Recommended Posts

A question, didn't know where to ask, so I might put it here, Arch Enemy has one guitar player or two, I hear two but see one lol. Also, was there a different singer before the possessed girl?

LOL You just asked that :laugh:

and yes theres 2 guitarist.

Yes they had a different singer. A male infact. Lots of people are saying that AE sold out because of her, but, well, it added a differnt sound.

Hehe, I wouldn't say they sold out - but their ex-singer was 100x times better because his voice was quite unique. Angela has the typical melodic death shrieking vocals that every band seems to have these days. Whilst we're on the subject, their melodic riffs were much better back in the day too.

hey guys

ive just seen a band on Scuzz (UK Music TV) and i didnt catch the same or song title fully

what i caught was this:

Octavia - Lifeless *summut summut*

can anyone shed any light on this?

thankx

perhaps you meant: Octavia - Lifelines of Depths

I want to ask... what actually is metal? What defines metal? The mindless shouting (I hate this part)?

Are bands like Rammstein, System of A Down, Korn metal?

So because you have little appreciation for a specific vocal style, it's now "mindless?" Right.

If you're honestly interested in learning about it rather than poking little jabs at the genre, here you go.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heavy_metal_music

Arch Enemy has two guitarists, the Amott brothers or something. Their original singer was replaced for 2001's Wages Of Sin. I think their new singer is pretty damn hot, got to see her live....and her vocals aren't bad....just kind of generic as mentioned. I haven't even heard their more recent albums but they have been going in a bad direction from what I've seen.

By the way, Gordian Knot is real good. Evergray bored the hell out of me when I saw them with Iced Earth though.

You guys hear about the new Cannibal Corpse album? If I remember correctly, it's going to be titled "Kill." Hahah. Going to be interesting to see how they try and top their last outing.

So because you have little appreciation for a specific vocal style, it's now "mindless?" Right.

If you're honestly interested in learning about it rather than poking little jabs at the genre, here you go.

I dont consider shouting at the top of their voice a vocal style... you can shout a little, but not those ear deafening roars.

I dont consider shouting at the top of their voice a vocal style... you can shout a little, but not those ear deafening roars.

Well despite that, it is still a legit vocal style. It's one that isn't as universally accepted as others, but that's mainly because people can't seperate the idea of disliking a style and thinking something isn't a real style at all.

I don't like Operas style of singing, but I do understand that it is a style and it takes much work to master.

Go download some random songs by Cannibal Corpse. Try and sing like that. Yes, it may be some of the ugliest sounding vocals you've heard, but that doesn't mean they can't use that style for people who do like it. Point is, it takes hard work to master, and is probably one of the most difficult ways of singing for prolonged amounts of time.

I can easily see why someone wouldn't like this style of music (Death Metal), but saying that it's "just noise" or anything along those lines is pure ignorance.

You can find a lot of metal without growled or yelled vocals though. Some bands like this would be Nightwish, Symphony X, Iron Maiden, Dream Theater etc.

Thanks at all the answers, but something is still not clear for me, if they (Arch Enemy) have two guitarists, why the hell is only 1 in the video. (2 guitar players + bass player = 3 people, Nemesis video has only two...). And I'm sure I've seen a poster in Metal Hammer or something, only 4 people in the band. Hmmm maybe they dont have a permanent bass player?

Yeah well ok, yelling is not my thing.

lol...i used to feel the same way. when i was first getting into bands like lacuna coil and nightwish, i couldnt really stand the whole screaming thing for extented periods. but for some reason i liked the way that these did that whole "beauty and the beast" thing...so eventually I found more music that had that sort of vocal style to it. and after a whole bunch of female fronted bands (some with male "death" growls) I actually started to like the growling part and even the screaming, so i bought some trivium, opeth, and cradle of filth and that is where i am now.

I guess my hand was held through this whole process...it is almost like it creeped up on me too...haha.

but dont get me wrong...i still love the female vocals, i just like the male growls and screaming too...yay...more music to love.

STV

the problem is, genocider, like the vast majority of people that dont like the "screaming and loud grunts" are only focusing on that aspect. to the untrained ear, all they hear IS the screaming. the rest of the band is just back up. thats exactly what separates good music from everything else.... when the lead singer, or screamer, blends into the band, you have good music. you dont focus on the singer or the screaming, you focus on the other band members and what theyre playing. i'll ask people, for example, "oh man, did you hear that awesome set part?" and theyre like "no, what are you talking about?" "did you hear that awesome guitar riff??" "no, i just hear noise" to this day, i'll still listen to a cd that ive had for years and find new stuff. all of a sudden a certain part will just pop out and surprise me, it's great.

get past the screaming and truely listen to the music. this is why i mainly only listen to hard stuff/metal. i also like other genres but the stuff i listen to actually challenges the listener, makes them think and decipher whats going on.

Linkin Park, Korn, Staind, Creed, Nickelback (vast majority of whats on the radio) ------ that stuff's unchallenging child's play.

i agree that the yelling and screaming can be a little muc

i personally only listen to heavy metal in schoo, cause when im in school im frustrated

but when im at home i like listening to ac/dc, bob dylan, the beatles, django reihnhart

yknow not stuff called: Deathamphetamine

the problem is, genocider, like the vast majority of people that dont like the "screaming and loud grunts" are only focusing on that aspect. to the untrained ear, all they hear IS the screaming. the rest of the band is just back up. thats exactly what separates good music from everything else.... when the lead singer, or screamer, blends into the band, you have good music. you dont focus on the singer or the screaming, you focus on the other band members and what theyre playing. i'll ask people, for example, "oh man, did you hear that awesome set part?" and theyre like "no, what are you talking about?" "did you hear that awesome guitar riff??" "no, i just hear noise" to this day, i'll still listen to a cd that ive had for years and find new stuff. all of a sudden a certain part will just pop out and surprise me, it's great.

get past the screaming and truely listen to the music. this is why i mainly only listen to hard stuff/metal. i also like other genres but the stuff i listen to actually challenges the listener, makes them think and decipher whats going on.

Linkin Park, Korn, Staind, Creed, Nickelback (vast majority of whats on the radio) ------ that stuff's unchallenging child's play.

I guess all of you are right, its all down to the listener.

But presently, I'm not prepared and cant listen to it. And your list here, I never liked any of them bands except for Korn. LP, Creed, Nickelback suck IMHO. Dunno bout Staind.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Oh no...the wallet is already screaming. So many games and so little time. Being old and responsible is awful!
    • LibreWolf 152.0.2-1 by Razvan Serea LibreWolf is an independent “fork” of Firefox, with the primary goals of privacy security and user freedom. It is the community run successor to LibreFox. LibreWolf is designed to increase protection against tracking and fingerprinting techniques, while also including a few security improvements. This is achieved through our privacy and security oriented settings and patches. LibreWolf also aims to remove all the telemetry, data collection and annoyances, as well as disabling anti-freedom features like DRM. LibreWolf features: Latest Firefox — LibreWolf is compiled directly from the latest build of Firefox Stable. You will have the the latest features, and security updates. Independent Build — LibreWolf uses a build independent of Firefox and has its own settings, profile folder and installation path. As a result, it can be installed alongside Firefox or any other browser. No phoning home — Embedded server links and other calling home functions are removed. In other words, minimal background connections by default. User settings updates Extensions firewall: limit internet access for extensions. Multi-platform (Windows/Linux/Mac/and soon Android) Community-Driven Dark theme (classic and advanced) LibreWolf privacy features: Delete cookies and website data on close. Include only privacy respecting search engines like DuckDuckGo and Searx. Include uBlockOrigin with custom default filter lists, and Tracking Protection in strict mode, to block trackers and ads. Strip tracking elements from URLs, both natively and through uBO. Enable dFPI, also known as Total Cookie Protection. Enable RFP which is part of the Tor Uplift project. RFP is considered the best in class anti-fingerprinting solution, and its goal is to make users look the same and cover as many metrics as possible, in an effort to block fingerprinting techniques. Always display user language as en-US to websites, in order to protect the language used in the browser and in the OS. Disable WebGL, as it is a strong fingerprinting vector. Prevent access to the location services of the OS, and use Mozilla's location API instead of Google's API. Limit ICE candidates generation to a single interface when sharing video or audio during a videoconference. Force DNS and WebRTC inside the proxy, when one is being used. Trim cross-origin referrers, so that they don't include the full URI. Disable link prefetching and speculative connections. Disable disk cache and clear temporary files on close. Disable form autofill. Disable search and form history...and more. Download: LibreWolf 64-bit | Portable 64-bit | ~100.0 MB (Open Source) Download: ARM64 | Portable ARM64 Links: LibreWolf Home Page | Addons | Screenshot | Reddit Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hands on with iFlyTek AINote 2 E-Ink tablet: insanely thin and smart by Taras Buria During Amazon Prime Day 2026, iFlyTek is offering its E-Ink tablets with big discounts. The AINOTE 2 is now available at 20% off, allowing you to save quite a lot on one of the thinnest E-Ink tablets out there. I was offered a chance to look at the device, so here are my impressions. The AINOTE 2 is a large 10.65-inch E-Ink tablet that strikes you the moment you take it out of the box. It is extremely thin. At just 4.2 mm, this tablet is at the edge of what is possible for a device with a USB Type-C port. It is also very light, which makes it comfortable and enjoyable during long reading sessions. The tablet has a gold metal chassis with the front and back made of plastic. The back also features four rubber feet that prevent it from sliding around your desk when writing. Besides a USB Type-C port and an LED indicator, there are two buttons mounted on the top edge: a power button with a built-in fingerprint scanner and a dedicated AI button. I would say the fingerprint scanner is quite mid. Given that iFlyTek positions the device as a digital notebook, it makes sense to have a biometric scanner to protect sensitive information. However, it is not the fastest fingerprint reader, and sometimes it fails to recognize my finger. I assume that is due to the tablet's insane thinness. A dedicated AI button is an interesting choice, especially in the middle of the top edge. I can see this button being useful for those who heavily rely on AI and use it frequently, but I cannot help but think its placement is impractical. Having it on one of the longer sides would make so much more sense. The AINOTE 2 is a very pretty device. Gold finish with thin chassis and nearly symmetrical front bezels create a fantastic combination, and iFlyTek cleverly hides the front chin with a section that looks like an extension of the screen, housing two touch-capacitive buttons: one for AI and one for quick notes. This section can also scroll pages when you swipe from the middle to the left or right. It is a cool idea, and very handy when you need to scroll tens of pages at once. AINOTE 2's elegant look extends from its exterior to its software. The user interface is very clean and not cluttered with an abundance of buttons. The tablet prioritizes the note-taking experience, and when you unlock it, it defaults to the list of all notes and folders. Additionally, there is a separate "Schedule" section with your calendar, tasks, memos, and other productivity features. You can connect your Outlook or Google account or use a local calendar. The tablet has quite a lot of AI features powered by OpenAI's GPT-5 and Google's Gemini 3. Besides a standard app with all your chats, you can invoke AI by pressing its dedicated button and dictating your request. It is not limited to just chats. It works with the built-in calendar, and you can tell it to create events, tasks, notes, and more. Additionally, AI features are integrated into the built-in notepad, allowing you to summarize notes, ask questions about your notes, and more. The tablet can OCR handwritten text in different languages (about 120 languages, which is very impressive), and it surprised me with very good accuracy. Voice note transcription is also available, including a "multiplayer" mode where the tablet detects each speaker. Unfortunately, the AINOTE 2 has no built-in speakers (even though it somehow makes a tapping noise when you flip pages using the Quick Bar), so the only way to listen to something is to connect a Bluetooth speaker or headphones. However, there are four front-facing mics for dictation, voice notes, AI chats, and more. Unfortunately, certain features require a Pro subscription that costs $5.99/mo or $59.99/year. Those include offline voice transcription, access to better AI models, the ability to edit notes on a PC or mobile app, and extended service coverage similar to Apple Care. It is a bummer to see yet another app, especially in a device that costs $649, but at least they give a free 90-day trial so that you can see if the benefits justify the price. As for the reader, it supports PDF, EPUB, TXT, MOBI, AZW3, DOC(X), XLS(X), PPT(X), JPEG, JPG, and PNG. The app is quite customizable, with features like text contrast/boldness/size adjustments, margins and spacing customization, and the ability to load custom fonts. Plus, you can annotate books with the stylus, add text notes, and use AI to work with them. Just keep in mind that most AI features require an active internet connection. Like with other E-Ink tablets with Android inside, you can load any other reader you want from the Google Play Store or a third-party source. Despite its hefty price tag of $629 or $519 by the time of publishing this article during Prime Day 2026, the AINOTE 2 has quite modest hardware inside. There is only 4 GB of RAM and about 42GB of storage. It is powered by the RockChip RK3576 processor with 8 cores at 2.2 GHz. Given that the tablet runs Android 14 and has Google Play, you can install Android apps, but do not expect much from this thing performance-wise. As for the battery, there is a 4,000 Li-Ion battery, which, on full charge, lasted me for about one week of active daily use of reading and note-taking. The screen has a resolution of 1920x2560 pixels, which equals 300 PPI, a perfect spot for a sharp, nice-to-read display. It supports EMR styluses that do not require charging, and I have to say that the note-taking experience on this tablet is fantastic. Stylus lag is nearly imperceivable, creating a very natural, paper-like feel. The stylus comes in the box (including two extra nibs), and it features an extra button for various actions and an eraser on top. It magnetically attaches to the tablet and stays safely secured. The stylus has a very nice coarse texture, and thanks to using Wacom tech, you can swap it for any other EMR pen if you wish. The AINOTE 2 has no front light, and because of that, the display sits very close to the screen surface, reducing the distance between the stylus tip/your finger and the display to a minimum. No front light is certainly an inconvenience in certain scenarios, but the screen makes up for that with a seriously impressive paper-like feel and writing experience. In dark conditions, you will have to find a lamp, but the good thing is that the screen has a solid anti-glare surface that diffuses light. The display has two modes: Crisp and Fast. Crisp ensures the image stays, well, crisp and sharp, while Fast speeds up refresh rate and response by toning down display resolution and making everything a bit more jagged. In my testing, I only used Fast mode when browsing the web for a much faster render time. The iFlyTek AINOTE is an impressive device, but it's not flawless. A few things disappointed me during a week of using it. Software localization has a bunch of not necessarily broken, but certainly awkward, machine-translated English. System navigation is not good, as there is no universal "Home" gesture. To go to the main page, you have to swipe up and then press the Home button from the multi-tasking window. There are many gestures for various actions, such as display cleanup, screenshot, undo/redo, but no back/forward or Home gestures. I really hate that the tablet won't let me update its software without creating an iFlyTek account first. Finally, privacy could be a concern for some, as most tablets' features require an active internet connection, an iFlyTek account, and sharing data when using AI. If you can overlook its quirks, some of which could be addressed with software updates (I received two with massive changelogs over a single week), and accept a $519 price tag (with a discount), you will be happy with the AINOTE 2. However, if you do not need that many AI features in an E-Ink reader or you want something a bit more affordable, you'd better look at cheaper competitors from BOOX or Amazon, such as the BOOX Go 10.3 Gen 2 or the Kindle Scribe, which is currently 24% off during Prime Day sales. Buy iFlyTek AINOTE 2 on Amazon - $519 | 20% off with Prime What I liked What I disliked Very impressive hardware Beautiful design Fantastic display with an EMR stylus Supports offline voice transcription Easy-to-use software Clever, useful, and well-made AI features A fingerprint scanner Very expensive Some features require a subscription Poor system navigation Mandates a user account No speakers Privacy could be a concern Note: iFlyTek provided the review unit without any editorial input or review guidance. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Look up "greed". If you are willing to buy that it's only inflation, I've got a bridge to sell you.
    • Very umm, blue?  
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      416
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      168
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      132
    4. 4
      Xenon
      73
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!