[Definitive] Nintendo Wii Thread


Recommended Posts

Here's the thing, the Revolution is not going to be release this year. There is no reason what-so-ever for them to give out any details or secrets they have that they don't want to share at this time. Chances are that both the Revolution and PS3 are both going to be at the E3 next year so that would be the opportune time for Nintendo to show all their cards. For instance, why give Sony a year in advance to counter what they have? Why reveal everything this year and then when next year rolls around they have nothing new to show just before they release the console?

I don't hear any of you complaining that Xbox360 didn't release anything last year at the E3 show, why, because they waited right until the last months before they are gonig to release their console, which is the smart thing to do. If they told you everything the Xbox360 had to offer a year ago, most of us would have forgotten by now or would not have been so excited by the time the release came around this year.

And for the last time NO SPECS WERE RELEASED, SO THERE IS NO REASON TO SAY THE REVOLUTION'S HARDWARE IS ALREADY INFERIOR TO THE PS3 AND XBOX360. I don't know why some of you keep insisting it is.

Edited by jmole
The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess announced..

585933974[/snapback]

My God, the clips of that were stunning. I need this game yesterday! :o

Psst... links to new images here: http://www.zeldalegends.net/index.php?p=130&s=602

Here's the thing, the Revolution is not going to be release this year.  There is no reason what-so-ever for them to give out any details or secrets they have that they don't want to share at this time.  Chances are that both the Revolution and PS3 are both going to be at the E3 next year so that would be the opportune time for Nintendo to show all their cards.  For instance, why give Sony a year in advance to counter what they have?  Why reveal everything this year and then when next year rolls around they have nothing new to show just before they release the console?

585934411[/snapback]

Agreed. But with Sony unveiling their PS3 and its specs in a very detailed manner, it wouldnt too far fetched if Nintendo did the same. But like you said, it might've cost them their "revolutionary" idea.

And for the last time NO SPECS WERE RELEASED, SO THERE IS NO REASON TO SAY THE REVOLUTION'S HARDWARE IS ALREADY INFERIOR TO THE PS3 AND XBOX360.  I don't know why some of you keep insisting it is.

585934411[/snapback]

Its the way the Nintendo execs keep emphasizing the powerful consoles are not required logic, they did it not once but throughout the presentation. That is why it is almost understood that they wont be looking to match either of the competition. I for one would love if the Revolution surpassed both PS3 & Xbox 360.

"The secret weapon: The console also will have downloadable access to 20 years of fan-favorite titles originally released for Nintendo 64, the Super Nintendo Entertainment System (SNES) and even the Nintendo Entertainment System (NES). "

-http://www.nintendo.com/newsarticle?articleid=02ea1a40-ac09-4cdf-9548-91e5a4e78746&page=

wow thats cool and hope is wasnt posted already

Nintendo is for younger people thats are the games based of, look at super Maria/Zelda.

XBOX/Playstation is for mature people and has good games, like halo / far cry / Doom / Quake to name a few

585933190[/snapback]

Points there :p ---> http://www.gamespot.com/e3/e3live.html

Agreed. But with Sony unveiling their PS3 and its specs in a very detailed manner, it wouldnt too far fetched if Nintendo did the same. But like you said, it might've cost them their "revolutionary" idea.

Its the way the Nintendo execs keep emphasizing the powerful consoles are not required logic, they did it not once but throughout the presentation. That is why it is almost understood that they wont be looking to match either of the competition. I for one would love if the Revolution surpassed both PS3 & Xbox 360.

585934773[/snapback]

Well if you look at Nintendo's past they are always completely random and sometimes don't make sense. Like releasing the realistic Zelda trailer at the SpaceWorld expo then at the next E3, boom, cell-shaded Zelda. Then I think it was last E3 out of nowhere comes the realistic looking Zelda. And now today the GameBoy mini, who would have expected that. Who knows, out of nowhere they could release specs for the Revolution. They always do stuff without any warning.

And like some people are suggesting on Slashdot, maybe they are reducing hardware specs and keeping the same architecture to give independent game developers a chance considering the costs of developing/producing a game are becoming insane. It would be like the NES\SNES era where there were so many game developers because it was affordable and not so difficult to make a game.

"The secret weapon: The console also will have downloadable access to 20 years of fan-favorite titles originally released for Nintendo 64, the Super Nintendo Entertainment System (SNES) and even the Nintendo Entertainment System (NES). "

-http://www.nintendo.com/newsarticle?articleid=02ea1a40-ac09-4cdf-9548-91e5a4e78746&page=

wow thats cool and hope is wasnt posted already

585934774[/snapback]

What they dont tell you is that each game will cost money, less is more, milking it for all its worth. Final nail in the coffin as far as im concerned i refuse to buy another Nintendo product as long as they are stubborn enough to sit in the dark ages and prattle on about being all for the games, all they do is take something and slap Mario name on it.

Whats next Mario Housework?

"The secret weapon: The console also will have downloadable access to 20 years of fan-favorite titles originally released for Nintendo 64, the Super Nintendo Entertainment System (SNES) and even the Nintendo Entertainment System (NES). "

-http://www.nintendo.com/newsarticle?articleid=02ea1a40-ac09-4cdf-9548-91e5a4e78746&page=

wow thats cool and hope is wasnt posted already

585934774[/snapback]

They made that one of the "selling points" but the revolutionary feature is still to be seen. So if that's just a selling point... well I think you guys all know what I think the revolutionary feature will be :p

you can view the presentation streamed off gamespot...

i think the revolution could easily match the power of xbox360. its being released later, it will be easier to get the tech in the box, and cheaper.

the gc was nearly as powerful as the xbox and look at the size difference there.

What they dont tell you is that each game will cost money, less is more, milking it for all its worth. Final nail in the coffin as far as im concerned i refuse to buy another Nintendo product as long as they are stubborn enough to sit in the dark ages and prattle on about being all for the games, all they do is take something and slap Mario name on it.

Whats next Mario Housework?

585934896[/snapback]

they EMPHASIZE games because thats what they are about. they are a publisher, developer, and ALSO console designers. just because they put the emphasis on the content, doesnt mean there isnt going to be a strong machine behind it.

sorry for the double post, it all happened too fast!

What they dont tell you is that each game will cost money, less is more, milking it for all its worth. Final nail in the coffin as far as im concerned i refuse to buy another Nintendo product as long as they are stubborn enough to sit in the dark ages and prattle on about being all for the games, all they do is take something and slap Mario name on it.

Whats next Mario Housework?

585934896[/snapback]

Oh no, they are getting money for their work!

Being a little hypocritical are we, coming from someone who likes the Xbox where they want you to make micropayments for stuff that should be free on Xbox Live and make you pay for their online service in order to get patches? I also heard that Apple is milking songs that are like 60 years old on iTunes and selling them for a profit. Shame on them!

Edited by jmole
Oh no, they are getting money for their work!

Being a little hypocritical are we, coming from someone who likes the Xbox where they want you to make micropayments for crap that should be free on Xbox Live and make you pay for their online service?  I also heard that Apple is milking songs that are like 60 years old on iTunes and selling them for a profit.

585934929[/snapback]

How am i being hippocritical?

Xbox live silver is free to use, all they showed in the E3 conference you got for free, why should the crap be free they worked hard to get such a complete service up and running for Xbox, Nintendo have done nothing, they just charge money for stuff that stop being sold 10-15 years ago.

I just finished watching the video, and I am VERY unimpressed.

I mean Nintendogs and wireless mario cart is what they are pimpin? I thought they were trying to get away fromt he kids image?

Nothing at all was revealed about Revlolution. The box wasnt even shown, just the prototype? And Smash Bros is a launch title? Big friggin deal, where is Mario Revolution?

I am very dissapointed after watching the PS3 and 360 videos.

How am i being hippocritical?

Xbox live silver is free to use, all they showed in the E3 conference you got for free, why should the crap be free they worked hard to get such a complete service up and running for Xbox, Nintendo have done nothing, they just charge money for stuff that stop being sold 10-15 years ago.

585934949[/snapback]

Do you not purchase DVD movies or music that were made 10-15 years ago? Or do you play board games like Monopoly, Risk, Game of Life? People don't seem to have a problem when Parker Brothers repackages their board games made like 50 years ago in a nice new box or if 20th Century Fox releases a Star Wars boxset. So I don't see the problem with Nintendo selling games that were made 10-15 years ago. Edited by jmole
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!