Longhorn could be tough sell for Microsoft


Recommended Posts

But I do hope it does, because I won't spend money on a video card so soon (or at least don't plan on doing so).

Someone please tell me if I'm talking jibberish here :)

585699689[/snapback]

So soon ? You are expecting a little too much out of your 5200. Longhorn is slated for late 2006. You could give the 5200 a proper burial by then and move onto Nvidia's GF7 series. :p

I wouldn't say it was a waste of money just yet. By the time it comes out, all of you big mouths will be drooling over it. After all, this is a huge new upgrade to a 5 year old Windows XP. Did you see people sticking with Windows ME or 98 after Windows XP came out? I don't think so, this will be the same thing. It's the novelty spectrum and the new features that will blow you away once they are finished. Nothing you have seen is finished yet, and the new screenshots are showing us that this really will be a great upgrade.

I will probably still run Linux by then anyways, and unless longhorn becomes a requirement for games, I don't see myself upgrading the "gaming" hard drive in my machine.

I'm pretty sure that new DirectX replacement w/e it's called will most likely mean you will have to upgrade for gaming purposes maybe for the newest games. Or maybe it will just carry over to XP too and you won't have to :p who knows.. hard to say.

I wouldn't say it was a waste of money just yet. By the time it comes out, all of you big mouths will be drooling over it. After all, this is a huge new upgrade to a 5 year old Windows XP. Did you see people sticking with Windows ME or 98 after Windows XP came out? I don't think so, this will be the same thing. It's the novelty spectrum and the new features that will blow you away once they are finished. Nothing you have seen is finished yet, and the new screenshots are showing us that this really will be a great upgrade.

585699766[/snapback]

You might not know that some of the features of Longhorn will be offered as free upgrades to Windows XP. Avalon, IE7 etc.,

So soon ? You are expecting a little too much out of your 5200. Longhorn is slated for late 2006. You could give the 5200 a proper burial by then and move onto Nvidia's GF7 series. :p

585699734[/snapback]

unfortunately, i don't have that big a fortune to be spending on a new expensive video card every 6 months :( i don't like the idea of spending 200 dollars on something new every 6 months....

Agreed.. with Avalon, Indigo and WinFS being backported to prior OS's, the impetus is not there to buy a new machine and buy LH.

Let me tell ya, LH runs barely passbily on HT 3.06 machines... It would be good on dual procs with 1GB+ of ram...

I have noplans of buying it...

585699306[/snapback]

The APIs are backported, they mean nothing to the end user, you can't even take advantage of the entire engine. It's back ported for a reason, and it's one of the smartest ones of all, to allow developers to start deving in these pillars so by the time Longhorn goes RTM, there would be at least some Longhorn ready applications.

people will definately buy longhorn when they see how pretty and nice the new WGF enabled UI is. That's 1/2 the reason people buy macs now for christ's sake, because "it's so pretty". I seriously doubt microsoft is gonna have a hard time selling longhorn. For those of use who have been around for a while, we all remember the windows 2000 zealots when whistler was in beta (whistler was xp's codename) who said, you can do all this on win2k, etc etc, no one will buy whistler, it's gonna be slow, you're gonna need a 1 Ghz Computer to run it, etc etc. None of those things were true, and the same applies to LH.  ;)

585699417[/snapback]

Windows XP does take a lot of RAM though. My computers struggle with it still, but I suppose my computers are outdated.

No probably will not buy Longhorn when it's released.

1. Can't afford 4 GB of RAM

2. Can't afford a PCI Express Video Card with 1GB of RAM

3. Can't afford a Pentium 4 / 64Bit @ <3.8GHz

but if I somehow get invited to play with Longhorn in a Microsoft beta test, and get it for free - then I will happily test it and maybe even attempt to use it. For me Windows XP does everything I need.

585699613[/snapback]

Do you really think those are the minimum specs for Longhorn? Do you really think most people can afford those things?

LH rumors show 3 different display modes depending on the hardware in your system. It is likely that most of the GUI effects will be optional.

this thread is making me sick, a bunch of people saying misuninformed specs of an operating system thats not even out yet. jesus christ 64 bit only? why would they do that? microsoft is all about legacy devices and 32bit isnt going yet.

longhorn 3718, 4074, 4029, 4051 ran FINE on my ****ty p4 1.8 ghz machine. with nvidia 5200 card, total budget card and yet it runs DCE/DWM perfectly. im sick of all these retarded comments. there is a memory hole in explorer right now that makes it use so much memory but before when i only had 256mb it wasnt all that bad anyway

Damn, I cannot believe you guys are arguing about what it will look like. I don't give a rat's ass about Longhorn and I don't think my employer will buy longhorn if it is as bloated and buggy as it appears to be so far. Windows XP is "good enough" for business.

Since they are only including the flashy crap apparently in the first release and WinFS will not make an appearance until about a year later, there is no point in upgrading business machines until winfs comes out.

I'm looking for more stability, not bloat and pretty graphics.

At home, I'm a mac guy and I'm personally looking forward to to Tiger which should hit the shelves in a couple months.

:D

I'm looking for more stability, not bloat and pretty graphics.

Ever try the Linux command-line?

At home, I'm a mac guy and I'm personally looking forward to to Tiger which should hit the shelves in a couple months.

That's great - here's a cookie...I mean a latte. Cookies aren't good enough for a Mac user. And the new groundbreaking user interface in Tiger is what? And the brand new filesystem is what? And they're backporting it to OS 9? Oh wait, they're not.

this thread is making me sick, a bunch of people saying misuninformed specs of an operating system thats not even out yet.

longhorn 3718, 4074, 4029, 4051 ran FINE on my ****ty p4 1.8 ghz machine.

Is it just me or are you going against what you said yourself. You claim that people are whinging about an OS that isn't out yet and then you claim that THIS OS THAT ISN'T OUT YET runs fine on your PC. :rofl: Hmmmm. Maybe you should wait till its closer to release date before you talk about 64bit support ONLY!

and I don't think my employer will buy longhorn if it is as bloated and buggy as it appears to be so far. Windows XP is "good enough" for business.

Hmmmm I bet they said the same thing when Windows XP was around the same stage as Longhorn is currently. "Oh we will never upgrade yadda yadda yadda", and look 90% who had Win2000 are now on WinXP. :pinch:

hm ... well I'm happy with xp, but then again i was happy with win98 ...

Anyway, one thing's for sure : if they make the prices for longhorn as high as for xp (well i find it pretty expensive) then few people will buy it and dl it from w/e source freely(illegally) instead. I'm no economist, but I think that if prices are lowered, than more people will buy, and in the end MS will make more profit.

Windows 2000 still runs fine on thousands of machines in businesses and some still have NT 4.0, moving to Windows XP didn't make much sense because it didn't really offer anything that serious business users wanted accept maybe security features.

Longhorn though may have some new and tempting features that will attract business users.

Home users will probably not be swayed, most can't use the features in Windows XP or have no real use for many of them. It will be hard to convince 90% of users that they "need" something that Longhorn has.

It reminds me of ACDsee 3.1 versus 7.0, 3.1 had all the features I wanted or need in a image viewer, it's launches fast and has the neccessary plugins to do all the things I want. ACDsee 7.0 has some new stuff but launches slower and is bloated with stuff that really belongs in a photo editor.

Longhorn will undoubtly have some features that will belong in an office suite but some users will take advantage of them.

585699638[/snapback]

I would agree totally with you although I am curious to know if there are any issues of 3.1 for ACDSee running on XP? I had some problems that is why I deleted it...

No probably will not buy Longhorn when it's released.

1. Can't afford 4 GB of RAM

2. Can't afford a PCI Express Video Card with 1GB of RAM

3. Can't afford a Pentium 4 / 64Bit @ <3.8GHz

but if I somehow get invited to play with Longhorn in a Microsoft beta test, and get it for free - then I will happily test it and maybe even attempt to use it. For me Windows XP does everything I need.

585699613[/snapback]

So, um where are you getting your info from? I think you have been misinformed. While noone at this point knows for sure what the minimum specs will be, i think that its safe to say that they won't be that demanding. I think at the very most, 2-3 times the Windows XP minimum.

hm ... well I'm happy with xp, but then again i was happy with win98 ...

Anyway, one thing's for sure : if they make the prices for longhorn as high as for xp (well i find it pretty expensive) then few people will buy it and dl it from w/e source freely(illegally) instead. I'm no economist, but I think that if prices are lowered, than more people will buy, and in the end MS will make more profit.

585700546[/snapback]

I don't know about you guys, but after half a year, Win98 would start giving me random BSODs. As for WinXP, I never get a BSOD, no matter what I do, unless I overclock past the safety threshold (which causes a BSOD following a reboot). My impression of Win98 is that it just wasn't very stable...after a long time.

About the profit, also note that MS makes money selling OEM copies of its software to major distributors like Dell.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The sweet release of death has never looked more appealing.
    • Meh, just another dongle-haven downgrade compared to my Surface Pro 7+. Whenever I decide to upgrade in the next decade or so, it certainly won't be another microslop Surface with this enshitification trend they've been having after the Surface Pro 7+. Hopefully a future generation of the Framework 12 will be a real upgrade...
    • This could exactly be how our Sun ends but it's not as simple by Sayan Sen Image by Drew Rae via Pexels An international team led by Université de Montréal (University of Montreal) PhD student Érika Le Bourdais has found that the ancient white dwarf star LSPM J0207+3331 is still pulling in planetary debris, even though it has been cooling for about three billion years. White dwarfs are dense, Earth-sized stellar remnants left behind when Sun-like stars exhaust their nuclear fuel and shed their outer layers. The star, located 145 light-years away in the constellation Triangulum, is the oldest and coldest white dwarf known to have a surrounding disk of dust. The star was first spotted in 2019 by a citizen scientist through the Backyard Worlds: Planet 9 project. Its cool temperature immediately suggested that it was very old, since white dwarfs gradually lose heat over time. Using the W. M. Keck telescopes in Hawaii, astronomers later confirmed that the star shows infrared signals consistent with dust rings formed by asteroids breaking apart under its strong gravity. Such infrared excesses occur when a star emits more infrared light than expected, often because warm dust surrounding it absorbs and re-radiates energy. “This discovery challenges our understanding of planetary system evolution,” said Le Bourdais. “The fact that we still see planetary debris being accreted three billion years after the star became a white dwarf suggests that asteroids, comets, and even planets can remain in orbit around these stars for a very long time.” Spectroscopic analysis—a technique that studies light to identify the chemical elements present in an object—revealed thirteen heavy elements in the star’s atmosphere: sodium, magnesium, aluminium, silicon, calcium, titanium, chromium, manganese, iron, cobalt, nickel, copper, and strontium. Normally, heavy elements sink quickly in hydrogen-rich white dwarfs, making them hard to detect. “We expected to see only a few elements, but we found dozens!” explained Le Bourdais. The research paper adds more detail. The absence of carbon features suggests the debris came from a carbon-volatile-depleted source. The abundance pattern shows slight deficits of magnesium and silicon compared to iron but otherwise resembles Earth-like material. This points to a differentiated rocky body—one whose materials have separated into distinct layers such as a metallic core and rocky mantle—with a metallic core fraction higher than Earth’s. In other words, the star is accreting the remains of a large rocky object, similar in structure to Earth or the asteroid Vesta. “White dwarfs offer one of the only ways we can directly measure the composition of exoplanets,” said Patrick Dufour, co-author and professor at Université de Montréal. “When planetary debris come too close, they are torn apart by the star’s gravity and end up polluting its atmosphere, leaving a detailed chemical fingerprint of its composition.” The team also detected weak Ca II H & K line core emission, making this only the second known isolated polluted white dwarf to show this feature. These are specific spectral signatures produced by ionised calcium and can indicate unusual physical activity in a star’s upper atmosphere. The finding suggests that extra physical processes may be happening in or above the star’s upper atmosphere. The study stresses the importance of including heavy elements in model atmosphere calculations, since leaving them out can distort the inferred structure and lead to inaccurate stellar parameters. Earlier work suggested the star’s infrared excess came from two dust rings. The new analysis shows that a single silicate dust disk—a ring composed largely of rock-forming minerals rich in silicon and oxygen—can explain the observed signal at 11.6 μm, simplifying the picture of the system’s structure. The question of how debris ended up falling into the star so late remains open. One idea is that giant planets in the system slowly destabilised smaller bodies over billions of years. Another possibility is that a passing star disturbed the orbits of debris. “Future observations with the James Webb Space Telescope or archival data found in the European Space Agency’s Gaia mission could help distinguish between a planetary rearrangement and the gravitational effect of a close stellar encounter,” said John Debes, co-author and researcher at the Space Telescope Science Institute. Dufour noted that hydrogen-rich white dwarfs are the most common type, and the coolest among them are the oldest stars in the galaxy. “We didn't have the habit of looking for signs of accretion in them. This unique case motivates us to expand our search to more of these stars.” The findings show that even after billions of years, planetary systems can remain active and complex. Substantial accretion events—the gradual accumulation of surrounding material onto a celestial object—can still occur long after a star’s death, offering a rare window into the composition and fate of distant worlds. Source: University of Montreal, IOPScience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Doesn't DDG mainly use Bing?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      jefred earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Apprentice
      JoeyNeo went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Week One Done
      oliviaexpo earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      480
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      228
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      67
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      58
    5. 5
      neufuse
      55
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!