Woman wins '100 grand', gets candy bar, sues


Recommended Posts

EXACTLY!

EVERYONE READ THIS PARAGRAPH!!! (Y) (Y)

586109489[/snapback]

Thats like the worst example on earth. If they said

"win a 100 grand"

then yes she took it out of its context but they no doubt said

"win 100 grand"

and as many radio station do offer cash prizes she was well within her rights to believe it would be cash. I don't know of any stations currently offering babies as prizes so if someone suspected that then they would probably be very delusional.

If I held a contest and said I am giving away A baby Ruth. How many of you would think I am giving away a little baby girl named Ruth? None would be my guess, but say you show up expecting a candy bar and I hand you a little girl... Can you sue me for not giving what your dumb ass assumed I was giving? I hardly think so. You can turn down the prize, in my case a little girl, this case a candy bar, but you couldn't get a judge to force me to give you a candy bar because your stupid, or "most people would be expecting a candy bar'. The world doesn't work like that.

And if the contest said that you are giving away Babe Ruth (distinguish between 'Babe Ruth' and 'A Babe Ruth')?

Such a faulty argument, do you really think that people are equally likely to assume that a babe ruth meant a baby named Ruth, as they are to assume that 100 Grand imples cash? What if I said here, have a million bucks. How many people do you know who would immediately think, "wow, that's a lot of male deer!" Be realistic.

There are certain points that would make this a lawyer's dream in court:

1) I'm sure they referred to the contest as "Win 100 Grand!" If the station has a website, it would most definitely be advertised on there as well using the same wording. If they advertised the contest as "Win a 100 grand!" things might be different, but the fact that they said "Win 100 Grand!" Just shows that they knew they were being deceiving.

2) What this equates to is advertising. When a station advertises a contest with a large reward (which is what this contest was doing!) they do that to boost listener count. With higher listeners, they can charge more for advertising, and the station profited from this stunt. That is illegal.

No matter if you think shes a "dumb broad" or whatever, she is in the right. The radio station played dirty and is going to pay for it.

There are two ways to pronounce 100 Grand in words. It can be stated "a hundred grand" which is the name of the bar, or "one hundred grand." I would like to believe that the DJ cleared this with his legal or marketing people at the station prior to this "contest." A DJ, especially a late night one, usually cannot just do giveaways on the radio without approval. Also, when other stations do big giveaways, they promo it like crazy. You will hear stuff every day about their BIG CONTEST.

There are certain points that would make this a lawyer's dream in court:

1) I'm sure they referred to the contest as "Win 100 Grand!" If the station has a website, it would most definitely be advertised on there as well using the same wording. If they advertised the contest as "Win a 100 grand!" things might be different, but the fact that they said "Win 100 Grand!" Just shows that they knew they were being deceiving.

586109603[/snapback]

Well, they also could have used the wording (on the air) "win a hundred grand" or "win one hundred grand", which could be taken either way. Without confirmation (an audio clip of the contest maybe?) of exactly what wording was used, it's difficult to speculate exactly how it should be taken.

Wanna see something funny? Goto Gooogle News and do a search for "100 grand".

The 4th or 5th article down is this:

http://www.kentucky.com/mld/kentucky/livin...od/11722375.htm

The article was posted May 29th, 2005 and the title of it is this:

THE 100-GRAND PRIZE WINNER

If you read the article, you'll learn that a woman won $100,000 (read: not a candy bar!) for winning a Chicken Cooking contest. To say that using "100 Grand" as slang will not hold up in court is ridicules.

EDIT:

Does anyone else think it's ironic that the article I linked also happens to be from Lexington, Kentucky? Didn't see that at first.... :p

I don't understand the Babe Ruth logic either.  I do not see it as a valid comparison.

586109602[/snapback]

There's a candy bar named BabY Ruth. If there was a contest that said "Win a Baby Ruth", and you won, and received a baby named Ruth, and NOT a candy bar, then what would you do?

Just because the general public makes an assumption, it doesn't necessarily prove anything.

Hmmm, guess what I found? A copy of the the lawsuit!

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0623051grand1.html

Guess what else? A screenshot of the contest announcement!

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0623051grand4.html

This is what it states:

-Since only 7 of you will actually be tuned in tonight and the rest of the nation's eyeballs glued to the IDOL Finale, HOT 102 is showing our appreciation to our loyal listeners with a chance to Win 100 GRAND!!!! It's sitting in a bag to my left ready for someone to take off with just like the Runaway bride! Here's how this is gonna work: Right BEFORE Mr. Seacrest announces the Winner (or before he teases the audience with another annoying "After the break!" bit) be caller 10 @ 280-1025 and you'll be 100 GRAND RICHER!!!

Deception, my friends.

I think he was referring to the term "Babe" Ruth instead of "Baby" Ruth.  If someone told me I could win a Babe Ruth, I'd assume I was getting a dead baseball player.  :)

586109711[/snapback]

NO Why would I refer to a dead guy that you could win? Another candy bar is exactly what I meant. I know other individuals may not be able to type what they mean on here but I typed exactly what I meant.

A Contest to win a BabY Ruth, does not entitle you to whatever you interept 'Baby Ruth' to mean. If I went and dug up Babe Ruth to give to you, then there is a legal problem because I was giving away a BABY RUTH, not BABE RUTH. Thus a candy bar or baby girl named RUTH is what I can give. Asside from the whole legal issues of giving babies away.

How this hypothetical contest could be any more dead on appropriate to this topic, I do not know.

There's a candy bar named BabY Ruth.  If there was a contest that said "Win a Baby Ruth", and you won, and received a baby named Ruth, and NOT a candy bar, then what would you do? 

Just because the general public makes an assumption, it doesn't necessarily prove anything.

586109688[/snapback]

Well I knew that a chocolate bar exists with a name somewhat like that. If we get Baby Ruth's and 100 Grand's here then they are not very popular. I know I used the term earlier in the thread but they are almost never referred to as "candy bars" here either.

According to our courts, the judge or jury would decide what a typical person would assume in that situation. Would it be more reasonable to assume $100,000 as a prize or a chocolate bar? Given that test, I would assume that $100,000 would be more reasonable for a radio station promotion. I mean, what's the point of winning a chocolate bar? It's not worth the gas/public transportation costs to go pick up the prize. Chocolate bars are only worth US$0.40 to US$0.80 anyway.

Cincinnati TV stations played the Promo and the contest info, they clearly say "100 grand", and "I see a duffel bag full of them".

They also talked about the candy bar over and over during the contest. While she was on the phone, after winning the prize she started yelling to her family and Friends that she had won $100,000, and was going to treat everyone, parents and children, the DJ transfered the call immediately to the General Manager, whom explained to her that it was a candy bar promotion. She hung up and told everyone that she won $100,000 and how she was going to spread the money out to family, and after several calls, she final understood, and then called the local TV stations.

She is wrong on this one, but then again cry loudly and complain to everyone, getting the sympathy. She said she was going to sue, on day one, because they caused emotional harm to her and her family, and wants what she thinks she won.

My favorite line from her 'You tell my kids they are not getting a new house, and that you mother was fooled by a radio station', i call and volunteered, but no one has returned my call.

BTW - This is old radio promo, WMMR in Philly used to do this, and so did Q102 in the 80's.

Well I knew that a chocolate bar exists with a name somewhat like that.  If we get Baby Ruth's and 100 Grand's here then they are not very popular.  I know I used the term earlier in the thread but they are almost never referred to as "candy bars" here either.

According to our courts, the judge or jury would decide what a typical person would assume in that situation.  Would it be more reasonable to assume $100,000 as a prize or a chocolate bar?  Given that test, I would assume that $100,000 would be more reasonable for a radio station promotion.  I mean, what's the point of winning a chocolate bar?  It's not worth the gas/public transportation costs to go pick up the prize.  Chocolate bars are only worth US$0.40 to US$0.80 anyway.

586109824[/snapback]

hmmm, different locations, different thoughts ;)

just shows how difficult interpreting things is....

reading over the lawsuit, they really seem to stress "breach of contract". was there really a contract agreed upon in the first place?

That sucks! I would have sued the station also for false info....

586108731[/snapback]

but that may be hard to prove. if he never said $100,000 in "cash" and if he only said "a hundred grand" then it could be hard to prove.

all contests have rules and fine print, etc.. you can't just assume that you're going to win $100,000 without a hitch.

misleading - quite possibly, but then, most advertising is.

true that.... minivan (new)... ~$25,000.... a reasonable home... ~$80,000.... savings accounts anyone?

586108571[/snapback]

Our two-storey five-bed-room house (with a back yard) was $30'000. Our van (don't think it was new, but pretty close) was like $11'000. Not everybody lives in Dallas.

NO Why would I refer to a dead guy that you could win?  Another candy bar is exactly what I meant. I know other individuals may not be able to type what they mean on here but I typed exactly what I meant.

A Contest to win a BabY Ruth, does not entitle you to whatever you interept 'Baby Ruth' to mean. If I went and dug up Babe Ruth to give to you, then there is a legal problem because I was giving away a BABY RUTH, not BABE RUTH. Thus a candy bar or baby girl named RUTH is what I can give. Asside from the whole legal issues of giving babies away.

How this hypothetical contest could be any more dead on appropriate to this topic, I do not know.

586109793[/snapback]

Sorry, wasn't replying to you. Someone else said Babe Ruth, which is not a candy bar, but a long dead baseball player. Baby Ruth is the bar.

Bah.

"100 Grand" is not one hundred thousand dollars. Of course the DJ was being funny and was purposely screwing people thinking that it was real U.S. dollars.

But to say breach of contract is utter nonsense, I bet she listens to the station prior to winning her "100 Grand" every day. And I bet the same DJ played "jokes" that were meant to deceive the listener. She had knowledge that this may or may not happen to her.

Can I say idiot?

:rolleyes:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft finally launches WSL Containers in public preview by David Uzondu Microsoft has announced that WSL containers, a feature that allows developers to run Linux containers natively inside Windows without the need for Docker Desktop, is now available in public preview several weeks after Microsoft previewed it at Build 2026. To use the new container feature, you first have to install the latest pre-release version of the Windows Subsystem for Linux by running a quick update command in your terminal: wsl --update --pre-release After installing, you'd get access to the new Linux container CLI (wslc.exe) and the programmable API. Microsoft said that the CLI has a "familiar format" that matches the toolsets developers already use every day. If you know standard Docker commands, your muscle memory will translate directly to wslc.exe, which even features a built-in alias called container.exe. You can quickly run a full Ubuntu KDE desktop container by exposing ports, or pass your graphics card straight into a machine learning environment to run PyTorch workloads. Passing the --gpus all flag inside the run command instantly links your hardware. Image via Microsoft As for the API, developers can now embed Linux container operations directly inside native Windows applications without exposing the command line to users. The team integrated the API directly into MSBuild and CMake, so developers can define container steps directly in project files. Apart from bringing the CLI and API into public preview, Microsoft also said that it's working on a new default file system called virtiofs to speed up file transfer rates between Windows and Linux. Microsoft also introduced an experimental networking mode named consomme, which resolves compatibility issues with corporate VPNs by routing Linux network traffic straight through Windows. One thing to note about WSL containers is that they don't run in your standard WSL distributions; instead, every application and CLI session spawns its own lightweight Hyper-V utility VM in the background. This basically reduces the chances of one app snooping on the container of another app.
    • Google reportedly limited Meta's Gemini access over limited AI compute by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly limiting Meta's use of its Gemini AI models after Meta tried buying more computing capacity than even Google could supply. According to the Financial Times, Google told Meta in March that it could not provide the full Gemini capacity that Meta had requested. This shortfall even disrupted and delayed some of Meta's internal projects. Due to this, Meta even told its employees internally to use AI tokens more efficiently. Meta wasn't the only one to get hit by this sudden refusal by Google; even other customers were affected. But Meta was hit harder because of its unusually high demand for Google's models. The move from Google makes it evident that companies all over are in limited supply of both infrastructure and compute. Alphabet said in April that Google Cloud revenue grew 63% year-over-year to $20 billion in the first quarter, helped by enterprise AI infrastructure and AI solutions. In pursuit of more compute, Meta had earlier signed a multi-billion-dollar AWS agreement as well as a large AMD GPU deal for AI data centers. But the crunch would be short-lived as both Meta and Google have also ramped up infrastructure investments heavily. Meta said in November that it was committing more than $600 billion in the U.S. by 2028 for AI technology, infrastructure, and workforce expansion. In the first quarter of this year, Meta also raised its expected capital expenditure for 2026 to a range of $125 billion to $145 billion, citing higher component pricing and additional data center costs for future capacity. However, this doesn't make the company immune to the current dependence on outside suppliers. Meta has also spent many years promoting Llama as an open-weight alternative to closed models from Google, OpenAI, and Anthropic. But if the reported reliance on Google's Gemini models is severe enough for internal work to get impacted, then it looks like even frontier labs and Big Tech aren't fully self-sufficient. Source: Financial Times
    • I like to reminisce about the good old days, way back in autumn 2025 when building a gaming machine was fun and the drives were about $150 when you caught a deal. Yes duh, back in the day we had it gone. Then baby Skynet came along, hiding in AI datacenters demanding more processing power until it reached singularity. End of a not totally fictional story.
    • My experience in the past with older Windows 11 builds was not great on unsupported machines but I recently used Rufus to put the latest build on a older 5th Gen Core Thinkpad T that we upgraded with a SATA SSD and 8GB of RAM four years ago when hardware was reasonable and it seemed pretty fast and solid. Customer is very happy with the performance and will probably get four more years out of that venerable laptop that he loves so much. Another customer just retired his Dell Studio laptop from 2009 running Windows 10. It got an SSD over 10 years ago and did everything he needed it to for 17 years but he also retired last year and is happy doing everything on his iPad now.
    • Apple's newest AirTag 2 gets first big discount by Taras Buria In late January 2026, Apple introduced its second-generation AirTag trackers, bringing a refresh to the old model that has been on the market for half a decade. Now, you can get these new trackers at an all-time low price, thanks to the first big discount that brought the price down by 17% on Amazon. While the second-generation AirTag looks identical to its predecessor, it packs meaningful upgrades inside. The second-gen ultrawideband chip works 50% farther than the original AirTag, allowing you to detect lost items in a wider range. In addition, the second-generation AirTag features an upgraded Bluetooth chip for extended range and a significantly louder speaker (up to 50%) so that you can hear it better when locating a lost item. Note that the second-gen AirTag only works with iPhones and iPads that run iOS/iPadOS 26 and newer, so you need a compatible device to use the tracker. Like the original AirTag, the AirTag 2 is available in two packs: one and four pieces. Both are now available at a notable discount on Amazon, and you can purchase them using the links below. Apple AirTag 2 tracker - $24 | 17% off on Amazon Apple AirTag 2 tracker (four-pack) - $89 | 10% off on Amazon Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S.- specific and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      538
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      269
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!