?  

1072 members have voted

  1. 1. ?

    • Yes, I only use other browsers for the tabs
      159
    • Yes, I just want the enhanced security
      86
    • I already use IE
      266
    • No, I need my mouse gestures and other features
      276
    • No, M$ is 73h $uck
      207
    • No, i use linux/OSX and MS doesnt like me
      59
    • No, i use win 9x/2k and MS doesnt care about me
      19


Recommended Posts

I would download and install IE7 but Firefox will remain my primary browser of choice.

And to all the people that get tired of having to download a full installer for an upgrade

Firefox 1.1 will have binary patching .. so only what needs to be updated will be updated

my stance on IE and MS can be read on my spreadfirefox blog here

585905483[/snapback]

going by your stance I doubt you will even consider downloading IE7 :D.

I switched back to IE a long, long time ago.

At the time I tried it out, to many things were buggy in FF, and I found myself opening up IE 50% of the time to resolve those bugs. That was about 6 months ago, I finally stopped using FF, and I never looked back.

Also keep in mind 85% of my surfing is done on my Mac, so I use Safari most of the time such as right now replying in this post.

However, that other 15% I am surfing on my Windows Comp, yes, it is all IE. If you are smart about your habits, and you do not go to sites that you know are naturally infested (*cough* porn sites *cough*), and finally you check for that random spyware and adaware frequently enough, there is really nothing to worry about at all.

If I use IE my pc gets full of ****e and spyware, I use firefox and my pc is totally free of this crap. Until IE is fixed I will not use it. PERIOD

585905591[/snapback]

Its because of your custom security settings or you click yes all the time when you get a promt to download activex content. Its not IE's mistake.

Its because of your custom security settings or you click yes all the time when you get a promt to download activex content. Its not IE's mistake.

585907243[/snapback]

It is, IE is insecure out of the box and there are tons of exploids, bugs, and flaws out of the box, long live m$

Still use IE6, with no plans for using FF got no need really to change, I've tried it and liked it a lot, but just didn't change :blink:

We use IE at work without any issues, don't really care that its not up to standard, but o well.

I do hope that IE7 has tabs and some of the other features of FF, as some are really good :p

What the heck... So many options, but not one for an obvious one to me:

"Yes, but only if it's better than competing browsers for my needs."

There ARE more than tabs and such things for me in Opera and Firefox, and my general impression has to decide whether I'll end up using it. I'm certainly not using browsers because of a company being more of a "favorite" than another though, but it really depends on if MS will be able to deliver.

99.9% likely to NOT switch. I have heard of very little progress being made with the rendering engine, and that is enough for me to stay away from it and continue to promote alternatives. It's security really needs to be overhauled; it is secure by default in Windows XP SP2 and that was a good start, but the whole "Internet Options" dialog needs to be overhauled to make it simpler to understand for normal users. The browser's interface is decent, but it also needs quite an overhaul to even come close to the alternatives. Quite frankly, I highly doubt I will switch to Internet Explorer for the next 4 years...

I think it would take Microsoft a lot longer then 4 years to get to the point that I would switch back to IE again, a lot longer

it took 3 years for Microsoft to get IE secure enough to the point that you don't have to worry about every little link ya click on potentially sending a virus or a worm your way.(XP SP2)

While XP on the whole is a solid OS and very stable .. it's gonna take separating IE from the OS to make IE as stable and secure as it should/needs to be. Microsoft made a big big mistake making IE part of the XP core .. it's stupid from an end user perspective and from a IT perspective

<this opinion is only that of the owner of this account on neowin.net and does not speak for anyone else that uses the internet...thank you>

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
    • So how did you solve the problem? Disabling Secure Boot isn’t a solution.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!