Woman wins '100 grand', gets candy bar, sues


Recommended Posts

Jun. 23, 2005. 11:36 AM

Woman wins '100 grand', gets candy bar, sues

FROM ASSOCIATED PRESS

LEXINGTON, Ky. ? A woman who won a radio contest that promised the winner "100 grand" sued after the station gave her a candy bar ? a Nestle's 100 Grand ? instead of $100,000.

Norreasha Gill filed a complaint yesterday in Fayette District Court against Atlanta-based Cumulus Media, which owns WLTO-FM in Lexington. Gill, 28, says the station and its parent company breached a contract to pay $100,000 to the contest winner.

Night host DJ Slick sponsored the station's contest to "win 100 grand," Gill said in the lawsuit. Gill won by listening to the radio show for several hours and being the 10th caller at a specified time.

She went to the radio station the next morning to pick up her prize, but was asked to return later. When she got home, she found that the station manager had left a message explaining she had won a 100 Grand candy bar, not money.

Later, he offered her $5,000, Gill said.

"I said I wanted $95,000 more," she said. "Nobody would watch and listen for two hours for a candy bar."

DJ Slick did not return an email from the Herald-Leader, but he said on his Web site that he had left his job. WLTO and Cumulus declined to comment, identify DJ Slick by his given name or say whether he was fired.

Experts said the radio station could face action by the Federal Communications Commission, which licenses radio stations.

FCC regulations say contest descriptions can't be false or deceptive and that stations must conduct contests as advertised. Stations in two other states have been fined for contests that told listeners they'd won cash prizes without specifying they were in the Italian or Turkish lira, not the U.S. dollar.

Before her family went to sleep that night, Gill says, she promised her children ? ages 1, 5 and 11 ? that they'd have a minivan, a shopping spree, a savings account and a home with a back yard.

"What hurts me is they were going to get me in front of my children, all dressed up, and hand me a candy bar, after all those promises I made to them," she told the Lexington Herald-Leader. ``You just don't do that to people."

http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentSe...id=968332188492

Before her family went to sleep that night, Gill says, she promised her children ? ages 1, 5 and 11 ? that they'd have a minivan, a shopping spree, a savings account and a home with a back yard.

it's kinda sad that she thinks she can do all of that with 100 grand.

It happened just less than a month ago, the lawsuit was just filed

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0623051grand1.html

it's kinda sad that she thinks she can do all of that with 100 grand.

586108538[/snapback]

maybe not in Seattle, but we're talking about Kentucky....very possible

HAHA sucks for her. I think a radio station in Omaha did something similar. They did an April fools joke by saying they were going to give away a vacation or something like that. They said April Fools and the person who had 'won' it was ****ed and sued. They decided to change the station name instead of giving away the vacation. It sucks since they were won of the few good rock stations in town.

it's kinda sad that she thinks she can do all of that with 100 grand.

586108538[/snapback]

true that.... minivan (new)... ~$25,000.... a reasonable home... ~$80,000.... savings accounts anyone?

586108571[/snapback]

Many people have the resources to carry a mortgage (I mean, they're probably paying a similar amount in rent anyway) but they have trouble coming up with a downpayment.

She could have purchased a new minivan, placed a downpayment on a house and still had some decent money left over for shopping.

WAAF in Boston did that about 2 years ago and the DJs are still on the air.

586108598[/snapback]

Somebody else (the program director?) probably took the fall then.

true that.... minivan (new)... ~$25,000.... a reasonable home... ~$80,000.... savings accounts anyone?

586108571[/snapback]

I was thinking the same thing...she obviously has no concept of money. I remember I used to be like that too, granted I was five years old and I thought a dollar would buy me the world. :D

It is disgusting that radio stations can do this and expect to get away with it - not just because they mislead her about the prize, but because they get a HUGE amount of "free" advertising from it. :no:

Many people have the resources to carry a mortgage (I mean, they're probably paying a similar amount in rent anyway) but they have trouble coming up with a downpayment.

She could have purchased a new minivan, placed a downpayment on a house and still had some decent money left over for shopping.

good point.

Lol.

Pity she doesn't see the humor in it.  I don't think people should be able to complain when it comes to prizes..

586108534[/snapback]

:huh:

She was tricked, if she laughed it off whats to stop loads of other people being tricked like this. I'd be annoyed too

$100,000 for most people <= middle-class is more than enough to set their finances straight and give them room to grow happily, especially when you're a young mom with three kids. She could pay off $10K worth of debt, buy a nice new vehicle for $20K, put $40K down on a new (or first) home, and still set aside $10K/child for university. I'm sure to her that would mean the world.

As far as advertising/contests go, there is just waaay too much B.S. out there. You think you're clever and want to make up stupid claims or trick prizes? Screw that. I hope the station is forced to pay up. This isn't a joke, it's business and there are rules.

:huh:

She was tricked, if she laughed it off whats to stop loads of other people being tricked like this.  I'd be annoyed too

586108661[/snapback]

I don't know, I guess I just never felt people were entitled to free stuff.

It was misleading yes, but I'm sure the contest wasn't hard. Now if the contest were to climb Mt. Everest for 100 grand, and 6 people risked death for a damn candybar, then yeah I'd say they had grounds for suing, but for a 10th call ro a radio station, nah I don't think so.

Besides those contests are freaking rare as hell, I haven't heard one for 100,000 dollars in years down here, I don't know of many radio stations that can give away 100,000 dollars, I would have been prepared for a switch myself.

I never heard any promos, but did the station ever say "100,000 dollars" or "100 grand in cash"? I know its misleading, but I don't think the suit can stand. It would have to be proven that they purposely misled the listeners. Bait and switch is a common sales practice to get patrons to come buy something, this was along those same lines. Caveat emptor.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 by Razvan Serea Hasleo Disk Clone is a free and all-in-one disk cloning software for Windows 11/10/8/7/Vista and Windows Server that can help you migrate Windows OS to another disk, clone one disk to another disk or clone one partition to another location quickly and efficiently. Completely Free Windows Migration and Disk/Partition Cloning Software Migrate Windows from one disk to another without reinstalling Windows, apps. Clone one disk to another and makes the data on 2 disks are exactly the same. Clone a partition to another location without losing any data. Easily adjust the size and location of the destination partition. Convert MBR to GPT or convert GPT to MBR by cloning. Creation of Windows PE emergency disk. Extremely fast cloning speed and multi-language support. Supported OS: Windows Vista/Server 2008 or later, fully compatible with GPT and UEFI. Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 changelog: Fixed an issue that caused disk enumeration to fail Fixed an issue where WinPE created under Windows ARM64 26H1 did not work properly Download: Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 | 32.3 MB (Freeware) Link: Hasleo Disk Clone Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • This got me thinking, would you rather a self driving car prioritise protecting its passengers or everyone else? I'd choose the one that keeps me and my kids safest. At some point, these cars have to make those choices already, don't they? Wonder if we have a way to find out what way they lean.
    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      558
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      78
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!