[NFL]Who is the best QB of all time


Who is the best QB of all time  

67 members have voted

  1. 1. Who is the best QB of all time

    • 1.John Elway
      12
    • 2.Joe Montana
      27
    • 3.Johnny Unitas
      3
    • 4.Dan Marino
      11
    • 5.Brett Favre
      5
    • 6.Terry Bradshaw
      0
    • 7.roger staubach
      1
    • 8.Steve Young
      7
    • 9.Dan Fouts
      0
    • 10.Other
      1


Recommended Posts

As much as I hope so, lets hope it doesn't backfire on you ;)

586103595[/snapback]

I was partially joking. I am sure he its going to get a lot better, but he is already marked because:

1.- He had the highest hype for a rookie I can remember in years

2.- Roethlisberger just ridiculized him.

I was partially joking. I am sure he its going to get a lot better, but he is already marked because:

1.- He had the highest hype for a rookie I can remember in years

2.- Roethlisberger just ridiculized him.

586103599[/snapback]

Yeah I'm not sure he'll live up to the hype but I don't see him pulling a Ryan Leaf. Near the end of his rookie season he started to GET it. I don't remeber Leaf ever getting it. If he could turn out to be three-quarters of what his brother is (adding a Super Bowl) then I'd be more than thrilled. Plus last year he had no one to throw the ball to. Jeremy (butterfingers) Shockey and Amani (falls off the face of the earth after a Pro-Bowl season) Toomer aren't a great receiving corps to have.

And o yeah, my pick was Montana. Three Super Bowl MVPs, four rings, orchestrating the drive against Cincinnati in SB XXIII, throwing "The Catch." Plus, he could've probably had another SB title in XXV if Leonard Marshall of my Giants hadn't knocked him out of the NFC Championship game.

Edited by bigbluepride35
Being the best QB doesn't mean you must have a ring... You team could be really bad, and that is no reflection of your skills...  He does have the record for having the most records you know.. Had he had some better players around him, he would prolly have a few rings.  Gotta admire him for sticking it out as long as he did!  My vote goes to Dan Marino!

(SC)Dan_Marino_Photo.jpg

586103451[/snapback]

(Y)

American Football is a very team oriented game. A players greatness shouldnt be detracted because his team never won a championship.

Dan Marino, easily.

but marino CHOKED every SB! compare his regular season stats with his stats in the SB. good team or not, he wasn't able to sustain what he did during the regular season.

if marino had played as well in the SB as he did during the regular season, then ok, blame it on the team or something.

but at this point, i don't think marino deserves to be on the all-time greatest list. marino is 2nd tier.

Superbowl XXXVII Winner: Tampa Bay. No good RB

Superbowl XXXVI Winner: New England. No good RB at that time

Superbowl XXIX Winner: 49ers. Horrid RB at that time (Wasnt Garrison "Irregular" Hearts their RB at that time?)

586103428[/snapback]

In XXIX (1995), then it was Ricky Watters, who had only < 1000yds rushing, but had >700 yds receiving, so all in all he wasn't that unproductive. Also, 1996 GB Packers didn't have a rusher over 1000 yds either.

Lets not be mistaken, Eli must feel stupid for not wanting to be with the Chargers.  Talking about the Chargers, I must say Brees had one of the best comeback years in recent times.

586103613[/snapback]

Actually he should be glad he didn't go there, since Brees took off liek he did he'd definately be riding the pine for a while.

My vote is to Montana. Stats and Championships back it up. A QB is and should be rated by their teams performance in the big games. It is part of his job to inspire and lead those guys out there. Marino was great, but not the best. I'd even take Steve Young over Marino.

Actually he should be glad he didn't go there, since Brees took off liek he did he'd definately be riding the pine for a while.

586104027[/snapback]

Most likely, he would've been the starting QB on opening day, so I'm sure he still feels a little awkward.

Most likely, he would've been the starting QB on opening day, so I'm sure he still feels a little awkward.

586104368[/snapback]

That's assuming San Diego wouldn't have taken so long to get the contract done. That's a big assumption to make with them lol. They kind of have a history of not dealing with contract negotiations with draft picks that well.

Superbowl XXIX Winner: 49ers. Horrid RB at that time (Wasnt Garrison "Irregular" Hearts their RB at that time?)

586103428[/snapback]

It was Ricky Watters (who was hardly horrid, in my opinion). That season the 49ers also ran the ball alot with fullback William Floyd, so Watters would easily have had 1,000 yards and over 10 TDs rushing. I think that 1994 49ers team is quite possibly one of the best teams ever assembled.

My vote is for Joe Montana as well, but I would love to see the type of career Steve Young would have had if he didn't spend all those seasons sitting behind Joe.

It was Ricky Watters (who was hardly horrid, in my opinion). That season the 49ers also ran the ball alot with fullback William Floyd, so Watters would easily have had 1,000 yards and over 10 TDs rushing. I think that 1994 49ers team is quite possibly one of the best teams ever assembled. 

My vote is for Joe Montana as well, but I would love to see the type of career Steve Young would have had if he didn't spend all those seasons sitting behind Joe.

586106933[/snapback]

For me there is no better team than the 90's cowboys. Aikaman + Emmit + Irvin = Godlike team.

but marino CHOKED every SB!  compare his regular season stats with his stats in the SB.  good team or not, he wasn't able to sustain what he did during the regular season. 

if marino had played as well in the SB as he did during the regular season, then ok, blame it on the team or something.

but at this point, i don't think marino deserves to be on the all-time greatest list.  marino is 2nd tier.

586103671[/snapback]

He only played in one. Stats werent bad either...

29/50 318yds 1 TD 2 INT

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft making much needed change to Windows 11, 10 Patch Tuesday security updates by Sayan Sen Recently, Microsoft delivered its latest Defender patches for Windows 11 ISOs. These definitions are released from time to time alongside the general security updates available during Patch Tuesday. Speaking of Defender, the company has now announced another important change that affects how security updates are delivered to enterprise devices running Windows. According to a recent announcement, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint's endpoint detection and response (EDR) updates will no longer be bundled with the monthly Windows security updates or Patch Tuesdays. Instead the company is shifting delivery of these updates to Microsoft Update, bringing EDR servicing in line with several other Microsoft Defender components. If you recall, Microsoft last year moved PowerShell updates to Microsoft Update (MU) as well since it provides automatic updates for Microsoft products and services. Thus the move is intended to allow Microsoft to deliver EDR improvements and security enhancements independently of the OS's regular monthly update cycle; this should enable faster deployment of protection updates without requiring organizations to wait for the next Patch release. For those unfamiliar, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint's EDR capabilities are designed to help organizations detect, investigate, and respond to advanced threats across managed devices. Keeping these components updated is critical for maintaining protection against evolving attack techniques. The rollout has already began for Windows 10 devices in late May 2026 (last month) and Microsoft says it will gradually expand support to Windows 11 and the remaining supported Windows versions over the coming months. The company expects deployment across Windows 10 and Windows 11 to be completed by fall 2026 or around Q3 of this year. Once the transition is complete, EDR updates will be delivered through Microsoft Update using KB5005292, provided the required prerequisite updates have already been installed. Microsoft is also introducing a new Defender Update Service as part of the change. Following installation of the first update, devices will automatically create a new directory located at %ProgramData%\Microsoft\Microsoft Defender\Defender Update. Microsoft notes that restarts may occasionally be necessary in case of "rare" failure scenarios. For most organizations, the tech giant says no action will be required as long as Microsoft Update is already permitted within their update management strategy. Admins who rely on manually deployed update packages, however, will need to adjust their processes to ensure the new Defender update package is included. Microsoft also recommends reviewing internal documentation and notifying helpdesk and security operations teams about the updated delivery mechanism to avoid confusion during the transition. As a prerequisite, the tech giant notes that systems must be running Sense version 10.8798.25857.1000 or later and have one of the following Windows updates (or later) installed: Win11 24H2 KB5062660 (2025-07 Cumulative Update Preview) Win11 23H2 KB5062663 (2025-07 Cumulative Update Preview) Win11 22H2 KB5062663 (2025-07 Cumulative Update Preview) Win10 22H2 KB5062649 (2025-07 Cumulative Update Preview) Win10 1809 KB5063877 (2025-08 Cumulative Update) Server 2019 KB5063877 (2025-08 Cumulative Update) Server 2022 KB5063880 (2025-08 Cumulative Update) Server 2025 KB5063878 (2025-08 Cumulative Update) As always, organizations should verify that their update policies align with the new servicing approach before the broader rollout reaches all supported Windows platforms later this year. In case of major problems, the EDR update can be rolled back to the inbox version stored in %ProgramFiles%\\Windows Defender Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) using: MpCmdRun.exe -RevertMde -Product Edr -ToVersion Inbox For those who have access to the Microsoft 365 Admin Center portal, you can view the message here under ID MC1381119.
    • My problem with these smart scopes is that IMO they're not really an entrance into astronomy, they're an entrance to looking at pretty(ish) pictures that you take by essentially pressing a button and letting the scope do the work. I still maintain that getting some binoculars or a solid dedicated telescope (which doesn't have to mean expensive) and actually spending time learning the night sky and using a telescope is a much better way to actually learn. But, granted, the learning curve is a bit steeper (as it tends to be).
    • I never played Crazy Taxi before, but this looks like a fun game!
    • The perception of Microsoft Edge is unfortunate as it's a world class browser. I'm not exaggerating when I say it's the best browser I've ever used with its feature set, speed, reliability and advanced security. Running the extension Ublock Origin is a must though to deal with advertising and trackers.
    • You can check out our latest 9070 GRE review with scores for the XT too, but these are on Windows: Gaming performance Productivity performance
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      248
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      73
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!