[NFL]Who is the best QB of all time


Who is the best QB of all time  

67 members have voted

  1. 1. Who is the best QB of all time

    • 1.John Elway
      12
    • 2.Joe Montana
      27
    • 3.Johnny Unitas
      3
    • 4.Dan Marino
      11
    • 5.Brett Favre
      5
    • 6.Terry Bradshaw
      0
    • 7.roger staubach
      1
    • 8.Steve Young
      7
    • 9.Dan Fouts
      0
    • 10.Other
      1


Recommended Posts

As much as I hope so, lets hope it doesn't backfire on you ;)

586103595[/snapback]

I was partially joking. I am sure he its going to get a lot better, but he is already marked because:

1.- He had the highest hype for a rookie I can remember in years

2.- Roethlisberger just ridiculized him.

I was partially joking. I am sure he its going to get a lot better, but he is already marked because:

1.- He had the highest hype for a rookie I can remember in years

2.- Roethlisberger just ridiculized him.

586103599[/snapback]

Yeah I'm not sure he'll live up to the hype but I don't see him pulling a Ryan Leaf. Near the end of his rookie season he started to GET it. I don't remeber Leaf ever getting it. If he could turn out to be three-quarters of what his brother is (adding a Super Bowl) then I'd be more than thrilled. Plus last year he had no one to throw the ball to. Jeremy (butterfingers) Shockey and Amani (falls off the face of the earth after a Pro-Bowl season) Toomer aren't a great receiving corps to have.

And o yeah, my pick was Montana. Three Super Bowl MVPs, four rings, orchestrating the drive against Cincinnati in SB XXIII, throwing "The Catch." Plus, he could've probably had another SB title in XXV if Leonard Marshall of my Giants hadn't knocked him out of the NFC Championship game.

Edited by bigbluepride35
Being the best QB doesn't mean you must have a ring... You team could be really bad, and that is no reflection of your skills...  He does have the record for having the most records you know.. Had he had some better players around him, he would prolly have a few rings.  Gotta admire him for sticking it out as long as he did!  My vote goes to Dan Marino!

(SC)Dan_Marino_Photo.jpg

586103451[/snapback]

(Y)

American Football is a very team oriented game. A players greatness shouldnt be detracted because his team never won a championship.

Dan Marino, easily.

but marino CHOKED every SB! compare his regular season stats with his stats in the SB. good team or not, he wasn't able to sustain what he did during the regular season.

if marino had played as well in the SB as he did during the regular season, then ok, blame it on the team or something.

but at this point, i don't think marino deserves to be on the all-time greatest list. marino is 2nd tier.

Superbowl XXXVII Winner: Tampa Bay. No good RB

Superbowl XXXVI Winner: New England. No good RB at that time

Superbowl XXIX Winner: 49ers. Horrid RB at that time (Wasnt Garrison "Irregular" Hearts their RB at that time?)

586103428[/snapback]

In XXIX (1995), then it was Ricky Watters, who had only < 1000yds rushing, but had >700 yds receiving, so all in all he wasn't that unproductive. Also, 1996 GB Packers didn't have a rusher over 1000 yds either.

Lets not be mistaken, Eli must feel stupid for not wanting to be with the Chargers.  Talking about the Chargers, I must say Brees had one of the best comeback years in recent times.

586103613[/snapback]

Actually he should be glad he didn't go there, since Brees took off liek he did he'd definately be riding the pine for a while.

My vote is to Montana. Stats and Championships back it up. A QB is and should be rated by their teams performance in the big games. It is part of his job to inspire and lead those guys out there. Marino was great, but not the best. I'd even take Steve Young over Marino.

Actually he should be glad he didn't go there, since Brees took off liek he did he'd definately be riding the pine for a while.

586104027[/snapback]

Most likely, he would've been the starting QB on opening day, so I'm sure he still feels a little awkward.

Most likely, he would've been the starting QB on opening day, so I'm sure he still feels a little awkward.

586104368[/snapback]

That's assuming San Diego wouldn't have taken so long to get the contract done. That's a big assumption to make with them lol. They kind of have a history of not dealing with contract negotiations with draft picks that well.

Superbowl XXIX Winner: 49ers. Horrid RB at that time (Wasnt Garrison "Irregular" Hearts their RB at that time?)

586103428[/snapback]

It was Ricky Watters (who was hardly horrid, in my opinion). That season the 49ers also ran the ball alot with fullback William Floyd, so Watters would easily have had 1,000 yards and over 10 TDs rushing. I think that 1994 49ers team is quite possibly one of the best teams ever assembled.

My vote is for Joe Montana as well, but I would love to see the type of career Steve Young would have had if he didn't spend all those seasons sitting behind Joe.

It was Ricky Watters (who was hardly horrid, in my opinion). That season the 49ers also ran the ball alot with fullback William Floyd, so Watters would easily have had 1,000 yards and over 10 TDs rushing. I think that 1994 49ers team is quite possibly one of the best teams ever assembled. 

My vote is for Joe Montana as well, but I would love to see the type of career Steve Young would have had if he didn't spend all those seasons sitting behind Joe.

586106933[/snapback]

For me there is no better team than the 90's cowboys. Aikaman + Emmit + Irvin = Godlike team.

but marino CHOKED every SB!  compare his regular season stats with his stats in the SB.  good team or not, he wasn't able to sustain what he did during the regular season. 

if marino had played as well in the SB as he did during the regular season, then ok, blame it on the team or something.

but at this point, i don't think marino deserves to be on the all-time greatest list.  marino is 2nd tier.

586103671[/snapback]

He only played in one. Stats werent bad either...

29/50 318yds 1 TD 2 INT

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I'm happy with my launch XSX, however, won't mind that 25th anniversary controller to join my 20th anniverary controller! don't need it but sure do want it
    • App, useful & Teams shouldn't be used in the same sentence.
    • New Outlook for Windows and Web is getting a simple but very useful email feature by Sayan Sen Recently Microsoft put up a blog post highlighting not one, not two, but 15 total reasons why it feels you should switch to New Outlook already. If that was not enough, the company is bringing another new feature soon that could finally compel you to switch over to the new app. According to a recent update on the Microsoft 365 roadmap, the tech giant is making changes to how message sorting works when users choose criteria besides the traditional options of From, Subject, or Date Received. The idea is to provide better options for the attribute being used for sorting and make it easier to understand why messages appear in a particular order. For those unfamiliar Outlook already allows users to sort emails using a variety of fields including sender, category, importance, subject, and message size. Users can access these options through the Filter menu in Outlook for Windows and Outlook on the web. With the upcoming change, whenever users sort by a field other than From, Subject, or Date Received, Outlook will automatically display an additional column showing the value being used for the sort. For example, if messages are sorted by Size, a Size column will appear in the message list, allowing users to immediately see the data that determines the ordering of emails. Microsoft believes this should make sorting behavior simpler and reduce the need to manually adjust views or inspect individual messages. Support for sorting by Flag Due Date is also coming and should be especially be helpful for users who rely on email flags to manage follow-up tasks and deadlines. The feature is listed under Microsoft 365 Roadmap ID 564803 and is expected to reach general availability beginning later this month itself (June 2026). You can find the entry here. As always though, users should keep in mind that roadmap timelines can change and rollout schedules may occasionally be adjusted by Microsoft. Outlook for Web is also set to receive this feature.
    • That is true. but the liability side of my balance sheet is clean and has been for decades.  Nobody comes a knocking,  calling or writing harassing me for the money i owe them.😎👍  Haven't dealt with "a money changer" in decades and like Jesus it was in Jerusalem.  Don't have much money, but have even less stress in my life.👍👍     P.S.  Sorry, can't walk on water or change it to wine,  
    • Maybe ? DLSS Swapper (can swap the DLSS/FSR/XeSS versions) as long as the game (typically online/competitive) doesn't checks for file tampering. You can try different version(s) or update if not the current version of the FSR. https://github.com/beeradmoore/dlss-swapper
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      492
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      249
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      70
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!