Mac Mini Questions Thread


Recommended Posts

The way Compaq worked with RAM was to make the RAM CL and other specs so specific if you tried anything else it would throw it out. Some old HP's use a hardware trick to make sure you only use HP memory (i had a big problem with some Brio's :( ) So i would assume that Apple are doing the same, however after a while crucial seems to be able to work it out, as with the hp's the generic ram i carry didn't work! but ordered some on crucial without any probs.

I went through the manufacturer selector on the crucial site (UK) and there isn't a listing for the Mac Mini ...YET!

Does it contain a internal power supply? Or does it include a power brick like some of the smaller pc's by Dell?

I am thinking this is why the thing can be so small.

585281528[/snapback]

imacmini_large.jpg

this should answer your question: yeh. it seems it has a power brick.

but it seems like a small one.

question 2: will i be able to access/manipulate files on my pc via SMB over wifi? i don't mind the 40GB drive in the mini mostly because i've got 280GB on my dell. but i'm not sure if i'll be able to run the iLife apps on files sitting on my dell drives...i'd like to use the mac hd solely for apps, and have all my media on the pc.

question 3: lots of people complain about there only being 2 usb 2.0 ports...is there any reason why i couldn't just add a usb 2.0 hub to provide more ports? buy.com was selling 4-port usb 2.0 hubs for $7 the other day.

585281664[/snapback]

2. Yes, that would work fine, I do it all the time.

3. That works too. What I don't understand is why anyone would think that it wouldn't.

The way Compaq worked with RAM was to make the RAM CL and other specs so specific if you tried anything else it would throw it out. Some old HP's use a hardware trick to make sure you only use HP memory (i had a big problem with some Brio's :(  ) So i would assume that Apple are doing the same, however after a while crucial seems to be able to work it out, as with the hp's the generic ram i carry didn't work! but ordered some on crucial without any probs.

I went through the manufacturer selector on the crucial site (UK) and there isn't a listing for the Mac Mini ...YET!

585282034[/snapback]

Yes there is. Mac mini is already listed on crucial's site.

Edit: nm, I see now that you said UK site.

I remember hearing something earlier about an OSX patch that made it so some third party RAM did not work (I believe it was Kingston)?  How would you be able to tell what ram would work and what ram apple has banned (really cheap move in my opinion).

585281837[/snapback]

It can happen simply because Apple likes to tweak the Kernel not just in different releases like for instance Jaguar to Panther but even in its mini service pack decimal releases for example in about a fortnight 10.3.8 will be released and the kernel will go up to version 7.8.0 from 7.7.0.

So in short if you had a dodgy stick of RAM it may work up until Apple tweaks the Kernel again to get even more performace out of the system, thats what people mean when they say OS X gets faster and smoother with every release, but the downside to it is it can show up faults that were previously going un-noticed.

I am suprised that Kingston would be a problem though.

It can happen simply because Apple likes to tweak the Kernel not just in different releases like for instance Jaguar to Panther but even in its mini service pack decimal releases for example in about a fortnight 10.3.8 will be released and the kernel will go up to version 7.8.0 from 7.7.0.

So in short if you had a dodgy stick of RAM it may work up until Apple tweaks the Kernel again to get even more performace out of the system, thats what people mean when they say OS X gets faster and smoother with every release, but the downside to it is it can show up faults that were previously going un-noticed.

I am suprised that Kingston would be a problem though.

585282317[/snapback]

Wasn't me. I heard about it though. Supposedly somebody just ran updates and it disabled some third party ram that I believe was Kingston. My main point is, is there any company we can go with that is sure to work (and keep working, meaning Apple would never backstab the company)?

Wasn't me.  I heard about it though.  Supposedly somebody just ran updates and it disabled some third party ram that I believe was Kingston.  My main point is, is there any company we can go with that is sure to work (and keep working, meaning Apple would never backstab the company)?

585282396[/snapback]

It probably came from someone who promotes other silly rumors like the reason OS X never gets spyware or virus's is 100% down to market share or the other funny one about no software being available for Mac.

I am hoping to order one soonish, I have a question though is there any chance of using my 7.1's (they can run under 5.1)

Oh yeah isn't tiger meant to be 64bit which would therefore mean it wouldn't run on a G4?

And there may only be 2 usb ports but the keyboard provides and extra 2 if you go with the Mac keyboard....if not get a hub

Alright... was looking at a mini here at work today.... (yes you read that right) and the memory slot is buried underneath the optical drive... and is extremely hard to get to. It is not user serviceable and must be taken into an Authorized Service Provider.

As for the hard drive.... it doesnt look like it would be easy, but a possibility. Attempting both however would void the warranty. Apple can tell when something has been replaced that was not meant to be, even if you remove the part before service.

i was thinking of getting a mini mac sometime wheni can afford to spend the money

but id want to use a kvm as i dont have enough desk space for a second screen.

only problem is all the ones ive seen have ps2 connectors for keyboard and mouse but i want to use usb keyb/mouse is there a kvm that can support use keyb/mouse (that and the mac doesnt have any ps2 ports)

I am hoping to order one soonish, I have a question though is there any chance of using my 7.1's (they can run under 5.1)

Oh yeah isn't tiger meant to be 64bit which would therefore mean it wouldn't run on a G4?

And there may only be 2 usb ports but the keyboard provides and extra 2 if you go with the Mac keyboard....if not get a hub

585282573[/snapback]

Tiger supports both 32bit and 64bit, its very doubtful that anyone using a consumer grade system such as this would ever have the need for 64bit support, 98% of apps will run better as 32bit, even the most demanding games such as Doom3 and HL2 would not benefit from 64bit support.

Dbase, 3D Graphics rendering and a few others are the only type of apps needing 64bit support or rather those that use more that 2gig of ram on a regular basis.

Alright... was looking at a mini here at work today.... (yes you read that right) and the memory slot is buried underneath the optical drive... and is extremely hard to get to.? It is not user serviceable and must be taken into an Authorized Service Provider.

As for the hard drive.... it doesnt look like it would be easy, but a possibility.? Attempting both however would void the warranty.? Apple can tell when something has been replaced that was not meant to be, even if you remove the part before service.

585282629[/snapback]

Silly Rabbit, did you really think we would believe that you had one of these at work, especially when they have not even been realeased for sale through ADC yet. by the way the whole top of the unit comes off to reveal the ram running down the side, not the front under the optical drive.

Oh yeah, looks pretty user upgrade friendly to me.

designinsides20050111.jpg

Silly Rabbit, did you really think we would believe that you had one of these at work, especially when they have not even been realeased for sale through ADC yet. by the way the whole top of the unit comes off to reveal the ram running down the side, not the front under the optical drive.

Oh yeah, looks pretty user upgrade friendly to me. 

http://images.apple.com/uk/macmini/images/...des20050111.jpg

585282814[/snapback]

Well noyb..... yes :yes: you should belive that i had one of these at work, its not that hard to do considering that I work for Apple. Both the Mac mini and the iPod shuffle were brought up from a guy in Cupertino for us to mess around with for the day and become familliar with.

The moment someone other than a service provider opens this case... your warranty is gone. Trust me on that one. But nice try on trying to discredit me! :p

http://ppleyard.org.uk/postimages/imacmini_large.jpg

this should answer your question: yeh. it seems it has a power brick.

but it seems like a small one.

585282064[/snapback]

the chord is easy enuff you can just put it behind your desk, or :shifty: attach it to the underside of your desk.

Well noyb..... yes :yes: you should belive that i had one of these at work, its not that hard to do considering that I work for Apple.  Both the Mac mini and the iPod shuffle were brought up from a guy in Cupertino for us to mess around with for the day and become familliar with. 

The moment someone other than a service provider opens this case... your warranty is gone.  Trust me on that one. But nice try on trying to discredit me! :p

585282976[/snapback]

I was pointing out that you were feeding people false information that may influence their buying choice, buying memory from Apple would push up the price negating one of the key selling points of this machine. You said that the memory was in a hard to get area under the optical drive, ITS NOT, i proved that much and furthermore i have never come across an Apple machine that did not allow the user to upgrade the memory themselves, do you realise how much of a waste of time that would be for service centres, they have more pressing things to do than fiddle about stripping components to get to a clip in component that would be one of the most common replacement parts of the system both BTO and Fault correction.

Apple has good reputation with form and function and placing a component in a small case in an enclosed area where circulation would not only be restricted for the component itself but in turn would cause circulation problems for the componets it would block, this heat would then be re-absorbed by the ram and then rise up to the optical drive possibly causing damage to the unit instead of being spread evenly throughout the case shell where unfocused it can cool down to around room temperature.

K enough flaming, cswadner does work for Apple so chill your panties.

585283179[/snapback]

I was not flaming, as stated i was showing that he was posting false information that could affect people's buying decision, do you not think that statements such as voiding warranty and buying memory from Apple would not affect people's decision, it would mine.

Well this is my final comment, its just friendly banter here, no worries. I never stated that memory HAD to be purchased from Apple. I only stated that the memory needed to be installed by an Authorized Service Provider. Whether that is a physical Apple Retail Store, or some other place, I never said that you couldnt use 3rd party memory. (personally i would purchase 3rd party memory, lol) I would only leave installation up to one of these Authorized places only to prevent a customer's warranty from being voided, as a safeguard. So that is that, I rest my peace, but do appreaciate you looking out for the people out there

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I have a Motorola, one of the lower end ones, it works fine. It is possible to get rid of the Gemini app and also to disable googles assistant , but A.i is still apps. I try to avoid all LLM A.I, is i can, I use no Ai duck duck go.
    • Free Software Foundation Europe pushes EU to force Google to allow AI uninstalls on Android by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels Users should be able to fully uninstall AI-based features from Android devices and be able to access interoperability functions, free from Google’s verification requirements, the European Commission has heard as part of an Android interoperability consultation under the Digital Markets Act. These measures were proposed by the Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) last week when it submitted its documentation. The FSFE noted that Google had started silently installing AI models without telling users. It noted that the EU’s DMA requires companies like Google to allow users to uninstall pre-loaded software from their devices, but in the case of the AI models Google is installing, they reinstall if you delete them, contravening the DMA. To get Google back under control, the FSFE has told the European Commission that there needs to be improvements within the Android Open Source Project (AOSP). First, it said that users should be able to fully remove pre-loaded AI components from their devices, with companies being prohibited from silently reinstalling or reactivating them. Second, access to Android interoperability features should not be contingent on registration, authorization, or contractual relationships with Google. This pertains to Google’s attempt to force developers to register with Google, even to publish apps to alternative app stores like F-Droid. Discussing its submission, Lucas Lasota, FSFE Legal Programme Manager, said: Google is planning to roll out its Android Developer Certification in September 2026. This will force every Android app developer to register with Google before their software can be installed on certified Android devices, but it should affect those who have removed Google Apps from their device. The program is controversial because it entails the signing of contracts and payment of account fees to Google, as well as the handing over of the identities of developers. It said: The FSFE said that if the Commission’s draft measures remain unchanged, then Google will be allowed to make developers verify their identity. The FSFE believes that asking developers to register is contrary to the text and spirit of the law. In summary, the FSFE has told the Commission that no developer should need a Google account, a Play Store presence, or any agreement with Google to access Android’s interoperability features.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      189
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!