Woman wins '100 grand', gets candy bar, sues


Recommended Posts

Well, first off before any legal actions can take place a judge should decide whether or not she is fit to bring any kind of lawsuit. I mean if you are that Fargin dumb you must be at least partially retarded, and hence not legally capable of making an informed decision.

Before you all go nuts, there are plenty of people with mental retardation that are great functioning human beings, better than some 'normal' people, just not this woman.

If I held a contest and said I am giving away A baby Ruth. How many of you would think I am giving away a little baby girl named Ruth? None would be my guess, but say you show up expecting a candy bar and I hand you a little girl... Can you sue me for not giving what your dumb ass assumed I was giving? I hardly think so. You can turn down the prize, in my case a little girl, this case a candy bar, but you couldn't get a judge to force me to give you a candy bar because your stupid, or "most people would be expecting a candy bar'. The world doesn't work like that.

As for 'There are rules in business.. and they must pay...' For all of you who do not know, the FCC is a government body that enforces a set of rules and regulations on Radio, Television etc. those RULES are only upheld because we the people (in the US) agree to abide by a list of rules. They however are not for BUSINESS! Business has one rule in the US and it is really simple. "Most customers are stupid, and will buy anything we tell them to, we just have to market it correctly." Case in point Tobacco, Alchohol, Britney Spears, FoxNews Channel, AOL. etc.etc.

So this woman, can take her fargin candy bar, and 5k and buy her kids some books. So maybe, just maybe, the next generation can learn to walk upright!

it's kinda sad that she thinks she can do all of that with 100 grand.

586108538[/snapback]

That depends on where you live.

Where I live:

Home with a back yard: $50,000 or so

Mini van: $10,000 to $30,000 or so.

That still leaves at least $20,000 for the shopping spree and the savings account.

Bait and switch is a common sales practice to get patrons to come buy something, this was along those same lines.  Caveat emptor.

586108705[/snapback]

Bait and switch is also illegal (at least where I live, not sure if it is everywhere) and can earn a store a lawsuit rather quickly.

I've heard of a few stories like this. I remember a story about a hooter's waitress who won a contest thinking she was getting a brand new toyota. But rather, they gave her a toy yoda.

All I know is that this isn't the first time something like this has happened/

The point is that a Federally-regulated broadcaster probably thought they'd be clever by mixing signals about a supposed prize in order to gain more hype/listeners/callers (ie. boost their business). Put up or F*k off. Precidents need to be set and upheld so others learn from it and be careful next time.

I've heard of a few stories like this.  I remember a story about a hooter's waitress who won a contest thinking she was getting a brand new toyota.  But rather, they gave her a toy yoda.

586109382[/snapback]

Yeah I think you remember that story from page 2 of this thread.

As for 'There are rules in business.. and they must pay...' For all of you who do not know, the FCC is a government body that enforces a set of rules and regulations on Radio, Television etc. those RULES are only upheld because we the people (in the US) agree to abide by a list of rules. They however are not for BUSINESS! Business has one rule in the US and it is really simple. "Most customers are stupid, and will buy anything we tell them to, we just have to market it correctly." Case in point Tobacco, Alchohol, Britney Spears, FoxNews Channel, AOL. etc.etc.

586109274[/snapback]

I guess all those lawyers with degrees in Business Law have meaningless degrees then? You are saying that businesses don't have to abide by the law?

Bait and switch is also illegal (at least where I live, not sure if it is everywhere) and can earn a store a lawsuit rather quickly.

586109345[/snapback]

THIS IS NOT BAIT AND SWITCH PEOPLE!

A 'Bait and switch' method IS HIGHLY ILLEGAL!

There was NO SWITCH!

I assume we all agree on two things

1- The radio station was giving away 100 grand.

2- The radio station gave away 100 grand.

NO FARGIN SWITCH!

Just because this dumb woman assumed it meant cash money does not make it illegal.

Radio stations offer contests for big prizes like money and new cars all the time.  Why would it he so strange for her to assume that "100 grand" means $100,000?

586109400[/snapback]

Exactly. How often have you heard of a radio station giving away money? Daily (at least where I live). How often have you heard of one giving away a candy bar? For me, never.

Reminds me of the hooters contest where the winner won a "Toy Yoda" doll instead of a "toyota" (car). I think she sued too. idk if she won.

/edit

Clearly the radio station was wanting to play a trick. It's as obvious as day.

not necessarily. The radio station here has a contest every year that involves rolling dice ( 5 i think) and if you spell like "$100k" or "IRock" (the station name, came out before ipods, don't worry, it's not that ghey) )you get 100,000 dollars. You have to first call in to have your name put in a drawing, then have your name picked in the drawing, then roll, but still, it's a legit offer. So far nobody has won, but I think last year some guy one a few grand by getting a certain combination."

The "She should have known better" defense won't cut it in court. 100 Grand is a commonly accepted expression for 100,000$. Plus, the specific wording of the advertisement promised the winner "1000 Grand", not "a 100 Grand". The defense doesn't even have a case of ambiguity here, taken in the way that the radio station claims, the ad wouldn't have even made sense. The station sacrificed grammatical correctness for a cheap marketting ploy, clearly proving that the contest was intended to be misleading.

I hope the prosecution stomps all over that radio station. BTW, the FCC will happily accept the 5000$ offering as a fine for violating its broadcasting rules.

Reminds me of the hooters contest where the winner won a "Toy Yoda" doll instead of a "toyota" (car).  I think she sued too.  idk if she won.

586109440[/snapback]

Good for you. That makes you only the 3rd or 4th person in this thread to mention it. :rolleyes:

Well, first off before any legal actions can take place a judge should decide whether or not she is fit to bring any kind of lawsuit. I mean if you are that Fargin dumb you must be at least partially retarded, and hence not legally capable of making an informed decision.

Before you all go nuts, there are plenty of people with mental retardation that are great functioning human beings, better than some 'normal' people, just not this woman.

If I held a contest and said I am giving away A baby Ruth. How many of you would think I am giving away a little baby girl named Ruth? None would be my guess, but say you show up expecting a candy bar and I hand you a little girl... Can you sue me for not giving what your dumb ass assumed I was giving? I hardly think so. You can turn down the prize, in my case a little girl, this case a candy bar, but you couldn't get a judge to force me to give you a candy bar because your stupid, or "most people would be expecting a candy bar'. The world doesn't work like that.

As for 'There are rules in business.. and they must pay...' For all of you who do not know, the FCC is a government body that enforces a set of rules and regulations on Radio, Television etc. those RULES are only upheld because we the people (in the US) agree to abide by a list of rules. They however are not for BUSINESS! Business has one rule in the US and it is really simple. "Most customers are stupid, and will buy anything we tell them to, we just have to market it correctly." Case in point Tobacco, Alchohol, Britney Spears, FoxNews Channel, AOL. etc.etc.

So this woman, can take her fargin candy bar, and 5k and buy her kids some books. So maybe, just maybe, the next generation can learn to walk upright!

586109274[/snapback]

Thank you for that. You have your PhD in what again?

Case in point alcohol? Please (drink responsibly)?

EDGE 102FM does their whole wheel of sloth, wheel of envy, wheel of whatever sin.  Prizes are always big. It is not usually for the total package to be $50,000 for each one with different contests every month or so.

As of today, somebody won the EDGE Poorly Paid Employee Contest

586109469[/snapback]

I love the edge!

Barry Taylor is teh funny.

Exactly.  How often have you heard of a radio station giving away money?  Daily (at least where I live).  How often have you heard of one giving away a candy bar?  For me, never.

586109425[/snapback]

EDGE 102FM does their whole wheel of sloth, wheel of envy, wheel of whatever sin. Prizes are always big. It is not usually for the total package to be $50,000 for each one with different contests every month or so.

As of today, somebody won the EDGE Poorly Paid Employee Contest

The Edge Poorly Paid Employee will be rewarded with a low paying job at 102.1 the Edge, along with a 2005 Mazda 3 Sport from the Toronto Area Mazda Dealers. This Mazda will also come with a $12,000 Alpine system.
If I held a contest and said I am giving away A baby Ruth. How many of you would think I am giving away a little baby girl named Ruth? None would be my guess, but say you show up expecting a candy bar and I hand you a little girl... Can you sue me for not giving what your dumb ass assumed I was giving? I hardly think so. You can turn down the prize, in my case a little girl, this case a candy bar, but you couldn't get a judge to force me to give you a candy bar because your stupid, or "most people would be expecting a candy bar'. The world doesn't work like that.

EXACTLY!

EVERYONE READ THIS PARAGRAPH!!! (Y) (Y)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I've been on Deezer for over a decade, but glad that Tidal joined them in fighting AI slop. Can't stand such takes as Spotify's: "Spotify's CEO recently pushed back against listeners who call AI music "slop," urging people to stop using the term and instead embrace the creative potential of AI music."
    • “Could” … in the IS the healthcare is run by insurance companies that make indecent profits denying basic treatments to people that are paying money for nothing. Besides, where are all the Trump epigones who were stating that the tariffs were going to paid by foreign companies and not the US citizens? …
    • Microsoft Teams gets smarter at spotting sneaky meeting bots by Usama Jawad Microsoft Teams is set to receive a couple of new features soon, including a dedicated Recap app and a rather controversial location tracking functionality. The Redmond tech giant has also explained how it has made online communication and collaboration a lot more performant this year. Now, the company has detailed more secure bot admission mechanisms, as first reported by us in March 2026, and now available in Teams. As the use of AI has expanded across enterprise environments, Microsoft has begun allowing users to integrate bots into their meetings for various tasks, such as note-taking. While this has a tangible productivity benefit for users, Microsoft has highlighted how misconfiguration has allowed bots to join meetings that they shouldn't. This has created security and privacy risks, which Microsoft is now combating using a new Teams admin policy that allows organizers to control how external bots access meetings. Admins can leverage a policy called Manage external bots and their access to meetings. The default configuration is "When detected, require approval before joining", which places detected bots in a lobby before they are explicitly admitted into the meeting. The other option disables the experience. Microsoft has also requested admins to only allow organizers and co-organizers to manage access to a meeting, so that other people don't randomly allow bots into meetings. Teams will now be able to leverage infrastructure signals to intelligently detect and distinguish between bots and humans. Microsoft will soon also trial a registration experience for independent software vendors (ISVs) to build a system that registers a bot with Microsoft, so it is marked as a "known" bot. Teams will also categorize bots as trusted and suspected threats so that organizers can quickly identify which bots they want to allow into a meeting. Additional safeguards to block accidental admission of a bot into a meeting include: No one-click Admit option for identified bots Confirmation prompts when admitting participants that include bots Warnings when organizers choose Admit all, and bots are included Microsoft has begun rolling out this experience, and it will be retiring the current CAPTCHA verification implementation. In the future, the company plans to roll out new capabilities like allow-lists, organization-wide policies, admin reports, audit logs, and more granular controls.
    • With the current hardware prices Microsoft should lift the restriction. Then if you have the correct TPM then allow you to use X feature, if you don't have the correct TPM then don't but still actually let you run windows. 11. With a disclaimer during install that X features would be unavailable.
    • It's good for recycling of course. But commence inflation of a second hand RAM bubble and price gouging on DDR 4 inventory in 3... 2... 1...
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      538
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!