[Definitive] Nintendo Wii Thread


Recommended Posts

the rest of the zelda games are going to be cell shaded

in an interveiew i once read with the creator of zelda, he said that he would definately make some more cell shaded games if he could convince the public to buy them

i think thats how it went, anyway i'll try and find that article

Nice interview, thanks for posting. Regarding the comment about all remaining zeldas being cell-shaded, I really hope that's the way their going to be. I loved the way Link and the entire world looked, and I'm a bit dissapointed they moved to the "realistic" type, but hey, it's all to please the majority, or at least the many, many people who were too narrow-minded.... I mean, thought that it looked childish.

Nice interview, thanks for posting. Regarding the comment about all remaining zeldas being cell-shaded, I really hope that's the way their going to be. I loved the way Link and the entire world looked, and I'm a bit dissapointed they moved to the "realistic" type, but hey, it's all to please the majority, or at least the many, many people who were too narrow-minded.... I mean, thought that it looked childish.

586476253[/snapback]

The reason that I don't like the cell shading is because I fell in love with the dark feeling that was so beautifully delivered in Ocarina of Time that switching to a more upbeat and colorful cell-shaded version was just too much of a change from what I loved.

The reason that I don't like the cell shading is because I fell in love with the dark feeling that was so beautifully delivered in Ocarina of Time that switching to a more upbeat and colorful cell-shaded version was just too much of a change from what I loved.

586476447[/snapback]

Cell shading is pretty different from the atmosphere. You can have a very dark, serious game with cell-shading.

I loved the cell shading style personally, thus the wind waker is one of my favorite zelda games. I also think that is because of the awesome music at least partly though. I hope they make variations, some cell shaded when the game calls for it, and some normal like for Twilight Princess where the game calls for a darker feel.

Resident Evil 5?

Oh no, here we go again. First it was announced that Resident Evil 5 was coming to the Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3, with no mention of Nintendo?s next generation console. Then Nintendo claimed that the game might be announced later this year as more information on the Revolution is revealed. Now, Adam Riley from Cubed3 who attended the Nintendo?s Christmas Party 2005 in Europe (yes, it took place on August 25th) has stated that ?it was also confirmed that what a few of us had suspected is true ? Resident Evil 5 has yet to be announced for the Revolution purely because details of the system are not publicly available.?

One problem with the claim is that he does not mention from whom he heard this story. Another is that the prior claim of Revolution?s hopeful Resident Evil 5 announcement also came from Cubed3. So who knows? We will try to confirm or disprove this as soon and as best as we can. In the meantime, feel free to be hopeful, but do not be surprised if you are let down.  Otherwise, the article is very lengthy and gives great insight to upcoming Nintendo products, so check it out if you are interested.

Source: Joystiq

It is going to be interesting to see how capable the Revolution acutally turns out to be because if this is true, this will be the third game that are both on the PS3, Xbox360, and Revolution. It could possibly turn out to be another GameCube where Nintendo was down playing the capabilities of the GameCube prior to release and it turned out that it was a little less powerful then the Xbox, but cost Nintendo significantly less to produce.

Edited by jmole

link was always just a kid thrown in the middle of an epic story, and before windwaker, the zelda games had seriously lost its artistic character... the move to 3d was not very stylized. windwaker felt like alttp realized in a 3d world... with lots of water and a fat green fairy.

ok, i just convinced myself to play this game again...

THQ Onboard Revolution

Company president pledges support, hints at aggressive Nintendo.

by IGN Staff

September 8, 2005 - Tonight at THQ's year-end press event, IGNcube caught up with company president Brian Farrell and quizzed him on Revolution plans. Farrell did confirm that THQ is developing "games for Revolution." Providing more details than that, Farrell indicated wide support for all the next-generation consoles including Revolution, saying, "THQ's plan is to serve gamers no matter what platform they are on." Backing that up, he also firmly stated, "We are commited to Nintendo's [Revolution]."

However, when asked about what plans Nintendo has laid out for THQ, Brian was hush-hush on the matter. But he claims that based on his discussions with the hardware giant, he feels that "Nintendo is waking up."

Finally, when confronted with the question of whether or not THQ was in possession of development hardware, Mr. Farrell declined to provide specifics due to non-disclosure agreements (NDAs). All he would say was that "We're seeing more from Nintendo now [for Revolution] than we have an any other Nintendo platform."

THQ, joins the ranks of Square Enix, Konami, Bandai, and a few other publishers that have pledged support for the Revolution, which, as a reminder, is not the finalized name. Read our Revolution FAQ now for a full list of known details.

Source: http://cube.ign.com/articles/649/649292p1.html

^^ Interesting ... I swear, if Iwata doesn't say anything about Rev, I'm going to shoot someone

586497990[/snapback]

He's going to speak in riddles and it shall drive the internet into madness. It will be a glorious eight months of more speculation until E3 2006.
-bYtE,Sep 9 2005, 02:52]Source: http://cube.ign.com/articles/649/649292p1.html

586497927[/snapback]

well.. the "[Revolution]" and "[for Revolution]" i believe the words

"and a few other publishers that have pledged support for the Revolution, which, as a reminder, is not the finalized name" is trying to hint at us that the revolution now has a brand new name. if they don't show us what the revolution is. its probably a given that they will tell us the new name for the Revolution.

well.. the "[Revolution]" and "[for Revolution]" i believe the words

"and a few other publishers that have pledged support for the Revolution, which, as a reminder, is not the finalized name" is trying to hint at us that the revolution now has a brand new name. if they don't show us what the revolution is. its probably a given that they will tell us the new name for the Revolution.

586500440[/snapback]

Nice find, I agree with you. Well, at the very least then they'll provide the actual name, which it'll surely be better than the lame-ass names of the competition ("360" sucks, and "3" is plain old repetitive).

Not surprisingly there are a lot of rumors and speculation on the net starting to appear now. Something about Mario's birthday (13/9) and that Nintendo will reveal things before the keynote.

I will not post link because it will only fuel the fire.... but you'll read about on the most popular gameforums right now. For myself, I'm not getting into this like I did at 19th May... If something happens we'll know soon :)

Not surprisingly there are a lot of rumors and speculation on the net starting to appear now. Something about Mario's birthday (13/9) and that Nintendo will reveal things before the keynote.

I will not post link because it will only fuel the fire.... but you'll read about on the most popular gameforums right now. For myself, I'm not getting into this like I did at 19th May... If something happens we'll know soon :)

586512422[/snapback]

I do not believe anything will happen. there have been too many dates that information may have been unvieled on. If any date. I believe the 16th.

I do not believe anything will happen. there have been too many dates that information may have been unvieled on. If any date. I believe the 16th.

586512607[/snapback]

Yea, I'm thinking that too. I'm just saying there's a lot of rumors and speculation right now. Guess it's only the beginning.

I sincerely hope Nintendo reveal the controller the 16th, or else I think it will be to long of a wait until E3 next year. Show us the controller this week and games and hardware etc at E3 2006. PLEASE!

So I guess the NDA theory with developers is true.

From the GameCube mailbag on IGN: Link

I tell ya Matt, it's encouraging to hear these developers say Nintendo is moving into the right direction with the Revolution. Im less worried and all the more excited now and hope Nintendo blows our minds during TGS. Keep up the good Revolution news reporting.

Matt responds: I know what you mean. I wasn't expecting much when I cornered THQ's Brian Farrell last night, but was really surprised by his comments. He's very optimistic about Nintendo Revolution and he's definitely seen more than any of us. He kept telling me he couldn't say much because of NDAs and even that is encouraging because so often we just don't know if Nintendo is even reaching out to publishers. The simple fact that he's under NDA means that THQ is working with the Big N. And if THQ is there, it's very likely that most of the other big publishers have been contacted, too.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Are you going to do performance benchmarks comparing all states? I'd be interested in seeing that in the next "part".
    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      78
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!