[Definitive] Nintendo Wii Thread


Recommended Posts

Why does everyone care about specs? The controller is important; how many giga-quads of colour can be rammed down your throat or how many parsecs it can make the Kessel run in is not. The games just have to be good.

585934016[/snapback]

Exactly. And not showing any type of controller is a little bizarre. Either they have something extremely "revolutionary" lined up or they have no idea yet. They did say the Revolution was a prototype and not even the colors are for sure yet. So, basically, as far as next-gen consoles go, Nintendo revealed nothing.

Good or bad...I don't know :D

(Was it me or did Nintendo focus alot of angst and direct attacks at Sony :laugh: )

Joel: and that's why they sold me. Being able to play ALL of the original games from NES and SNES and (because I never had a gamecube) the current generation of games, I'm sold.

Earthbound + Mario 3 + Goldeneye + Super Mario World + Original Zeldas = SOLD!

Why does everyone care about specs? The controller is important; how many giga-quads of colour can be rammed down your throat or how many parsecs it can make the Kessel run in is not. The games just have to be good.

585934016[/snapback]

But they didnt even show the controller. Hence :sleep:

I've been saying this for a long time, gamers these days ARE NOT gamers at all.

585934022[/snapback]

Sad deluded Nintendo fans, ive been a gamer pretty much all my life and ive had every major console and handheld release (gb, nes, snes, n64, gc/gg, ms, md, saturn, dc) graphics dont make a game but they sure do help, id take an x360 game over a snes game anyday.

Sad deluded Nintendo fans, ive been a gamer pretty much all my life and ive had every major console and handheld release (gb, nes, snes, n64, gc/gg, ms, md, saturn, dc) graphics dont make a game but they sure do help, id take an x360 game over a snes game anyday.

585934043[/snapback]

go save up $$$ for your xbox 360 live already :laugh:

Good for them for not showing their controllers or whatever is going to make this system revolutionary.  Because if they did we would probably hear MS and Sony next week say "Hey, we have these brand new ideals for our consoles!"

585934034[/snapback]

Microsot doesnt have the time frame to do such because they are already into production. Sony might copy it but then it would be a sore thumb on the PS3 like fish out of water. You can just borrow one "revolutionary" idea and incorporate it in your console when you dont have the games to utilise it.

The downloadable 20+ years of content will sell that revolution like no others, but how exactly are they going to offer the controllers for all those old consoles? The 64 controller was rather unique, as is the gamecube one. Oh well... wait and see, I suppose.

wait... any of you think the wireless controller already for gamecube could work on it?

Oneill: as a current Xbox owner, I have to agree. Graphics do help. But it's like saying "Candles are good on cakes". I have had cakes without candles or even crappy looking ones. Sometimes it's not all about the candles but the cake deep down inside. Super Mario 3 was amazing and will always be. Same with Super Mario World.

Oneill: as a current Xbox owner, I have to agree. Graphics do help. But it's like saying "Candles are good on cakes". I have had cakes without candles or even crappy looking ones. Sometimes it's not all about the candles but the cake deep down inside. Super Mario 3 was amazing and will always be. Same with Super Mario World.

585934056[/snapback]

its about how the cake tastes :p

Oneill: as a current Xbox owner, I have to agree. Graphics do help. But it's like saying "Candles are good on cakes". I have had cakes without candles or even crappy looking ones. Sometimes it's not all about the candles but the cake deep down inside. Super Mario 3 was amazing and will always be. Same with Super Mario World.

585934056[/snapback]

I agree with you, i do actually prefer a lot of 1st party nintendo games to most of the tosh that big companies like EA churn out year after year, but Nintendo has consistently been the underacheiver every console launch and its getting tiring that they are sticking to their less is more approach, people look at the x360/ps3 and see amazing graphics compared to the poor old revolution and dont actually give it a look in which in turn makes more developers and publishers turn away from it.

Good for them for not showing their controllers or whatever is going to make this system revolutionary.? Because if they did we would probably hear MS and Sony next week say "Hey, we have these brand new ideals for our consoles!"

585934034[/snapback]

you mean like everybody coping the water pack from Mario sunshine? :rolleyes::

face it people, everybody isn't looking to copy Nintendo these days. the only thing noteworthy they've done in this generation is the wavebird and nobody copied that. the next gen wirless controllers are just a natural evolution of the controller design. like people have said, graphics aren't everything but they sure as hell help.

basically Nintendo has a chance to create some serious thunder and they failed IMO. when Reggie revelaed the gameboy micro, I mean you could count on 1 hand the amount of people clapping. the damn thing is alreayd small enough, why make it even smaller? audio small=yes, video small= retarded. i admit the prospect of being able to play old games on the system is appealing, but let's be honest most of us and most gamers with a computer have all the games from the NES, SNES, and N64 era on emulators. why would they want to pay for those games again?

Microsot doesnt have the time frame to do such because they are already into production. Sony might copy it but then it would be a sore thumb on the PS3 like fish out of water. You can just borrow one "revolutionary" idea and incorporate it in your console when you dont have the games to utilise it.

585934053[/snapback]

For some reason, I don't think what Sony showed us is going to be the final product. There's no way in hell they release that system with that controller.

In the end, Microsoft is releasing the 360 this year. They are ready, they had to show the final product in all it's glory. Sony and Nintendo still have at least another year. They showed and talked about what they want to do and how they hope to do it. Whether they will pull it off remains to be seen. I do know this, though: Sony showed no in-game footage of any PS3 games other than tech demos and Nintendo didn't even have the Revolution hooked up other than the power cord.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!