Recommended Posts

Originally posted by BananaMan

I'm going to respectfully disagree here, hehe.

No there's a word that is shocking in a thread like this - respecfully :)

Originally posted by BananaMan

. And when I was chrisitan, I definately wasn't like that, I detested that behaviour.

Ditto this, and the stuff I cut out

Originally posted by BananaMan

Also, with your reference to the middle ages, I don't really think that's fair. The christians of today aren't responsible for what the other middle ages nutters did. It's sort of like blaming all the germans for the behaviour of the Nazi party, y'know?

Anyway, that's just my two cents!

True, true.

Originally posted by BananaMan

EDIT: I have to agree with you about one thing, religion, or at least key religious representatives deserves a slap for some of the BS being pumped out their to the public, and the wrongful acts that have been done. In Australia ATM, the catholic church is under fire as it's been revealed that a priest (or two) have molested some poor children, although it's being denied. Sick sick people.

I'm a recovering Catholic myself. I saw very early on the insane hypocracy of the religion, as well as what was going on. I still don't understand why this sex scandal with the priests is shocking so many people - has the Catholic Church really blinded that many people? They have been hiding behind the "Separation" issue for decades in order to protect themselves. They move proests around, but never let it get out why. It's freightnening how many people never had a clue about what was going on - Heck I knew when I was 10, and woke up and decided the religion was a disgusting crock. Not to mention how they view/treat women (the Catholic Church has some very disturbing views on women and their role in society). Does that mean everyone who believes it is stupid or below me, no of course not. I just choose to be realistic and not be blinded by what they tell people.

Originally posted by BudMan

How about leave them out - who loses in this?? If anyone is forcing anything on anyone - it is the xians. Why should someone that does not agree with your beliefs have to go into the hall??

-BudMan

You should do some reasearch. The phrase was ADDED to the pledge 50 years ago (pretty much a political thing, and it was wrong to begin with). Restoring the pledge to it's original form would be the right thing to do, as it would be correcting a mistake that should not have been allowed by congress in the first place.

And stop with the racist abbreviations already!:p

Originally posted by IgwanaRob

How are they trying to destroy this country?

Like I said its a group of people like this one Athiest group who is apparently speaking for all the people of the state of Minnesota. This in itself is unescusable. This should of been the will of the people and not the will of one group. So, in a sense it is destroying a part of the country (one state I mean) which could spark movements like this all the way around the country.

People like me? Excuse me jackass? Apparently, and obviously, you ARE the one with an agenda. You seem to think anyone who is an Atheist is inherently wrong. Aside from your obvious belief that you are better than Atheists (an obvious trait of the hypocritically based Christian religion), you are trying to accuse me of being a liberal and trying to tear down the country. Bite me. Seriously, take your hypocritical BS and bite me.

If I was a one with an agenda, I would be just like Pat Robertson shoving religion down your mouth. Then wouldn't I. I believe in the separation of Church and State as declared in the first paragraph of the Declaration of Independence.

IN CONGRESS, July 4, 1776.

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

As you can see we should disband all political motivations of religion or ideology from becoming widespread in our country. I don't think every Athiest is wrong but only the ones that use politically correct ideas like this fellow out in California.

I was just replying to your attack on me as being a stupid schmuck in which I am not. And I assumed you thought I was a liberal in which I am not. I apologize for what I assumed of you in my reply of your attack on me.

Your right in saying that the separation of church and state was more pure in 1776 than it is today before all this political motivation of religion began. Church and state should be separate entities but in reality they are not today. These children should understand what they are saying because somebody that doesn't truly believe in what their saying shouldn't say it at all. The same goes for Christians that take holy communion and all the beliefs that go into it.

The only reason the pledge was started with the words 'Under God' was to show the soviets that we denounced communism.

Wow, are you confused. Am I forcing my beliefs on anyone or not - you seem to jump back and forth on this. Let's get this straight - Ventura did nothing with the Federal Holiday of Independence Day. He simply declared that in his state, it is officially 'Indivisible Day'. Only in Minnesota, not the entire country. He has every right to do that, and it's done in every state all the time, as well as in individual towns in individual counties in states. Are you offended when a town declares a day as Official Pig Race day? What if it fell on another national holiday - say Thanksgiving. Would you think that they are trying to ruin the country by renaming Thanksgiving Pig Race Day? Truly mind-boggling.

Just because you cannot comprehend the difference between a National, Federal holiday and a day of recognition in a state, doesn't mean you should attack and accuse. You name 2 very important documents, yet obviously have no clue what they say or mean.

I know the difference between a federal and a state holiday is. If you can't read the first post in this thread, then you can't read at all. I was saying it about my state and not the whole country. I was just assuming people would realize that from reading the whole thread. Its the same as a book. The author is assuming that you have read Book A before you read my book.

As I don't truly know you IgwanaRob, I don't truly know that your imposing any beliefs on anybody at all. If I assumed wrong, then I apologize for that.

Again, he did NOT change the national holiday - get that through your head.

Again you assumed wrong. I was talking about my state holiday and not the federal holiday. Please refer to the first post in the thread. Plus, I know the difference between a national holiday and a state holiday.

Ahh, the hypocrisy continues. You freely admit, how nice. Here again, you show your contempt for "non-believers", in the same breathe that you say people have the right to a "CHOICE". (apparently as long as that choice is belief in some religion) Funny, you seem to be pushing religion quite a bit, while putting down people who you falsely accuse of imposing their views on people.

Ahh, you don't understand me. You didn't read my argument did you. I said he didn't represent me. He is a rogue Christian Liberal trying to impose on me and other Christians that his way of believing is right. You forgot that there are many Christian denominations and some don't agree with Pat Robertson. I am in a denomination that rejects the way Pat Robertson does things. So, please read before you post. I am not imposing anything on anybody. You just assumed that from me freely admitting that Pat Robertson didn't represent me.

I meant the choice of anything. That includes Athiests believing there is no God. They can do or believe ANYTHING they want. So, you assumed wrong because I didn't say belief in any religion.

Lets get one thing straight - the entire Politically Correct movement, largely made up of Liberals, is what is destroying this country. They claim to be trying to remove racial boundaries, and make it a nicer place to live - when in reality they are segregating this country by separating people into religious, political, and racial groups and pitting them against each other in a race to see which group can accuse the most people of offending them.

I agree with you on this statement. This Athiest group in Minnesota is trying to segregate rather then bring together. If they wanted to truly bring people together, then why did they write this proclamation in the first place.

Also, Jesse Ventura contradicted what he approves as being a proper proclamation:

5. Subject matter of the proclamation should not take sides in matters of political controversy, ideological or religious beliefs, or individual conviction.

http://www.governor.state.mn.us/proclamations.html

But he signed it anyway. This was for the state holiday and not the federal one if you don't understand IgwanaRob.

If Ventura was a true American he wouldn't of segregrated but he would of united then wouldn't he. And if Ventura was seeking re-election as governor he wouldn't of signed it in the first place. So, don't give me this BS that it wasn't political like this Athiest group wanted it to be.

Originally posted by Borg77

I'd like to thank you for being adult about this. Too many people would have jumped on and continued with more vicious and personal attacks, whereas you were courteous enough to explain your thoughts (even the wrong ones - j/k :p ). Although some of what I replied with was semi-personal (at least in appearance), the intent was to get honest reactions, as that seems to be to only way to make some people think honestly (not that it's right or wrong, just a method).

At least we agree on the fundamentals, and can agree to disagree on the rest.

It's amazing, even to this day, how insightful the founding fathers were. Imagine how much worse we would be without the Separation of two very strong, and very different schools of belief that contradict each other in so many ways.

Enjoy the rest of the holiday.

In my eons of life I?ve been studying religions very hard (christianism, catolicism, budism, SATANISM, and some cults)

my conclussions are:

there?s no god

The word and image of a god was created by the human mind, a mind that needs to believe in something because that adds a "meaning" to their life, of course, and this is MY opinion, minds like that are somehow weak, not weak in the intelligence level, weak in the level that that minds cant explain certain things without the word "god", is just the easy and fast answers to everything, of course there almost no religious scientist

Im not attacking any specific religion here, every religion was founded in the same base, the curiosity for find answers, but the answers that religions provide are just biased, unless science comes and show us the truth (ex: plain earth, the earth centrism theory and some other myths that religons created)

This is my last post (maybe) in this thread because I cant stand some religious people here, thanks.

Originally posted by [saint dark]In my eons of life I?ve been studying religions very hard (christianism, catolicism, budism, SATANISM, and some cults)

my conclussions are:

there?s no god

The word and image of a god was created by the human mind, a mind that needs to believe in something because that adds a "meaning" to their life, of course, and this is MY opinion, minds like that are somehow weak, not weak in the intelligence level, weak in the level that that minds cant explain certain things without the word "god", is just the easy and fast answers to everything, of course there almost no religious scientist

Im not attacking any specific religion here, every religion was founded in the same base, the curiosity for find answers, but the answers that religions provide are just biased, unless science comes and show us the truth (ex: plain earth, the earth centrism theory and some other myths that religons created)

This is my last post (maybe) in this thread because I cant stand some religious people here, thanks. b>

As a whole, Athiests can't prove there is no God or not. Although that is your opinion, in general, people can't disprove or prove either God or evolution with hard SOLID facts. So, its a two way street because in the future one will eventually be proven. JMHO.

Originally posted by Borg77

As a whole, Athiests can't prove there is no God or not. Although that is your opinion, in general, people can't disprove or prove either God or evolution with hard SOLID facts. So, its a two way street because in the future one will eventually be proven. JMHO.

agreed, whe cannot prove the non existence of a god, as you cant prove it, very well stated post, however, the most solid facts that I know are on the evolution and atheism side, maybe Im wrong and you see the things in other eyes, thats because I dont want to enter into a debate here, is not only a two ways street, is a grenade

Originally posted by Borg77

As a whole, Athiests can't prove there is no God or not. Although that is your opinion, in general, people can't disprove or prove either God or evolution with hard SOLID facts. So, its a two way street because in the future one will eventually be proven. JMHO.

Well, one group will disprove the other's arguments. Einstein tried to prove mathematically that there was a God, but he died before he could complete the proof. I don't think the existance of God can be proven mathematically, nor do I think that it can be proven at all. Athiests may think that this is the main reason that there is no God, but the fact is that the existance of god exists within faith in Him. People who truly believe in Him don't need scientific proof of his existance. They already know that He exists. And athiests: don't flame be because that is the beliefs of many God-fearing people across the planet.

Originally posted by codyg11

Well, one group will disprove the other's arguments. Einstein tried to prove mathematically that there was a God, but he died before he could complete the proof. I don't think the existance of God can be proven mathematically, nor do I think that it can be proven at all. Athiests may think that this is the main reason that there is no God, but the fact is that the existance of god exists within faith in Him. People who truly believe in Him don't need scientific proof of his existance. They already know that He exists. And athiests: don't flame be because that is the beliefs of many God-fearing people across the planet.

I agree with you on what you said. But the point of the matter is that Athiests and others alike have chosen not to believe in anything. Thats why we have freedom of choice. I also have faith in the existence of God. But my point earlier is they can't disprove or prove that one exists. If they could prove that it didn't exist, we wouldn't be having this conversation. Thats why the debate continues.

We as humans rely on sight, taste, smell, and observation to get us through the day. And we as humans want to find out the truth. Thats why we have divisions. One being science trying to prove everything and anything with numbers and the other through faith alone.

As being a member of the human race, its up to the individual to make his/her own decisions without anything being forced on them. Thats why our country exists for that very reason and why we celebrate July 4th.

Originally posted by Borg77

If a 7 year old can pass a Microsoft certification test, then yes a 8 year old has the capacity to know that.

If that Indian (if I correctly remember) kid passed that exam, it's because he learnt not because he understood.

There's a big difference between the two. :right:

Originally posted by Fedr0

If that Indian (if I correctly remember) kid passed that exam, it's because he learnt not because he understood.

There's a big difference between the two. :right:

Ok, I will agree with you on that point. But there are a few 8 year olds in the world that do understand the difference. As that said, they are probably in some potential learning school for the gifted.

Originally posted by Borg77

Ok, I will agree with you on that point. But there are a few 8 year olds in the world that do understand the difference. As that said, they are probably in some potential learning school for the gifted.

And I will agree with you on your point now. Actually, I was referring to a normal life situation. :)

Originally posted by IgwanaRob

xian?

You meant Christian.

As much as I don't like the religion (or at least some of it's denominations), I dispise the use of, and people who use that disgusting abbreviation. It Christian, and Christmas - NOT xian, and xmas.

No I did not mean Christian - I mean xian. More to the -ian part, referring to anyone that belongs to any type of religion. If you read it as being a direct reference to christian, that is how you read. Not how I meant it ;)

I look at all religions the same, does not matter if yours revolves around some guy named christ or buddha, or billy, allah, jehova, or whatever. In my eyes your a xian :) Now I also could of been referring to anyone from Xian - a city in China. But then that would of been way off the mark, and the correct term would of be Xianian.

And to the remark about it being racist - thats just crazy!! What does your religion have to do with your race?? It is at no way a racist type remark. Now it may have some prejudiced overtones to it - by attempting to lump everyone with a religious belief together. But it is not in anyway a racist term!

If you do not like the term, I am sorry - but I thought this term better to use on a public forum than the term I normally use to refer to religious people --> "Moron" Now if you like, I would be happy to replace the word "xian" with "moron" since in fact they very interchangeable words - ROFL ;)

-BudMan

Originally posted by BudMan

No I did not mean Christian - I mean xian. More to the -ian part, referring to anyone that belongs to any type of religion. If you read it as being a direct reference to christian, that is how you read. Not how I meant it ;)

-BudMan

Ah, I see. Sorry then:)

This thread is the perfect example of why you should mix politics and religion with alcohol - to easy to misinterpret things and quickly end up in some sort of violent outburst (be is physical or mental).

BTW, I like your regular term ;)

*edit* I ain't saying I am drinking, nor implying anyone else in this thread was - just pointing to an old saying, and how the lesson can be applied to any situation, not just drinking.

Ok, I'm appalled at some of the comments early on in this thread. Here on Neowin people have complained over and over about people 'forcing' their beliefs on others and mods have concequently stopped it. But whats this? People condeming ALL religions? Come on, this should work both ways! I'm christian, and yes, religions have been the cause of many wars etc. But it's the extremists of those religions. Not the normal believers (in most cases).

Now to me, condeming all religions includes my own, and that ****es me off.

- ZX

What? So because the Mother is a xian - that makes the daughter one 2? Why is that? Does this girl not have freedom of choice? Why do you assume that she would choose the Mothers belief vs the Fathers views - or something else for that matter.

You don't know? Xtianity is hereditary. It's like a passed-on genome. Or a disease. Your pick.

Personally, I choose the latter.

--Happily living out of the "flock" for seven years now.

;)

Originally posted by ZeroXero

Ok, I'm appalled at some of the comments early on in this thread. Here on Neowin people have complained over and over about people 'forcing' their beliefs on others and mods have concequently stopped it. But whats this? People condeming ALL religions? Come on, this should work both ways! I'm christian, and yes, religions have been the cause of many wars etc. But it's the extremists of those religions. Not the normal believers (in most cases).

Now to me, condeming all religions includes my own, and that ****es me off.

- ZX

Extremists? So, the "extremists" were the ones burning witches at the stake in Salem? The "extremists" were the ones on a holy crusade to take back Jerusalem during the Crusades, thereby slaughtering thousands. In the name of the all-mighty catholic church no less? What about all the hundreds of thousands of men, women and children that were murdered outright or tortured to death during the Spanish Inquisition? These weren't "extremists", this was the general populous at the time carrying these acts out. It's estimated that more people have died in the name of religion than have died in every major military conflict *combined*. Love thy neighbor indeed. And this has changed how? People blowing up abortion clinics? Snipers shooting abortion doctors? Suicide bombers blowing themselves and others up under the premise that they will be securing their way into the afterlife. Life should be precious, but instead, it's better to be a martyre and die for your faith. No thanks, I'd rather live my life secure in the knowledge that everything I have here is only that which I have gotten through my own hard work and abilities, and I'm a lot happier for it.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
    • Just to understand: your solution to getting rid of an online password manager is...another online password manager?
    • Cjam 2.5.0.0 by Razvan Serea Cjam is a lightweight and fast MP3 editor for Windows that lets you cut, join, and edit MP3 files without re-encoding. This means your audio quality remains untouched, and edits happen instantly. Cjam is ideal for quick, lossless edits—whether you're trimming music, combining tracks, or preparing audio for learning tools or podcasts. It features batch processing, scripting support, cue and playlist file handling, and a simple interface. Cjam is perfect for anyone who needs efficient MP3 editing without the complexity of full audio suites. Cjam requires a PC running Windows 10 or later and Microsoft .NET 6.0 or later. Key features for Cjam: No Re-encoding: Edit MP3 files without losing quality. Cut and Join MP3: Easily cut, trim, and combine MP3 tracks. Batch Processing: Edit multiple files at once for faster workflows. Scriptable Interface: Automate tasks with a custom command language. Cue and Playlist Support: Handle CUE and playlist files for seamless audio management. Fast and Lightweight: Quick processing with minimal system resources. Lossless Audio Editing: Ensure your edits don't affect audio quality. Simple User Interface: Clean, intuitive design for easy navigation. File Format Support: Works with MP3, Cjam-specific file formats (CJAMC, CJAMJ, CJAM). Cjam 2.5.0.0 changelog: Added clipboard-based import/export support for mp3DirectCut Added clipboard-based export support for REAPER Added support for naming IMP3 elements Changed the Reset behavior to preserve Undo/Redo history; use Shift key + Reset button to clear it Added a new command parameter (qcp) Added 8 new entries to lang.txt (main_c124-126, main_d150-151, main_m082, vme_c014, vme_d005) Fixed a bug where the il parameter was incorrectly applied when pasting VMP3s into the main list Fixed several other minor bugs Download: Cjam 2.5.0.0 | 1.4 MB (Freeware) Links: Cjam Home Page | Cjam Manual | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      91
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!