Woman wins '100 grand', gets candy bar, sues


Recommended Posts

EXACTLY!

EVERYONE READ THIS PARAGRAPH!!! (Y) (Y)

586109489[/snapback]

Thats like the worst example on earth. If they said

"win a 100 grand"

then yes she took it out of its context but they no doubt said

"win 100 grand"

and as many radio station do offer cash prizes she was well within her rights to believe it would be cash. I don't know of any stations currently offering babies as prizes so if someone suspected that then they would probably be very delusional.

If I held a contest and said I am giving away A baby Ruth. How many of you would think I am giving away a little baby girl named Ruth? None would be my guess, but say you show up expecting a candy bar and I hand you a little girl... Can you sue me for not giving what your dumb ass assumed I was giving? I hardly think so. You can turn down the prize, in my case a little girl, this case a candy bar, but you couldn't get a judge to force me to give you a candy bar because your stupid, or "most people would be expecting a candy bar'. The world doesn't work like that.

And if the contest said that you are giving away Babe Ruth (distinguish between 'Babe Ruth' and 'A Babe Ruth')?

Such a faulty argument, do you really think that people are equally likely to assume that a babe ruth meant a baby named Ruth, as they are to assume that 100 Grand imples cash? What if I said here, have a million bucks. How many people do you know who would immediately think, "wow, that's a lot of male deer!" Be realistic.

There are certain points that would make this a lawyer's dream in court:

1) I'm sure they referred to the contest as "Win 100 Grand!" If the station has a website, it would most definitely be advertised on there as well using the same wording. If they advertised the contest as "Win a 100 grand!" things might be different, but the fact that they said "Win 100 Grand!" Just shows that they knew they were being deceiving.

2) What this equates to is advertising. When a station advertises a contest with a large reward (which is what this contest was doing!) they do that to boost listener count. With higher listeners, they can charge more for advertising, and the station profited from this stunt. That is illegal.

No matter if you think shes a "dumb broad" or whatever, she is in the right. The radio station played dirty and is going to pay for it.

There are two ways to pronounce 100 Grand in words. It can be stated "a hundred grand" which is the name of the bar, or "one hundred grand." I would like to believe that the DJ cleared this with his legal or marketing people at the station prior to this "contest." A DJ, especially a late night one, usually cannot just do giveaways on the radio without approval. Also, when other stations do big giveaways, they promo it like crazy. You will hear stuff every day about their BIG CONTEST.

There are certain points that would make this a lawyer's dream in court:

1) I'm sure they referred to the contest as "Win 100 Grand!" If the station has a website, it would most definitely be advertised on there as well using the same wording. If they advertised the contest as "Win a 100 grand!" things might be different, but the fact that they said "Win 100 Grand!" Just shows that they knew they were being deceiving.

586109603[/snapback]

Well, they also could have used the wording (on the air) "win a hundred grand" or "win one hundred grand", which could be taken either way. Without confirmation (an audio clip of the contest maybe?) of exactly what wording was used, it's difficult to speculate exactly how it should be taken.

Wanna see something funny? Goto Gooogle News and do a search for "100 grand".

The 4th or 5th article down is this:

http://www.kentucky.com/mld/kentucky/livin...od/11722375.htm

The article was posted May 29th, 2005 and the title of it is this:

THE 100-GRAND PRIZE WINNER

If you read the article, you'll learn that a woman won $100,000 (read: not a candy bar!) for winning a Chicken Cooking contest. To say that using "100 Grand" as slang will not hold up in court is ridicules.

EDIT:

Does anyone else think it's ironic that the article I linked also happens to be from Lexington, Kentucky? Didn't see that at first.... :p

I don't understand the Babe Ruth logic either.  I do not see it as a valid comparison.

586109602[/snapback]

There's a candy bar named BabY Ruth. If there was a contest that said "Win a Baby Ruth", and you won, and received a baby named Ruth, and NOT a candy bar, then what would you do?

Just because the general public makes an assumption, it doesn't necessarily prove anything.

Hmmm, guess what I found? A copy of the the lawsuit!

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0623051grand1.html

Guess what else? A screenshot of the contest announcement!

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0623051grand4.html

This is what it states:

-Since only 7 of you will actually be tuned in tonight and the rest of the nation's eyeballs glued to the IDOL Finale, HOT 102 is showing our appreciation to our loyal listeners with a chance to Win 100 GRAND!!!! It's sitting in a bag to my left ready for someone to take off with just like the Runaway bride! Here's how this is gonna work: Right BEFORE Mr. Seacrest announces the Winner (or before he teases the audience with another annoying "After the break!" bit) be caller 10 @ 280-1025 and you'll be 100 GRAND RICHER!!!

Deception, my friends.

I think he was referring to the term "Babe" Ruth instead of "Baby" Ruth.  If someone told me I could win a Babe Ruth, I'd assume I was getting a dead baseball player.  :)

586109711[/snapback]

NO Why would I refer to a dead guy that you could win? Another candy bar is exactly what I meant. I know other individuals may not be able to type what they mean on here but I typed exactly what I meant.

A Contest to win a BabY Ruth, does not entitle you to whatever you interept 'Baby Ruth' to mean. If I went and dug up Babe Ruth to give to you, then there is a legal problem because I was giving away a BABY RUTH, not BABE RUTH. Thus a candy bar or baby girl named RUTH is what I can give. Asside from the whole legal issues of giving babies away.

How this hypothetical contest could be any more dead on appropriate to this topic, I do not know.

There's a candy bar named BabY Ruth.  If there was a contest that said "Win a Baby Ruth", and you won, and received a baby named Ruth, and NOT a candy bar, then what would you do? 

Just because the general public makes an assumption, it doesn't necessarily prove anything.

586109688[/snapback]

Well I knew that a chocolate bar exists with a name somewhat like that. If we get Baby Ruth's and 100 Grand's here then they are not very popular. I know I used the term earlier in the thread but they are almost never referred to as "candy bars" here either.

According to our courts, the judge or jury would decide what a typical person would assume in that situation. Would it be more reasonable to assume $100,000 as a prize or a chocolate bar? Given that test, I would assume that $100,000 would be more reasonable for a radio station promotion. I mean, what's the point of winning a chocolate bar? It's not worth the gas/public transportation costs to go pick up the prize. Chocolate bars are only worth US$0.40 to US$0.80 anyway.

Cincinnati TV stations played the Promo and the contest info, they clearly say "100 grand", and "I see a duffel bag full of them".

They also talked about the candy bar over and over during the contest. While she was on the phone, after winning the prize she started yelling to her family and Friends that she had won $100,000, and was going to treat everyone, parents and children, the DJ transfered the call immediately to the General Manager, whom explained to her that it was a candy bar promotion. She hung up and told everyone that she won $100,000 and how she was going to spread the money out to family, and after several calls, she final understood, and then called the local TV stations.

She is wrong on this one, but then again cry loudly and complain to everyone, getting the sympathy. She said she was going to sue, on day one, because they caused emotional harm to her and her family, and wants what she thinks she won.

My favorite line from her 'You tell my kids they are not getting a new house, and that you mother was fooled by a radio station', i call and volunteered, but no one has returned my call.

BTW - This is old radio promo, WMMR in Philly used to do this, and so did Q102 in the 80's.

Well I knew that a chocolate bar exists with a name somewhat like that.  If we get Baby Ruth's and 100 Grand's here then they are not very popular.  I know I used the term earlier in the thread but they are almost never referred to as "candy bars" here either.

According to our courts, the judge or jury would decide what a typical person would assume in that situation.  Would it be more reasonable to assume $100,000 as a prize or a chocolate bar?  Given that test, I would assume that $100,000 would be more reasonable for a radio station promotion.  I mean, what's the point of winning a chocolate bar?  It's not worth the gas/public transportation costs to go pick up the prize.  Chocolate bars are only worth US$0.40 to US$0.80 anyway.

586109824[/snapback]

hmmm, different locations, different thoughts ;)

just shows how difficult interpreting things is....

reading over the lawsuit, they really seem to stress "breach of contract". was there really a contract agreed upon in the first place?

That sucks! I would have sued the station also for false info....

586108731[/snapback]

but that may be hard to prove. if he never said $100,000 in "cash" and if he only said "a hundred grand" then it could be hard to prove.

all contests have rules and fine print, etc.. you can't just assume that you're going to win $100,000 without a hitch.

misleading - quite possibly, but then, most advertising is.

true that.... minivan (new)... ~$25,000.... a reasonable home... ~$80,000.... savings accounts anyone?

586108571[/snapback]

Our two-storey five-bed-room house (with a back yard) was $30'000. Our van (don't think it was new, but pretty close) was like $11'000. Not everybody lives in Dallas.

NO Why would I refer to a dead guy that you could win?  Another candy bar is exactly what I meant. I know other individuals may not be able to type what they mean on here but I typed exactly what I meant.

A Contest to win a BabY Ruth, does not entitle you to whatever you interept 'Baby Ruth' to mean. If I went and dug up Babe Ruth to give to you, then there is a legal problem because I was giving away a BABY RUTH, not BABE RUTH. Thus a candy bar or baby girl named RUTH is what I can give. Asside from the whole legal issues of giving babies away.

How this hypothetical contest could be any more dead on appropriate to this topic, I do not know.

586109793[/snapback]

Sorry, wasn't replying to you. Someone else said Babe Ruth, which is not a candy bar, but a long dead baseball player. Baby Ruth is the bar.

Bah.

"100 Grand" is not one hundred thousand dollars. Of course the DJ was being funny and was purposely screwing people thinking that it was real U.S. dollars.

But to say breach of contract is utter nonsense, I bet she listens to the station prior to winning her "100 Grand" every day. And I bet the same DJ played "jokes" that were meant to deceive the listener. She had knowledge that this may or may not happen to her.

Can I say idiot?

:rolleyes:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Amazon may use OpenAI and Nova models after Anthropic reportedly raises costs by Karthik Mudaliar Amazon is reportedly considering to use OpenAI models and even its own Nova family of AI models after Anthropic raised the cost of using Claude inside Amazon services. According to a report from The Information, Amazon is weighing its options to reduce costs under a new arrangement with Anthropic. But back in April, Amazon said it would invest $5 billion more in Anthropic, with the possibility of adding up to another $20 billion if certain commercial milestones are met. That investment actually came on top of another $8 billion Amazon had already put into the Claude maker. Anthropic, meanwhile, committed to spend more than $100 billion over 10 years on AWS technologies, including Amazon’s Trainium chips. Amazon isn't just a customer of Anthropic but also one of the most important backers and cloud partners. This is why it makes it interesting that Amazon is considering other alternatives to handle its internal workloads. Although Amazon has been building its own options for a while now. Its Nova family of AI models was announced in late 2024 for Amazon Bedrock, with models aimed at text, image, and video tasks. Amazon pitched the model around cost and latency at that time. With that said, OpenAI has also become a more realistic option recently for AWS customers as well as for Amazon itself. Earlier this year, OpenAI brought its latest models and Codex coding agent to Amazon Bedrock, after changes to its previously more restrictive Microsoft cloud arrangement. This allowed AWS to serve even those customers who wanted other alternatives from Claude, without having to move workloads out of Amazon's cloud. Evaluating alternatives could also be due to commercial pressure and not necessarily a sign of a damaged partnership between Amazon and Anthropic. Whether or not Amazon is actually considering switching entirely to OpenAI's models or its own Nova models remains unknown at this moment.
    • Samsung introduces new AI classroom tools and interactive displays at ISTELive 2026 by Fiza Ali Samsung has announced several new education-focused software features and interactive displays for schools during ISTELive 2026, taking place in Orlando, Florida, from 28 June to 1 July. The focus of these updates is on making shared classroom displays easier to use for teachers while giving IT administrators more control over managing devices. One of the key additions is the Samsung Account Management Solution (AMS). In many schools, multiple teachers share the same interactive display throughout the day, which means signing in and setting everything up can become repetitive. With AMS, teachers can log in by scanning a QR code or tapping an NFC-enabled ID card. Once signed in, their personalised workspace, including wallpapers, bookmarks, app shortcuts, and files, can be instantly accessed through Home Personalisation. Samsung has also included a screen lock feature, allowing teachers to lock the display if they need to step away briefly. Furthermore, the company is also updating its Education Portal with new tools designed for school IT administrators. The portal will allow IT administrators to register teachers, enrol devices, and manage user access from a central dashboard. Administrators can also link NFC cards to teacher accounts, making sign-ins quicker across shared displays. Another addition is a Tags feature that lets schools organise displays by building or classroom. Those tags can also be used to send emergency notifications to selected Samsung Interactive Displays through compatible platforms such as InformaCast and Raptor. Moreover, the tech giant's AI Assistant is gaining several new features aimed at supporting everyday classroom tasks such as lesson planning and classroom engagement. One of the features is Circle to Search, which lets teachers circle text or images on the display to quickly find related information, videos, or web results without interrupting the lesson. The content can then be brought into Samsung Whiteboard. Another feature, Live Transcript, converts spoken lessons into real-time captions, which could be useful for students with hearing impairments or those in multilingual classrooms. The AI Assistant also introduces AI Summary and AI Quiz. The summary tool creates summaries of recorded lessons, while AI Quiz generates questions based on lesson content so teachers can quickly check how well students are following along. Teachers signed in through Samsung AMS can also return to their previous AI-generated lesson materials without logging in again. Alongside the software updates, Samsung has expanded its Android-based Interactive Display range with three new models: the WAF-S, WAFX-PS, and WAHX-M. The WAF-S and WAFX-PS ship with Android 16, bringing updates to security, accessibility, and overall usability while maintaining compatibility with Google's education services including Google Classroom and Google Drive through EDLA certification. Meanwhile, the new WAHX-M is the biggest addition to the lineup, introducing a 98-inch display for larger spaces such as lecture halls and conference rooms. It will also be available in 65-inch, 75-inch and 86-inch sizes. Samsung says the WAHX-M further includes on-device AI features such as voice commands, text-to-speech, and an AI calculator, alongside support for Samsung AMS and AI Assistant. Samsung AI Assistant has been available since April, while Samsung AMS and the updated Education Portal will begin rolling out in July.
    • It's been $24 (single) or $89 (4-pack) for many days on both Amazon and Walmart as far as I know. That isn't a big discount. If these end up like the 1st gen, the 4-pack will routinely get down around $80, give or take a dollar. I think they have even hit $69 at times.
    • Microsoft brings Claude to its own Azure infrastructure, powered by Nvidia GB300 Blackwell by Karthik Mudaliar Anthropic's Claude models are now generally available in Microsoft Foundry on Azure and are running on Nvidia's GB300 Blackwell Ultra systems. Nvidia wrote in its announcement that the models are hosted on Microsoft Azure and accelerated by GB300 Blackwell Ultra GPUs, with Quantum-X800 InfiniBand networking used to support larger agentic systems and specialized sub-agents that can operate across business domains. This is great for customers and enterprises that want to build autonomous and domain-specific AI agents using Claude without moving outside Microsoft’s cloud platform. Microsoft currently offers Claude models in Foundry in two forms: “Hosted on Azure,” which runs end-to-end on Azure infrastructure and is generally available, and “Hosted on Anthropic infrastructure,” which remains in preview. This separation is quite important for organizations that have procurement, compliance, data processing, or internal governance requirements tied to Azure. Anthropic currently has 11 Claude models listed in Microsoft Foundry, including Opus 4.8, Sonnet 4.6, and even the unavailable Mythos and Fable models. Billing is handled through Claude Consumption Units (CCUs). Microsoft says CCU is an invoicing unit for Claude models in Foundry, with token usage converted using Anthropic’s published per-model token rates. The usage is billed through Azure Marketplace just like models from other distributors and appears on the customer's Azure invoice, while eligible spend can count against a Microsoft Azure Consumption Commitment. For starters, GB300 NVL72 is a rack-scale, fully liquid-cooled system that combines 72 Blackwell Ultra GPUs and 36 Grace CPUs. Nvidia has listed 37TB of fast memory, 130TB/s of NVLink bandwidth, and FP4 Tensor Core performance of up to 1,440 petaflops with sparsity. The deal is also part of a three-way partnership between Microsoft, Nvidia, and Anthropic. Under the deal, Anthropic has committed to buying $30 billion in Azure compute capacity and contracting additional capacity up to one gigawatt. Nvidia and Microsoft also said they would invest up to $10 billion and $5 billion in Anthropic, respectively.
    • WhatsApp is getting usernames, and you can reserve your preferred one now by Fiza Ali Sharing your phone number isn't always something you want to do, especially with people you've just met. Whether it's someone from a class, a local community group, or a sports team chat, handing over your number can feel like giving away more personal information than necessary. That's exactly the problem WhatsApp is trying to solve with its upcoming usernames feature. The company has announced that users can now reserve a unique WhatsApp username ahead of the feature's wider rollout later this year. Once usernames become available, they'll let people connect without revealing their phone numbers. It's a change that makes a lot of sense for group chats. Right now, everyone in the group can see your phone number. With usernames enabled, that won't necessarily be the case when someone contacts you for the first time. WhatsApp says it's opening username reservations early because more than three billion people use the app, meaning plenty of people are likely to want the same usernames. Reserving one now gives users a better chance of securing the name they actually want before the feature launches more broadly. If your preferred username is already taken, WhatsApp will also offer a built-in username generator to suggest available alternatives. The feature isn't only aimed at individual users. Creators, businesses, and organisations will be able to claim the same username they already use on Instagram or Facebook, making it easier to keep a consistent identity across Meta's apps. Furthermore, privacy is a big part of how WhatsApp is introducing usernames. There won't be a public directory where people can browse or search for usernames. Instead, people will need to know your exact username before they can start a conversation with you. Additionally, users can also choose to enable a username key, which adds another layer of control by requiring people to enter that key before sending a message. Once the feature rolls out, people who choose to use a username will no longer have their phone number shown when messaging a person or business for the first time. If you want to reserve a username, make sure you're running the latest version of WhatsApp, then head to Settings > Account > Username. The tech giant says usernames will roll out gradually over the coming months, and users will receive an in-app notification when the feature becomes available in their country.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      536
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      269
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!