Recommended Posts

A question, didn't know where to ask, so I might put it here, Arch Enemy has one guitar player or two, I hear two but see one lol. Also, was there a different singer before the possessed girl?

LOL You just asked that :laugh:

and yes theres 2 guitarist.

Yes they had a different singer. A male infact. Lots of people are saying that AE sold out because of her, but, well, it added a differnt sound.

Hehe, I wouldn't say they sold out - but their ex-singer was 100x times better because his voice was quite unique. Angela has the typical melodic death shrieking vocals that every band seems to have these days. Whilst we're on the subject, their melodic riffs were much better back in the day too.

hey guys

ive just seen a band on Scuzz (UK Music TV) and i didnt catch the same or song title fully

what i caught was this:

Octavia - Lifeless *summut summut*

can anyone shed any light on this?

thankx

perhaps you meant: Octavia - Lifelines of Depths

I want to ask... what actually is metal? What defines metal? The mindless shouting (I hate this part)?

Are bands like Rammstein, System of A Down, Korn metal?

So because you have little appreciation for a specific vocal style, it's now "mindless?" Right.

If you're honestly interested in learning about it rather than poking little jabs at the genre, here you go.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heavy_metal_music

Arch Enemy has two guitarists, the Amott brothers or something. Their original singer was replaced for 2001's Wages Of Sin. I think their new singer is pretty damn hot, got to see her live....and her vocals aren't bad....just kind of generic as mentioned. I haven't even heard their more recent albums but they have been going in a bad direction from what I've seen.

By the way, Gordian Knot is real good. Evergray bored the hell out of me when I saw them with Iced Earth though.

You guys hear about the new Cannibal Corpse album? If I remember correctly, it's going to be titled "Kill." Hahah. Going to be interesting to see how they try and top their last outing.

So because you have little appreciation for a specific vocal style, it's now "mindless?" Right.

If you're honestly interested in learning about it rather than poking little jabs at the genre, here you go.

I dont consider shouting at the top of their voice a vocal style... you can shout a little, but not those ear deafening roars.

I dont consider shouting at the top of their voice a vocal style... you can shout a little, but not those ear deafening roars.

Well despite that, it is still a legit vocal style. It's one that isn't as universally accepted as others, but that's mainly because people can't seperate the idea of disliking a style and thinking something isn't a real style at all.

I don't like Operas style of singing, but I do understand that it is a style and it takes much work to master.

Go download some random songs by Cannibal Corpse. Try and sing like that. Yes, it may be some of the ugliest sounding vocals you've heard, but that doesn't mean they can't use that style for people who do like it. Point is, it takes hard work to master, and is probably one of the most difficult ways of singing for prolonged amounts of time.

I can easily see why someone wouldn't like this style of music (Death Metal), but saying that it's "just noise" or anything along those lines is pure ignorance.

You can find a lot of metal without growled or yelled vocals though. Some bands like this would be Nightwish, Symphony X, Iron Maiden, Dream Theater etc.

Thanks at all the answers, but something is still not clear for me, if they (Arch Enemy) have two guitarists, why the hell is only 1 in the video. (2 guitar players + bass player = 3 people, Nemesis video has only two...). And I'm sure I've seen a poster in Metal Hammer or something, only 4 people in the band. Hmmm maybe they dont have a permanent bass player?

Yeah well ok, yelling is not my thing.

lol...i used to feel the same way. when i was first getting into bands like lacuna coil and nightwish, i couldnt really stand the whole screaming thing for extented periods. but for some reason i liked the way that these did that whole "beauty and the beast" thing...so eventually I found more music that had that sort of vocal style to it. and after a whole bunch of female fronted bands (some with male "death" growls) I actually started to like the growling part and even the screaming, so i bought some trivium, opeth, and cradle of filth and that is where i am now.

I guess my hand was held through this whole process...it is almost like it creeped up on me too...haha.

but dont get me wrong...i still love the female vocals, i just like the male growls and screaming too...yay...more music to love.

STV

the problem is, genocider, like the vast majority of people that dont like the "screaming and loud grunts" are only focusing on that aspect. to the untrained ear, all they hear IS the screaming. the rest of the band is just back up. thats exactly what separates good music from everything else.... when the lead singer, or screamer, blends into the band, you have good music. you dont focus on the singer or the screaming, you focus on the other band members and what theyre playing. i'll ask people, for example, "oh man, did you hear that awesome set part?" and theyre like "no, what are you talking about?" "did you hear that awesome guitar riff??" "no, i just hear noise" to this day, i'll still listen to a cd that ive had for years and find new stuff. all of a sudden a certain part will just pop out and surprise me, it's great.

get past the screaming and truely listen to the music. this is why i mainly only listen to hard stuff/metal. i also like other genres but the stuff i listen to actually challenges the listener, makes them think and decipher whats going on.

Linkin Park, Korn, Staind, Creed, Nickelback (vast majority of whats on the radio) ------ that stuff's unchallenging child's play.

i agree that the yelling and screaming can be a little muc

i personally only listen to heavy metal in schoo, cause when im in school im frustrated

but when im at home i like listening to ac/dc, bob dylan, the beatles, django reihnhart

yknow not stuff called: Deathamphetamine

the problem is, genocider, like the vast majority of people that dont like the "screaming and loud grunts" are only focusing on that aspect. to the untrained ear, all they hear IS the screaming. the rest of the band is just back up. thats exactly what separates good music from everything else.... when the lead singer, or screamer, blends into the band, you have good music. you dont focus on the singer or the screaming, you focus on the other band members and what theyre playing. i'll ask people, for example, "oh man, did you hear that awesome set part?" and theyre like "no, what are you talking about?" "did you hear that awesome guitar riff??" "no, i just hear noise" to this day, i'll still listen to a cd that ive had for years and find new stuff. all of a sudden a certain part will just pop out and surprise me, it's great.

get past the screaming and truely listen to the music. this is why i mainly only listen to hard stuff/metal. i also like other genres but the stuff i listen to actually challenges the listener, makes them think and decipher whats going on.

Linkin Park, Korn, Staind, Creed, Nickelback (vast majority of whats on the radio) ------ that stuff's unchallenging child's play.

I guess all of you are right, its all down to the listener.

But presently, I'm not prepared and cant listen to it. And your list here, I never liked any of them bands except for Korn. LP, Creed, Nickelback suck IMHO. Dunno bout Staind.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      458
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!