Presenting the new Neowin Logo


Recommended Posts

Again, that's just me, though it is unfortunate to hear you say with such authority that it IS the logo, no matter what we (the people who visit the site, and some of us, the people that help pay for the site) think.

586368057[/snapback]

Sorry to sound like that. lol It's coming down from a higher authority. :pinch:

Anyway, the whole site doesn't look like that. You'll just have to trust me when I say those who don't like the logo now, will probably like it when they see it in place. :)

Sorry to sound like that.  lol  It's coming down from a higher authority.  :pinch:  Anyway, the whole site doesn't look like that.  You'll just have to trust me when I say those who don't like the logo now, will probably like it when they see it in place.  :)

586368069[/snapback]

Well, either way, I meant it to whoever made the definitive decision, even if it was Steve himself. I just think there isn't much point of posting bits and pieces of opinions don't matter. That said, most websites wouldn't ask either, so it's fine. I just don't think I will like it, but all that matters is that the person who runs the site likes it I guess right?

I think I may just go to stictly viewing the website in IE 7's RSS feed reader. That thing makes it look beautiful :)

I add another vote to Timan's first logo. I'm on the same side with Dazzla and other minorities that the new logo has too much bevel. I stand all for simplicity and cripse/clean look.

EDIT: seems like we're not minority anymore, more and more people dislike the new logo...

Sorry to sound like that.? lol? It's coming down from a higher authority.?&nbs:pinch:ch:?

Anyway, the whole site doesn't look like that.? You'll just have to trust me when I say those who don't like the logo now, will probably like it when they see it in pla:).? :)

586368069[/snapback]

I believe ya...I can't wait to see the new revampe:yes: :yes:

and it's very blurry... Really looks like a Photoshop product... I'd have done in in vector instead

It'll be resized so the "bluriness" won't be so obtrusive.

I add another vote to Timan's first logo. I'm on the same side with Dazzla and other minorities that the new logo has too much bevel. I stand all for simplicity and cripse/clean look.

586368112[/snapback]

Actualy Dazzla changed his mind after I showed him what it looked like in the context of the site. :whistle: He's on my side now... bwa ha ha haaaa

Actualy Dazzla changed his mind after I showed him what it looked like in the context of the site.  :whistle:  He's on my side now... bwa ha ha haaaa

586368115[/snapback]

I guess I also need to keep an open mind then, until I see the new site.

God Flish show us the site already!

I guess I also need to keep an open mind then, until I see the new site.

God Flish show us the site already!

586368132[/snapback]

Yeah, it's hard to imagine it, but it's being kept in the dark. Neobond originally wasn't going to reveal the logo till the end, either. For whatever reason, he just changed his mind this morning and told me "Post the logo to the masses!". :laugh:

... Give or take 10%.

586368126[/snapback]

well, you know ;) it's not like im gonna be like "omgz teh logoz is teh badzor suxorz im not visiting anymore." i could care less what it looks like, and i know Flish is putting some damn hard work into this, but folks here still like to complain.

After all it's not like one is gonna sit there for eons gawking at the logo anyways, i dont see why folks are throwing up a fart about it.

Once its finished your gonna be in the forums mostly anyways, stop complaining and deal with it (Y)

well, you know ;) it's not like im gonna be like "omgz teh logoz is teh badzor suxorz im not visiting anymore." i could care less what it looks like, and i know Flish is putting some damn hard work into this, but folks here still like to complain.

After all it's not like one is gonna sit there for eons gawking at the logo anyways, i dont see why folks are throwing up a fart about it.

Once its finished your gonna be in the forums mostly anyways, stop complaining and deal with it (Y)

586368143[/snapback]

We generally refer to such as opinions. I don't recal (now I haven't read every page, so I may be wrong) anyone saying "I'm not visiting the site anymore if that's the logo". Rather we are sharing what we think about the new logo. You sound like you're making a bigger deal about it than just about anyone else is heh, we just are trying to give our suggestions, whether they will be used or not is entirely up to the staff.

Oh, and either way Flish, I thank you for the work you have done so far. I know the new site puts it a little more into place (though I haven't seen it anytime recently). Don't get me wrong, nothing against anyone, just stating my opinion. Good job either way :)

^ It looks weak, old, two tone, and unoriginal.

Were going for a new look... not the same.

No offense to Timan... you do go great work, but I don't think that logo works in this case.

586368811[/snapback]

Sorry, but that is basically what I think of the official new one(No Offense!), Timan's is very cool looking. :D

Hey, that'd be neat for the "Apple" section.

586368865[/snapback]

I too thought your Neowin logo was Aquaish. I like it, but from what we have seen from Flish's image, it probably wouldn't fit with what they are doing.

I imagine if you saw it within the full page design, as Flish has said, you lot would change your mind.

I imagine if you saw it within the full page design, as Flish has said, you lot would change your mind.

586368919[/snapback]

Yeah. Sorta like when your friend hates this band, and then they hear some song on the radio and they're like WOW THIS SONG IS GREAT and then you tell them that it's by that band they hate, and then all of a sudden they don't like the song anymore.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Glow 26.10 by Razvan Serea Glow provides detailed reporting on every hardware component in your computer, saving you valuable time typically spent searching for CPU, motherboard, RAM, graphics card, and other stats. With Glow, all the information is conveniently presented in one clean interface, allowing you to easily access and review the comprehensive hardware details of your system. Glow provides detailed information on various system aspects, including OS, motherboard, processor, memory, graphics card, storage, network, battery, drivers, and services. The well-organized format ensures easy access to the required information. You can export all the gathered data to a plain text file, facilitating sharing with others for troubleshooting purposes. No installation needed. Just decompress the archive, launch the executable, and access computer-related information. Glow runs on Windows 11 and Windows 10 64-bit versions. Glow 26.10 changelog: New Features The bootstrapping algorithm has been completely redesigned. The software can now launch directly without requiring TS Preloader. As part of this change, the startup splash screen displayed during initialization has been removed. In addition, spikes in CPU usage have been eliminated, resulting in a more stable architecture with significantly lower memory consumption. The Microsoft Office detection infrastructure within the Operating System section has been enhanced. Additional detection support has been added for Office C2R (Click-to-Run) installations. Furthermore, the license status evaluation system has been improved, and the priority order has been revised as follows: Licensed > Grace Period > Other (NOTIFICATIONS, EVALUATION, etc.). Glow now includes preliminary support for Wi-Fi 8 technology, allowing more detailed information to be displayed for Wi-Fi 8-compatible network adapters. Glow now provides full support for Bluetooth 6.2. Adapters supporting Bluetooth 6.2 can be analyzed in greater detail and with improved accuracy. The disk distribution view in the Disk section has been modernized, replacing the traditional table layout with a new 2×2 card-based design. The TS Custom Controls module has been updated to v26.7. Thanks to the new custom controls, all Türkaysoft applications now offer a more modern and consistent user interface aligned with Windows 11 design standards. Bug Fixes Potential line-ending handling issues in the Office detection code within the Operating System section have been resolved. Additionally, the output format has been standardized to UTF-8 to prevent character encoding issues and ensure consistent data processing. Several stability and file management issues within the Debugging infrastructure have been addressed. Problems that prevented new log files from being created after Debugging was disabled, as well as issues causing debug records to be lost, have been fixed. File deletion and reaccess issues that occurred after file locks were released have also been resolved. In addition, a bug that caused newly recreated log files to remain locked after deletion has been eliminated. Unnecessary blank lines within debug logs and the extra empty line that could appear at the end of log files have also been corrected. A shortcut key conflict caused by assigning identical hotkeys to both the DNS Test Tool and the Donation page has been fixed. The DNS Test Tool can now be accessed using CTRL + Shift + D, while the Donation page is available via CTRL + Alt + D. Changes The service responsible for providing the Public IP Address and Internet Service Provider information in the Network section has been updated to use the ipinfo.io infrastructure. This change improves the accuracy and consistency of the displayed data. (No external requests are made while Hiding Mode is enabled.) Some terms in the Dutch and Korean language files have been updated to make them clearer and more user-friendly. [TS Updater] Before the update process begins, users are now prompted to choose whether they would like to view the release notes. Note: Always unzip the program before using it. Otherwise you may get an error. Download: Glow 26.10 | 1.8 MB (Open Source) Links: Glow Homepage | Screenshot | Github Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Maradona if hydration breaks had existed in Mexico 86.
    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!