(Rumour)Bush and Cheney Indicted

By stanneh
in It's a Conspiracy!

 Share

Recommended Posts

Proficient

stanneh

Posted
Posted

Well for the past few days this story has been gaining more and more attention but i havent seen it on neowin this could be complete **** but read it anyway

We talked to Tom Flocco and he is adamant that this story is accurate. If so is it any wonder his website is having so many hacking problems?

Furthermore, journalist Greg Szymanski called the prosecuter's office and their response was "no comment." If this was all totally made up they would certainly distance themselves from it and not leave it open.

U.S. federal prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald's Chicago grand jury has issued perjury and obstruction of justice indictments to the following members of the Bush Administration: President George W. Bush, Vice-President Richard Cheney, Bush Chief of Staff Andrew Card, Cheney Chief of Staff I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, Attorney General Alberto Gonzalez, former Attorney General John Ashcroft, imprisoned New York Times reporter Judith Miller and former Senior Cheney advisor Mary Matalin.

There were no indications given as to whether the President and his top staff members would appear publicly before cameras at the grand jury proceedings, given the gravity of the charges.

Besides the Valerie Plame CIA leak case, the Fitzgerald probe is reportedly far-reaching and expanding much deeper into past White House criminal acts involving Bush-Clinton drug money laundering in Mena, Arkansas to White House involvement in 9.11; but also for sending America's young people to their deaths or to be maimed in Iraq and Afghanistan under false pretenses.

British Prime Minister Tony Blair was indicted for obstruction of justice and is reportedly consulting with members of Parliament and legal aides regarding how to avoid appearing in the U.S.A. for interrogation before Fitzgerald in Chicago.

The revelations emanated from sources close to the grand jury who spoke with federal whistleblower Thomas Heneghen in California who said White House Senior Advisor to the President Karl Rove was also indicted for perjury and was reportedly involved with Mary Matalin in a major Bush administration document shredding operation to cover-up evidence.

Heneghen had reported over ten days ago on a TruthRadio.com broadcast that his sources close to the grand jury said former Secretary of State Colin Powell had been subpoenaed and had testified against President Bush, telling the citizen panel that the President had taken the United States to war based upon lies--a capital crime involving treason under the United States Code.

Heneghen also reported a week ago that Gonzalez and Card had been subpoened and that Tony Blair had defied his subpoena after the response time limit had expired.

Sources close to the investigation report that members of the House, Senate, 9.11 Commission and other members of the media are also under investigation as potential targets by a grand jury regarding obstruction of justice and other oversight failures linked to the 9.11 attacks--indicating that citizen panelists working with Fitzgerald may be seeking a wholesale cleansing of what many have said is a crime-wracked White House and Congress.

Also last Monday, the whistleblower reported that Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Pat Roberts was planning to obstruct justice by calling Fitzgerald for Senate hearings to question the prosecutor's motives for the far-reaching investigation.

This, giving rise to questions as to whether Roberts and other Republican legislators--some now under secret investigation--would join President Bush in seeking to fire Fitzgerald in the same manner that President Nixon had fired Watergate Special Prosecutor Archibald Cox in order to obstruct justice and cut off further investigations into White House crimes.

Two weeks ago Heneghen said he had talked to sources just ten minutes prior to French and U.S. intelligence agents intercepting British intelligence agents who were attempting to bomb the subway underneath the Dirksen Federal Building where Fitzgerald was presiding over grand jury hearings.

Serious questions can also be raised as to whether intelligence forces linked to President Bush and Tony Blair had participated in a failed attempt to scuttle the Fitzgerald probe by literally blowing it up--at a time when UK reports reveal that military-grade explosives were used to blow up the London subway on July 7.

Sources say the alleged Chicago subway bombing attempt has been attributed to an underground and closeted enmity involving warring intelligence and military factions within the United States government.

Moreover, reports indicate that the disturbance occurred at the same time that the Chicago Tribune and local web blogs had reported that the subway had been evacuated for 45-50 minutes regarding a "suspicious package" late on Monday afternoon, July 18.

Also confirming the under-the-radar-screen hostilities involving agents loyal to the administration and others who are disturbed about the cover-up of government involvement in the 9.11 attacks was a recent contact made with this writer by a major New York media outlet which called seeking "names of those who could confirm its own reports of warring factions within the government which were threatening the safety of U.S. citizens."

developing.....please link or copy--and distribute widely.

Tom Flocco

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/augus...5bushcheney.htm

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Grand Master

MonkeyClaw Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

oh lord please let this be true, please oh please. what goes around comes around and this would be amazing if true. but of course if it is our wonderful "fair and balanced" media wont cover a single word.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mentor

Scudworth

Posted
Posted
the President had taken the United States to war based upon lies--a capital crime involving treason under the United States Code.

capital crime, that means capital punishment, does it not? cuz that would be too much fun....

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Proficient

stanneh

Posted
  • Author
Posted

if there is any truth in it at all Which i myself doubt then you simply will not see this on the bbc or cnn the bbc is a lapdog of tony blair and cnn well its cnn :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Veteran

2xSilverKnight

Posted
Posted

Can somebody answer this question ..

Why people think that if it's not covered by the mainstream media, it's not true?

This is rediculous, do you know how many independent news media on internet has been created since 9/11. How many mainstream media reporters are not working anymore for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Grand Master

aristotle-dude

Posted
Posted
Can somebody answer this question ..

Why people think that if it's not covered by the mainstream media, it's not true?

This is rediculous, do you know how many independent news media on internet has been created since 9/11. How many mainstream media reporters are not working anymore for them.

586356672[/snapback]

You do not seem to understand what a conspiracy is. If it was true, chances are some news agency would have picked up the story. It would be virtually impossible to maintain the silence of all mainstream reporters.

That "news" site is a well known crackpot rumour mill and has zero credibility. I would not be surprised if it was in fact a site like "the onion" or "landover baptist", set up as a tongue in cheek satire site. It is sad that some people take it seriously.

Have you been able to access that site I sent you to or are they still blocking Quebecers?

I spent the day poring over terrorist lists today at work. Why is it that I, as a fellow Canadian can access sites that you cannot?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Veteran

2xSilverKnight

Posted
Posted (edited)
You do not seem to understand what a conspiracy is. If it was true, chances are some news agency would have picked up the story. It would be virtually impossible to maintain the silence of all mainstream reporters.

That "news" site is a well known crackpot rumour mill and has zero credibility. I would not be surprised if it was in fact a site like "the onion" or "landover baptist", set up as a tongue in cheek satire site. It is sad that some people take it seriously.

Have you been able to access that site I sent you to or are they still blocking Quebecers?

I spent the day poring over terrorist lists today at work. Why is it that I, as a fellow Canadian can access sites that you cannot?

586359535[/snapback]

omfg .. what are u talking about. The site i was talking was another person that i thought was you because of your same way of exposing your opinions. And you think they will expose this in the mainstream, no they can't, it would be against the National Security.

If i say to you, that next week, August 17th, there will be a terrorist attack (nuclear perhaps) in the US and they will blame it on Al-Quaeda (of course :rolleyes:). You will call me a damn retard. Yes i would understand. But if it happen, what will you say ? Just wait till next week, you'll be shocked of what is happening. Don't talk , wait till then, you'll see. I can already hear you crying a conspiracy theory again, rofl yeah it's far to be one, it's the reality. Wait wednesday.

Edited by 2xSilverKnight
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Grand Master

vincent

Posted
Posted
omfg .. what are u talking about. The site i was talking was another person that i thought was you because of your same way of exposing your opinions. And you think they will expose this in the mainstream, no they can't, it would be against the National Security.

If i say to you, that next week, August 17th, there will be a terrorist attack (nuclear perhaps) in the US and they will blame it on Al-Quaeda (of course  :rolleyes:). You will call me a damn retard. Yes i would understand. But if it happen, what will you say ? Just wait till next week, you'll be shocked of what is happening. Don't talk , wait till then, you'll see. I can already hear you crying a conspiracy theory again, rofl yeah it's far to be one, it's the reality. Wait wednesday.

586363241[/snapback]

So are you calling yourself a prphet or an investigator. ther is a distinct difference betwwen the two you know? And that is called evidence. Word of mouth and one's thoughts aren't proof enough, same goes for your webiste, your precious prisonplanet.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Veteran

2xSilverKnight

Posted
Posted
So are you calling yourself a prphet or an investigator. ther is a distinct difference betwwen the two you know? And that is called evidence. Word of mouth and one's thoughts aren't proof enough, same goes for your webiste, your precious prisonplanet.com

586363373[/snapback]

oh sure why not i'm a phrophet now. rofl :rolleyes:

I didn't pointed any evidence anyway, i know, that's why i said wait and see. That will be the evidence. Now plz, stop your misunderstanding comments.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Grand Master

lav-chan

Posted
Posted
If i say to you, that next week, August 17th, there will be a terrorist attack (nuclear perhaps) in the US and they will blame it on Al-Quaeda (of course  :rolleyes:). You will call me a damn retard. Yes i would understand. But if it happen, what will you say ? Just wait till next week, you'll be shocked of what is happening. Don't talk , wait till then, you'll see. I can already hear you crying a conspiracy theory again, rofl yeah it's far to be one, it's the reality. Wait wednesday.

586363241[/snapback]

Sooooo.... Was Wednesday like a ball-park figure, or....

Link to comment
Share on other sites
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.