Woman wins '100 grand', gets candy bar, sues


Recommended Posts

Well, first off before any legal actions can take place a judge should decide whether or not she is fit to bring any kind of lawsuit. I mean if you are that Fargin dumb you must be at least partially retarded, and hence not legally capable of making an informed decision.

Before you all go nuts, there are plenty of people with mental retardation that are great functioning human beings, better than some 'normal' people, just not this woman.

If I held a contest and said I am giving away A baby Ruth. How many of you would think I am giving away a little baby girl named Ruth? None would be my guess, but say you show up expecting a candy bar and I hand you a little girl... Can you sue me for not giving what your dumb ass assumed I was giving? I hardly think so. You can turn down the prize, in my case a little girl, this case a candy bar, but you couldn't get a judge to force me to give you a candy bar because your stupid, or "most people would be expecting a candy bar'. The world doesn't work like that.

As for 'There are rules in business.. and they must pay...' For all of you who do not know, the FCC is a government body that enforces a set of rules and regulations on Radio, Television etc. those RULES are only upheld because we the people (in the US) agree to abide by a list of rules. They however are not for BUSINESS! Business has one rule in the US and it is really simple. "Most customers are stupid, and will buy anything we tell them to, we just have to market it correctly." Case in point Tobacco, Alchohol, Britney Spears, FoxNews Channel, AOL. etc.etc.

So this woman, can take her fargin candy bar, and 5k and buy her kids some books. So maybe, just maybe, the next generation can learn to walk upright!

it's kinda sad that she thinks she can do all of that with 100 grand.

586108538[/snapback]

That depends on where you live.

Where I live:

Home with a back yard: $50,000 or so

Mini van: $10,000 to $30,000 or so.

That still leaves at least $20,000 for the shopping spree and the savings account.

Bait and switch is a common sales practice to get patrons to come buy something, this was along those same lines.  Caveat emptor.

586108705[/snapback]

Bait and switch is also illegal (at least where I live, not sure if it is everywhere) and can earn a store a lawsuit rather quickly.

I've heard of a few stories like this. I remember a story about a hooter's waitress who won a contest thinking she was getting a brand new toyota. But rather, they gave her a toy yoda.

All I know is that this isn't the first time something like this has happened/

The point is that a Federally-regulated broadcaster probably thought they'd be clever by mixing signals about a supposed prize in order to gain more hype/listeners/callers (ie. boost their business). Put up or F*k off. Precidents need to be set and upheld so others learn from it and be careful next time.

I've heard of a few stories like this.  I remember a story about a hooter's waitress who won a contest thinking she was getting a brand new toyota.  But rather, they gave her a toy yoda.

586109382[/snapback]

Yeah I think you remember that story from page 2 of this thread.

As for 'There are rules in business.. and they must pay...' For all of you who do not know, the FCC is a government body that enforces a set of rules and regulations on Radio, Television etc. those RULES are only upheld because we the people (in the US) agree to abide by a list of rules. They however are not for BUSINESS! Business has one rule in the US and it is really simple. "Most customers are stupid, and will buy anything we tell them to, we just have to market it correctly." Case in point Tobacco, Alchohol, Britney Spears, FoxNews Channel, AOL. etc.etc.

586109274[/snapback]

I guess all those lawyers with degrees in Business Law have meaningless degrees then? You are saying that businesses don't have to abide by the law?

Bait and switch is also illegal (at least where I live, not sure if it is everywhere) and can earn a store a lawsuit rather quickly.

586109345[/snapback]

THIS IS NOT BAIT AND SWITCH PEOPLE!

A 'Bait and switch' method IS HIGHLY ILLEGAL!

There was NO SWITCH!

I assume we all agree on two things

1- The radio station was giving away 100 grand.

2- The radio station gave away 100 grand.

NO FARGIN SWITCH!

Just because this dumb woman assumed it meant cash money does not make it illegal.

Radio stations offer contests for big prizes like money and new cars all the time.  Why would it he so strange for her to assume that "100 grand" means $100,000?

586109400[/snapback]

Exactly. How often have you heard of a radio station giving away money? Daily (at least where I live). How often have you heard of one giving away a candy bar? For me, never.

Reminds me of the hooters contest where the winner won a "Toy Yoda" doll instead of a "toyota" (car). I think she sued too. idk if she won.

/edit

Clearly the radio station was wanting to play a trick. It's as obvious as day.

not necessarily. The radio station here has a contest every year that involves rolling dice ( 5 i think) and if you spell like "$100k" or "IRock" (the station name, came out before ipods, don't worry, it's not that ghey) )you get 100,000 dollars. You have to first call in to have your name put in a drawing, then have your name picked in the drawing, then roll, but still, it's a legit offer. So far nobody has won, but I think last year some guy one a few grand by getting a certain combination."

The "She should have known better" defense won't cut it in court. 100 Grand is a commonly accepted expression for 100,000$. Plus, the specific wording of the advertisement promised the winner "1000 Grand", not "a 100 Grand". The defense doesn't even have a case of ambiguity here, taken in the way that the radio station claims, the ad wouldn't have even made sense. The station sacrificed grammatical correctness for a cheap marketting ploy, clearly proving that the contest was intended to be misleading.

I hope the prosecution stomps all over that radio station. BTW, the FCC will happily accept the 5000$ offering as a fine for violating its broadcasting rules.

Reminds me of the hooters contest where the winner won a "Toy Yoda" doll instead of a "toyota" (car).  I think she sued too.  idk if she won.

586109440[/snapback]

Good for you. That makes you only the 3rd or 4th person in this thread to mention it. :rolleyes:

Well, first off before any legal actions can take place a judge should decide whether or not she is fit to bring any kind of lawsuit. I mean if you are that Fargin dumb you must be at least partially retarded, and hence not legally capable of making an informed decision.

Before you all go nuts, there are plenty of people with mental retardation that are great functioning human beings, better than some 'normal' people, just not this woman.

If I held a contest and said I am giving away A baby Ruth. How many of you would think I am giving away a little baby girl named Ruth? None would be my guess, but say you show up expecting a candy bar and I hand you a little girl... Can you sue me for not giving what your dumb ass assumed I was giving? I hardly think so. You can turn down the prize, in my case a little girl, this case a candy bar, but you couldn't get a judge to force me to give you a candy bar because your stupid, or "most people would be expecting a candy bar'. The world doesn't work like that.

As for 'There are rules in business.. and they must pay...' For all of you who do not know, the FCC is a government body that enforces a set of rules and regulations on Radio, Television etc. those RULES are only upheld because we the people (in the US) agree to abide by a list of rules. They however are not for BUSINESS! Business has one rule in the US and it is really simple. "Most customers are stupid, and will buy anything we tell them to, we just have to market it correctly." Case in point Tobacco, Alchohol, Britney Spears, FoxNews Channel, AOL. etc.etc.

So this woman, can take her fargin candy bar, and 5k and buy her kids some books. So maybe, just maybe, the next generation can learn to walk upright!

586109274[/snapback]

Thank you for that. You have your PhD in what again?

Case in point alcohol? Please (drink responsibly)?

EDGE 102FM does their whole wheel of sloth, wheel of envy, wheel of whatever sin.  Prizes are always big. It is not usually for the total package to be $50,000 for each one with different contests every month or so.

As of today, somebody won the EDGE Poorly Paid Employee Contest

586109469[/snapback]

I love the edge!

Barry Taylor is teh funny.

Exactly.  How often have you heard of a radio station giving away money?  Daily (at least where I live).  How often have you heard of one giving away a candy bar?  For me, never.

586109425[/snapback]

EDGE 102FM does their whole wheel of sloth, wheel of envy, wheel of whatever sin. Prizes are always big. It is not usually for the total package to be $50,000 for each one with different contests every month or so.

As of today, somebody won the EDGE Poorly Paid Employee Contest

The Edge Poorly Paid Employee will be rewarded with a low paying job at 102.1 the Edge, along with a 2005 Mazda 3 Sport from the Toronto Area Mazda Dealers. This Mazda will also come with a $12,000 Alpine system.
If I held a contest and said I am giving away A baby Ruth. How many of you would think I am giving away a little baby girl named Ruth? None would be my guess, but say you show up expecting a candy bar and I hand you a little girl... Can you sue me for not giving what your dumb ass assumed I was giving? I hardly think so. You can turn down the prize, in my case a little girl, this case a candy bar, but you couldn't get a judge to force me to give you a candy bar because your stupid, or "most people would be expecting a candy bar'. The world doesn't work like that.

EXACTLY!

EVERYONE READ THIS PARAGRAPH!!! (Y) (Y)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I always thought the moon gets a lot of impact because there’s no atmosphere, so surely building a moon base is only going to end in disaster?
    • Gets them every time !  
    • This piece of ###### is probably one of the most hated apps that ever existed.
    • Microsoft is bringing a much-needed Recap app to Teams, here is a first look by Usama Jawad Microsoft Teams is heavily used in work and school environments, and perhaps one of its core but extremely useful features is the ability to record meetings. In past years, Microsoft has further improved upon this functionality by integrating AI, but you do need a Microsoft 365 Copilot license to leverage most, if not all, all of those capabilities. Now, the Redmond tech firm is making another significant enhancement in the area of Teams meeting recordings. Up until now, if you wanted to access Teams recordings, you had to arduously locate the meeting invite and navigate to the dedicated tab, or go to the cloud storage location such as a SharePoint site. This was a rather overwhelming activity, especially if you don't remember the name of the meeting or the meeting occurred quite a while ago. Microsoft is now attempting to solve this problem through a dedicated Recap app that consolidates all your recordings. This centralized experience will allow users to find all recordings from the past 30 days and also offer access to other related services such as transcripts and AI-powered summaries. Customers will have the option to search for recordings, filter them, and review multiple meetings by generating AI-powered podcast-style recaps. The Recap app will list all available recordings in both thumbnail and list views. The former is shown below: And here is how Teams users with a Microsoft 365 Copilot license can select multiple recordings to generate a podcast-style audio recap: Microsoft has emphasized that the Recap app is pre-installed in Teams but it will not be pinned by default. Users will able to navigate to the Teams app store from the left rail, and pin it from the apps section. It will be enabled by default for all users once it becomes available. It's worth noting that while Teams recordings and transcripts can be accessed by all users governed by existing permissions, AI-powered features like intelligent summaries, audio recaps, and video recaps will require a Microsoft 365 Copilot license. The Recap app will be generally available to Teams users on Windows, Mac, and the web by the end of next month, with mobile support coming soon.
    • It's so stupid that you have to "enroll" in these extended updates.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      Kolakid60 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      xvvxcvv earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      427
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      184
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!