Recommended Posts

I've tested LE3 and I didnt find too much bugs!

I have a french version of Windows XP so the start menu says D?marrer>.

There's a difference between the start button and the taskbar gradient.

I use the Default (Alt start button) so the english start menu doesnt bother me.

em3: I have a picture with the little bugs if you want to see.

Edited by klop
But since the Alt. Startbutton style has been available since version 1 of LE and no one has reported any problems with that I think there won't be any problems...... hopefully.

585943655[/snapback]

I reported a bug for new Compact Alt. Button... check your pms.

This is the only bugless theme I ever tried, besides the b0se's ones. :yes:

585946372[/snapback]

At least the currect version (2.51) has the problem with Java Swing application using SystemLookAndFeel (buttons are not displayed correctly), but maybe this belongs to xpsp2 and jdk 1.5.0_03.

But besides this, the theme is really great. Thanks em3.

At least the currect version (2.51) has the problem with Java Swing application using SystemLookAndFeel (buttons are not displayed correctly), but maybe this belongs to xpsp2 and jdk 1.5.0_03.

But besides this, the theme is really great. Thanks em3.

585946478[/snapback]

We already discussed this issue, and I never experienced this bug neither in version 2.51 nor v.3 beta. Oh, and I use the same jdk on XP SP2.

We already discussed this issue, and I never experienced this bug neither in version 2.51 nor v.3 beta. Oh, and I use the same jdk on XP SP2.

585946740[/snapback]

I saw the discussion but no solution for it.

I've also done a fresh install of xp (sp2 is already included) and i use the latest stylexp version.

Anyway - since i rarely use swing apps, the problem doesn't really bother me.

I saw the discussion but no solution for it.

I've also done a fresh install of xp (sp2 is already included) and i use the latest stylexp version.

Anyway - since i rarely use swing apps, the problem doesn't really bother me.

Yes indeed, this issue is a strange one, as I too have just completed a reformat of my WinXP SP2 laptop, and still experience this 'bug' with JRE 1.5_Update3 and with a patched uxtheme.dll (not WindowX multi-patcher), and it only happens in LunaElement2...

Original LunaElement does not exhibit this issue with my Java Control Panel (windows) not does any other VS that I currently switch to...this includes VS's from my colleagues, Franco (KoL), Ross (b0se) or Stefan (StefanKa)...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • If only Windows would have a toggle switch named "Get the latest updates as soon as possible" inside Windows Update settings... But nah, let's hide the new stuff inside a controlled feature rollout, even if the user is explicitly asking for the new stuff as soon as possible.
    • After watching the Apple event earlier this week it is quite the contrast. Apple is going back and tweaking the code to make things more efficient in many areas of MacOS. Windows is boosting your electric build to hide their issues.
    • It is silly there is no simple way to check whether this profile has been activated. CFRs are normal, but trying to even hide the fact if it's on / off seems silly, especially for something so user-facing. Surely Microsoft is "proud" of their engineering efforts on this one and ought to display it somwhere in the GUI.
    • Many Linux distros are not known for excellent battery life, so I'm not sure that is the best example. A more apt example may be Apple, but Apple's CPUs are simply far more efficient than Intel & AMD at single-threaded tasks like these, so "boosting" is not as power-hungry and less heat-inducing. Not to mention Apple will hardly engage P-cores for basic UI tasks; they use a pretty complicated QoS scheme to only activate P-cores for more serious workloads like HTML / JS execution or decompression or application launch. Microsoft is (smartly) doing it for launch, but also for UI tasks, which is the more nonsensical part: why ... do Windows 11's UIs need modern CPUs to boost? It should load so quickly that there's not even time for the CPU to boost.
    • I've not seen any controlled testing and, judging by Microsoft's mentality, within a year, they'll have added so much more bloat, it'll undo any perceptible latency benefit and we'll have boosted the CPU clocks for nothing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      slackerzz earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      499
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      198
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      74
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!