Recommended Posts

Don't ask for anything

they why post it  :rolleyes:

586294330[/snapback]

Because this is the desktops thread, in which you post desktops. :blink:

At least post links if they are downloadable.

586294691[/snapback]

*sigh* this again. I've posted information on my desktops for months and people still ask instead of searching. I'm tired of doing peoples work for them, and this is a desktop thread, so I do what the thread is for, and post my desktop. :rolleyes:

I might start posting info again if people bitch about it every time I post.

And before someone quotes the guidelines:

# In the interests of keeping the thread on topic it is strongly urged <-- that you format your posts in the following order:

# Visual Style: Name/where you got it (with link would be nice).

# Wallpaper: Name/where you got it (with link would be nice).

# Icons: Name/where you got it (with link would be nice).

# Programs: Name/where you got it (with link would be nice).

Nothing I havent seen

VS: Inspirat SE by Stefanka

Icon: Minium

Miranda: just a transparent clist with blank icons and ieview, I dont remember but I guess it's pastel by razor.

586294726[/snapback]

Thanks. :laugh:

I'll forward you to the first post of the desktops thread, in which we ask everyone post the names of the info in the shot.

It's a little hard to search for something if there is no name to search for.  If someone still asks instead of searching, just don't answer.  It's not too hard

586294743[/snapback]

Already did it myself, in no where it states it is required to post the information. I chose not to, and it's a personal choice. I broke no rules. :blink:

I guess I'll post the names then, sorry if any of that sounded offensive. :)

nothing special here, if you want the wall it will take 3 minutes for me to mod his windows and task bar out of it.

586294832[/snapback]

Er, thanks for the info? I hope you feel l337 now, although that post was completely pointless. :blink:

What is it with you people and me nost posting the info? This is the second time, there's nothing wrong with it at all.

Already did it myself, in no where it states it is required to post the information. I chose not to, and it's a personal choice. I broke no rules. :blink:

I guess I'll post the names then, sorry if any of that sounded offensive. :)

Er, thanks for the info? I hope you feel l337 now, although that post was completely pointless. :blink:

What is it with you people and me nost posting the info? This is the second time, there's nothing wrong with it at all.

586294880[/snapback]

Personally, the only thing that tweaks my cookie at all is your "high and mighty" attitude. That's just how it is to me. No offense ;)

-Emily

Personally, the only thing that tweaks my cookie at all is your "high and mighty" attitude.  That's just how it is to me.  No offense ;)

-Emily

586295190[/snapback]

I've noticed myself acting like an ass lately as well. :| Added a disclaimer to my sig though.

It's not as much of a high and mighty attitude as it is me speaking my mind. I treat people depending on how they treat me. I'm seriously not like this with friends or IRL. :p

Edited by mynimal
I've noticed myself acting like an ass lately as well. :| Added a disclaimer to my sig though.

It's not as much of a high and mighty attitude as it is me speaking my mind. I treat people depending on how they treat me. I'm seriously not like this with friends or IRL. :p

586295263[/snapback]

I meant more-so with your "don't ask for anything" bit, not necessarily your attitude afterwards. Obviously you don't mind posting, because you post quite a bit, particularly on this thread. So it seems more of a "beg me if you want it" or that you just can't share kinda thing.

-Emily

I meant more-so with your "don't ask for anything" bit, not necessarily your attitude afterwards.  Obviously you don't mind posting, because you post quite a bit, particularly on this thread.  So it seems more of a "beg me if you want it" or that you just can't share kinda thing.

-Emily

586295571[/snapback]

Nah, it's not that I was keeping it to myself, it was that I was too tired of/to do peoples work for them.

What would we want from this desktop anyhow??

586295724[/snapback]

I love how everyone assumes I have something to hide when I decide not to list the details. I also clearly stated why I didn't post the details. :sleep:

(The above is a perfect example of "I treat people how they treat me ;))

Now, can we get this back on topic?

What would we want from this desktop anyhow??

586295724[/snapback]

Keep the crap out if you aren't here to help.

Already did it myself, in no where it states it is required to post the information. I chose not to, and it's a personal choice. I broke no rules.

I never said it was required. But we could have avoided all of this if that info was put in there.

To be honest, all i was looking for was the wallpaper, which no one has shared any info about yet

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • JetBrains launches Rider 2026.2 EAP 5, bringing several AI improvements by David Uzondu JetBrains has released the fifth EAP version of Rider 2026.2, bringing a faster startup flow with the new non-modal startup screen and quality-check hooks for Claude Code and Codex. In the latest EAP release, Rider now has newly bundled "quality-check" hooks that run background tests on code edits before the external agent proceeds. For example, after Claude Code rewrites a class, Rider immediately triggers a PostToolUse hook that analyzes the code for syntax errors and formatting warnings. It then passes those findings back to the model as feedback, allowing the agent to fix its own output before finalizing the task. If Rider detects compilation errors, the IDE prevents the agent from treating the task as complete, while minor formatting warnings simply help guide the model toward better output. The "Explain with AI" feature can now tackle tricky build errors directly from the console, helping .NET developers who frequently wrestle with multi-targeting failures and MSBuild errors. JetBrains introduced Explain with AI back in the 2024.1 release cycle. With this feature, instead of forcing developers to copy long diagnostics into a separate chat window, Rider now lets you trigger these explanations directly from the error source. In similar EAP news, JetBrains recently opened the first EAP for IntelliJ IDEA 2026.2, with features that appeal to both those who are into AI-assisted coding and those who prefer "classic" manual development. For manual developers, the release adds revamped dependency completion for Maven and Gradle build scripts, which pulls data directly from the local cache to suggest relevant versions. It also brings the Spring Debugger update, displaying security indicators next to endpoints to visualize secured routes during runtime. In addition to database migration tools for Flyway and Liquibase, this build introduces a Hibernate debugger that shows the exact SQL or HQL queries that the framework plans to execute, letting developers jump directly to the Java code that triggered them.
    • I have updated my Series 9 Watch so I assume there is either a mistake in what was said, or as suggested - the new AI feature set isn’t supported on anything other than those listed above.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Very Popular
      Captain_Eric earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • One Month Later
      amusc earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      502
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      222
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      87
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      80
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      80
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!