Official NFL Season 2005 Thread


Recommended Posts

with absolutely no running game, seattle could keep 3 guys on smith the whole time. no running game + no smith = no offense.

things might have been a little closer with a healthy foster.

Yeah well, that's the story of the Carolina Panthers isn't it? If you remember last year we were on our... 6th string running back if I remember correctly? :wacko:

as of right now, big ben is the new tom brady. smart, composed, accurate, effective, no mistakes, no turnovers. i LOVE that kind of qb. screw huge numbers, just win the game.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Thanks for the laugh! Ben played good in that game. The problem is that Denver isn't that good of a team. The real Denver Broncos and the real Jake Plummer showed up in that game. Did you see how soft the Denver converage was in that game? I could have completed passes to the recievers in that game, they were wide open. Ben won a couple of playoff games. Tom Brady won a couple of Super Bowls. Ben's not in the same league as Tom Brady. Don't be ridiculous.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Thanks for the laugh! Ben played good in that game. The problem is that Denver isn't that good of a team. The real Denver Broncos and the real Jake Plummer showed up in that game. Did you see how soft the Denver converage was in that game? I could have completed passes to the recievers in that game, they were wide open. Ben won a couple of playoff games. Tom Brady won a couple of Super Bowls. Ben's not in the same league as Tom Brady. Don't be ridiculous.

Does that mean the fake denver broncos handled the real new england patriots?

I love you guys make winning out to be because of the QB. "Ben won, Manning didn't", etc. No, Pittsburg won, Indy didn't.

I mean, c'mon guys, Trent Dilfer won a superbowl with the Ravens! Do you think Trent Dilfer is better than Peyton? What about Dan Marino?

Put Peyton on that 2000 Ravens team, Or Dan Marino, and they'd both have Superbowl rings.

Football is a team sport. No one wins a championship on a QB's arm alone.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Thanks for the laugh! Ben played good in that game. The problem is that Denver isn't that good of a team. The real Denver Broncos and the real Jake Plummer showed up in that game. Did you see how soft the Denver converage was in that game? I could have completed passes to the recievers in that game, they were wide open. Ben won a couple of playoff games. Tom Brady won a couple of Super Bowls. Ben's not in the same league as Tom Brady. Don't be ridiculous.

i really don't know what you are talking about, but just for the record, i've never put ben in tom brady's league yet. tom went to michigan and he is my boy. nobody is close to him right now.

Does that mean the fake denver broncos handled the real new england patriots?

After living in Denver for four years, I became a Broncos fan. For some reason I could never get interested in the Phoenix Cardinals, although I lived there much longer. I didn't know what to think when they got Jake the Snake. :devil: Anyway, even as a Denver fan, I never expected them to get as far as they did with the 29th ranked passing defense. Sure New England made a ton of mistakes and lost, but Pittsburgh didn't and won easily. But i never expected Seattle to crush Carolina either!

  • 2 weeks later...
Trent Dilfer

he won because he was a bull dog :rolleyes:

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Thanks for the laugh! Ben played good in that game. The problem is that Denver isn't that good of a team. The real Denver Broncos and the real Jake Plummer showed up in that game. Did you see how soft the Denver converage was in that game? I could have completed passes to the recievers in that game, they were wide open. Ben won a couple of playoff games. Tom Brady won a couple of Super Bowls. Ben's not in the same league as Tom Brady. Don't be ridiculous.

it wasnt jake plummers fult the broncos lost, the lack of WRs coming back to the ball made him look bad. jake looked alot better in that game then games last year.

Big ben does show some of the tom brady trates, use his brain. tom brady had a all pro QB to help him get the game, and did have to play much of the AFC chapionship game.and in that super bowl the rams had a problum passing the ball. and in another he did nothing in the 1st haft(even if it was agains a good D) and but if the panthers had another dive they would have most likely went down and got a TD.but time ran out and bardy became the new butt budy of madden(replace favre)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • If you don't care to read what I said, then you prove my point. Maybe written media is beyond your attention span. Titles are not summaries my friend.
    • Nobody asked... in fact, I said "I don't care about political leanings"  
    • TLDR. Here is a far better title (just a basic example): Windows 11 26H2 to allow disabling Web search results
    • Restore will get my vote, only if to see if things are any different, doubt it though but Labour and Conservatives too out of touch and same thing over and over and over…, Lib Dem who?
    • There is nothing wrong with this title. You have completely missed the plot when it comes to "clickbait." The issue was never that a title tries to entice you to click, that is how titles have worked for over 100 years. The issue is when the title subverts expectations, getting you to click expecting something that isn't there. The classic clickbait example is "Boyfriend caught cheating, what happens next will shock you," then what happened next is the girlfriend was upset...which is probably the least shocking outcome imaginable. If sounds like what you want is for the titles to be a collection of 10-word summaries that you can skim, get the just of the story, and only click if you want more details. That is not, never has been, and never will be what titles are. You can go all the way back to print newspapers during the great depression and see the same thing. The newspaper was locked in a vending machine, all you can see is the headline, you choose to put in 5¢ to buy the paper and read the rest if you want. Those headlines were written in a way to sell the paper, not just to provide a summery. Here are two actual headlines from that time, "Wall Street Lays an Egg," or "Stocks Hit Bottom?" Maybe you'd say something like "it was wrong then and it's still wrong now." Okay, fine opinion to have, but it isn't like Neowin is doing something unjurnalistic, they are just following the age-old standards for written media.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      mnsgroup earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      525
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      199
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      94
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      neufuse
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!