MS sues college student for selling legit software


Recommended Posts

This topic is about a guy sued by MS, and half the thread involves cars and insurance crap WTH IS IT WITH YOU GUYS AND ANOLOGYS! GAH!

585609690[/snapback]

because the anti-MS fanboys (trollboys?) don't want to accept the fact that MS was perfectly in their rights to do this, so we have to bring in something totally un-related to try and convince them.

The people who write the software get more then their share.  That's not the issue, the issue is with MS putting rediculous limits on something you bought for the ultimate intent and purpose of making more money.  I guess the 50 somewhat billion they already have isn't enough.  Then they thank the very people who keep them alive by sueing anyone who tries to sell their software.  Yeah, that's great business ethic.  :rolleyes:

Tell that to my dad, MS threatened to sue him when he posted a laptop on ebay that came with windows preloaded on it.

585609631[/snapback]

You're allowed to sell the laptop with preloaded software, the o.e.m. licence says you must only use the software with the machine it was built with, so your dad has 2 choices, sell with software or without, doubt many would buy a second hand laptop without and ops on it.

Show us the threat received from M$ please.

in that case, he could be sued if they want after him for the right damn thing. They just seemingly picked the most pathetic sounding excuse of a lawsuit ever and went with it.

585593909[/snapback]

haahahhaha totally

I may be confused but...

How is reselling software that is clearly licensed only for students and teachers legal?? It's not like he was verifying that the winners of his auction(s) were indeed students, correct...?

Microsoft purposely sells their software at extremely discounted rates for academic users and this guy was taking advantage of that.? At least, that's what it seems like to me.

585593670[/snapback]

One of my jobs is a sales assistant at a well known technology retail store. Whenever we sell academic software (such as Office, Windows, etc.) we'rnotu> required to ask for student I.D and other retail stores such as Harvey Norman and Harris Technology don't do this either.

I'm not sure if its the same in the U.S. however if we're not required to do that, why should someone else have to demand for Student I.D?

Edited by kizzaaa

As much as I hate and loathe MS and their crushing idiology. I still realize that I wouldnt be typing this message without them. To be honest, I feel that MS is doing something good here. They need to protect themselves. My first reaction was, MS should lose, but I have changed to the kid should lose. He is moron for doing this. But oh well. So I guess what I am saying is that I support MS in this lawsuit.

You're allowed to sell the laptop with preloaded software, the o.e.m. licence says you must only use the software with the machine it was built with, so your dad has 2 choices, sell with software or without, doubt many would buy a second hand laptop without and ops on it.

Show us the threat received from M$ please.

585610028[/snapback]

Well that's not what MS claimed. This was many years ago, I don't have access to the email.

From personal dealings with MS, they are a money grubbing organization that likes to impose limits so that they may make more money. It's as simple as that.

Well that's not what MS claimed.  This was many years ago, I don't have access to the email.

From personal dealings with MS, they are a money grubbing organization that likes to impose limits so that they may make more money.  It's as simple as that.

585611851[/snapback]

name one profit company that doesn't money grub? hell if you started a company, you wouldn't want to break even or lose money..think before you speak

allow me to make this simpler for the fanboys to understand: WE KNOW THAT WHAT THE STUDENT DID WAS ILLEGAL what we are saying is that microsoft is greedy. when you "buy" their software you arent actually buying it. you are giving them money so they can give you a disk and tell you how to use it. think of it this way, its like buying a wrench and finding out you can only use it on one thing. sure it could be used on a thousand things but that would be illegal wouldnt it :rolleyes: . hell, your not even buying the wrench, you buying a licence to use it!

allow me to make this simpler for the fanboys to understand: WE KNOW THAT WHAT THE STUDENT DID WAS ILLEGAL what we are saying is that microsoft is greedy. when you "buy" their software you arent actually buying it. you are giving them money so they can give you a disk and tell you how to use it. think of it this way, its like buying a wrench and finding out you can only use it on one thing. sure it could be used on a thousand things but that would be illegal wouldnt it  :rolleyes: . hell, your not even buying the wrench, you buying a licence to use it!

585613476[/snapback]

That's how all software is. Don't blame Microsoft.

This topic is about a guy sued by MS, and half the thread involves cars and insurance crap WTH IS IT WITH YOU GUYS AND ANOLOGYS! GAH!

585609690[/snapback]

Troll fights (especially ones involving MS) usually break down into a argument involving flawed analogies with cars because the people using the analogies are a bunch of rice kids. It's best to avoid the thread at that point...

  • 4 weeks later...

UPDATE: After the news broke, Microsoft offered to settle with Zamos.

http://clevescene.com/issues/2005-03-30/news/feature.html

[via NetworkWorld Compendium: http://www.nwfusion.com/compendium/2005/008440.html ]

Meanwhile, the company's lawyers seemed to understand they'd created a PR nightmare. "I got a call from Chudakoff [lawyer] in the early afternoon, the day the story came out," says David Sr. "He was looking for my son, and when I asked him what for, that cockroach said he couldn't discuss the case with me, because it defies legal ethics. So I said, 'What legal ethics?'"

When Zamos finally talked to Chudakoff, his tone had changed. "He was very complimentary," Zamos says. "He said he was impressed by my pleadings. His flattery was ridiculous."

This is from the same lawyer who initially threatened to repossess Zamos's Ford Escort as partial restitution (actually an illegal act, Zamos discovered).

In case you're wondering, Zamos had attempted to return the software to the university (they refused), attempted to return the software to MS (they also refused, despite the license agreement stating otherwise) before putting it on eBay (which has a MS-approved policy allowing resale of academic versions).

His argument was that he could not possibly accept the EULA because he never opened the package to install the software. Therefore, he could not be legally bound to it. (which is valid)

Further, the corporate lawyers said, ``Microsoft has suffered... substantial and irreparable damage to its business reputation and good will, as well as losses in an amount not yet ascertained.''

hahahAHAHAHAHAHAAAA - are they kidding?

Suffered? I bet all those copies that he sold or whatever would never have been missed by Microsoft if they didnt know about it!

I have done alot of thinking on this whole MS power struggle thing and how they seem to monopolize and how I hate them for it, etc. My conclusion is this: I must use Windows to run all the programs that I want to run in Windows and that only run and work in windows, so thus, I must support them. (damn, i know why I spent that $100).

SO...GO MICROSOFT...KICK SOME NARLY butt. HEHE, GO MS!!

Lawsuits are all about establishing a precedence. Microsoft doesn't care about this guys money. But, take this guy times 2million college students, and, you have a -real- potential for lost money.

All this serves is to deter people from doing the same thing. It's called smart business.

Did you know that Bill Gates is the wealthiest person in the world? You dont get to that point by not being smart about business.

haha fine if you want to think of it that way, does your insurance cover one car only, or all your cars..

ONE CAR. you have to buy seperate insurance for EACH car..so whats so different from that and software licenses? plus..insurance is so expensive =\

585596694[/snapback]

I have 3 vehicles and my ONE policy covers them all. What was your point with that?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • We now know when and how the Universe may truly end by Sayan Sen Image by Marek Pavlík via Pexels| Not representative A study by physicist Henry Tye of Cornell University suggests that the universe may not expand forever. Instead, it could eventually stop expanding, begin contracting and end in a "Big Crunch" roughly 20 billion years from now. The research, published in the Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, was conducted by Tye, Horace White Professor of Physics Emeritus at Cornell University. Using recent observations from major dark-energy surveys, Tye and his collaborators developed a cosmological model that predicts the universe could have a total lifespan of about 33 billion years. Since the universe is currently estimated to be 13.8 billion years old, the model places it near the midpoint of its existence. According to Cornell University's summary of the research, the study centers on the cosmological constant, a term introduced by Albert Einstein in his theory of general relativity. In modern cosmology, the cosmological constant is commonly used to describe the simplest form of dark energy, the unknown phenomenon believed to be driving the accelerating expansion of the universe. "For the last 20 years, people believed that the cosmological constant is positive, and the universe will expand forever," Tye said in a Cornell University news release. "The new data seem to indicate that the cosmological constant is negative, and that the universe will end in a big crunch." The study draws on data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) and the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), two major projects designed to investigate the nature of dark energy. According to Tye, recent observations suggest that dark energy may not behave exactly like a simple cosmological constant. To account for those observations, Tye and his collaborators proposed a model involving an extremely light hypothetical particle that evolves over time. In their calculations, this produces a negative cosmological constant and leads to a future collapse of the universe. The model predicts that cosmic expansion would continue for approximately another 11 billion years before reaching a maximum size, after which the universe would begin contracting and eventually collapse. Scientists have long debated how the universe might end. As explained in an article published in The Conversation by Stephen DiKerby of Michigan State University, several possibilities have been proposed. If dark energy remains constant and positive, the universe could continue expanding indefinitely, gradually becoming colder, darker and more diffuse in a scenario often called the "heat death" of the universe. Other theoretical possibilities include a Big Rip, in which cosmic expansion accelerates so dramatically that galaxies, stars and even atoms are torn apart, or a Big Crunch, in which expansion reverses and the universe collapses back into an extremely dense state. DiKerby notes that the Big Crunch idea itself is not new. What distinguishes Tye's work is that it attempts to use current observational data to estimate when such a collapse might occur and how it could unfold. Much of the universe's long-term evolution remains uncertain. According to current astrophysical understanding, stars will continue to form and die for billions of years. The Sun, for example, is about halfway through its expected lifespan. Galaxies are also expected to continue merging; the Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies are projected to collide several billion years from now. At the same time, the nature of dark energy remains one of the biggest unanswered questions in cosmology. While observations indicate that the universe's expansion is accelerating, scientists still do not know what is causing that acceleration. Future observations may therefore alter current predictions about the cosmos's ultimate fate. Tye emphasized that additional evidence will be needed before firm conclusions can be drawn. DESI continues to collect data, while upcoming observations from missions and observatories including Euclid, SPHEREx and the Vera C. Rubin Observatory are expected to provide more precise measurements of dark energy. "People have said before that if the cosmological constant is negative, then the universe will collapse eventually. That's not new," Tye said. "However, here the model tells you when the universe collapses and how it collapses." For now, the study presents one possible future for the cosmos rather than a settled prediction. Whether the universe ultimately ends in a Big Crunch, expands forever, or follows another path entirely remains an open question that future observations will help answer. Source: Cornell University, The Conversation This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • If you look around on Amazon, some of these are available for $9
    • I’m still using an Xbox One S, so time for an upgrade to play this but as much as I hate Sony, I think I’ll get the ps5 pro
    • I bought this game. Played it for an hour, and then got a refund from Steam. Not a fun game at all.
    • Nothing Ear buds with active noise cancellation are at their lowest price ever with 51% off by Fiza Ali Amazon is currently offering the Nothing Ear wireless earbuds at their lowest price ever with 51% off limited prime deal. The earbuds feature an 11mm dynamic drivers with a ceramic diaphragm, and support high-resolution audio codecs including AAC, SBC, LDAC, and LHDC 5.0. They support active noise cancellation of up to 45dB across a frequency range of up to 5000Hz, and include a smart ANC algorithm, adaptive noise cancellation, and a transparency mode that allows surrounding sounds to be heard when needed. Connectivity is provided via Bluetooth 5.3, with support for multiple profiles including HFP, A2DP, AVRCP, and others. The earbuds also support dual connection, allowing them to be paired with two devices at the same time. Additional features include IP54 water and dust resistance for the earbuds and IP55 for the charging case, in-ear detection, pinch controls, low-latency mode, Google Fast Pair, Microsoft Swift Pair, and a three-microphone system per earbud for clearer voice calls. The Nothing X app, available on Android and iOS, provides access to custom EQ settings, bass enhancement, personal sound profiles, ear tip fit testing, firmware updates, customisable controls, dual-device management, and a find-my-earbuds feature. In terms of battery performance, each earbud has a 46mAh battery and the charging case has a 500mAh capacity. With active noise cancellation (ANC) turned off, the earbuds should offer up to 8.5 hours of playback on a single charge and up to 40.5 hours in total with the charging case. With ANC enabled, playback should last up to 5.2 hours on the earbuds and up to 24 hours with the case. For calls, talk time should reach up to 5 hours on the earbuds and 23 hours with the case when ANC is off, while ANC on should provide up to 4 hours on the earbuds and 18 hours with the case. Finally, fast charging should deliver up to 10 hours of playback from 10 minutes of charging when ANC is disabled. Nothing Ear Wireless Earbuds Bluetooth: $73.15 (Amazon US) - 51% off Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      572
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      173
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      73
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!