[NFL]Who is the best QB of all time


Who is the best QB of all time  

67 members have voted

  1. 1. Who is the best QB of all time

    • 1.John Elway
      12
    • 2.Joe Montana
      27
    • 3.Johnny Unitas
      3
    • 4.Dan Marino
      11
    • 5.Brett Favre
      5
    • 6.Terry Bradshaw
      0
    • 7.roger staubach
      1
    • 8.Steve Young
      7
    • 9.Dan Fouts
      0
    • 10.Other
      1


Recommended Posts

Lets see. Many people its going to say Favre or Marino. statistically they are.

But I think that the title should be reserved for the one who made his team win and that, my friends its no other than the great Montana.

Elway also its in a close second.

P.D.: If Brady wins another Bowl he its going to top Montana easily.

Joe Montana.  This isn't even close.

Elway has no business being on this list.

586103282[/snapback]

Come on, give him some credit...his RB's won him the rings :p

586103380[/snapback]

Oh please. While Davis was amazing (I am still think that he is the real best RB ever, but his injury was too much) no team go to the superbowl and wins (Two times in a row) without a good QB.

Elway was amazing. The captain comeback gentlemen.

Oh please. While Davis was amazing (I am still think that he is the real best RB ever, but his injury was too much) no team go to the superbowl and wins (Two times in a row) without a good QB.

Elway was amazing. The captain comeback gentlemen.

586103394[/snapback]

I'm not discrediting him for his rings, I'm just saying that he deserves credit for winning the rings along with his RB's. No team will ever win a Super Bowl without a good RB.

I'm not discrediting him for his rings, I'm just saying that he deserves credit for winning the rings along with his RB's.  No team will ever win a Super Bowl without a good RB.

586103418[/snapback]

Superbowl XXXVII Winner: Tampa Bay. No good RB

Superbowl XXXVI Winner: New England. No good RB at that time

Superbowl XXIX Winner: 49ers. Horrid RB at that time (Wasnt Garrison "Irregular" Hearts their RB at that time?)

Without Davis, Elway was 0-3...and two of them being some of the most embarrassing defeats in SB history.

586103424[/snapback]

Hey, at least he was at the SB 3 times (I am looking at your direction Marino) :p

Superbowl XXXVII Winner: Tampa Bay. No good RB

Superbowl XXXVI Winner: New England. No good RB at that time

Superbowl XXIX Winner: 49ers. Horrid RB at that time (Wasnt Garrison "Irregular" Hearts their RB at that time?)

586103428[/snapback]

Let me correct myself, if I may: It's very rare for a team to win a Superbowl without a good running back.

Better? ;)

montana now. 

brady may beat him soon, which is scary....

you just can't consider marino the best, he's missing the ring.  to be the best, you have to win.

586103259[/snapback]

Being the best QB doesn't mean you must have a ring... You team could be really bad, and that is no reflection of your skills... He does have the record for having the most records you know.. Had he had some better players around him, he would prolly have a few rings. Gotta admire him for sticking it out as long as he did! My vote goes to Dan Marino!

(SC)Dan_Marino_Photo.jpg

In that case, looks like Brady will be the all-time best in no time.  Seeing as he didn't even play in the NFL until Bledsoe got injured, he has the story of an underdog, which is always favored.

586103464[/snapback]

But still, he has prove that he is not only surrounded by a good team, he is a true leader and an excellent player.

Not all underdogs are overrated. Look at Steve Young.

Not all underdogs are overrated.

586103470[/snapback]

What I meant about underdogs being favored is that people look at adversity when ranking athletes, and obviously, as of now, Brady has had more adversity than Montana. Underdogs are almost never overrated, just like last year's Pistons in the NBA and the Marlins against the Yankees.

What I meant about underdogs being favored is that people look at adversity when ranking athletes, and obviously, as of now, Brady has had more adversity than Montana.  Underdogs are almost never overrated, just like last year's Pistons in the NBA and the Marlins against the Yankees.

586103482[/snapback]

Or we can remember Mark Brunell (My biggest football dissapointment in my life) or Jamal Anderson :p

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Good, because the nonstop chattering from the voices in her head made me quit the second game.
    • This new cabinet design lets you run AMD, Intel, and Nvidia PCs inside one case by Sayan Sen At Computex 2026 earlier this month, AMD announced a couple of new X3D processors for both sockets AM4 and AM5 as it confirmed the support extension of the latter till 2029. And although Intel didn't unveil any new desktop chips, the company's Core Ultra 200S Plus series is relatively new too. Let's say though that you want the best of both worlds simultaneously, and instead of running two different systems, you can have both running together side-by-side, or rather on top of one another. That's exactly what Thermaltake's CAPO X dual system is made for doing. While it's not exactly mandatory to run AMD with Intel, or vice versa, you get the idea. As you can see in the render above, it is essentially like a double-decker PC case that is capable of holding two microATX (mATX) motherboards. Even running just one discrete graphics card in a PC can get toasty, so you may be wondering how well the cooling is designed on the CAPO X, Thermaltake has confirmed, as is evident from the marketing promo image above, that the case supports up to two 360 mm AIO liquid coolers. 420mm is not supported. In total there is room for 13 120mm case fans. In terms of I/O (input/output) options for the two systems, there are naturally two places for those ports, one at the top and one at the very bottom of the chassis in the front panel. In terms of use cases, there are many possibilities. Thermaltake itself, for example, highlights how one system can be your main PC while the other could be the AI agent PC. Another example given is how it can be used to stream and game simultaneously with dedicated systems instead of hogging one with the entire load. Nothing regarding pricing or availability was said. Source: Thermaltake (YouTube, X)
    • There might be some passive design improvements (cooling, etc), but I doubt they'd change the core performance spec of the hardware mid-generation when they've already got a new console in development.
    • State of Decay 3 is out in 2027, reveals Plague Nests with new co-op gameplay trailer by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe A few months ago, Undead Labs broke its silence about the third entry in the State of Decay series since its announcement in 2020. Today, the studio had a brand-new trailer to reveal at the Xbox Games Showcase, finally giving players a look at the Unreal Engine 5-powered title. A broad 2027 release window is now attached to State of Decay 3 too. The studio confirmed that every scene seen in the gameplay trailer (except for the studio logo) released today is from the game with no cinematic footage. "The quality bar of the moment-to-moment experience is higher than anything we’ve achieved in Undead Labs’ history," says the studio. "State of Decay 3 is being built in Unreal Engine 5, and we’re creating better quality versions of what makes our game the survival sandbox it is, and the combat experience is really, really important to us, and I think you can see it coming through in this trailer." One new aspect of this upcoming entry is the Plague Nests. These are supposed to be dynamic, dungeon‑like enemy hubs with varied “personas” that change tactics each time one appears on a map. These areas will have the best loot in the game for players brave enough to tackle them. The combat system is being overhauled too, letting players do quick and power attacks depending on the situation. This isn't just on the player's side though, as zombies themselves now have multiple new types of behaviors depending on how fresh or decayed they are. "All of these play very differently, especially as you start getting outnumbered or when you’re making noise and running around and trying to save your rear end or the rear end of your friend next to you," adds the developer. Of course, settlement building and community management are massive parts of this third entry too. These are being further expanded with the cooperative focus, giving players much more freedom for playing together than in State of Decay 2. Players will even be able to split up and build settlements in different areas of the same map with different goals. Undead Labs confirmed that playtests are already ongoing for the title, and interested players can sign up to participate by heading over here once more slots open up ahead of the full release. State of Decay 3 is coming out on PC, Xbox Series X|S, PlayStation 5, and Xbox Game Pass sometime in 2027.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      492
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      247
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      68
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!