Woman wins '100 grand', gets candy bar, sues


Recommended Posts

Jun. 23, 2005. 11:36 AM

Woman wins '100 grand', gets candy bar, sues

FROM ASSOCIATED PRESS

LEXINGTON, Ky. ? A woman who won a radio contest that promised the winner "100 grand" sued after the station gave her a candy bar ? a Nestle's 100 Grand ? instead of $100,000.

Norreasha Gill filed a complaint yesterday in Fayette District Court against Atlanta-based Cumulus Media, which owns WLTO-FM in Lexington. Gill, 28, says the station and its parent company breached a contract to pay $100,000 to the contest winner.

Night host DJ Slick sponsored the station's contest to "win 100 grand," Gill said in the lawsuit. Gill won by listening to the radio show for several hours and being the 10th caller at a specified time.

She went to the radio station the next morning to pick up her prize, but was asked to return later. When she got home, she found that the station manager had left a message explaining she had won a 100 Grand candy bar, not money.

Later, he offered her $5,000, Gill said.

"I said I wanted $95,000 more," she said. "Nobody would watch and listen for two hours for a candy bar."

DJ Slick did not return an email from the Herald-Leader, but he said on his Web site that he had left his job. WLTO and Cumulus declined to comment, identify DJ Slick by his given name or say whether he was fired.

Experts said the radio station could face action by the Federal Communications Commission, which licenses radio stations.

FCC regulations say contest descriptions can't be false or deceptive and that stations must conduct contests as advertised. Stations in two other states have been fined for contests that told listeners they'd won cash prizes without specifying they were in the Italian or Turkish lira, not the U.S. dollar.

Before her family went to sleep that night, Gill says, she promised her children ? ages 1, 5 and 11 ? that they'd have a minivan, a shopping spree, a savings account and a home with a back yard.

"What hurts me is they were going to get me in front of my children, all dressed up, and hand me a candy bar, after all those promises I made to them," she told the Lexington Herald-Leader. ``You just don't do that to people."

http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentSe...id=968332188492

Before her family went to sleep that night, Gill says, she promised her children ? ages 1, 5 and 11 ? that they'd have a minivan, a shopping spree, a savings account and a home with a back yard.

it's kinda sad that she thinks she can do all of that with 100 grand.

It happened just less than a month ago, the lawsuit was just filed

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0623051grand1.html

it's kinda sad that she thinks she can do all of that with 100 grand.

586108538[/snapback]

maybe not in Seattle, but we're talking about Kentucky....very possible

HAHA sucks for her. I think a radio station in Omaha did something similar. They did an April fools joke by saying they were going to give away a vacation or something like that. They said April Fools and the person who had 'won' it was ****ed and sued. They decided to change the station name instead of giving away the vacation. It sucks since they were won of the few good rock stations in town.

it's kinda sad that she thinks she can do all of that with 100 grand.

586108538[/snapback]

true that.... minivan (new)... ~$25,000.... a reasonable home... ~$80,000.... savings accounts anyone?

586108571[/snapback]

Many people have the resources to carry a mortgage (I mean, they're probably paying a similar amount in rent anyway) but they have trouble coming up with a downpayment.

She could have purchased a new minivan, placed a downpayment on a house and still had some decent money left over for shopping.

WAAF in Boston did that about 2 years ago and the DJs are still on the air.

586108598[/snapback]

Somebody else (the program director?) probably took the fall then.

true that.... minivan (new)... ~$25,000.... a reasonable home... ~$80,000.... savings accounts anyone?

586108571[/snapback]

I was thinking the same thing...she obviously has no concept of money. I remember I used to be like that too, granted I was five years old and I thought a dollar would buy me the world. :D

It is disgusting that radio stations can do this and expect to get away with it - not just because they mislead her about the prize, but because they get a HUGE amount of "free" advertising from it. :no:

Many people have the resources to carry a mortgage (I mean, they're probably paying a similar amount in rent anyway) but they have trouble coming up with a downpayment.

She could have purchased a new minivan, placed a downpayment on a house and still had some decent money left over for shopping.

good point.

Lol.

Pity she doesn't see the humor in it.  I don't think people should be able to complain when it comes to prizes..

586108534[/snapback]

:huh:

She was tricked, if she laughed it off whats to stop loads of other people being tricked like this. I'd be annoyed too

$100,000 for most people <= middle-class is more than enough to set their finances straight and give them room to grow happily, especially when you're a young mom with three kids. She could pay off $10K worth of debt, buy a nice new vehicle for $20K, put $40K down on a new (or first) home, and still set aside $10K/child for university. I'm sure to her that would mean the world.

As far as advertising/contests go, there is just waaay too much B.S. out there. You think you're clever and want to make up stupid claims or trick prizes? Screw that. I hope the station is forced to pay up. This isn't a joke, it's business and there are rules.

:huh:

She was tricked, if she laughed it off whats to stop loads of other people being tricked like this.  I'd be annoyed too

586108661[/snapback]

I don't know, I guess I just never felt people were entitled to free stuff.

It was misleading yes, but I'm sure the contest wasn't hard. Now if the contest were to climb Mt. Everest for 100 grand, and 6 people risked death for a damn candybar, then yeah I'd say they had grounds for suing, but for a 10th call ro a radio station, nah I don't think so.

Besides those contests are freaking rare as hell, I haven't heard one for 100,000 dollars in years down here, I don't know of many radio stations that can give away 100,000 dollars, I would have been prepared for a switch myself.

I never heard any promos, but did the station ever say "100,000 dollars" or "100 grand in cash"? I know its misleading, but I don't think the suit can stand. It would have to be proven that they purposely misled the listeners. Bait and switch is a common sales practice to get patrons to come buy something, this was along those same lines. Caveat emptor.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I've been on Deezer for over a decade, but glad that Tidal joined them in fighting AI slop. Can't stand such takes as Spotify's: "Spotify's CEO recently pushed back against listeners who call AI music "slop," urging people to stop using the term and instead embrace the creative potential of AI music."
    • “Could” … in the IS the healthcare is run by insurance companies that make indecent profits denying basic treatments to people that are paying money for nothing. Besides, where are all the Trump epigones who were stating that the tariffs were going to paid by foreign companies and not the US citizens? …
    • Microsoft Teams gets smarter at spotting sneaky meeting bots by Usama Jawad Microsoft Teams is set to receive a couple of new features soon, including a dedicated Recap app and a rather controversial location tracking functionality. The Redmond tech giant has also explained how it has made online communication and collaboration a lot more performant this year. Now, the company has detailed more secure bot admission mechanisms, as first reported by us in March 2026, and now available in Teams. As the use of AI has expanded across enterprise environments, Microsoft has begun allowing users to integrate bots into their meetings for various tasks, such as note-taking. While this has a tangible productivity benefit for users, Microsoft has highlighted how misconfiguration has allowed bots to join meetings that they shouldn't. This has created security and privacy risks, which Microsoft is now combating using a new Teams admin policy that allows organizers to control how external bots access meetings. Admins can leverage a policy called Manage external bots and their access to meetings. The default configuration is "When detected, require approval before joining", which places detected bots in a lobby before they are explicitly admitted into the meeting. The other option disables the experience. Microsoft has also requested admins to only allow organizers and co-organizers to manage access to a meeting, so that other people don't randomly allow bots into meetings. Teams will now be able to leverage infrastructure signals to intelligently detect and distinguish between bots and humans. Microsoft will soon also trial a registration experience for independent software vendors (ISVs) to build a system that registers a bot with Microsoft, so it is marked as a "known" bot. Teams will also categorize bots as trusted and suspected threats so that organizers can quickly identify which bots they want to allow into a meeting. Additional safeguards to block accidental admission of a bot into a meeting include: No one-click Admit option for identified bots Confirmation prompts when admitting participants that include bots Warnings when organizers choose Admit all, and bots are included Microsoft has begun rolling out this experience, and it will be retiring the current CAPTCHA verification implementation. In the future, the company plans to roll out new capabilities like allow-lists, organization-wide policies, admin reports, audit logs, and more granular controls.
    • With the current hardware prices Microsoft should lift the restriction. Then if you have the correct TPM then allow you to use X feature, if you don't have the correct TPM then don't but still actually let you run windows. 11. With a disclaimer during install that X features would be unavailable.
    • It's good for recycling of course. But commence inflation of a second hand RAM bubble and price gouging on DDR 4 inventory in 3... 2... 1...
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      538
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!