Presenting the new Neowin Logo


Recommended Posts

Again, that's just me, though it is unfortunate to hear you say with such authority that it IS the logo, no matter what we (the people who visit the site, and some of us, the people that help pay for the site) think.

586368057[/snapback]

Sorry to sound like that. lol It's coming down from a higher authority. :pinch:

Anyway, the whole site doesn't look like that. You'll just have to trust me when I say those who don't like the logo now, will probably like it when they see it in place. :)

Sorry to sound like that.  lol  It's coming down from a higher authority.  :pinch:  Anyway, the whole site doesn't look like that.  You'll just have to trust me when I say those who don't like the logo now, will probably like it when they see it in place.  :)

586368069[/snapback]

Well, either way, I meant it to whoever made the definitive decision, even if it was Steve himself. I just think there isn't much point of posting bits and pieces of opinions don't matter. That said, most websites wouldn't ask either, so it's fine. I just don't think I will like it, but all that matters is that the person who runs the site likes it I guess right?

I think I may just go to stictly viewing the website in IE 7's RSS feed reader. That thing makes it look beautiful :)

I add another vote to Timan's first logo. I'm on the same side with Dazzla and other minorities that the new logo has too much bevel. I stand all for simplicity and cripse/clean look.

EDIT: seems like we're not minority anymore, more and more people dislike the new logo...

Sorry to sound like that.? lol? It's coming down from a higher authority.?&nbs:pinch:ch:?

Anyway, the whole site doesn't look like that.? You'll just have to trust me when I say those who don't like the logo now, will probably like it when they see it in pla:).? :)

586368069[/snapback]

I believe ya...I can't wait to see the new revampe:yes: :yes:

and it's very blurry... Really looks like a Photoshop product... I'd have done in in vector instead

It'll be resized so the "bluriness" won't be so obtrusive.

I add another vote to Timan's first logo. I'm on the same side with Dazzla and other minorities that the new logo has too much bevel. I stand all for simplicity and cripse/clean look.

586368112[/snapback]

Actualy Dazzla changed his mind after I showed him what it looked like in the context of the site. :whistle: He's on my side now... bwa ha ha haaaa

Actualy Dazzla changed his mind after I showed him what it looked like in the context of the site.  :whistle:  He's on my side now... bwa ha ha haaaa

586368115[/snapback]

I guess I also need to keep an open mind then, until I see the new site.

God Flish show us the site already!

I guess I also need to keep an open mind then, until I see the new site.

God Flish show us the site already!

586368132[/snapback]

Yeah, it's hard to imagine it, but it's being kept in the dark. Neobond originally wasn't going to reveal the logo till the end, either. For whatever reason, he just changed his mind this morning and told me "Post the logo to the masses!". :laugh:

... Give or take 10%.

586368126[/snapback]

well, you know ;) it's not like im gonna be like "omgz teh logoz is teh badzor suxorz im not visiting anymore." i could care less what it looks like, and i know Flish is putting some damn hard work into this, but folks here still like to complain.

After all it's not like one is gonna sit there for eons gawking at the logo anyways, i dont see why folks are throwing up a fart about it.

Once its finished your gonna be in the forums mostly anyways, stop complaining and deal with it (Y)

well, you know ;) it's not like im gonna be like "omgz teh logoz is teh badzor suxorz im not visiting anymore." i could care less what it looks like, and i know Flish is putting some damn hard work into this, but folks here still like to complain.

After all it's not like one is gonna sit there for eons gawking at the logo anyways, i dont see why folks are throwing up a fart about it.

Once its finished your gonna be in the forums mostly anyways, stop complaining and deal with it (Y)

586368143[/snapback]

We generally refer to such as opinions. I don't recal (now I haven't read every page, so I may be wrong) anyone saying "I'm not visiting the site anymore if that's the logo". Rather we are sharing what we think about the new logo. You sound like you're making a bigger deal about it than just about anyone else is heh, we just are trying to give our suggestions, whether they will be used or not is entirely up to the staff.

Oh, and either way Flish, I thank you for the work you have done so far. I know the new site puts it a little more into place (though I haven't seen it anytime recently). Don't get me wrong, nothing against anyone, just stating my opinion. Good job either way :)

^ It looks weak, old, two tone, and unoriginal.

Were going for a new look... not the same.

No offense to Timan... you do go great work, but I don't think that logo works in this case.

586368811[/snapback]

Sorry, but that is basically what I think of the official new one(No Offense!), Timan's is very cool looking. :D

Hey, that'd be neat for the "Apple" section.

586368865[/snapback]

I too thought your Neowin logo was Aquaish. I like it, but from what we have seen from Flish's image, it probably wouldn't fit with what they are doing.

I imagine if you saw it within the full page design, as Flish has said, you lot would change your mind.

I imagine if you saw it within the full page design, as Flish has said, you lot would change your mind.

586368919[/snapback]

Yeah. Sorta like when your friend hates this band, and then they hear some song on the radio and they're like WOW THIS SONG IS GREAT and then you tell them that it's by that band they hate, and then all of a sudden they don't like the song anymore.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      569
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    5. 5
      neufuse
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!