gunna blow everyone up oh noes!" expansions, now it's time to kick back and have a laugh.

Or, you know, you could cancel your subscription, not post about it to garner attention and just go play that new Star Wars MMO. Guaranteed serious faces 24/7 in that game. Bye.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • I'm still on Windows 10 22H2 because I didn't want to deal with all the issues in Windows 11, so I waited almost a week before installing the latest Patch Tuesday update (KB5094127), I went ahead and did it, and it was a huge mistake—ever since then, my File Explorer has seen a performance drop of about 30% when transferring large files... Once again, Microsoft has outdone itself! This update cannot be uninstalled, either through the Control Panel (via Settings) or by accessing Advanced Startup Options. The only possible alternative would be to use system restore points, but I’d have to reinstall all app and driver updates (and there’s no guarantee it would work). Or there’s the “nuclear option” of a in-place repair without losing files or apps, but even then, all my customizations would be lost! Microsoft just can’t help but mess everything up! Way to go, Microsoft! But I still don’t want your c****y Windows 11!
    • Microsoft: Windows 11 could finally solve a major issue across AMD, Nvidia, and Intel GPUs by Sayan Sen While Microsoft has been trying to improve it, Windows 11 is definitely not flawless, as even today some issues are taking a year to publicly acknowledge. However, one area of trouble that may finally see much better results soon is graphics driver crashes. Work on graphics driver timeouts, also called Timeout and Detection Recovery (TDR), is not new as the latest WDDM 3.2 also has specific improvements regarding it. Windows Display Driver Model (WDDM) version 3.2 is supported on Windows 11 24H2 and 25H2. However, with the upcoming version 26H2, TDR crash diagnosis could go to the next level as Microsoft is introducing a new DirectX 12 API feature called "DirectX Dump Files". Similar to how system memory dump files work when a system crashes or freezes or encounters any such major issue, DirectX Dump Files (DDF) will essentially record a snapshot of the GPU execution right at the moment a graphics-related crash or hang or freeze occurs, so that developers can better understand and diagnoze these TDR and timeout detection errors. The dump will be available as a .dxdmp file for analysis and it will be a comprehensive dump file generated with detailed insights about the hardware, drivers, Windows, as well as the affected application. This should be another welcome change in this department. Earlier at GDC 2026, when the technology was first debuted, Microsoft had shared more details regarding it. The company had explained how DDF is designed to gather data from every layer of the graphics stack into a single file, eliminating the need for developers to manually correlate logs from multiple tools. As mentioned above, the dump can contain a lot of useful details like GPU hardware state information such as register values, shader program counters, page fault virtual addresses, shader memory data, and command buffers. Alongside that, it also captures DirectX runtime and kernel information, including D3D objects, pipeline state objects, device error data, adapter details, and CPU call stacks. Microsoft says the feature has been built around two primary use cases: retail device removals and local device removals. The former allows developers to collect crash information from end users' systems in the field, while the latter helps QA teams and developers investigate issues on test machines. Developers will also be able to include up to 2 MB of custom application data through new D3D12 APIs, providing additional context for troubleshooting. In addition, Microsoft is introducing three dump collection modes ranging from zero-overhead capture, which has no runtime performance impact on supported hardware, to higher-detail modes that collect more vendor-specific debugging data. On compatible Tier 2 hardware, zero-overhead dumps will be enabled by default, meaning developers may begin receiving useful crash diagnostics without making any code changes. The table below explains the three tiers: Tier Description NO_OVERHEAD Enables crash capture with no runtime cost and is suitable for broad deployment MEDIUM_OVERHEAD Provides a balance, capturing additional diagnostic data with moderate impact HIGH_OVERHEAD Collects the most detailed GPU and driver state available, enabling deeper investigation at the cost of higher runtime overhead In terms of availability, the company expects broader release to be around the fall of 2026, which should be right around the time when Windows 11 version 26H2 lands. Right now, DirectX Dump Files are available as a preview and currently, only AMD has the compatible AgilitySDK Developer Preview driver version 26.10.07.02. You can find the official announcement post here on Microsoft's website.
    • And with SO much better perf than the laggy mess that is Files.
    • BrowserOS 0.46.0 by Razvan Serea BrowserOS is a free, open-source Chromium-based browser that runs AI agents natively, offering a smarter, more productive browsing experience. It supports Chrome extensions and integrates AI agents to automate tasks, fill forms, and streamline workflows. Your data stays on your computer: you can use your own API keys or run local models via Ollama, making it a privacy-first alternative to tools like Perplexity, Comet, or Dia. With built-in productivity tools and app integrations, BrowserOS boosts efficiency while keeping control firmly in your hands. Being Chromium-based, BrowserOS lets you effortlessly import your bookmarks, passwords, and Chrome extensions in just a few clicks. BrowserOS works with OpenAI GPT models, Anthropic Claude, Google Gemini, and local AI models via Ollama or LMStudio. You can use your own API keys and effortlessly switch between providers. BrowserOS Agent Your AI productivity assistant that organizes and manages your browsing effortlessly Quickly list, group, or close tabs Save and resume browsing sessions Search your history and organize bookmarks Switch instantly to the tab you need BrowserOS Navigator – Automate web tasks with ease Navigate websites and search automatically Interact with pages without manual effort Handle repetitive tasks in seconds What makes BrowserOS special Feels like home - same familiar interface as Google Chrome, works with all your extensions AI agents that run on YOUR browser, not in the cloud Privacy first - bring your own keys or use local models with Ollama. Your browsing history stays on your computer Open source and community driven - see exactly what's happening under the hood MCP store to one-click install popular MCPs and use them directly in the browser bar (coming soon) Built-in AI ad blocker that works across more scenarios! BrowserOS 0.46.0 changelog: Run Claude Code & Codex right in your browser — We've extended the agent harness to bring full coding agents into BrowserOS. Claude Code and Codex now come bundled and plug straight into the assistant, so you can drive your browser with the agent — and the subscription — you already use. A brand new experience — A redesigned new tab, a calmer composer, and a rebuilt command center for switching between agents. The whole assistant is cleaner, faster to reach, and easier to live in. New MCP tools — We rebuilt the browser tool surface from the ground up — a tighter, more reliable set of tools for agents to drive the browser. Plus one-click install of BrowserOS as an MCP server into the agents you already run, with automatic URL sync. Chromium 148 — Updated to the latest Chromium base with all recent upstream fixes and security patches. Streamlined — We've pulled back a few features that weren't getting much use — Skills, Soul, and Memory — so we can focus and ship better versions of them soon. Download: BrowserOS 0.46.0 | 181.0 MB (Open Source) Download: BrowserOS for macOS | 485.0 MB Links: BrowserOS Homepage | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Jordan Smith earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      594
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      187
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      79
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      74
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!