Recommended Posts

Guys, you forget one thing: windows xp themes system is a bad copy of stardock's windowblinds v3+ .... windowblinds5 already does what vista will do but using less resources than vista will require... so please don;t be stupid. .... Anyway, until vista will be out maybe a few more of you willl get a mac and spit on windows... IT SUCKS!

Well, it must be incredibly difficult to make a smooth skin for Windowblinds judging by all of the bulky, uninspired/bland (meaning lack of color or bad use of color...and bulky Vista clones with authors who refuse to allow thin taskbars :rolleyes: ), and rough-edged themes available for it. I'm not that hyped about WB5 (it just makes the titlebar and taskbar difficult to see, not to mention all of the complications with games and apps making me have to go through trouble to disable themes after fighting with an app that hates WB5.....). But, if EM3 later decides to move over to it, and the theme looks professional like it does now, I'll switch. ;)

RaisedFist, WB3 was not a bad "copy" of Windows XP themes; it was a bulky, bloated, and third party app that allowed limited use of bitmaps on the GUI of previous copies of Windows. It never compared to the ease of use and compatibility in using Windows XP VSs that I experienced (I went from Win2000+WB to WinXP...there was a difference). I'm sure WB5 and Vista will be quite different as well. I do agree, though, if it becomes less expensive to own a MAC (or a get a laptop), I'll probably switch...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • It is silly there is no simple way to check whether this profile has been activated. CFRs are normal, but trying to even hide the fact if it's on / off seems silly, especially for something so user-facing. Surely Microsoft is "proud" of their engineering efforts on this one and ought to display it somwhere in the GUI.
    • Many Linux distros are not known for excellent battery life, so I'm not sure that is the best example. A more apt example may be Apple, but Apple's CPUs are simply far more efficient than Intel & AMD at single-threaded tasks like these, so "boosting" is not as power-hungry and less heat-inducing. Not to mention Apple will hardly engage P-cores for basic UI tasks; they use a pretty complicated QoS scheme to only activate P-cores for more serious workloads like HTML / JS execution or decompression or application launch. Microsoft is (smartly) doing it for launch, but also for UI tasks, which is the more nonsensical part: why ... do Windows 11's UIs need modern CPUs to boost? It should load so quickly that there's not even time for the CPU to boost.
    • I've not seen any controlled testing and, judging by Microsoft's mentality, within a year, they'll have added so much more bloat, it'll undo any perceptible latency benefit and we'll have boosted the CPU clocks for nothing.
    • It depends: heat soak is a thing. Initially on cold boot-up, the heatsinks & heatpipes are at ambient temp. After heatsinks & heatpipes warm up (through normal usage), they don't immediately cool to ambient temp when the load goes away. So their baseline is higher and the trigger point for fans is much less stress. Add a few more CPU spikes → it's too hot to stay at the same fan RPM → fans get triggered to start up up much sooner / get triggered to ramp much more quickly.
    • Can LibreOffice just shut up and worry about themselves and stop comparing themselves? Do we see Microsoft complaining about euro office?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      slackerzz earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      501
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      198
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      156
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!