Recommended Posts

A question, didn't know where to ask, so I might put it here, Arch Enemy has one guitar player or two, I hear two but see one lol. Also, was there a different singer before the possessed girl?

LOL You just asked that :laugh:

and yes theres 2 guitarist.

Yes they had a different singer. A male infact. Lots of people are saying that AE sold out because of her, but, well, it added a differnt sound.

Hehe, I wouldn't say they sold out - but their ex-singer was 100x times better because his voice was quite unique. Angela has the typical melodic death shrieking vocals that every band seems to have these days. Whilst we're on the subject, their melodic riffs were much better back in the day too.

hey guys

ive just seen a band on Scuzz (UK Music TV) and i didnt catch the same or song title fully

what i caught was this:

Octavia - Lifeless *summut summut*

can anyone shed any light on this?

thankx

perhaps you meant: Octavia - Lifelines of Depths

I want to ask... what actually is metal? What defines metal? The mindless shouting (I hate this part)?

Are bands like Rammstein, System of A Down, Korn metal?

So because you have little appreciation for a specific vocal style, it's now "mindless?" Right.

If you're honestly interested in learning about it rather than poking little jabs at the genre, here you go.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heavy_metal_music

Arch Enemy has two guitarists, the Amott brothers or something. Their original singer was replaced for 2001's Wages Of Sin. I think their new singer is pretty damn hot, got to see her live....and her vocals aren't bad....just kind of generic as mentioned. I haven't even heard their more recent albums but they have been going in a bad direction from what I've seen.

By the way, Gordian Knot is real good. Evergray bored the hell out of me when I saw them with Iced Earth though.

You guys hear about the new Cannibal Corpse album? If I remember correctly, it's going to be titled "Kill." Hahah. Going to be interesting to see how they try and top their last outing.

So because you have little appreciation for a specific vocal style, it's now "mindless?" Right.

If you're honestly interested in learning about it rather than poking little jabs at the genre, here you go.

I dont consider shouting at the top of their voice a vocal style... you can shout a little, but not those ear deafening roars.

I dont consider shouting at the top of their voice a vocal style... you can shout a little, but not those ear deafening roars.

Well despite that, it is still a legit vocal style. It's one that isn't as universally accepted as others, but that's mainly because people can't seperate the idea of disliking a style and thinking something isn't a real style at all.

I don't like Operas style of singing, but I do understand that it is a style and it takes much work to master.

Go download some random songs by Cannibal Corpse. Try and sing like that. Yes, it may be some of the ugliest sounding vocals you've heard, but that doesn't mean they can't use that style for people who do like it. Point is, it takes hard work to master, and is probably one of the most difficult ways of singing for prolonged amounts of time.

I can easily see why someone wouldn't like this style of music (Death Metal), but saying that it's "just noise" or anything along those lines is pure ignorance.

You can find a lot of metal without growled or yelled vocals though. Some bands like this would be Nightwish, Symphony X, Iron Maiden, Dream Theater etc.

Thanks at all the answers, but something is still not clear for me, if they (Arch Enemy) have two guitarists, why the hell is only 1 in the video. (2 guitar players + bass player = 3 people, Nemesis video has only two...). And I'm sure I've seen a poster in Metal Hammer or something, only 4 people in the band. Hmmm maybe they dont have a permanent bass player?

Yeah well ok, yelling is not my thing.

lol...i used to feel the same way. when i was first getting into bands like lacuna coil and nightwish, i couldnt really stand the whole screaming thing for extented periods. but for some reason i liked the way that these did that whole "beauty and the beast" thing...so eventually I found more music that had that sort of vocal style to it. and after a whole bunch of female fronted bands (some with male "death" growls) I actually started to like the growling part and even the screaming, so i bought some trivium, opeth, and cradle of filth and that is where i am now.

I guess my hand was held through this whole process...it is almost like it creeped up on me too...haha.

but dont get me wrong...i still love the female vocals, i just like the male growls and screaming too...yay...more music to love.

STV

the problem is, genocider, like the vast majority of people that dont like the "screaming and loud grunts" are only focusing on that aspect. to the untrained ear, all they hear IS the screaming. the rest of the band is just back up. thats exactly what separates good music from everything else.... when the lead singer, or screamer, blends into the band, you have good music. you dont focus on the singer or the screaming, you focus on the other band members and what theyre playing. i'll ask people, for example, "oh man, did you hear that awesome set part?" and theyre like "no, what are you talking about?" "did you hear that awesome guitar riff??" "no, i just hear noise" to this day, i'll still listen to a cd that ive had for years and find new stuff. all of a sudden a certain part will just pop out and surprise me, it's great.

get past the screaming and truely listen to the music. this is why i mainly only listen to hard stuff/metal. i also like other genres but the stuff i listen to actually challenges the listener, makes them think and decipher whats going on.

Linkin Park, Korn, Staind, Creed, Nickelback (vast majority of whats on the radio) ------ that stuff's unchallenging child's play.

i agree that the yelling and screaming can be a little muc

i personally only listen to heavy metal in schoo, cause when im in school im frustrated

but when im at home i like listening to ac/dc, bob dylan, the beatles, django reihnhart

yknow not stuff called: Deathamphetamine

the problem is, genocider, like the vast majority of people that dont like the "screaming and loud grunts" are only focusing on that aspect. to the untrained ear, all they hear IS the screaming. the rest of the band is just back up. thats exactly what separates good music from everything else.... when the lead singer, or screamer, blends into the band, you have good music. you dont focus on the singer or the screaming, you focus on the other band members and what theyre playing. i'll ask people, for example, "oh man, did you hear that awesome set part?" and theyre like "no, what are you talking about?" "did you hear that awesome guitar riff??" "no, i just hear noise" to this day, i'll still listen to a cd that ive had for years and find new stuff. all of a sudden a certain part will just pop out and surprise me, it's great.

get past the screaming and truely listen to the music. this is why i mainly only listen to hard stuff/metal. i also like other genres but the stuff i listen to actually challenges the listener, makes them think and decipher whats going on.

Linkin Park, Korn, Staind, Creed, Nickelback (vast majority of whats on the radio) ------ that stuff's unchallenging child's play.

I guess all of you are right, its all down to the listener.

But presently, I'm not prepared and cant listen to it. And your list here, I never liked any of them bands except for Korn. LP, Creed, Nickelback suck IMHO. Dunno bout Staind.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Amazon Prime Day 2026: Best Dolby soundbar deals from Sony, Samsung, JBL, Polk, and more by Sayan Sen Yesterday we covered the JBL BAR 800 which is a 5.1.2 Dolby Atmos/Vision soundbar. The unit is on sale for its lowest ever price of just $800 making it a solid offer. However, there are many more options to choose from and in this article, we have made a compilation of the best deals including from Sony, Polk, Yamaha, Denon, Samsung and more. Sony's BAR models are currently at their lowest prices which makes them solid offerings. The company's BRAVIA Theatre Bar lineup is designed to suit different home cinema needs. The Bar 5 is an entry-level 3.1-channel soundbar with a wireless subwoofer, supporting Dolby Atmos®, DTS:X, S-Force PRO Front Surround, and Vertical Surround Engine for immersive audio with clear dialogue. The Bar 6 upgrades to a 3.1.2-channel configuration by adding dedicated up-firing speakers for more convincing overhead Atmos effects while retaining the wireless subwoofer. At the premium end, the Bar 7, Bar 8, and flagship Bar 9 are single-soundbar solutions featuring Sony’s 360 Spatial Sound Mapping technology, which creates phantom speakers for a wider surround field. Bar 7 includes nine speaker units, Bar 8 increases this to eleven, and Bar 9 offers thirteen speaker driver units promising the most expansive soundstage and acoustic performance. All models should integrate seamlessly with compatible BRAVIA TVs and support the BRAVIA Connect app for setup and control. Get them at the links below: Sony BRAVIA Theater Bar 9 Soundbar (HT-A9000): $998.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $1498) Sony BRAVIA Theater Bar 8 Soundbar (HT-A9000): $798.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $998) Sony BRAVIA Theater Bar 7 Soundbar (HT-A7100): $618.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $768) Sony BRAVIA Theater System 6: $548.00 | Sony BRAVIA Theater Bar 6: $448.00 Sony BRAVIA Theater Bar 5 (HT-B500): $278.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $348) Sony HT-S400 2.1 soundbar: $198.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $248) Aside from those, we also have more discounts including from Samsung, Polk Audio, and more: Samsung Q-Series Soundbar HW-QS90H 7.1.2: $797.99 (Amazon US) (Was: $998) Polk Audio Signa S4: $336.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $449) Hisense AX3120Q: $229.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $259) Check out more soundbar deals that you may like at this link. Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Stellarium 26.2 by Razvan Serea Stellarium is a free open source planetarium for your computer. It shows a realistic sky in 3D, just like what you see with the naked eye, binoculars or a telescope. It is being used in planetarium projectors. Just set your coordinates and go. Stellarium key features: Realistic simulation of the sky, sunrise and sunset Default catalogue of over 600,000 stars Downloadable additional catalogues for up to 210 million stars Catalog data for all New General Catalogue (NGC) objects Images of almost all Messier objects and the Milky Way Artistic illustrations for all 88 modern constellations More than a dozen different cultures with their constellations Solar and lunar eclipse simulation Photorealistic landscapes (more are available on the website) Scripting support with ECMAScript (a few demo scripts are included) Extendable with plug-ins: 8 plug-ins installed by default, including: artificial satellites plug-in (updated from an on-line TLE database) ocular simulation plug-in (shows how objects look like in a given ocular) Solar System editor plug-in (imports comet and asteroid data from the MPC) telescope control plug-in (Meade LX200 and Celestron NexStar compatible) The major changes of this version: Added new sky culture Added new plugin: Planes Many improvements in plugins Many improvements in Core and GUI Many updates in sky cultures. [full release notes] Download: Stellarium 26.2 (64-bit) | 456.0 MB (Open Source) View: Stellarium Home Page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      418
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!