[NFL]Who is the best QB of all time


Who is the best QB of all time  

67 members have voted

  1. 1. Who is the best QB of all time

    • 1.John Elway
      12
    • 2.Joe Montana
      27
    • 3.Johnny Unitas
      3
    • 4.Dan Marino
      11
    • 5.Brett Favre
      5
    • 6.Terry Bradshaw
      0
    • 7.roger staubach
      1
    • 8.Steve Young
      7
    • 9.Dan Fouts
      0
    • 10.Other
      1


Recommended Posts

Lets see. Many people its going to say Favre or Marino. statistically they are.

But I think that the title should be reserved for the one who made his team win and that, my friends its no other than the great Montana.

Elway also its in a close second.

P.D.: If Brady wins another Bowl he its going to top Montana easily.

Joe Montana.  This isn't even close.

Elway has no business being on this list.

586103282[/snapback]

Come on, give him some credit...his RB's won him the rings :p

586103380[/snapback]

Oh please. While Davis was amazing (I am still think that he is the real best RB ever, but his injury was too much) no team go to the superbowl and wins (Two times in a row) without a good QB.

Elway was amazing. The captain comeback gentlemen.

Oh please. While Davis was amazing (I am still think that he is the real best RB ever, but his injury was too much) no team go to the superbowl and wins (Two times in a row) without a good QB.

Elway was amazing. The captain comeback gentlemen.

586103394[/snapback]

I'm not discrediting him for his rings, I'm just saying that he deserves credit for winning the rings along with his RB's. No team will ever win a Super Bowl without a good RB.

I'm not discrediting him for his rings, I'm just saying that he deserves credit for winning the rings along with his RB's.  No team will ever win a Super Bowl without a good RB.

586103418[/snapback]

Superbowl XXXVII Winner: Tampa Bay. No good RB

Superbowl XXXVI Winner: New England. No good RB at that time

Superbowl XXIX Winner: 49ers. Horrid RB at that time (Wasnt Garrison "Irregular" Hearts their RB at that time?)

Without Davis, Elway was 0-3...and two of them being some of the most embarrassing defeats in SB history.

586103424[/snapback]

Hey, at least he was at the SB 3 times (I am looking at your direction Marino) :p

Superbowl XXXVII Winner: Tampa Bay. No good RB

Superbowl XXXVI Winner: New England. No good RB at that time

Superbowl XXIX Winner: 49ers. Horrid RB at that time (Wasnt Garrison "Irregular" Hearts their RB at that time?)

586103428[/snapback]

Let me correct myself, if I may: It's very rare for a team to win a Superbowl without a good running back.

Better? ;)

montana now. 

brady may beat him soon, which is scary....

you just can't consider marino the best, he's missing the ring.  to be the best, you have to win.

586103259[/snapback]

Being the best QB doesn't mean you must have a ring... You team could be really bad, and that is no reflection of your skills... He does have the record for having the most records you know.. Had he had some better players around him, he would prolly have a few rings. Gotta admire him for sticking it out as long as he did! My vote goes to Dan Marino!

(SC)Dan_Marino_Photo.jpg

In that case, looks like Brady will be the all-time best in no time.  Seeing as he didn't even play in the NFL until Bledsoe got injured, he has the story of an underdog, which is always favored.

586103464[/snapback]

But still, he has prove that he is not only surrounded by a good team, he is a true leader and an excellent player.

Not all underdogs are overrated. Look at Steve Young.

Not all underdogs are overrated.

586103470[/snapback]

What I meant about underdogs being favored is that people look at adversity when ranking athletes, and obviously, as of now, Brady has had more adversity than Montana. Underdogs are almost never overrated, just like last year's Pistons in the NBA and the Marlins against the Yankees.

What I meant about underdogs being favored is that people look at adversity when ranking athletes, and obviously, as of now, Brady has had more adversity than Montana.  Underdogs are almost never overrated, just like last year's Pistons in the NBA and the Marlins against the Yankees.

586103482[/snapback]

Or we can remember Mark Brunell (My biggest football dissapointment in my life) or Jamal Anderson :p

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Guess it's one of those things best used by devs to thoroughly test stuff.
    • is it all upside down there? traffic lights reverted too?
    • Bluesky COO warns social media regulations could destroy competition from small startups by Paul Hill Fears that increasing government control of social media risks regulatory capture by the biggest social media firms were raised again recently. Bluesky’s chief operating officer said in an interview that social media bans for children and tighter regulations for social media firms risk creating a world where there are only a few social media platforms run by companies with the deepest pockets. Regulations on social media firms have been very lax since they appeared for mainstream users in the 2000’s. This gave Meta, Snapchat, and Google time to build up their user bases and get entrenched, with Meta being the most successful. Now that Meta has succeeded, it has been attempting regulatory capture. By pushing for more regulations of social media, Meta hopes to make it more difficult for rivals to challenge it. For its part, it doesn’t need to worry about the cost of regulation because it has a lot of money to spend, whereas startups do not. Speaking to CNBC, Rose Wang, Bluesky’s chief operating officer, said: “I support the protection and the safety of youth, the question that we have then is at what cost, because essentially what I’m scared of is in the long term, we’re headed to a world where there’s about three to five platforms, and extreme heavy regulation of those platforms, and basically the whole compliance teams of these platforms are 10 times the size of our entire team. So, basically, we’re living in a world where it’s almost impossible for smaller entrants to come in and build healthier spaces. These platforms have led to a place where the bottom line is the thing that drives what they do... so I understand why governments have to step in and regulate, because the platforms have done nothing right.” She said that while she is not against regulation, there needs to be more channels between the small to mid-sized players and regulators to help protect them. She says that big tech players, on the other hand, “who we know are circumventing regulation,” need to be regulated. Essentially, the Bluesky position is one of nuance, rather than absolutes. While Bluesky’s proposal may preserve competition in the social media space, it still doesn’t address the massive privacy implications these age verification measures introduce, such as handing over sensitive identity documents to access age-gated content. Source: CNBC
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      249
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      70
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!