How old were you when you first had sex?


  

1 member has voted

  1. 1. How old were you when you first had sex?

    • 14 an under
      26
    • 15 or 16
      23
    • 17 or 18
      22
    • 19 or 20
      15
    • 20 - 23
      8
    • 24 - 26
      4
    • 27 - 30
      3
    • 30 and up
      3
    • I'm still a virgin (Which is perfectly okay)
      55
    • I was also sexually abused
      7


Recommended Posts

Okay, this is serious, and not meant to be sick.

Another post in this forum got me thinking. How old were you when you first had sex? Now, i'd be sick of me just to post for no real reason, but, I've decided to do my sociological survey on it. So, it's for my sociology summer class.

I'd like as many people to vote as possible, but you don't have to post anything. If you'd like, you can post comments that I can use in my report.

Thanks.

Age limits are to low. UK has the highest under age preg rate in europe.

Other countires have unisex bogs etc. UK keeps everything locked up. every other country is open about it, and i think this helps.

There are sluts in my school who had been f**ked loads of times before 16.

They think its all great hitting the high C's but them comes the baby coz no blobs were used.

UK NEEDS MORE INFORMATION FOR TEENAGERS AND ITS JUST NOT THERE. PEOPLE ARE BECOMING PREGNANT AND NO ONE CARES UNTIL IT HAPPENS TO THEM.

THINK BEFORE U SHAG

Originally posted by JaggedFlame

Remember now, your right hand doesn't count. ;)

AGH!!

Gentlemen!!!

Please, please, please. I want to welcome everyone to post, but if we post about stuff that is inapproprate, we are not welcomeing those who are already uncomforitable with this subject!!

24 and still none yet :s

But by choice, the few oppertunities I had were with women I didn't even know, and having to choose between a little nookie and the possibility of Aids or soemthing, easy choise...

beside if the she got pregnant, I'd have to know her for the rest of my life, so unless I totoally love the girl and know that she is healthly, the risks aint worth it to me.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I've been using MWB Premium for a number of years so that along with Windows updates and updated browser should be fine. Thanks for that.
    • For some reason I suddenly have the urge to go shopping at Sears.
    • So I did a quick test based on 3+ different public instances from the litany at searx.space ... and it spins everything rather differently. It seems that SearXNG is a meta-search engine (queries multiple search indexes rather than only Google's or Bing's or Wikipedia's or Reddit's) that operates in two modes: > public instances ... each instance opens itself to outside users who piggyback on its cached search history; this instance's own identity becomes known/tracked but end-users are hidden similar to an anonymization proxy; this instance's querying of major search indexes may be API based [rated limited, blocked, etc.]). > private instances ... your private install/instance that itself queries multiple (configurable) search indexes of crawled web content; every major Search Engine associates all traffic to your private instance (so your traffic is tracked via network usages) but client-side tracking (your own browser/computer specs) is flushed because it's a "server" doing the querying rather than your browser. My test asked the same 1 question to the 3+ engines and they all returned vastly different results: some had CAPTCHA failures against Google, some had failures against Wikipedia, and the actual results were also different -- some had auto-complete enabled, others returned a wikipedia highlighted excerpt despite the Wikipedia failure (hinting at results being cached from previous keyword matching), and others just gave an Are-You-Human non-CAPTCHA loop before returning random results. So this begs the caveat: Search query results will vary based on which instance is used because every instance queries the other search indexes separate (and thus its results are influenced on that instance's aggregate search history and index-access limitations). The major distinctions for SearXNG versus DDG or Brave: > The search UI is 'untracked' since no UI trackers are baked-in which would phone home or lay cookies into your browser (for DDG/Brave usage stats), > There is no 'crawler' that canvasses the Internet to discover fresh content (it leaves that to the major search indexes), > Queries multiple search indexes ("meta-search engine") based on the configurations and usage history of the server instance, > Privacy-friendly due to its ability to shield user tracking via standing up a non-local server instance connectable to major VPN providers: queries would all appear to come from general VPN/Proxy providers rather than your private instance (whether installed locally or on your own VPS in the cloud). PS: I've previously come across specialized search engines of this nature that indexes searches across media assets like YT, OF, etc. SearXNG seems to be a good backbone...if the rate-limiting/captcha/etc. issues were resolved.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      490
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      225
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!