Woman wins '100 grand', gets candy bar, sues


Recommended Posts

Well, first off before any legal actions can take place a judge should decide whether or not she is fit to bring any kind of lawsuit. I mean if you are that Fargin dumb you must be at least partially retarded, and hence not legally capable of making an informed decision.

Before you all go nuts, there are plenty of people with mental retardation that are great functioning human beings, better than some 'normal' people, just not this woman.

If I held a contest and said I am giving away A baby Ruth. How many of you would think I am giving away a little baby girl named Ruth? None would be my guess, but say you show up expecting a candy bar and I hand you a little girl... Can you sue me for not giving what your dumb ass assumed I was giving? I hardly think so. You can turn down the prize, in my case a little girl, this case a candy bar, but you couldn't get a judge to force me to give you a candy bar because your stupid, or "most people would be expecting a candy bar'. The world doesn't work like that.

As for 'There are rules in business.. and they must pay...' For all of you who do not know, the FCC is a government body that enforces a set of rules and regulations on Radio, Television etc. those RULES are only upheld because we the people (in the US) agree to abide by a list of rules. They however are not for BUSINESS! Business has one rule in the US and it is really simple. "Most customers are stupid, and will buy anything we tell them to, we just have to market it correctly." Case in point Tobacco, Alchohol, Britney Spears, FoxNews Channel, AOL. etc.etc.

So this woman, can take her fargin candy bar, and 5k and buy her kids some books. So maybe, just maybe, the next generation can learn to walk upright!

it's kinda sad that she thinks she can do all of that with 100 grand.

586108538[/snapback]

That depends on where you live.

Where I live:

Home with a back yard: $50,000 or so

Mini van: $10,000 to $30,000 or so.

That still leaves at least $20,000 for the shopping spree and the savings account.

Bait and switch is a common sales practice to get patrons to come buy something, this was along those same lines.  Caveat emptor.

586108705[/snapback]

Bait and switch is also illegal (at least where I live, not sure if it is everywhere) and can earn a store a lawsuit rather quickly.

I've heard of a few stories like this. I remember a story about a hooter's waitress who won a contest thinking she was getting a brand new toyota. But rather, they gave her a toy yoda.

All I know is that this isn't the first time something like this has happened/

The point is that a Federally-regulated broadcaster probably thought they'd be clever by mixing signals about a supposed prize in order to gain more hype/listeners/callers (ie. boost their business). Put up or F*k off. Precidents need to be set and upheld so others learn from it and be careful next time.

I've heard of a few stories like this.  I remember a story about a hooter's waitress who won a contest thinking she was getting a brand new toyota.  But rather, they gave her a toy yoda.

586109382[/snapback]

Yeah I think you remember that story from page 2 of this thread.

As for 'There are rules in business.. and they must pay...' For all of you who do not know, the FCC is a government body that enforces a set of rules and regulations on Radio, Television etc. those RULES are only upheld because we the people (in the US) agree to abide by a list of rules. They however are not for BUSINESS! Business has one rule in the US and it is really simple. "Most customers are stupid, and will buy anything we tell them to, we just have to market it correctly." Case in point Tobacco, Alchohol, Britney Spears, FoxNews Channel, AOL. etc.etc.

586109274[/snapback]

I guess all those lawyers with degrees in Business Law have meaningless degrees then? You are saying that businesses don't have to abide by the law?

Bait and switch is also illegal (at least where I live, not sure if it is everywhere) and can earn a store a lawsuit rather quickly.

586109345[/snapback]

THIS IS NOT BAIT AND SWITCH PEOPLE!

A 'Bait and switch' method IS HIGHLY ILLEGAL!

There was NO SWITCH!

I assume we all agree on two things

1- The radio station was giving away 100 grand.

2- The radio station gave away 100 grand.

NO FARGIN SWITCH!

Just because this dumb woman assumed it meant cash money does not make it illegal.

Radio stations offer contests for big prizes like money and new cars all the time.  Why would it he so strange for her to assume that "100 grand" means $100,000?

586109400[/snapback]

Exactly. How often have you heard of a radio station giving away money? Daily (at least where I live). How often have you heard of one giving away a candy bar? For me, never.

Reminds me of the hooters contest where the winner won a "Toy Yoda" doll instead of a "toyota" (car). I think she sued too. idk if she won.

/edit

Clearly the radio station was wanting to play a trick. It's as obvious as day.

not necessarily. The radio station here has a contest every year that involves rolling dice ( 5 i think) and if you spell like "$100k" or "IRock" (the station name, came out before ipods, don't worry, it's not that ghey) )you get 100,000 dollars. You have to first call in to have your name put in a drawing, then have your name picked in the drawing, then roll, but still, it's a legit offer. So far nobody has won, but I think last year some guy one a few grand by getting a certain combination."

The "She should have known better" defense won't cut it in court. 100 Grand is a commonly accepted expression for 100,000$. Plus, the specific wording of the advertisement promised the winner "1000 Grand", not "a 100 Grand". The defense doesn't even have a case of ambiguity here, taken in the way that the radio station claims, the ad wouldn't have even made sense. The station sacrificed grammatical correctness for a cheap marketting ploy, clearly proving that the contest was intended to be misleading.

I hope the prosecution stomps all over that radio station. BTW, the FCC will happily accept the 5000$ offering as a fine for violating its broadcasting rules.

Reminds me of the hooters contest where the winner won a "Toy Yoda" doll instead of a "toyota" (car).  I think she sued too.  idk if she won.

586109440[/snapback]

Good for you. That makes you only the 3rd or 4th person in this thread to mention it. :rolleyes:

Well, first off before any legal actions can take place a judge should decide whether or not she is fit to bring any kind of lawsuit. I mean if you are that Fargin dumb you must be at least partially retarded, and hence not legally capable of making an informed decision.

Before you all go nuts, there are plenty of people with mental retardation that are great functioning human beings, better than some 'normal' people, just not this woman.

If I held a contest and said I am giving away A baby Ruth. How many of you would think I am giving away a little baby girl named Ruth? None would be my guess, but say you show up expecting a candy bar and I hand you a little girl... Can you sue me for not giving what your dumb ass assumed I was giving? I hardly think so. You can turn down the prize, in my case a little girl, this case a candy bar, but you couldn't get a judge to force me to give you a candy bar because your stupid, or "most people would be expecting a candy bar'. The world doesn't work like that.

As for 'There are rules in business.. and they must pay...' For all of you who do not know, the FCC is a government body that enforces a set of rules and regulations on Radio, Television etc. those RULES are only upheld because we the people (in the US) agree to abide by a list of rules. They however are not for BUSINESS! Business has one rule in the US and it is really simple. "Most customers are stupid, and will buy anything we tell them to, we just have to market it correctly." Case in point Tobacco, Alchohol, Britney Spears, FoxNews Channel, AOL. etc.etc.

So this woman, can take her fargin candy bar, and 5k and buy her kids some books. So maybe, just maybe, the next generation can learn to walk upright!

586109274[/snapback]

Thank you for that. You have your PhD in what again?

Case in point alcohol? Please (drink responsibly)?

EDGE 102FM does their whole wheel of sloth, wheel of envy, wheel of whatever sin.  Prizes are always big. It is not usually for the total package to be $50,000 for each one with different contests every month or so.

As of today, somebody won the EDGE Poorly Paid Employee Contest

586109469[/snapback]

I love the edge!

Barry Taylor is teh funny.

Exactly.  How often have you heard of a radio station giving away money?  Daily (at least where I live).  How often have you heard of one giving away a candy bar?  For me, never.

586109425[/snapback]

EDGE 102FM does their whole wheel of sloth, wheel of envy, wheel of whatever sin. Prizes are always big. It is not usually for the total package to be $50,000 for each one with different contests every month or so.

As of today, somebody won the EDGE Poorly Paid Employee Contest

The Edge Poorly Paid Employee will be rewarded with a low paying job at 102.1 the Edge, along with a 2005 Mazda 3 Sport from the Toronto Area Mazda Dealers. This Mazda will also come with a $12,000 Alpine system.
If I held a contest and said I am giving away A baby Ruth. How many of you would think I am giving away a little baby girl named Ruth? None would be my guess, but say you show up expecting a candy bar and I hand you a little girl... Can you sue me for not giving what your dumb ass assumed I was giving? I hardly think so. You can turn down the prize, in my case a little girl, this case a candy bar, but you couldn't get a judge to force me to give you a candy bar because your stupid, or "most people would be expecting a candy bar'. The world doesn't work like that.

EXACTLY!

EVERYONE READ THIS PARAGRAPH!!! (Y) (Y)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • "Not found" - this is what you get when you embed a tweet instead of just taking a screenshot.
    • Wonder if they will let you go into an Apple Store and have your white glass back swapped for a silver one, will they refuse even if you pay?
    • Honestly that feels even more useless than it did when Win11 was first released. In 2021, the uproar was somewhat justified, but only when comparing how good we've had it since Windows 7. Prior to that, a new Windows release would often require new, or very recent hardware. Windows XP wouldn't run (in any usable way) on hardware released when it's predecessor Win98 was released (let's ignore ME). It was time to shift the goal post, and the way Microsoft did that was actually ok. People have still had another FIVE YEARS of free software support with Windows 10, and those of us who want to have used these tools to bypass the limitations, all while understanding the impacts that may have. Most laptops don't last 5 years (sadly), so now the youngest unsupported hardware is 9 years old, and apparently has another year of support with Windows 10. That's good. Meanwhile, understanding the impacts and limitations, I have my 2013 laptop running Win11 perfectly fine. The thing that's failing on it is the hardware, the 2.5" SATA cable/chip is failing and corrupting the SSDs I put in. Thankfully it has a functional M.2 sata drive that works fine!
    • iPhone 18 Pro drop-test video and photos leak on the dark web following a data breach by Hamid Ganji iPhone 17 Pro - Image via Apple Apple is seemingly facing one of the biggest data breaches in its history, and just a few months before the official debut of the iPhone 18 Pro series, photos, a drop-test video, a supplier list, and key phone components have reportedly been leaked by hackers. Last week, we reported that Tata Electronics, an Apple supplier and iPhone producer in India, was hit by a data breach. As a result, it was reported that more than 200,000 trade secrets and confidential documents belonging to Apple and Tesla were stolen by the ransomware group World Leaks. According to Reuters, the group has now leaked supplier lists, component details, and photos of the upcoming iPhone 18 Pro models on the dark web. One of the materials leaked by the hackers is a drop-test video of the iPhone 18 Pro, which is due to launch this September. The phone is shown in a gray color and has the same familiar design we saw on last year's iPhone 17 Pro series. The device also appears to be quite durable, though it seems to be thicker than last year's model. One possible explanation is that Apple may be using a larger battery in the iPhone 18 Pro series. Moreover, Reuters says it has seen at least six documents mapping many components in the iPhone 18 Pro models to their respective suppliers, including details on chips on the main circuit board and on battery and camera components. The documents reportedly detail hundreds of parts that will be used in the iPhone 18 Pro models. A person familiar with the matter told the outlet that Apple classifies this data as sensitive and “is concerned about the documents being shared on the dark web as they relate to unreleased models.” Apple is reportedly investigating the issue but has yet to issue an official statement.
    • You do you, I've just said that it first appeared in "home" version before it will be available in "work" one. I use Edge only because it still supports MV2 uBO extension even on Android - I'll switch when they stop.
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      516
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      273
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      141
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      100
    5. 5
      macoman
      53
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!