Recommended Posts

Since peaking at an all-time high player base of 12 million in 2010, WOW has steadily shed subscribers, dropping to a current tally of 10.2 million.

Well I went back about a week ago and the server Im on is doing fine. 10.2Mill is still a hell of a lot. So hes quiet right in what he saying.

So since I started playing WoW in 2007 I've had to reinstall Windows countless times and I lost most of my Burning Crusade screenshots. I'm glad I uploaded images here every chance I could get in 2007-2008. Got tons of them back. Evn is probobly the only one that would remember them. :p

I just recently started playing again with my free 80 when I came back. I successfully geared my 85 mage which was still in all Season 9 PvP gear from my year break in about 4 days....so easy to get gear now, lol. Hes all in 384-397 gear completely with a bit of gold spent, and perfect timing when I came back for raid finder. I came back on a monday, did all of LFR, then logged in tuesday and did LFR again.

It's kind of boring really.....both LFR can be cleared in one day as well as valor maxed, and JP.

Guess I'll start leveling my free 80 rogue I got now while waiting for LFR to reset again.

So since I started playing WoW in 2007 I've had to reinstall Windows countless times and I lost most of my Burning Crusade screenshots.

I uploaded videos from everything to youtube this expansion for the same reason. Try and pug heroic nef with openraid some time. Then

It's kind of boring really.....both LFR can be cleared in one day as well as valor maxed, and JP.

Worse, heroic dragon soul can be cleared faster than a typical LFR run (because your people are competent and not AFK half the time). If you've got an 8/8 heroic toon you can easily find 5/8 heroic pugs for your alts if you want to: but what's the point? The gear reset is coming so you can't prepare for the Tier 14 race, having more 410/416 just means the content we do have becomes even more trivial, and selling mounts for gold (my current hobby) seems like a waste of time now that we're in the "gold has no value" days. I wonder if there's an "undergeared" raiding project I could get in on. Farm up a set of blue gear on an alt, see how much heroic content you can clear without ever equipping an epic item before the next expansion comes out. I'm willing to bet you could do all of Tier 12 and 13 heroic modes with 346 blues or crafted PVP gear, Tier 11 hard modes would probably stop you at the 6/13 mark.

So do you guys think Guild Wars 2 will put a significant dent in WoW? I know every new MMO that comes out is deemed the "WoW killer", and none of them have...lol.

Yes. Cause unlike most new mmo's, it's doing more than just trying to copy wow with very few changes. That and the next xpack just sounds terrible. Which will combine with gw2 to cause an even larger sub drop than cata did.

well bnet is back up. Copied my main over, and made a premade pandaran monk. Though I will probably start a fresh one too. Download is crawling though. Getting 150 -> 300kb/s which if I was getting full speed I should be getting 3-4mb/s

ahh wait, it's only the 30mb installer :/ - Make sure you untik P2P in the connection settings. Generally speeds things up for me

I tried with it unchecked, didn' seem to make a difference. I am currently letting WoW Update to the latest (Currently "Reconfiguring game files"). I am wondering if updating it first may make the downloader go faster? I don't know haha.

Same here, but I can't login to the website. And I am 100% positive the only reason I got beta was because I had to pay my way in.

After not making the beta for Wrath, SC2, Cata or Diablo 3, I know this is why I got the invite last night lol. Have had the game downloading since then. Transferred my hunter and pally over as well as a druid and warrior pre-made as those are the two classes I am thinking of leveling next.

So after downloading most of the beta I had to shut the client and restart my computer as it was just starting to clog up cause I had to many things open. I open the client back up and it acts like it hasn't downloaded any of the beta. I have 16gb of useless data just sitting there now but I don't want to delete it just in case. I think I'll just wipe everything tonight and restart the download.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
    • A $300 price hike is insane! No one is going to want to pay that much!
    • Since the 1st one flopped, there is really no reason to make another one. It's just losing money left and right.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!