?  

1072 members have voted

  1. 1. ?

    • Yes, I only use other browsers for the tabs
      159
    • Yes, I just want the enhanced security
      86
    • I already use IE
      266
    • No, I need my mouse gestures and other features
      276
    • No, M$ is 73h $uck
      207
    • No, i use linux/OSX and MS doesnt like me
      59
    • No, i use win 9x/2k and MS doesnt care about me
      19


Recommended Posts

i use linux and i use ie7 also. never left it.

586306150[/snapback]

IE7 will work on Linux? I never knew that... Anyways, I'm already using IE7, simply because the browser engine works with just about every web page out there.

IE7 has to be a revolution if I should switch to it.

But it isn't. And it may never be.

Using Opera right now w/o any probs and secure-holes.

Firefox is more comfortable in my opinion but is less secure than Opera.

So... we have to wait und look. And test and reinstall and test and cry and we'll usw an alternate browser... :pinch:

In german:

"Da bei?t sich die Katze in den Schwanz" :pp

I think I probably would go back to IE 7, for a while atleast.

At the moment I'm using Firefox because it's security is so much better than IE6. Now, Firefox seems to be dying the same fate as IE6. Too many people are using it now, so hackers are spending more time looking for exploits - making it insecure. MS have a bigger team to fix security bugs than Mozilla do - MS tend to get security fixes out pretty damn quick. It's just a matter of time before Firefox is as much of a spyware magnet as IE6 is.

So if I'm going to use an insecure browser - I might aswell stick with the browser that is built into the OS and has security patches released very quickly. When I get bored of IE7, I have no doubt I'll migrate to Opera or another lesser-known browser. Then when that gets popular - move onto something else.

"IF IE7 disabled activeX and became more secure and added tabbed browsing, would you switch back from firefox/opera?"

you can go to the Security options and disable activeX options

and a side note, many sites (not the propor ones :p) in IE6 that spawns activex all over the place in IE7 dont do anything so i assume they have done better security indeed.

btw i am a FF user from versions 0.x but many pages until now dont work well in FF and surfing with IE7 its a blast compared to FF.

My only wish, tabs at bottom :D

just want to point out that whoever switches from Firefox or Opera clearly has no idea about what he's doing.

IE7 is still light years away from the state of a modern browser. so they added tab-browsing... hey Microsoft, 1997 called. they want their innovation in GUIs back.

sticking to Opera indefinitelly, or until Firefox becomes usable.

just want to point out that whoever switches from Firefox or Opera clearly has no idea about what he's doing.

586312851[/snapback]

Not necessarily... if all a person wanted was tabs then IE7 adding them would be plenty enough to warrant them going back to it. However, they could of had tabs with the MSN Toolbar or Maxthon anyway so it's not really very logical.

if IE7 can allow me to surf the web while at the same time having BT on, then i'm happy.

i don't know if this goes for everyone, but for me, I am unable to load pages with IE6, whereas, FF is able to load websites fine.

i was a happy IE user till my friends introduced to me FireFox. I'm in it for tabbed browsing. :)

I like girls. When you use Firefox, you get more hot chicks. So until IE has some sort of support for hot chick attraction, im sticking with Firefox.

Hot chicks are delicious.

586314293[/snapback]

"Hey baby, I use Firefox, wanna sleep with me?" *Cough* Yeah, lemmi know when that works :p

I have found Maxthon (an IE shell) infinitely superior to all other browsers for my purposes. It's extremely intuitive and makes everything easy. IE7 might be decent, but not innovative. I'll wait for a Maxthon variant of it.

Since there is no maxthon on Mac, though, my iBook runs Firefox exclusively. Safari and IE just don't do it for me.

I voted "I already use IE", since the original poster apparently doesn't believe (or doesn't know) there are variants to IE.

I have found Maxthon (an IE shell) infinitely superior to all other browsers for my purposes.  It's extremely intuitive and makes everything easy.  IE7 might be decent, but not innovative.  I'll wait for a Maxthon variant of it.

Since there is no maxthon on Mac, though, my iBook runs Firefox exclusively.  Safari and IE just don't do it for me.

I voted "I already use IE", since the original poster apparently doesn't believe (or doesn't know) there are variants to IE.

586314336[/snapback]

i was a Maxthon user too for a couple of years.. i loved the plugins it had, and the features it added to IE.. i have no beef with the IE core, because personally i've never had a problem with it.. i know the sites i visit, and i've learnt to be careful in Windows as it is.. however, i tried out Opera, and not only was it hell of a lot faster in rendering pages and using the interface, and had a generally lower resources usage, but also it had that added element of security of using a non-IE browser.. sure, it doesn't offer the customization level of Firefox, but FF is unusably slower on my system to begin with..

also, there's Opera for OSX and Linux too, and it beats every browser on those systems too.. try it out. you've got nothing to lose.

i was a Maxthon user too for a couple of years.. i loved the plugins it had, and the features it added to IE.. i have no beef with the IE core, because personally i've never had a problem with it.. i know the sites i visit, and i've learnt to be careful in Windows as it is.. however, i tried out Opera, and not only was it hell of a lot faster in rendering pages and using the interface, and had a generally lower resources usage, but also it had that added element of security of using a non-IE browser.. sure, it doesn't offer the customization level of Firefox, but FF is unusably slower on my system to begin with..

also, there's Opera for OSX and Linux too, and it beats every browser on those systems too.. try it out. you've got nothing to lose.

I've tried Opera and simply found it not to my liking.

I like Mozilla browser much better, followed by Firefox when compared to Opera.

But I too prefer Maxthon.

Plus, Opera is adware unless you pay for it, so when the others are all free, it makes just one more notch against Opera for me.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
    • So how did you solve the problem? Disabling Secure Boot isn’t a solution.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!