Longhorn could be tough sell for Microsoft


Recommended Posts

Longhorn has already survived several major delays, intense scrutiny from the industry and a radical redesign of its features.

But the toughest test for Microsoft's next release of Windows is still to come: Will anyone buy it?

Even though it will be five years after Windows XP's debut, Microsoft could still face a tough sell when it releases Longhorn next year. With past updates, users had clamored for more stability and security, but analysts say people are pretty happy with Windows XP.

"Microsoft for the very first time is going to be faced with the challenge of being the player whose (operating system) is 'good enough'" as is, said Jupiter Research analyst Michael Gartenberg.

Complete Article

Agreed.. with Avalon, Indigo and WinFS being backported to prior OS's, the impetus is not there to buy a new machine and buy LH.

Let me tell ya, LH runs barely passbily on HT 3.06 machines... It would be good on dual procs with 1GB+ of ram...

I have noplans of buying it...

Agreed.. with Avalon, Indigo and WinFS being backported to prior OS's, the impetus is not there to buy a new machine and buy LH.

Let me tell ya, LH runs barely passbily on HT 3.06 machines... It would be good on dual procs with 1GB+ of ram...

I have noplans of buying it...

585699306[/snapback]

you have no idea how longhorn runs. If you're going to spread FUD, do it elsewhere. Forming opinions on pre-alpha releases of an OS is never a good idea.

Let me tell ya, LH runs barely passbily on HT 3.06 machines... It would be good on dual procs with 1GB+ of ram...

585699306[/snapback]

Where did you get that info from??

Anyway I'm gonna buy it! Just bought new laptop, and I think it'd be powerful enough to run LH.

Let me tell ya, LH runs barely passbily on HT 3.06 machines... It would be good on dual procs with 1GB+ of ram...

585699306[/snapback]

Yes, the leaked version of Longhorn runs badly. However, it was never meant to be seen by the general public. One possible reason is because Microsoft knew people would jump to conclusions like you just did.

In short, an alpha build is not representative of a final product. The final build is pretty much guaranteed to run better.

people will definately buy longhorn when they see how pretty and nice the new WGF enabled UI is. That's 1/2 the reason people buy macs now for christ's sake, because "it's so pretty". I seriously doubt microsoft is gonna have a hard time selling longhorn. For those of use who have been around for a while, we all remember the windows 2000 zealots when whistler was in beta (whistler was xp's codename) who said, you can do all this on win2k, etc etc, no one will buy whistler, it's gonna be slow, you're gonna need a 1 Ghz Computer to run it, etc etc. None of those things were true, and the same applies to LH. ;)

people will definately buy longhorn when they see how pretty and nice the new WGF enabled UI is. That's 1/2 the reason people buy macs now for christ's sake, because "it's so pretty". I seriously doubt microsoft is gonna have a hard time selling longhorn. For those of use who have been around for a while, we all remember the windows 2000 zealots when whistler was in beta (whistler was xp's codename) who said, you can do all this on win2k, etc etc, no one will buy whistler, it's gonna be slow, you're gonna need a 1 Ghz Computer to run it, etc etc. None of those things were true, and the same applies to LH.  ;)

585699417[/snapback]

I completely agree. Saying right now whether you believe it's worth upgrading to or not is a bit pointless since none of us know exactly what features to expect just yet.

That's 1/2 the reason people buy macs now for christ's sake, because "it's so pretty".

585699417[/snapback]

Source to back that up or are we pulling figures from somewhere else ? :huh:

I seriously doubt microsoft is gonna have a hard time selling longhorn. For those of use who have been around for a while, we all remember the windows 2000 zealots when whistler was in beta (whistler was xp's codename) who said, you can do all this on win2k, etc etc, no one will buy whistler, it's gonna be slow, you're gonna need a 1 Ghz Computer to run it, etc etc. None of those things were true, and the same applies to LH.  ;)

585699417[/snapback]

Um I dont think there was any Windows 2000 vs Windows XP debate in the pre-XP era. Windows 2000 is aimed at corporate/business users where as XP is aimed at consumers.

And just for a fact, many people (power users) still use Windows 2000 over XP because they do not need the extra added features in XP.

Um I dont think there was any Windows 2000 vs Windows XP debate in the pre-XP era.

Well, you're wrong. There was plenty of debate all over the internet's forums. ever heard of windows 2000 professional upgraded to Windows XP professional ?

Source to back that up or are we pulling figures from somewhere else ?

I don't have a source to back it up because no source exists jerry, give me a break. But I see alot of people around here and who talk to me in real life and the first thing they mention about why they like macs is "it just looks better than windows" I think we can all relate to that.

And just for a fact, many people (power users) still use Windows 2000 over XP

That might have been true 2 years ago, but since you can't even get SP2 for Internet Explorer on Windows2000, most people have been moving to XP. At my job, we had windows 2000 for the longest time, until 2004, when we switched completely over to Windows XP Service Pack 2. I can tell you it performs better than Windows 2000 does, supports more hardware and has improved experience overall. I am a System Administrator here and I know what I'm talking about.

Edited by ev0|
Well, you're wrong. There was plenty of debate all over the forums. ever heard of windows 2000 professional upgraded to Windows XP professional ?

585699462[/snapback]

Ok so I didnt come across such arguments but the comparision was a joke.

Windows 2000 - Corporate Businesses

Windows XP - Individual home users

Ofcourse Windows XP would sell more. Here the comparision is different;

Windows XP - Individual home users

Longhorn - Individual home users

Okay ?

I don't have a source to back it up because no source exists jerry, give me a break. But I see alot of people around here and who talk to me in real life and the first thing they mention about why they like macs is "it just looks better than windows" I think we can all relate to that.

585699462[/snapback]

Most people who are like that just install a Mac OS X theme :rofl: they wont buy a Mac just for that reason alone. If what you are saying was to be true, Apple would have a higher market share but instead what we see is a lot of people just make their Windows look like Mac OS. :D

Most people who are like that just install a Mac OS X theme :rofl: they wont buy a Mac just for that reason alone. If what you are saying was to be true, Apple would have a higher market share but instead what we see is a lot of people just make their Windows look like Mac OS. :D

585699483[/snapback]

Very good point. That's why OS X themes are the most popular for XP.

Longhorn will have a slow adoption through years (those times of 95,98,are over),because of the high system requirements it will have,just like xp,this is on microsoft plans.

People should understand this

Longhorn will be a Powerful graphical OS,the porting to XP of some of it's technology means that upgrading to longhorn could be a little bit expensive,more than expected.so they are assuring users who don't have plans to upgrade to have access to some core components of LH,this won't diminish and won't take out the LH excitement,because longhorn is simply more than that. :woot:

People will be impressed for sure,so microsoft,won't have hard times selling it. :yes:

Very good point.  That's why OS X themes are the most popular for XP.

585699493[/snapback]

Come on guys - XP themes don't look anywhere near as nice as OS X does and you know it. You can't even get alpha blended shadows unless you use a buggy app like Y'z Shadow.

It's stupid to make any claims about this now.

I'm sure plenty of people will buy Longhorn when it is released. Microsoft will have a massive marketing campaign behind it, and being the first major Windows upgrade in several years - it will get people's attention. The revamped UI will make people want to switch.

But there will also be a huge number of people that stay with XP until they get a new computer.

Microsoft's first goal is to kill off Windows 98/Me. And it's not just about getting people to buy a new version of Windows.

Supporting those legacy non-NT OSes holds back the entire industry.

Supporting Windows 2000/XP is far easier. Moving Windows 2000 users to XP is less urgent, though they've made a real push with their security technologies and the upcoming IE 7 to get users to make that upgrade more worthwhile.

Believe me, killing off Windows 98/Me is a very, very important step for the industry. Windows 2000 (or possibly even XP) will become the new technology "baseline" instead of Win9x. That means no DOS and Win32 baggage. That means .NET support. And on XP or later, that means WinFX support. The amount of baggage that ties Windows 2000/XP to the 9x era is far greater than you've probably ever imagined.

Come on guys - XP themes don't look anywhere near as nice as OS X does and you know it. You can't even get alpha blended shadows unless you use a buggy app like Y'z Shadow.

585699503[/snapback]

You can say that for XP,but for longhorn the bird sings at another pace.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The sweet release of death has never looked more appealing.
    • Meh, just another dongle-haven downgrade compared to my Surface Pro 7+. Whenever I decide to upgrade in the next decade or so, it certainly won't be another microslop Surface with this enshitification trend they've been having after the Surface Pro 7+. Hopefully a future generation of the Framework 12 will be a real upgrade...
    • This could exactly be how our Sun ends but it's not as simple by Sayan Sen Image by Drew Rae via Pexels An international team led by Université de Montréal (University of Montreal) PhD student Érika Le Bourdais has found that the ancient white dwarf star LSPM J0207+3331 is still pulling in planetary debris, even though it has been cooling for about three billion years. White dwarfs are dense, Earth-sized stellar remnants left behind when Sun-like stars exhaust their nuclear fuel and shed their outer layers. The star, located 145 light-years away in the constellation Triangulum, is the oldest and coldest white dwarf known to have a surrounding disk of dust. The star was first spotted in 2019 by a citizen scientist through the Backyard Worlds: Planet 9 project. Its cool temperature immediately suggested that it was very old, since white dwarfs gradually lose heat over time. Using the W. M. Keck telescopes in Hawaii, astronomers later confirmed that the star shows infrared signals consistent with dust rings formed by asteroids breaking apart under its strong gravity. Such infrared excesses occur when a star emits more infrared light than expected, often because warm dust surrounding it absorbs and re-radiates energy. “This discovery challenges our understanding of planetary system evolution,” said Le Bourdais. “The fact that we still see planetary debris being accreted three billion years after the star became a white dwarf suggests that asteroids, comets, and even planets can remain in orbit around these stars for a very long time.” Spectroscopic analysis—a technique that studies light to identify the chemical elements present in an object—revealed thirteen heavy elements in the star’s atmosphere: sodium, magnesium, aluminium, silicon, calcium, titanium, chromium, manganese, iron, cobalt, nickel, copper, and strontium. Normally, heavy elements sink quickly in hydrogen-rich white dwarfs, making them hard to detect. “We expected to see only a few elements, but we found dozens!” explained Le Bourdais. The research paper adds more detail. The absence of carbon features suggests the debris came from a carbon-volatile-depleted source. The abundance pattern shows slight deficits of magnesium and silicon compared to iron but otherwise resembles Earth-like material. This points to a differentiated rocky body—one whose materials have separated into distinct layers such as a metallic core and rocky mantle—with a metallic core fraction higher than Earth’s. In other words, the star is accreting the remains of a large rocky object, similar in structure to Earth or the asteroid Vesta. “White dwarfs offer one of the only ways we can directly measure the composition of exoplanets,” said Patrick Dufour, co-author and professor at Université de Montréal. “When planetary debris come too close, they are torn apart by the star’s gravity and end up polluting its atmosphere, leaving a detailed chemical fingerprint of its composition.” The team also detected weak Ca II H & K line core emission, making this only the second known isolated polluted white dwarf to show this feature. These are specific spectral signatures produced by ionised calcium and can indicate unusual physical activity in a star’s upper atmosphere. The finding suggests that extra physical processes may be happening in or above the star’s upper atmosphere. The study stresses the importance of including heavy elements in model atmosphere calculations, since leaving them out can distort the inferred structure and lead to inaccurate stellar parameters. Earlier work suggested the star’s infrared excess came from two dust rings. The new analysis shows that a single silicate dust disk—a ring composed largely of rock-forming minerals rich in silicon and oxygen—can explain the observed signal at 11.6 μm, simplifying the picture of the system’s structure. The question of how debris ended up falling into the star so late remains open. One idea is that giant planets in the system slowly destabilised smaller bodies over billions of years. Another possibility is that a passing star disturbed the orbits of debris. “Future observations with the James Webb Space Telescope or archival data found in the European Space Agency’s Gaia mission could help distinguish between a planetary rearrangement and the gravitational effect of a close stellar encounter,” said John Debes, co-author and researcher at the Space Telescope Science Institute. Dufour noted that hydrogen-rich white dwarfs are the most common type, and the coolest among them are the oldest stars in the galaxy. “We didn't have the habit of looking for signs of accretion in them. This unique case motivates us to expand our search to more of these stars.” The findings show that even after billions of years, planetary systems can remain active and complex. Substantial accretion events—the gradual accumulation of surrounding material onto a celestial object—can still occur long after a star’s death, offering a rare window into the composition and fate of distant worlds. Source: University of Montreal, IOPScience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Doesn't DDG mainly use Bing?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      jefred earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Apprentice
      JoeyNeo went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Week One Done
      oliviaexpo earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      480
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      228
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      67
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      58
    5. 5
      neufuse
      55
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!