Longhorn could be tough sell for Microsoft


Recommended Posts

I would buy it because:

1. It has a really cool 3D interface.

2. It has a nice sidebar.

3. I want to keep up to date.

BUT: I would need a new PC: 20Ghz Pentium 90 would be OK, plus 100Tb RAM, and a 900Tb Disk!!!!! :rofl:

well,

1-no, it does not have a 3d interface. it has a hardware accelerated 2d interface

2-no, it wont have a sidebar anymore

personally, i like that windows needs a faster computer at every upgrade. that means cheaper and faster hardware for me to run linux on.

Oh rest assured, Microsoft will find some way of eventually forcing you to have to buy longhorn with thier power of a consolidated monopoly.

585699325[/snapback]

yup , that just what they are gonna do

from what i'm hearing, longhorn demands even more from your machine. why upgrade to longhorn when it's just gonna leave me less power for games and such? xp runs everything i need it to, no need to upgrade to longhorn for a few enhancements and more bloatware.

Remember that about 0.000000000004 % of the population is smart enough to know that WinFX and Avalon will be ported back to WinXP, thus they will associate it with Longhorn.

585717289[/snapback]

are you saying that 0,00028 person on earth know about it?

:p

Linux is an alternative for who?  My mother runs Windows just fine but I couldn't imagine her figuring out how to download iso images and installing them.

Linux is an alternative to Windows for nerds.

I'd say the two alternatives to Windows are: piracy, Mac OS X.

585717309[/snapback]

im guessing you havn't seen linux lately?

im guessing you havn't seen linux lately?

585719266[/snapback]

I'm guess he has. Guess what? It's not the interface, it's all about the apps. Linux does not have commercial desktop apps. Having said that, linux is still quite difficult for a noob to use.

Some people will not switch to OS X because they require a certain set of niche apps which are not available on the mac. The same thing goes for Linux.

Based on your comment, I'm guessing that you are talking about what the interface looks like (eye candy) or some of the usability improvements. That's all well and good but it's still got a way to go and Linux lacks commercial software.

Right now, the only real choices people have for the desktop are windows and OS X. The latter has ports of a large portion of linux software anyway. So where does that leave linux? It leaves linux to those who require fast windows compatibility through wine or dual booting windows that want to run an alternative OS so that they seem like ?bergeeks to their geek friends. There is also the subculture which insists on DIY computers because it's their hobby and they enjoy the challenge. Some of those people are attracted to linux because of the challenge of getting it working as well.

:laugh::

im talking about for the general user all they require is a user interface thats easy to use, an office package, a web browser and an email client.

well linux ui is pretty simple to use now, for office, open office beats microsoft office. web browser, firefox. and email theres a couple thunderbird or evolution to name two.

pretty much the only thing linux doesnt have is games, but thats cos developers insist in using directx instead of opengl and making their games portable.

from what i'm hearing, longhorn demands even more from your machine. why upgrade to longhorn when it's just gonna leave me less power for games and such

585719206[/snapback]

No you heard wrong. From the winsupersite review:

Cold boot time should be 50 percent less than with XP on the same system

In Longhorn, applications will launch and load files 15 percent faster than with Windows XP.

Ever try the Linux command-line?

Yes, in fact I administered the linux web server at work until our company hired a sys admin department and I got moved exclusively into windows software development. Next question?

That's great - here's a cookie...I mean a latte.? Cookies aren't good enough for a Mac user.

Aw poor boy cannot afford a latte? Have you tried the Chantico? I don't mind cookies but those Biscotti taste great with a latte. :laugh::

And the new groundbreaking user interface in Tiger is what?? And the brand new filesystem is what?? And they're backporting it to OS 9?? Oh wait, they're not.

585700214[/snapback]

Tiger will "ship" within a few weeks with Spotlight search API for searching within metadata and within docments. WinFS, which is just a search/indexing layer on top of NTFS will not ship for another 2 years.

Part of the new user interface enhancements (smart folders) rely on Spotlight technology.

They are also shipping Core Image and Core Video (Avalon in Longhorn) with Tiger which are an extension of Quartz, the hardware accelerated compositing engine found in Panther today.

Why would they port to OS9? Is MSFT backporting to Windows 9x? Longhorn is nothing more than NT 6.x with a new composition gfx engine and some other new APIs.

As I said before, I don't care about the flashy crap in longhorn. I want them to fix the process and thread management in NT as well as improve the memory allocation subsystem. Fix the damn core first.

im talking about for the general user all they require is a user interface thats easy to use, an office package, a web browser and an email client.

well linux ui is pretty simple to use now, for office, open office beats microsoft office. web browser, firefox. and email theres a couple thunderbird or evolution to name two.

pretty much the only thing linux doesnt have is games, but thats cos developers insist in using directx instead of opengl and making their games portable.

585719473[/snapback]

Sorry but I've tried out Open Office on windows and OS X and for all its faults (damn auto format in word), MS Office beats OO hands down for functionality and ease of use.

Those apps you mentioned (except for Evolution) are all cross-platform. There is no killer app for linux.

Boxed commercial apps are a necessity for wider acceptance of linux on the home desktop. The average Joe/Jane wants to be able to to go a store and buy software off the shelf and have it "just work".

i think longhorn is going to be like WinME, everyone was more than happy with windows 98 se so many didn't upgrade, those who did were disapointed with the bloated os and many of them proceeded to downgrade. Longhorn being so new and special is not gaurenteed to be better, ever buy a car the first year a new model comes out? See how well it stands up, its not until its out in the real world that the true problems will appear, longhorn is the beggining of Microsofts next wave of os's just like windows 95 -> ME. I wouldn't upgrade immediatley, i'd atleast wait for the first service pack.

Well I'm going to be the first one to purchase this windows. I am so tired of working with XP. Longhorn, from what I've seen, will be a lot more stable and will manage the good hardware better. Basically, 4 GB of ram in Longhorn will be better than 4 GB of ram in XP and that's pretty obvious because Longhorn has more support for the latest hardware (that's one of the main goals)

tried 2.0 beta? its really come on a lot, the previous versions wernt all that good but 2.0 is much much better

585719668[/snapback]

dont even bother with him, hes a mac user.

if he doesnt get ripped off, its not good enough for him.

@psykX, thats not true. the only innovations in terms of memory mangaement that i have seen or heard about was a giant memory leak in exploerer. other than that, longhorn will continue to use ram in the exact same way that xp and 2k do. It uses swap space even when there is free RAM, which leads to slower performance.

I'd download it! :laugh:

I do understand why people will be reluctant to buy Longhorn. A lot of key features are being ported over to Windows XP, they might be not exactly the same as in Longhorn but "good enough" for most people.

dont even bother with him, hes a mac user.

if he doesnt get ripped off, its not good enough for him.

585719828[/snapback]

Yeah, that's why is use free software from:

http://www.versiontracker.com/macosx/

Like:

Cyberduck

OSXPlanet

Smultron

VLC

:rolleyes:

If someone wanted to have a lightweight alternative to Word, they could look at AbiWord which is cross platform compatible and has native technology support on windows and OS X, unlike OO.

Aristole, as much as i respect you (yes i do) You *really* need to read up on WinFS :)

Summary;

* Extensible library type systems (Documents, Music, Games etc.) developers can add custom ones.

* You dont need to bother about actual physical locations (No real need for drive letters, no duplicates of the same files) as theyre all aggregated into libraries.

* Searching is *part* of WinFS - Its more on relational metadata (images sent by john etc.) again; developers can plug in their own metadata much like spotlight :p

* More ways to sort and filter information, im a little sketchy on this.

* Contacts, IMs etc. part of the store not as files also can be relational to files, other contacts etc.

Theres also other stuff i havent read about. And NT upwards has had an indexing system, its just really crappy/unexposed.

Edit: https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=111679

Edited by gizmostripe
Yeah, that's why is use free software from:

http://www.versiontracker.com/macosx/

Like:

Cyberduck

OSXPlanet

Smultron

VLC

:rolleyes:

If someone wanted to have a lightweight alternative to Word, they could look at AbiWord which is cross platform compatible and has native technology support on windows and OS X, unlike OO.

585720352[/snapback]

i was only kidding, lighten up.

However, i don't understand how you can praise Abiword and say that OOo is not good enough. i have abiword installed here and i just opened it up. honestly, its about as robust as Word mobile (from what ive seen in the WM2005 leak). OO(especially v2) has everything the average user needs and has very good import/export of MS office formats. Also, abiword is missing abiexcel, abipowerpoint, abiaccess...

why are we even talking about this anyway? i thought this was about longhorn :p

i was really lookin forward to the whole longhorn thing wen i herd about it

but now i duno its like meh to me xp is really now its stable n dosnt crash as much

also i wana noe if they r still keepin tat new file system they were gona put on it and also i herd they scraped the side bar is it true?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The sweet release of death has never looked more appealing.
    • Meh, just another dongle-haven downgrade compared to my Surface Pro 7+. Whenever I decide to upgrade in the next decade or so, it certainly won't be another microslop Surface with this enshitification trend they've been having after the Surface Pro 7+. Hopefully a future generation of the Framework 12 will be a real upgrade...
    • This could exactly be how our Sun ends but it's not as simple by Sayan Sen Image by Drew Rae via Pexels An international team led by Université de Montréal (University of Montreal) PhD student Érika Le Bourdais has found that the ancient white dwarf star LSPM J0207+3331 is still pulling in planetary debris, even though it has been cooling for about three billion years. White dwarfs are dense, Earth-sized stellar remnants left behind when Sun-like stars exhaust their nuclear fuel and shed their outer layers. The star, located 145 light-years away in the constellation Triangulum, is the oldest and coldest white dwarf known to have a surrounding disk of dust. The star was first spotted in 2019 by a citizen scientist through the Backyard Worlds: Planet 9 project. Its cool temperature immediately suggested that it was very old, since white dwarfs gradually lose heat over time. Using the W. M. Keck telescopes in Hawaii, astronomers later confirmed that the star shows infrared signals consistent with dust rings formed by asteroids breaking apart under its strong gravity. Such infrared excesses occur when a star emits more infrared light than expected, often because warm dust surrounding it absorbs and re-radiates energy. “This discovery challenges our understanding of planetary system evolution,” said Le Bourdais. “The fact that we still see planetary debris being accreted three billion years after the star became a white dwarf suggests that asteroids, comets, and even planets can remain in orbit around these stars for a very long time.” Spectroscopic analysis—a technique that studies light to identify the chemical elements present in an object—revealed thirteen heavy elements in the star’s atmosphere: sodium, magnesium, aluminium, silicon, calcium, titanium, chromium, manganese, iron, cobalt, nickel, copper, and strontium. Normally, heavy elements sink quickly in hydrogen-rich white dwarfs, making them hard to detect. “We expected to see only a few elements, but we found dozens!” explained Le Bourdais. The research paper adds more detail. The absence of carbon features suggests the debris came from a carbon-volatile-depleted source. The abundance pattern shows slight deficits of magnesium and silicon compared to iron but otherwise resembles Earth-like material. This points to a differentiated rocky body—one whose materials have separated into distinct layers such as a metallic core and rocky mantle—with a metallic core fraction higher than Earth’s. In other words, the star is accreting the remains of a large rocky object, similar in structure to Earth or the asteroid Vesta. “White dwarfs offer one of the only ways we can directly measure the composition of exoplanets,” said Patrick Dufour, co-author and professor at Université de Montréal. “When planetary debris come too close, they are torn apart by the star’s gravity and end up polluting its atmosphere, leaving a detailed chemical fingerprint of its composition.” The team also detected weak Ca II H & K line core emission, making this only the second known isolated polluted white dwarf to show this feature. These are specific spectral signatures produced by ionised calcium and can indicate unusual physical activity in a star’s upper atmosphere. The finding suggests that extra physical processes may be happening in or above the star’s upper atmosphere. The study stresses the importance of including heavy elements in model atmosphere calculations, since leaving them out can distort the inferred structure and lead to inaccurate stellar parameters. Earlier work suggested the star’s infrared excess came from two dust rings. The new analysis shows that a single silicate dust disk—a ring composed largely of rock-forming minerals rich in silicon and oxygen—can explain the observed signal at 11.6 μm, simplifying the picture of the system’s structure. The question of how debris ended up falling into the star so late remains open. One idea is that giant planets in the system slowly destabilised smaller bodies over billions of years. Another possibility is that a passing star disturbed the orbits of debris. “Future observations with the James Webb Space Telescope or archival data found in the European Space Agency’s Gaia mission could help distinguish between a planetary rearrangement and the gravitational effect of a close stellar encounter,” said John Debes, co-author and researcher at the Space Telescope Science Institute. Dufour noted that hydrogen-rich white dwarfs are the most common type, and the coolest among them are the oldest stars in the galaxy. “We didn't have the habit of looking for signs of accretion in them. This unique case motivates us to expand our search to more of these stars.” The findings show that even after billions of years, planetary systems can remain active and complex. Substantial accretion events—the gradual accumulation of surrounding material onto a celestial object—can still occur long after a star’s death, offering a rare window into the composition and fate of distant worlds. Source: University of Montreal, IOPScience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Doesn't DDG mainly use Bing?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      jefred earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Apprentice
      JoeyNeo went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Week One Done
      oliviaexpo earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      480
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      228
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      67
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      58
    5. 5
      neufuse
      55
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!